RE: [ozmidwifery] Pinky on Today Show re: Controlled Crying

2005-11-28 Thread Kelly @ BellyBelly








Ive just found out its been
postponed for two weeks until the opposition returns from India  gees I
was really looking forward to it too!!! Ill let you all know when its
all confirmed with the new day / time.



Best Regards,

Kelly Zantey
Director, www.bellybelly.com.au  www.toys4tikes.com.au
Gentle Solutions For Conception, Pregnancy, Birth
 Baby
Australian Little Tikes Specialists 











From: owner-ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au [mailto:owner-ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au] On Behalf Of Kelly @ BellyBelly
Sent: Monday, 28 November 2005
4:08 PM
To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
Subject: [ozmidwifery] Pinky on
Today Show re: Controlled Crying





Dear all,



Pinky McKay is going to be on the
Today show on channel 9 tomorrow morning discussing controlled crying - we don't
know who against as yet and an exact time but my guess would be around 8am. But
if everyone could watch the show and if possible email feedback afterwards, as
a show of support to Pinky and saying how great it was seeing her on (and
telling them that we think she should be on more regularly!) then that would be
great!!! I think the email address is [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Don't forget - and GO PINKY W HO we know you'll do us
proud



Go Pinky!!!

Best
Regards,

Kelly Zantey
Director, www.bellybelly.com.au  www.toys4tikes.com.au
Gentle Solutions For Conception, Pregnancy, Birth  Baby
Australian Little Tikes Specialists 










Re: [ozmidwifery] POP statistics

2005-11-28 Thread brendamanning



Thank you Sue  
Andrea Q.

With kind regardsBrenda Manning www.themidwife.com.au

  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  Andrea 
  Quanchi 
  To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au 
  
  Sent: Monday, November 28, 2005 11:14 
  AM
  Subject: Re: [ozmidwifery] POP 
  statistics
  As a part of some research I was doing ( and still haven't 
  written up) I think I have every article ever written on OP. Very little 
  research has ever been done on the subject and what has been done is on very 
  small numbers until Kariminia, Chamberlain, Keogh and Shea (2004) whose study 
  was of 2547 women. This article quotes 10-25% of all babies in early labour 
  are OP and 10-15% in active labour, and 6% persistant POP in second 
  stage.Most of the research done has been to see whether getting the 
  mothers to adopt hands and knees positions daily for eg 10 minutes twice a day 
  reduces the incidence of OP at the onset of labour and the answer is no. The 
  difference in what Sutton and Scott (1996) suggest is that they encourage a 
  life style change and encourages the woman to adopt knees lower than 
  hips/pelvis tilted forward positions all the time in their daily activities. 
  I agree with Sue that I rarely see OP in woman who understand and 
  adopt this practice. I have a couple of ergonomic stools ( similar to the 
  rocker recommended by Sutton  Scott but without the rockers) that I lend 
  to women in the last weeks of pregnancy and find that with these they are so 
  comfy they use them all the time in preference over other seating and dont 
  have a problem. A lot of other midwives I know recommend to women that they 
  sit on balls but I find that unless the balls are big enough / inflated enough 
  the women are rocking away on them with their pelvis tilted back to balance 
  themselves. I use my balls alot in labour but use the stools 
  antenatally.My pilot study was not big enough to show results and thus 
  I acknowledge that all recommendations to women are based on anecdotal 
  evidence and not research. Andrea QuanchiOn 28/11/2005, at 
  9:42 AM, Janet Fraser wrote:
  I'm fascinated to hear 
you don't see any, Sue, because there seems to be an epidemic in the hospy 
system and it's rapidly becoming an excuse to c-sec like breech. Great work 
you're doing!: )J
- Original 
  Message -From: 
Sue Cookson To: 
ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au 
Sent: 
  Sunday, November 27, 2005 10:53 PMSubject: 
  Re: [ozmidwifery] POP statisticsHi 
  Brenda,Just been taught that 5% stay OP of the 10-15% that present as 
  OP.NO research to support that, only texts.Other stats suggest 
  that up to 20% births begin as OP - Jean Sutton's optimum positioning 
  info.Hope this helps,I haven't seen an OP in 23 years of 
  homebirths - pretty careful with positions in pregnancy and info to help 
  mums to rotate their babies prior to labour.Sue
  Information seeking.. please 
ozmiddersDoes anyone have stats (or know where 
to access them)on the percentage of posterior babies who rotate 
during labour or whilst birthing ? Esprelevant toMg 
with SVDs previously ?How many babies actually remain OP  
do ore don'tobstruct how many rotate  birth 
spontaneously ?Any help greatly 
appreciated.With kind regardsBrenda Manningwww.themidwife.com.au


