- Original Message -
From:
islips
To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
Sent: Tuesday, May 09, 2006 3:47 PM
Subject: Re: [ozmidwifery] GDM
i had GDM with both my pregnancies. well
controlled with diet and daily monitoring. laboured spont at 38 weeks
to the individual woman to make her choice.
Katy
- Original Message -
From:
islips
To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
Sent: Tuesday, May 09, 2006 3:47 PM
Subject: Re: [ozmidwifery] GDM
i had GDM with both my pregnancies. well
controlled with diet and daily monitoring. laboured
@acegraphics.com.au
Sent: Tuesday, May 09, 2006 12:22
PM
Subject: Re: [ozmidwifery] GDM
I believe that Liz meant the baby died in
utero, while awaiting the onset of spontaneous labour'
Di
- Original Message -
From:
sharon
To: ozmidwifery
Subject: Re: [ozmidwifery] GDM
i had GDM with both my pregnancies. well
controlled with diet and daily monitoring. laboured spont at 38 weeks with
first and arm at 41 weeks with second.i had the first at birth centre and
transfered to KEMH with second. even though i had private obstetrician
: Tuesday, May 09, 2006 3:47 PM
Subject: Re: [ozmidwifery] GDM
i had GDM with both my pregnancies. well controlled with diet and daily
monitoring. laboured spont at 38 weeks with first and arm at 41 weeks with
second.i had the first at birth centre and transfered to KEMH with second.
even though i
Subject: Re: [ozmidwifery] GDM
Is there are reference a study relating to this, or conference papers?
At 4:12 PM +1000 9/5/06, Katy O'Neill wrote:
Dear all, Sorry my finger can't help the double click. The US
conference was referring to well controlled, non macrocosmic babies of GDM
mothers
- Original Message -
From:
diane
To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
Sent: Monday, May 08, 2006 12:38 PM
Subject: [ozmidwifery] GDM
Hi wise women,
I think this may have been a thread not long ago,
but can anyone point me to some research on the safety of
Dear Diane, This decision comes out of
the conference held annually in the US on GDM. This last one concluded
that diet controlled GDM should not go beyond term due to the risk ( very low,
1% ) of sudden unexplained deaths in utero beyond this time.
Apparently you can have a baby with U/S
explanation given was macrosomia. Was
a heartbreaking experience for all involved Liz
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of Katy
O'NeillSent: Tuesday, 9 May 2006 12:05 PMTo:
ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.auSubject: Re: [ozmidwifery
Bryant
To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
Sent: Tuesday, May 09, 2006 12:39
PM
Subject: RE: [ozmidwifery] GDM
Dear
Readers, I saw this as a student, very well controlled GDM (but on insulin),
the woman chose to wait for natural labour at T + 7 despite encouragement from
-
From:
Elizabeth and Mark Bryant
To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
Sent: Tuesday, May 09, 2006 12:39
PM
Subject: RE: [ozmidwifery] GDM
Dear Readers, I saw this as a student, very well controlled GDM (but
on insulin), the woman chose to wait
I believe that Liz meant the baby died in utero,
while awaiting the onset of spontaneous labour'
Di
- Original Message -
From:
sharon
To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
Sent: Tuesday, May 09, 2006 1:56 PM
Subject: Re: [ozmidwifery] GDM
insulin dependant
, 2006 12:22
PM
Subject: Re: [ozmidwifery] GDM
I believe that Liz meant the baby died in utero,
while awaiting the onset of spontaneous labour'
Di
- Original Message -
From:
sharon
To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
Sent: Tuesday, May 09, 2006 1:56
Hi Jo,
As per the Cochrane Data Base, there is no evidence to support glucose testing in pregnancy, and it is not accurate at least 50%-70% of the time. Even if the test was positive, there is noevidence tosupport treating gestational diabetes. Treating gestational diabetics withinsulin reduced
your body is simply telling you that it is having a bit of trouble
metabolising the amount of refined sugars it is receiving due to the
pregnancy although this is a good indicator of the predisposition to
type II diabetes if you continue your present pattern of eating. Cut
out as many refined
over, and women are also prone to have some glycosuria if there is
some stress in their lives as well.
Regards, Lynne
- Original Message -
From: JoFromOz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
Sent: Sunday, April 03, 2005 9:53 PM
Subject: Re: [ozmidwifery] GDM question
Ken
You are all so wonderful and knowledgable :) I am mindful of the GI
diet, so I will endeavour to watch my intake of higher GI foods more
closely from now on.
It's so nice to have you guys around :)
Thanks,
Jo (RM) (eating porridge and banana for breakfast as I type)
--
This mailing list is
Jo,
I think glycosuria is pretty common in pregnancy. Your BSL is of course
excellent.
Perhaps you could do some reading about glycosuria in pregnancy. I don't
think there is much evidence to support routine GTT or screening.
Nicole.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
of freedom for all women to choose exactly how and by whom, if by
anyone, our bodies will be handled.
- Linda Hes
- Original Message -
From: Nicole Carver [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
Sent: Sunday, April 03, 2005 6:02 AM
Subject: RE: [ozmidwifery] GDM question
Jo
It is not unusual to show some glucose. The renal threshold lowers. The fact
that your BSL was normal is very reassuring. Be a little careful of your
diet before you test your wee again. I wouldn't be worried. Maureen ps
just how many Easter eggs did you enjoy?
-Original Message-
20 matches
Mail list logo
