On 2012-09-10T10:45:30, Alberto Menichetti <albmeniche...@tai.it> wrote:
> thank you for the quick response.
> Maybe SPOF is not the best definition, but when the vcenter is
> unavailable the safety of my data is not guaranteed.
The safety remains guaranteed; the availability of your service wouldn't
be ;-)
> >>The fecing device I'd like to use is sdb.
> >If you have a working SBD setup, you do not need the external/vcenter
> >plugin any more.
> What about using 2 different fencing mechanisms?
But why? It doesn't provide any benefit.
> Do you think it could introduce some problems in the cluster or is
> it a suggested/supported solution?
> I'd like to use external/vcenter as first choice and rely on sdb
> only if the first stonith mechanism fails (for example, because of
> the vcenter unavailability).
Why?
Regards,
Lars
--
Architect Storage/HA
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imendörffer, HRB
21284 (AG Nürnberg)
"Experience is the name everyone gives to their mistakes." -- Oscar Wilde
_______________________________________________
Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org
http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker
Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org
Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf
Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org