Re: [ozmidwifery] POP statistics

2005-11-28 Thread Susan Cudlipp



In my experience, the vast majority of OP labours 
do rotate to OA eventually, especially in Multips. I used to see a great 
many more face to pubes births than I have in recent years - possibly due to 
denser epidurals in the past, in fact the only ones I can think of in the past 5 
years or so have been forceps deliveries, even then they usually rotate them 
with Keillands forceps before bringing them out. My last 3 births have all 
been OP labours rotating to OA on the pelvic floor - the last one was a 10lb 
baby who you could actually see spinning as he advanced.

I remember with amusement this being discussed at 
the homebirth conference at Yanchep some years ago and Ina May Gaskin was asked 
what they did on the farm with OP's
She replied " Oh well, y'know, no-one ever told us 
this was supposed to be a problem"!

Also watching an American TV medical doco some 
years back where the OB was taking the woman to theatre and he paused to explain 
to the TV crew why she could not deliver this baby vaginally as it was OP. 
While he was explaining this she gave an almighty yell and shot the baby out on 
the theatre trolley.

Love it!

Sue
"The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do 
nothing"Edmund Burke

  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  Janet 
  Fraser 
  To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au 
  
  Sent: Monday, November 28, 2005 6:42 
  AM
  Subject: Re: [ozmidwifery] POP 
  statistics
  
  I'm fascinated to hear you 
  don't see any, Sue, because there seems to be an epidemic in the hospy system 
  and it's rapidly becoming an excuse to c-sec like breech. Great work you're 
  doing!
  : )
  J
  
- Original Message - 
From: 
Sue Cookson 
To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au 

Sent: Sunday, November 27, 2005 10:53 
PM
Subject: Re: [ozmidwifery] POP 
statistics
Hi Brenda,Just been taught that 5% stay OP of the 10-15% 
that present as OP.NO research to support that, only texts.Other 
stats suggest that up to 20% births begin as OP - Jean Sutton's optimum 
positioning info.Hope this helps,I haven't seen an OP in 23 
years of homebirths - pretty careful with positions in pregnancy and info to 
help mums to rotate their babies prior to labour.Sue

  
  

  Information seeking.. please ozmidders
  
  Does anyone have stats (or know where to access them)on the 
  percentage of posterior babies who rotate during labour or whilst birthing 
  ? Esprelevant toMg with SVDs previously ?
  How many babies actually remain OP  do ore don'tobstruct 
  how many rotate  birth spontaneously ?
  
  Any help greatly appreciated.
  
  With kind regardsBrenda Manning www.themidwife.com.au 

  
  

  No virus found in this incoming message.Checked by AVG Free 
  Edition.Version: 7.1.362 / Virus Database: 267.13.8/183 - Release Date: 
  25/11/2005


RE: [ozmidwifery] Definition of a Birth Centre

2005-11-28 Thread Mary Murphy
The NACC definition has been painstakingly developed over many years by Ruth
Lubic and Kitty Ernst.  I have personally spent several holidays with Kitty
in Pennsylvania (since 1987) and discussed the absence OF true B.C's in
Australia. We just don't seem to be able to embrace the woman centred-ness
in Australia. MM

 The birth centre is a homelike facility existing within a healthcare 
system with a program of care designed in the wellness model of pregnancy 
and birth. Birth centers are guided by principles of prevention, 
sensitivity, safety, appropriate medical intervention, and cost 
effectiveness. Birth centers provide family-centered care for healthy women 
before, during and after normal pregnancy, labour and birth. (Adopted by 
NACC Board of Directors - New York - October 1, 1995).
--
This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or unsubscribe.


Re: [ozmidwifery] Omeo midwife?

2005-11-28 Thread Joy Cocks
Hi Noah and Danika,
I used to live and work in Omeo, some 16 years back.  I still have contact
with a midwife who still works at the Omeo hospital so will give her a call
and find out if she knows of anyone doing homebirths in the area.  There is
a homebirth midwife near Wodonga, but I think Omeo would be too far to
travel, especially at that time of the year.  There may be someone in the
Bairnsdale area, I don't know.
I'll let you know what I find out.
Best wishes,
Joy


Joy Cocks RN (Div 1) RM CBE IBCLC
BRIGHT Vic 3741
email:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message -
From: Noah Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
Sent: Monday, November 28, 2005 17:09 PM
Subject: [ozmidwifery] Omeo midwife?


