Re: [Pacemaker] Possible bug?

2012-09-10 Thread Andrew Beekhof
On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 11:43 PM, Borislav Borisov wrote: > Hi all, > > I am experiencing a very strange issue. On two test boxes I have a setup > that should server NFS and iSCSI Targets (SCST). > > When I create couple of iSCSI Target groups, composed of Target/Lun, and I > decide to remove one

Re: [Pacemaker] A VirtualDomain resource is deleted immediatly after create.

2012-09-10 Thread Andrew Beekhof
On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 4:10 PM, Changlimin wrote: > Hi; > I create some VirtualDomain resources VMwindows-moban-7 and > VMwindows-moban-6. I cannot see VMwindows-moban-7 when do crm status. In the > syslog, the VMwindows-moban-7 is deleted immediatly after create. > OS: ubuntu 1

Re: [Pacemaker] Clustered LVM in failover cluster

2012-09-10 Thread Lars Marowsky-Bree
On 2012-09-11T08:26:28, David Morton wrote: > So if we do not use clustered VG's will any changes made to a shared disk > (non clustered filesystem) be visible to all cluster nodes ? Or does > activating the VG resource effectively 'refresh' the LVM layout prior to > any filesystem actions taking

Re: [Pacemaker] CRM CLI guide gone?

2012-09-10 Thread Lars Marowsky-Bree
On 2012-09-10T22:15:44, Nenad Opsenica wrote: > Really, what is the status of CRM shell? > Is it deprecated now? It grew big enough to become it's own project. It is very much supported by Dejan and other contributors. > What is "official" way of configuring Peacemaker? If you want to use the

Re: [Pacemaker] Clustered LVM in failover cluster

2012-09-10 Thread emmanuel segura
I worked in Redhat Cluster without clvmd, i did a storage migration where the service was running. Until this point everythig was fine, but when the primary node where the service was running crashed it, the secondary node used the old luns, this happened because nobody synchronized the lvm metadat

Re: [Pacemaker] Clustered LVM in failover cluster

2012-09-10 Thread David Morton
So if we do not use clustered VG's will any changes made to a shared disk (non clustered filesystem) be visible to all cluster nodes ? Or does activating the VG resource effectively 'refresh' the LVM layout prior to any filesystem actions taking place in the event of a failover ? We will have one

Re: [Pacemaker] CRM CLI guide gone?

2012-09-10 Thread Nenad Opsenica
On 09/10/2012 06:26 PM, Andreas Ntaflos wrote: On 10/09/12 00:15, Andrew Beekhof wrote: On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 6:49 AM, Andreas Ntaflos wrote: It seems the CRM CLI guide formally found under http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/crm_cli.html is gone (404). Why so? Has it moved somewhere else? Yes

Re: [Pacemaker] Master/Slave drbd setup not working as expected

2012-09-10 Thread Luca Meron
> Firewall:slave cannot run on a different node. I assume you are > trying to have the DRBD masters on the same node? That should be > something like: > > colocation FirewallDiskWithWork inf: Firewall:Master Config:Master that is! thanks ___ Pace

Re: [Pacemaker] Master/Slave drbd setup not working as expected

2012-09-10 Thread Jake Smith
- Original Message - > From: "Luca Meron" > To: "The Pacemaker cluster resource manager" > Sent: Monday, September 10, 2012 12:39:30 PM > Subject: [Pacemaker] Master/Slave drbd setup not working as expected > > Hi. > I've a simple config with Corosync 1.4.2 on Ubuntu 12.04 which is > ca

[Pacemaker] Master/Slave drbd setup not working as expected

2012-09-10 Thread Luca Meron
Hi. I've a simple config with Corosync 1.4.2 on Ubuntu 12.04 which is causing me some troubles. I'm actually handling two drbd master/slave resources. The problem is that one of the two is not activated on the slave, causing it to remain out of sync! The setup is very simple (follows), the Confi

Re: [Pacemaker] CRM CLI guide gone?

