I have experience with both.
Sounds as though it's changed from accepting a relative path to a full path
- I could be wrong, but perhaps you should check the report viewer with
reflector on both versions and see whether this is the case. if it is,
you'll just have to generate the URL
: Tuesday, 6 December 2011 4:21 PM
To: 'ozMOSS'
Subject: RE: CrystalReports on sharepoint
I have experience with both.
Sounds as though it's changed from accepting a relative path to a full path - I
could be wrong, but perhaps you should check the report viewer with reflector
on both versions
-tips.comhttp://www.sharepoint-tips.com/ |
@ishaisagihttp://twitter.com/ishaisagi
From: ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com [mailto:ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com] On Behalf Of
Ishai Sagi
Sent: Tuesday, 6 December 2011 4:25 PM
To: ozMOSS
Subject: RE: CrystalReports on sharepoint
The code is basically exactly the same
methodology wins again.
M
From: ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com [mailto:ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com] On Behalf
Of Ishai Sagi
Sent: Tuesday, 6 December 2011 4:28 PM
To: ozMOSS
Subject: RE: CrystalReports on sharepoint
Ah! The plot thickens (as is my hatred to the developer who did the work
://twitter.com/ishaisagi
From: ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com [mailto:ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com] On Behalf Of
Matthew Cosier
Sent: Tuesday, 6 December 2011 4:21 PM
To: 'ozMOSS'
Subject: RE: CrystalReports on sharepoint
I have experience with both.
Sounds as though it's changed from accepting a relative