 Howdy,

 My wife and I are expecting our first child in June. We currently live
 in Melbourne but it's likely that we'll be moving to rural Omeo at the
 start of the year to take a teaching position. We hope to organize a
 home birth in Omeo, but we don't know if it's possible. The Omeo
 hospital no longer does deliveries - now they take place in Bairnsdale,
 90 minutes away. We would prefer a home birth but we don't know if this
 puts obstetrical support too far away.

 If anyone knows of (or is) a good midwife in the area please let us
 know. Any advice is appreciated.

 Thanks!

 Noah and Danika Davis

 --
 This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
 Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or unsubscribe.



--
This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or unsubscribe.


[ozmidwifery] article FYI

2005-11-28 Thread leanne wynne

Breast-Feeding May Lower Mom's Risk of Diabetes
By Serena Gordon
HealthDay Reporter
TUESDAY, Nov. 22 (HealthDay News) -- Breast-feeding your baby can cut your 
risk of developing type 2 diabetes, new research shows.


We found that breast-feeding is really good for mothers. Each year she 
breast-feeds cuts the risk of type 2 diabetes by 15 percent, said study 
author, Dr. Alison Stuebe, a clinical fellow in maternal fetal medicine at 
Brigham and Women's Hospital, and an instructor at Harvard Medical School in 
Boston.


Breast-feeding offers a host of health benefits for babies. Along with 
providing optimal nutrition, breast milk also provides compounds that boost 
babies' immune system and help protect against bacteria, viruses and 
parasites, according to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. In addition, 
breast-fed children have lower rates of childhood illnesses and tend to be 
leaner than their formula-fed counterparts.


And research has shown mothers benefit as well: Breast-feeding helps a 
mother's body return to normal faster after pregnancy, according to the FDA. 
Some studies have suggested that women who breast-feed for long periods of 
time may have lower rates of breast and ovarian cancer.


But, no long-term studies had examined the effect of breast-feeding on 
maternal risk of diabetes, Stuebe said.


Stuebe and her colleagues suspected breast-feeding might affect type 2 
diabetes risk because it substantially changes a mother's metabolic 
requirements, and research has shown that breast-feeding improves insulin 
sensitivity and glucose tolerance.


The researchers used data from the Nurses' Health Study and the Nurses' 
Health Study II, which together included more than 150,000 women who had 
given birth during the study period. More than 6,000 of these women were 
diagnosed with type 2 diabetes.


After controlling for body mass index (BMI) -- because a high BMI is a known 
risk factor for type 2 diabetes -- the researchers found that long-term 
breast-feeding reduced a woman's risk of developing diabetes.


The risk was decreased by 15 percent for each year of breast-feeding for 
women in the Nurses' Health Study, and by 14 percent for each year for those 
in the Nurses' Health Study II, according to the findings, which are 
published in the Nov. 23/30 issue of the Journal of the American Medical 
Association.


Stuebe said the researchers weren't able to determine how breast-feeding 
might offer some protection against diabetes, only that breast-feeding was 
associated with a drop in the rate of type 2 diabetes.


However, she said, the researchers suspect that breast-feeding may help keep 
blood sugar in balance, or homeostasis.


Breast-feeding mothers burn almost 500 additional calories daily, according 
to the study. That's equivalent to running about four to five miles a day, 
Stuebe noted.


If done for a year, it's not surprising that it might have an effect on how 
the body takes care of insulin and glucose, she said.


Dr. Loren Wissner Greene, an endocrinologist at New York University Medical 
Center in New York City, said the explanation for why women who breast-feed 
for long periods may have lower rates of diabetes could be a simple one: 
The small weight changes from lactation can make a significant impact on 
diabetes risk.


In fact, Wissner Greene said, the best advice for anyone to avoid type 2 
diabetes is to maintain a healthy weight, and lose weight if you're carrying 
excess weight.


Another potential explanation could be that women who breast-feed for a long 
time are more health-conscious than other women, and may have a healthier 
diet, may exercise more and do other health-promoting activities that could 
reduce their diabetes risk.


Stuebe said the researchers tried to take lifestyle factors into account and 
still saw an association between breast-feeding and reduced diabetes risk.


The bottom line, said Stuebe: We're talking about an intervention that 
doesn't cost anything, has no side effects and has other potential 
benefits.


