JT, so you;re actually part of the list also? good to know.
I sent an email to you about an issue with SPSource maybe you did not get
it. I'll try here.
When the CT definition is extracted and the type is person, the content type
xml will complain that UserSelectionMode='peopleonly' it is wrong
Consultant
M: +61 400 767 022 | E:
jeremy.th...@readify.netmailto:jeremy.th...@readify.net | W:
www.readify.nethttp://www.readify.net/
From: ozmoss@ozmoss.com [mailto:ozm...@ozmoss.com] On Behalf Of Edge
Sent: Monday, 27 July 2009 11:08 AM
To: ozmoss@ozmoss.com
Subject: Re: Upgrading solution
be that
of DWS Pty Ltd.
Please consider the environment before printing this email.
From: ozmoss@ozmoss.com [ozm...@ozmoss.com] On Behalf Of Jeremy Thake
[jeremy.th...@readify.net]
Sent: Monday, 27 July 2009 12:23 PM
To: ozmoss@ozmoss.com
Subject: RE: Upgrading solution for CT
Of Jeremy Thake [
jeremy.th...@readify.net]
*Sent:* Monday, 27 July 2009 12:23 PM
*To:* ozmoss@ozmoss.com
*Subject:* RE: Upgrading solution for CT
Thanks for compliments on SPSource it was @RichFinn as well.
It is a great tool for reverse engineering Web UI changes. What I’ve found
]
Sent: Monday, 27 July 2009 1:41 PM
To: ozmoss@ozmoss.com
Subject: Re: Upgrading solution for CT
See http://sharepoint.microsoft.com/2010/Sneak_Peek/Pages/Developer-Video.aspx
below Feature Highlights -- Visual Studio 2010 SharePoint Tools, click the 1
box which shows a screenshot of the project
that's a good article. I think I missed that during my swine-flu :)
As a matter of fact I am about to perform a content type rollout in our SP
farm, which have hundreds of sites.( not to mention the lists in them and
mysites ).
But I believe he missed some *very important* points when doing that
definitions using the API to provide more flexibility.
Regards,
Paul
Online Developer, ICT
CEO Sydney
From: ozmoss@ozmoss.com [mailto:ozm...@ozmoss.com] On Behalf Of Edge
Sent: Friday, 24 July 2009 2:35 AM
To: ozmoss@ozmoss.com
Subject: Re: Upgrading solution for CT
that's a good article. I think I
] On Behalf Of Paul Noone
[paul.no...@ceosyd.catholic.edu.au]
Sent: Tuesday, 21 July 2009 1:33 PM
To: ozmoss@ozmoss.com
Subject: RE: Upgrading solution for CT
What?! You mean there's a mistake in the SDK? Never...
Cheers Pauly. ;0
From: ozmoss@ozmoss.com [mailto:ozm...@ozmoss.com] On Behalf Of Paul
...@ozmoss.com] On Behalf Of Paul Noone
[paul.no...@ceosyd.catholic.edu.au]
Sent: Tuesday, 21 July 2009 1:33 PM
To: ozmoss@ozmoss.com
Subject: RE: Upgrading solution for CT
What?! You mean there's a mistake in the SDK? Never...
Cheers Pauly. ;0
From: ozmoss@ozmoss.com [mailto:ozm...@ozmoss.com
You shouldn't be modifying a content type definition in a solution upgrade,
it isn't supported.
*Updating Content Types *
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa543504.aspx
See this note:
[image: Important]*Important: *
*Do not, under any circumstances, update the content type definition
PM
To: ozmoss@ozmoss.com
Subject: RE: Upgrading solution for CT
No. Content Types don't get upgraded in *any* circumstances.
Regards,
Paul Turner
Senior Solutions Specialist
M: 0412 748 168 P: 08 8238 0912 F: 08 8234 5966
A: 66 Henley Beach Road, Mile End SA 5031
E: paul.tur
: ozmoss@ozmoss.com [ozm...@ozmoss.com] On Behalf Of Sezai Komur
[sharepointse...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, 21 July 2009 12:55 PM
To: ozmoss@ozmoss.com
Subject: Re: Upgrading solution for CT
You shouldn't be modifying a content type definition in a solution upgrade, it
isn't supported.
Updating
the environment before printing this email.
From: ozmoss@ozmoss.com [ozm...@ozmoss.com] On Behalf Of Sezai Komur
[sharepointse...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, 21 July 2009 12:55 PM
To: ozmoss@ozmoss.com
Subject: Re: Upgrading solution for CT
You shouldn't be modifying
] On Behalf Of Paul Noone
[paul.no...@ceosyd.catholic.edu.au]
Sent: Tuesday, 21 July 2009 1:03 PM
To: ozmoss@ozmoss.com
Subject: RE: Upgrading solution for CT
Thanks guys. That would explain a lot.
To date I’ve been making the changes through the UI, sucking them down with
SPsource
What?! You mean there's a mistake in the SDK? Never...
Cheers Pauly. ;0
From: ozmoss@ozmoss.com [mailto:ozm...@ozmoss.com] On Behalf Of Paul Turner
Sent: Tuesday, 21 July 2009 1:38 PM
To: ozmoss@ozmoss.com
Subject: RE: Upgrading solution for CT
http://mkeeper.spaces.live.com/blog/cns
]
Sent: Tuesday, 21 July 2009 1:33 PM
To: ozmoss@ozmoss.com
Subject: RE: Upgrading solution for CT
What?! You mean there’s a mistake in the SDK? Never…
Cheers Pauly. ;0
From: ozmoss@ozmoss.com [mailto:ozm...@ozmoss.com] On Behalf Of Paul Turner
Sent: Tuesday, 21 July 2009 1:38 PM
To: ozmoss
16 matches
Mail list logo
