PM
Subject: [ozmidwifery] GBS
Journal of Obstetrics Gynaecology Publisher: Taylor Francis Issue:
Volume 25, Number 5 / July 2005 Pages: 462 - 464 URL: Linking Options
DOI: 10.1080/01443610500160261
Group B streptococcus disease in neonates: To screen or not to screen
Journal of Obstetrics Gynaecology Publisher: Taylor Francis Issue:
Volume 25, Number 5 / July 2005 Pages: 462 - 464 URL: Linking
You don't "get it" , you aready have it. She
hasn't caught anything its very normal.
Amanda
- Original Message -
From:
Kelly @
BellyBelly
To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
Sent: Saturday, October 07, 2006 6:54
AM
Subject: RE: [ozmidwifery] GBS an
October 2006 1:43
PM
To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
Subject: Re: [ozmidwifery] GBS and
Staph
Interesting, our regime is different Amoxil IV
1gm 6th hourly. Katy.
- Original Message -
From: sharon
To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
Sent:
Friday, October
One of the women on my site has just found out she has both
of these things. She said she has googled for hours and cant find
anything on Staph specifically. Can someone pass on some knowledge on what this
is going to mean? I have never heard of someone having both before. Shes
almost
Isn't GBS a staph infection??? Been awhile since I was at work, relishing in the time off work with little munchkin who is now 3 and bit months old.
katrina
On 06/10/2006, at 7:06 PM, Kelly @ BellyBelly wrote:
x-tad-smallerOne of the women on my site has just found out she has both of these
@acegraphics.com.au
[mailto:owner-ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au]
On Behalf Of Ceri Katrina
Sent: Friday, 6 October 2006 7:32
PM
To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
Subject: Re: [ozmidwifery] GBS and
Staph
Isn't GBS a staph
infection??? Been awhile since I was at work, relishing in the time off work
@acegraphics.com.au
Sent: Friday, October 06, 2006 6:35
PM
Subject: RE: [ozmidwifery] GBS and
Staph
Thats right gbs is
group b streph which is found on vaginal swab at 36 weeks treated with
benzpennicillin during labour every 4 hours commencing with a loading dose of
3 gms
I was found to be positive with GBS and refused IV treatment in labour, baby was fine with no signs of GBS at all on swabbing.
Kristin
From: "Melissa Singer" [EMAIL PROTECTED]Reply-To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.auTo: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.auSubject: Re: [ozmidwifery] GBS and
: [ozmidwifery] GBS and
Staph
I thought group b strep and staph aureaus are
different organisms? Staph infections on vaginal swab require no
treatment or preventative abs in labour. Staph seems to have no effects
on baby (that they haven't found out yet!) and it is a normal colonisation
To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
Subject: Re: [ozmidwifery] GBS and
Staph
Yes Melissa - GBS is a different organism from Staph.
Not so long ago we used to 'anti-staph' the babies
post first bath and day 3 using chlorhexidine cream, it apparently no longer is
required as the 'staph
Sent: Friday, October 06, 2006 11:22
PM
Subject: Re: [ozmidwifery] GBS and
Staph
Yes Melissa - GBS is a different organism from
Staph.
Not so long ago we used to 'anti-staph' the
babies post first bath and day 3 using chlorhexidine cream, it apparently no
longer
Manning www.themidwife.com.au
- Original Message -
From:
Melissa Singer
To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
Sent: Friday, October 06, 2006 8:53
PM
Subject: Re: [ozmidwifery] GBS and
Staph
I thought group b strep and staph aureaus are
different organisms
Interesting, our regime is different Amoxil IV
1gm 6th hourly. Katy.
- Original Message -
From:
sharon
To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
Sent: Friday, October 06, 2006 8:35
PM
Subject: RE: [ozmidwifery] GBS and
Staph
Thats right gbs is
group b
GBS is part of the normal flora of a large number of women. It causes some
difficulty to some babies but not to all babies, even those that are
colonized. Colonization does not mean illness. MM
GBS is not normal. What is the cut-off point for midwifery care scope of
Px?
--
This mailing
: Mary Murphy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
Sent: Saturday, May 21, 2005 11:29 PM
Subject: [ozmidwifery] GBS
GBS is part of the normal flora of a large number of women. It causes
some
difficulty to some babies but not to all babies, even those that are
colonized
mei 2005 1:43
Aan: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
Onderwerp: Re: [ozmidwifery] GBS
Exactly 20to 30% of otherwise healthy women will test positive for GBS
by either urine culture or lvs at 37/40 wks: we have no way of knowing
which GBS positive women will have a GBS septic baby and, in fact most
GBS
Thanks for the link that led to the U.K.GBS site Lieve, It is very balanced
compared to what I have seen before. Cheers, Mary Murphy
--
This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or unsubscribe.
Thanks I am well aware of the guidelines.
Jennifer Cameron FRCNA FACM
PO Box 1465
Howard Springs NT 0835
0419 528 717
- Original Message -
From: Marilyn Kleidon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
Sent: Monday, May 23, 2005 9:12 AM
Subject: Re: [ozmidwifery] GBS
Where is the latter ??
Sounds very similar to the CMP (WA) mamangement of GBS basded on informed
choice!
Denise Hynd
Let us support one another, not just in philosophy but in action, for the
sake of freedom for all women to choose exactly how and by whom, if by
anyone, our bodies will be
Love to see you policy about this.
Sally
From: Ken WArd [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
Sent: Saturday, May 21, 2005 3:36 PM
Subject: RE: [ozmidwifery] re epidural top ups and iv cannulation
Why involve an obs for GBS? As long as correct procedure is followed,
there
21 matches
Mail list logo