SOURCES: Alison Stuebe, M.D., clinical fellow in maternal fetal medicine, 
Brigham and Women's Hospital, and instructor, Harvard Medical School, 
Boston, Mass.; Loren Wissner Greene, M.D., endocrinologist, New York 
University Medical Center, and clinical associate professor of medicine, New 
York University School of Medicine, New York City; Nov. 23/30, 2005, Journal 
of the American Medical Association


Copyright © 2005 ScoutNews LLC. All rights reserved.



Leanne Wynne
Midwife in charge of Women's Business
Mildura Aboriginal Health Service  Mob 0418 371862


--
This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or unsubscribe.


[ozmidwifery] article FYI - oxytocin

2005-11-28 Thread leanne wynne

Early Neglect Can Hinder Child's Relationships
By Alan Mozes
HealthDay Reporter
MONDAY, Nov. 21 (HealthDay News) -- Nurture may indeed be able to create a 
hormonal impact on nature.


A study of adopted orphans suggests early emotional deprivation can lead to 
hormonal deficiencies. This, in turn, may undermine an individual's ability 
to form healthy relationships as he or she ages.


Focusing on children raised in harsh orphanage environments in Russia and 
Romania prior to adoption by American families, researchers observed 
significant long-term drops in two hormones known to be key to regulating 
emotion.


Previously, we haven't known very much about how the early social 
experiences we have in infancy may play an important role in later life, and 
this suggests that the kinds of social experiences we have in infancy really 
are important in configuring the human brain and influencing the social 
behaviors we exhibit as adults, said study co-author Seth D. Pollak from 
the department of psychology at the University of Wisconsin in Madison.


The hormones in question -- oxytocin and arginine vasopressin (AVP) -- are 
believed to play an integral role from birth onward in priming children to 
communicate and bond with their parents, peers and other adults.


The absence of such a hormonal safety blanket may explain some behavioral 
problems displayed later in life by kids initially exposed to poor 
caregiving, the researchers conclude.


Pollak and his colleagues compared the hormonal levels of 18 children raised 
in orphanages shortly after birth with those of 21 children reared by their 
biological parents.


Reporting in this week's issue of the Proceedings of the National Academy of 
Sciences, the authors describe the orphanages as settings where a prominent 
lack of emotional and physical contact from caregivers was the norm.


The children lived in these types of institutional environments for an 
average of about 17 months (ranging from seven to 42 months). At the time of 
the study, the children had been living with their adoptive families in the 
United States for an average of just under three years.


Both groups of children in the study were of comparable age and physically 
healthy. The biological and adoptive families all lived in the Wisconsin 
area and shared similar well-to-do socioeconomic profiles.


Over the course of a two-week period, all the children were exposed to an 
interactive computer game while sitting for a half hour in the lap of both 
their mother and, subsequently, an adult female stranger.


Throughout each game session, the adults engaged with the children by means 
of tickling, patting, counting, and whispering. Prior to, and within 20 
minutes of the interaction, researchers obtained urine samples to track 
changes in hormonal levels.


The researchers found that while the amount of oxytocin among the children 
did not differ before the experiment, AVP levels were lower among those who 
had been raised in the orphanage environments.


In addition, the orphans didn't experience the rise in oxytocin hormones 
seen in family-reared children following game sessions involving their 
mothers.


But when the experiment was conducted with an adult the child didn't know, 
no differences in oxytocin levels were observed. AVP levels were comparable 
for both groups of children following sessions with either the mother or the 
adult stranger.


According to the researchers, the observed differences in hormonal activity 
between the two groups of children points to developmental changes in the 
brains of the adopted orphans. Specifically, neurological mechanisms 
directing the activity of oxytocin and AVP may have been altered in children 
deprived of stable and nurturing family environments, they said.


Pollak said further research is need to clarify the long-term effects of 
early neglect and to point to treatments, including medication, that might 
help these at-risk children.


One of the most interesting things is that a lot of parents who've adopted 
children from these orphanages often talk about the children being anxious 
-- having temper tantrums, being nervous kids, having trouble dropping them 
off at school, noted Pollak. So it may be a biological mechanism that is 
not operating well that explains this.


Dr. Bruce Perry, a senior fellow at the Houston-based nonprofit Child Trauma 
Academy, said the findings don't apply to adopted children in general, since 
most will have received adequate care from birth. And he said that, even for 
neglected children, behavioral problems aren't irreversible.


We fully expect that when children who are neglected like this get care 
over time those parts of the brain affected are capable of changing, because 
the brain is malleable and capable of responding to a whole range of 
environmental experiences, both good and bad, he said. So now these 
children are in a position where we can be hopeful that they will get 
better.