2012-09-10 Thread Andreas Ntaflos
On 10/09/12 00:15, Andrew Beekhof wrote: > On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 6:49 AM, Andreas Ntaflos > wrote: >> It seems the CRM CLI guide formally found under >> >> http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/crm_cli.html >> >> is gone (404). Why so? Has it moved somewhere else? > > Yes. The shell has its own projec

Re: [Pacemaker] Upgrading to Pacemaker 1.1.7. Issue: sticky resources failing back after reboot

2012-09-10 Thread Jake Smith
- Original Message - > From: "Parshvi" > To: pacema...@clusterlabs.org > Sent: Monday, September 10, 2012 4:06:51 AM > Subject: Re: [Pacemaker] Upgrading to Pacemaker 1.1.7. Issue: sticky > resources failing back after reboot > > David Vossel writes: > > > Hi, > > > We have upgr

Re: [Pacemaker] fencing best practices for virtual environments

2012-09-10 Thread Lars Marowsky-Bree
On 2012-09-10T14:40:43, Alberto Menichetti wrote: > Sorry, maybe I'm missing something, but suppose this scenario (also > remember that, being a 2-node cluster, I had to set > no-quorum-policy="ignore"): > 1. the virtual center is unavailable > 2. an event occurs that partition the cluster > 3. a

Re: [Pacemaker] fencing best practices for virtual environments

2012-09-10 Thread Alberto Menichetti
On 09/10/2012 12:15 PM, Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote: On 2012-09-10T10:45:30, Alberto Menichetti wrote: thank you for the quick response. Maybe SPOF is not the best definition, but when the vcenter is unavailable the safety of my data is not guaranteed. The safety remains guaranteed; the availabi

Re: [Pacemaker] Pacemaker 1.1.6 order possible bug ?

2012-09-10 Thread Tomáš Vavřička
On 09/06/2012 07:41 AM, Tomáš Vavřička wrote: On 09/05/2012 04:54 PM, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote: Hi, On Wed, Sep 05, 2012 at 03:09:15PM +0200, Tomáš Vavřička wrote: On 09/05/2012 11:44 AM, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote: On Wed, Sep 05, 2012 at 07:51:35AM +1000, Andrew Beekhof wrote: On Mon, Sep 3, 20

Re: [Pacemaker] HealthCPU

2012-09-10 Thread Michael Schwartzkopff
> Dear all, > > I want to add the possibility for pacemaker to move my master server in > case of high CPU load. I guess that adding a primitive > ocf:pacemaker:HealthCPU would do that; however, I do not have a clue about > either the mechanism or configuration of it. > I did read this > document<

[Pacemaker] HealthCPU

2012-09-10 Thread Hanie Maghsoudy
Dear all, I want to add the possibility for pacemaker to move my master server in case of high CPU load. I guess that adding a primitive ocf:pacemaker:HealthCPU would do that; however, I do not have a clue about either the mechanism or configuration of it. I did read this document

Re: [Pacemaker] fencing best practices for virtual environments

2012-09-10 Thread Lars Marowsky-Bree
On 2012-09-10T10:45:30, Alberto Menichetti wrote: > thank you for the quick response. > Maybe SPOF is not the best definition, but when the vcenter is > unavailable the safety of my data is not guaranteed. The safety remains guaranteed; the availability of your service wouldn't be ;-) > >>The f

Re: [Pacemaker] Clustered LVM in failover cluster

2012-09-10 Thread Lars Marowsky-Bree
On 2012-09-10T11:06:15, David Morton wrote: > Not directly Pacemaker related but a simple question for those who manage > clusters ... > > I'm recreating our failover cluster on a new SAN which will use cLVM and > XFS, I am after some clarification that the "--clustered y" directive is > the cor

Re: [Pacemaker] fencing best practices for virtual environments

2012-09-10 Thread Alberto Menichetti
On 09/09/2012 09:53 PM, Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote: On 2012-09-09T13:30:36, Alberto Menichetti wrote: I've successfully configured and tested the stonith plugin "external/vcenter"; but this plugin introduces a single point of failure in my cluster infrastructure because it depends on the availa

Re: [Pacemaker] Upgrading to Pacemaker 1.1.7. Issue: sticky resources failing back after reboot

2012-09-10 Thread Parshvi
David Vossel writes: > > Hi, > > We have upgraded pacemaker version 1.0.12 to 1.1.7 > > The upgrade was done since resources failed to recover after a > > timeout > > (monitor|stop[unmanaged]) and logs observed are: > > > > WARN: print_graph: Synapse 6 is pending (priority: 0) > > Sep 03 16:55:18