RE: [ozmidwifery] PPH & C/S

2006-04-12 Thread Kelly @ BellyBelly
] On Behalf Of Honey Acharya Sent: Monday, 3 April 2006 10:03 AM To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au Subject: Re: [ozmidwifery] PPH & C/S   "Its all about what she wants and is prepared to do to get it." very true I say this a lot lately! - Original Message --

Re: [ozmidwifery] PPH & C/S

2006-04-02 Thread Honey Acharya
"Its all about what she wants and is prepared to do to get it." very true I say this a lot lately! - Original Message - From: Andrea Quanchi To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au Sent: Monday, April 03, 2006 9:48 AM Subject: Re: [ozmidwifery] PPH &

Re: [ozmidwifery] PPH & C/S

2006-04-02 Thread Andrea Quanchi
the things is that if her babies are that big imagine how big her placentas are, probably the size of a dinner plate instead of a bread and butter plate.  It makes sense that a large placental site will bleed more than a little one but its whether the woman is symptomatic or not that matters.  If

Re: [ozmidwifery] PPH & C/S

2006-04-02 Thread Robyn Dempsey
: Kelly @ BellyBelly To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au Sent: 01 April, 2006 4:26 PM Subject: [ozmidwifery] PPH & C/S Hello all,   A woman on my forums has had two normal births of big babies – 11lb3oz and 13lb5oz and had a PPH with both. Her Ob is now reco

Re: [ozmidwifery] PPH & C/S

2006-04-02 Thread Katy O'Neill
loss anyway.  Initially anyway.  Katy. - Original Message - From: Melissa Singer To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au Sent: Saturday, April 01, 2006 8:52 PM Subject: Re: [ozmidwifery] PPH & C/S Maybe the thinking is should she have another large PPH

RE: [ozmidwifery] PPH & C/S

2006-04-01 Thread Mary Murphy
-ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au] On Behalf Of brendamanning Sent: Sunday, 2 April 2006 2:46 PM To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au Subject: Re: [ozmidwifery] PPH & C/S   I think it's because all the liquor is measured in with the blood loss in the suction bottles at a C/S. It totals 1000m

Re: [ozmidwifery] PPH & C/S

2006-04-01 Thread brendamanning
il 02, 2006 4:21 PM Subject: Re: [ozmidwifery] PPH & C/S Who is doing the caesars to get such a huge loss? The usual blood loss for uncomplicated c/s where I work is 3-400mls, I think that is pretty well par for the course.Monica- Original Message - From: "l

Re: [ozmidwifery] PPH & C/S

2006-04-01 Thread Mh
8 AM Subject: Fw: [ozmidwifery] PPH & C/S I have heard that a standard 100mls is lost with every c/s. How big was this womens pph. Its strange (or typical) how at a vaginal birth a women can loose 600mls and thats a considered pph but at a c/s 100mls is not. Lyn - Original Message

Fw: [ozmidwifery] PPH & C/S

2006-04-01 Thread lyn lyn
: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au Sent: Saturday, April 01, 2006 6:44 PM Subject: RE: [ozmidwifery] PPH & C/S Women also have PPH's at caesarean. Not sure if c/s would be safer. Perhaps she should see another ob for a second opinion. Nicole. -Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: [ozmidwifery] PPH & C/S

2006-04-01 Thread Kelly @ BellyBelly
@acegraphics.com.au [mailto:owner-ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au] On Behalf Of Sally-Anne Brown Sent: Sunday, 2 April 2006 9:00 AM To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au Subject: Re: [ozmidwifery] PPH & C/S   Dear Kelly   Re PPH: It would be interesting to find out if this woman was induce

Re: [ozmidwifery] PPH & C/S

2006-04-01 Thread Sally-Anne Brown
11-13 pounds and she has never had GD,  always normal vaginal births and peri intact everytime.    Kind Regards   Sally-Anne   - Original Message - From: Kelly @ BellyBelly To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au Sent: Saturday, April 01, 2006 4:26 PM Subject: [ozm

Re: [ozmidwifery] PPH & C/S

2006-04-01 Thread G Lemay
Kelly @ BellyBelly wrote: Hello all,   A woman on my forums has had two normal births of big babies – 11lb3oz and 13lb5oz and had a PPH with both. Her Ob is now recommending a c/s with her third bub and wants a scan at 34 weeks as a deciding factor of this. She wants a no

Re: [ozmidwifery] PPH & C/S

2006-04-01 Thread Melissa Singer
al Message - From: Nicole Carver To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au Sent: Saturday, April 01, 2006 4:44 PM Subject: RE: [ozmidwifery] PPH & C/S Women also have PPH's at caesarean. Not sure if c/s would be safer. Perhaps she should see another ob for a secon

RE: [ozmidwifery] PPH & C/S

2006-03-31 Thread Nicole Carver
PMTo: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.auSubject: [ozmidwifery] PPH & C/S Hello all,   A woman on my forums has had two normal births of big babies – 11lb3oz and 13lb5oz and had a PPH with both. Her Ob is now recommending a c/s with her third bub and wants a scan at 34 w

RE: [ozmidwifery] PPH & C/S

2006-03-31 Thread Dean & Jo
which support vbac in both instancesI will see if I can find them.   Jo -Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kelly @ BellyBellySent: Saturday, April 01, 2006 3:57 PMTo: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.auSubject: [ozmidwifery] PPH

Re: [ozmidwifery] PPH & C/S

2006-03-31 Thread Judy Chapman
She CAN always say no. How bad were the other PPH's? Enough to really comprimise her? She is probably at risk of another but it might still happen if she has a CS. Cheers Judy --- "Kelly @ BellyBelly" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello all, > > > > A woman on my forums has had two normal bir

[ozmidwifery] PPH & C/S

2006-03-31 Thread Kelly @ BellyBelly
Hello all,   A woman on my forums has had two normal births of big babies – 11lb3oz and 13lb5oz and had a PPH with both. Her Ob is now recommending a c/s with her third bub and wants a scan at 34 weeks as a deciding factor of this. She wants a normal birth – is it okay just for her to say