Re: [ozmidwifery] Definition of a Birth Centre

2005-11-28 Thread brendamanning

Thank you Mary.
With kind regards
Brenda Manning
www.themidwife.com.au

- Original Message - 
From: Mary Murphy [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
Sent: Monday, November 28, 2005 11:31 PM
Subject: RE: [ozmidwifery] Definition of a Birth Centre


The NACC definition has been painstakingly developed over many years by 
Ruth
Lubic and Kitty Ernst.  I have personally spent several holidays with 
Kitty

in Pennsylvania (since 1987) and discussed the absence OF true B.C's in
Australia. We just don't seem to be able to embrace the woman centred-ness
in Australia. MM

The birth centre is a homelike facility existing within a healthcare
system with a program of care designed in the wellness model of pregnancy
and birth. Birth centers are guided by principles of prevention,
sensitivity, safety, appropriate medical intervention, and cost
effectiveness. Birth centers provide family-centered care for healthy 
women

before, during and after normal pregnancy, labour and birth. (Adopted by
NACC Board of Directors - New York - October 1, 1995).
--
This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or unsubscribe. 


--
This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or unsubscribe.


Re: [ozmidwifery] Omeo midwife?

2005-11-28 Thread Cate
Hello, doula in training and very concerned consumer - coming out of lurkdom to 
reply to a post!

Check out the East Gippsland home birth group here:
http://www.joyousbirth.info/forums/viewtopic.php?t=12

they may be able to help you locate a hb midwife.
All the best!
Cate

 Joy Cocks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 
 Hi Noah and Danika,
 I used to live and work in Omeo, some 16 years back.  I still have contact
 with a midwife who still works at the Omeo hospital so will give her a call
 and find out if she knows of anyone doing homebirths in the area.  There is
 a homebirth midwife near Wodonga, but I think Omeo would be too far to
 travel, especially at that time of the year.  There may be someone in the
 Bairnsdale area, I don't know.
 I'll let you know what I find out.
 Best wishes,
 Joy
 
 
 Joy Cocks RN (Div 1) RM CBE IBCLC
 BRIGHT Vic 3741
 email:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 - Original Message -
 From: Noah Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
 Sent: Monday, November 28, 2005 17:09 PM
 Subject: [ozmidwifery] Omeo midwife?
 
 
  Howdy,
 
  My wife and I are expecting our first child in June. We currently live
  in Melbourne but it's likely that we'll be moving to rural Omeo at the
  start of the year to take a teaching position. We hope to organize a
  home birth in Omeo, but we don't know if it's possible. The Omeo
  hospital no longer does deliveries - now they take place in Bairnsdale,
  90 minutes away. We would prefer a home birth but we don't know if this
  puts obstetrical support too far away.
 
  If anyone knows of (or is) a good midwife in the area please let us
  know. Any advice is appreciated.
 
  Thanks!
 
  Noah and Danika Davis
 
  --
  This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
  Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or unsubscribe.
 
 
 
 --
 This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
 Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or unsubscribe.

--
This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or unsubscribe.


[ozmidwifery] birth chairs stools

2005-11-28 Thread Jennifer Price


hi am looking for inspiration from wise and experienced women about 
birthing stools/chairs as we are looking at getting some for our unit and you 
cannot trial some of these items so any ideas/prices/australian distributors 
would be great.. thanks for your help in advance. Jenni

*
This email, including any attachments sent with it, is
confidential and for the sole use of the intended recipient(s).
This confidentiality is not waived or lost, if you receive it and
you are not the intended recipient(s), or if it is transmitted/
received in error.

Any unauthorised use, alteration, disclosure, distribution or
review of this email is strictly prohibited.  The information
contained in this email, including any attachment sent with
it, may be subject to a statutory duty of confidentiality if it
relates to health service matters.

If you are not the intended recipient(s), or if you have
received this email in error, you are asked to immediately
notify the sender by telephone collect on Australia
+61 1800 198 175 or by return email.  You should also
delete this email, and any copies, from your computer
system network and destroy any hard copies produced.

If not an intended recipient of this email, you must not copy,
distribute or take any action(s) that relies on it; any form of
disclosure, modification, distribution and/or publication of this
email is also prohibited.

Although Queensland Health takes all reasonable steps to
ensure this email does not contain malicious software,
Queensland Health does not accept responsibility for the
consequences if any person's computer inadvertently suffers
any disruption to services, loss of information, harm or is
infected with a virus, other malicious computer programme or
code that may occur as a consequence of receiving this
email.

