Re: [Pacemaker] Pacemaker on Fedora 10 -- OpenAIS/Corosync version question

2009-04-09 Thread Andrew Beekhof
On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 19:23, Ty! Boyack wrote: > Thanks Andrew!  I have been using that install page from the wiki quite a > bit.  The difficulty I'm running into stems from rpm package dependencies. >  With our package set in fedora openais 0.91-2 and corosync 0.92.2 get > installed initially as

Re: [Pacemaker] Pacemaker on Fedora 10 -- OpenAIS/Corosync version question

2009-04-09 Thread Ty! Boyack
Thanks Andrew! I have been using that install page from the wiki quite a bit. The difficulty I'm running into stems from rpm package dependencies. With our package set in fedora openais 0.91-2 and corosync 0.92.2 get installed initially as dependencies to other packages. That prevents me fr

[Pacemaker] Maintaining CRM configurations

2009-04-09 Thread Terry Hull
I feel like I must be looking in the wrong place for information, and was hoping someone could help. I¹ve seen a good deal of information about creating CRM configurations, but very little information about maintaining them. I was wanting to organize my configurations with groups for files system

Re: [Pacemaker] not clear, so question

2009-04-09 Thread Infos E-Blokos
Hello Andrew, - How many nodes? 4 nodes - How many apps? about 10 - How many apps will users interact with directly? (This gives a good indication of how many IPs you need) about 5/8, in fact apache manage 2 public class IPs with virtual host so other apps work interactly with it. - Do the apps

Re: [Pacemaker] Resource Scheduler Parameters

2009-04-09 Thread Andrew Beekhof
On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 13:40, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote: > Hi, > > On Wed, Apr 08, 2009 at 08:18:52PM +0200, Andrew Beekhof wrote: >> On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 18:40, btinsley wrote: >> > AIS guys said to upgrade to the latest Whitetank :-)? I did and the >> > behavior >> > is the same, but it's not

Re: [Pacemaker] Resource Scheduler Parameters

2009-04-09 Thread Dejan Muhamedagic
Hi, On Wed, Apr 08, 2009 at 08:18:52PM +0200, Andrew Beekhof wrote: > On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 18:40, btinsley wrote: > > AIS guys said to upgrade to the latest Whitetank :-)? I did and the behavior > > is the same, but it's not necessarily incorrect. The aisexec process sets > > itself to the real

Re: [Pacemaker] not clear, so question

2009-04-09 Thread Andrew Beekhof
I think you need to back up a bit and simply state what you're trying to achieve. - How many nodes? - How many apps? - How many apps will users interact with directly? (This gives a good indication of how many IPs you need) - Do the apps talk to each other? - Will apps be accepting requests on mor

Re: [Pacemaker] newbie question

2009-04-09 Thread Andrew Beekhof
On Sat, Apr 4, 2009 at 10:01, Infos E-Blokos wrote: > Hi Andrew, > > congratulations for your pacemaker work and docs, very useful and clear. > also I d like to know how to manage ip aliases onto an openais cluster, > I really don't know how to do it and no example on the net. > is CLUSTERIP usefu

Re: [Pacemaker] Pacemaker on Fedora 10 -- OpenAIS/Corosync version question

2009-04-09 Thread Andrew Beekhof
On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 20:54, Ty! Boyack wrote: > I'm trying to get Pacemaker running on a set of Fedora 10 boxes, but > I've seen some conflicting/confusing information regarding the state of > Pacemaker and how it integrates with OpenAIS/Corosync. > > It looks like the ha-clustering repo (at Sus