Unless stated otherwise, this email represents only the views
of the sender and not the views of the Queensland Government.





Re: [ozmidwifery] birth chairs stools

2005-11-28 Thread Robyn Dempsey



Try the birthright birthing stool.many units 
use it. I use it and have found it wonderful.
Monika Boenigk sells them.
The only contact address I have is PO Box 27 
Hamilton NSW 2303

R. Dempsey

  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  Jennifer Price 
  To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au 
  
  Sent: 29 November, 2005 3:32 PM
  Subject: [ozmidwifery] birth chairs  
  stools
  hi am looking for inspiration from wise and 
  experienced women about birthing stools/chairs as we are looking at getting 
  some for our unit and you cannot trial some of these items so any 
  ideas/prices/australian distributors would be great.. thanks for your help in 
  advance. Jenni*This 
  email, including any attachments sent with it, isconfidential and for the 
  sole use of the intended recipient(s).This confidentiality is not waived 
  or lost, if you receive it andyou are not the intended recipient(s), or if 
  it is transmitted/received in error.Any unauthorised use, 
  alteration, disclosure, distribution orreview of this email is strictly 
  prohibited. The informationcontained in this email, including any 
  attachment sent withit, may be subject to a statutory duty of 
  confidentiality if itrelates to health service matters.If you are 
  not the intended recipient(s), or if you havereceived this email in error, 
  you are asked to immediatelynotify the sender by telephone collect on 
  Australia+61 1800 198 175 or by return email. You should alsodelete 
  this email, and any copies, from your computersystem network and destroy 
  any hard copies produced.If not an intended recipient of this email, 
  you must not copy,distribute or take any action(s) that relies on it; any 
  form ofdisclosure, modification, distribution and/or publication of 
  thisemail is also prohibited.Although Queensland Health takes all 
  reasonable steps toensure this email does not contain malicious 
  software,Queensland Health does not accept responsibility for 
  theconsequences if any person's computer inadvertently suffersany 
  disruption to services, loss of information, harm or isinfected with a 
  virus, other malicious computer programme orcode that may occur as a 
  consequence of receiving thisemail.Unless stated otherwise, this 
  email represents only the viewsof the sender and not the views of the 
  Queensland 
  Government.


RE: [ozmidwifery] birth chairs stools

2005-11-28 Thread Tania Smallwood










http://www.birthrite.com.au/













From: owner-ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
[mailto:owner-ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au]
On Behalf Of Robyn Dempsey
Sent: Tuesday, 29 November 2005
5:27 PM
To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
Subject: Re: [ozmidwifery] birth
chairs  stools







Try the birthright
birthing stool.many units use it. I use it and have found it wonderful.





Monika Boenigk
sells them.





The only contact
address I have is PO Box 27 Hamilton NSW 2303











R. Dempsey







- Original
Message - 





From: Jennifer Price 





To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au 





Sent: 29
November, 2005 3:32 PM





Subject:
[ozmidwifery] birth chairs  stools









hi am looking for
inspiration from wise and experienced women about birthing stools/chairs as we
are looking at getting some for our unit and you cannot trial some of these
items so any ideas/prices/australian distributors would be great.. thanks for
your help in advance. Jenni

*
This email, including any attachments sent with it, is
confidential and for the sole use of the intended recipient(s).
This confidentiality is not waived or lost, if you receive it and
you are not the intended recipient(s), or if it is transmitted/
received in error.

Any unauthorised use, alteration, disclosure, distribution or
review of this email is strictly prohibited. The information
contained in this email, including any attachment sent with
it, may be subject to a statutory duty of confidentiality if it
relates to health service matters.

If you are not the intended recipient(s), or if you have
received this email in error, you are asked to immediately
notify the sender by telephone collect on Australia
+61 1800 198 175 or by return email. You should also
delete this email, and any copies, from your computer
system network and destroy any hard copies produced.

If not an intended recipient of this email, you must not copy,
distribute or take any action(s) that relies on it; any form of
disclosure, modification, distribution and/or publication of this
email is also prohibited.

Although Queensland Health takes all reasonable steps to
ensure this email does not contain malicious software,
Queensland Health does not accept responsibility for the
consequences if any person's computer inadvertently suffers
any disruption to services, loss of information, harm or is
infected with a virus, other malicious computer programme or
code that may occur as a consequence of receiving this
email.

Unless stated otherwise, this email represents only the views
of the sender and not the views of the Queensland Government.