Re: [Pacemaker] Cannot control the placement of the resource.

2010-02-23 Thread Andrew Beekhof
2010/2/13 renayama19661...@ybb.ne.jp: Hi Andrew, I confirmed it in the next environment.  * CentOS 5.4 (on ESXi)  * Pacemaker-1-0-0bf7d14dd554  * Cluster-Resource-Agents-a3db4fe39301  * Reusable-Cluster-Components-f547243d9245  * corosync-1.2.0 I attach a result of hb_report as a

Re: [Pacemaker] Cannot control the placement of the resource.

2010-02-23 Thread renayama19661014
Hi Andrew, Thank you for a reply. I test your patch. Best Regards, Hideo Yamauchi. --- Andrew Beekhof and...@beekhof.net wrote: 2010/2/13 renayama19661...@ybb.ne.jp: Hi Andrew, I confirmed it in the next environment. \xA0* CentOS 5.4 (on ESXi) \xA0* Pacemaker-1-0-0bf7d14dd554

Re: [Pacemaker] Cannot control the placement of the resource.

2010-02-21 Thread renayama19661014
Hi Andrew, About the cause of this problem, did you understand what it was? Please contact me if there is the information that is necessary for investigation else. Best Regards, Hideo Yamauchi. --- renayama19661...@ybb.ne.jp wrote: Hi Andrew, I confirmed it in the next environment.

Re: [Pacemaker] Cannot control the placement of the resource.

2010-02-10 Thread Andrew Beekhof
Odd, I don't see any pacemaker messages in the log files... Anyway, I'll look at the PE files. 2010/2/8 renayama19661...@ybb.ne.jp: Hi, I set slightly complicated colocation.  * corosync 1.2.0  * Pacemaker 1.0.7(Pacemaker-1-0-d3fa20fc76c7)

Re: [Pacemaker] Cannot control the placement of the resource.

2010-02-10 Thread Andrew Beekhof
On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 1:42 PM, Andrew Beekhof and...@beekhof.net wrote: Odd, I don't see any pacemaker messages in the log files... Anyway, I'll look at the PE files. Actually, none of the included pe files seem to match the failure case... can you supply the cib from that condition?

Re: [Pacemaker] Cannot control the placement of the resource.

2010-02-10 Thread renayama19661014
Hi Andrew, Thank you for comment. Actually, none of the included pe files seem to match the failure case... can you supply the cib from that condition? I report the result that carried out cibadmin -Q at the stage of each problem. Is this information(cibadmin -Q) enough? Best Regards, Hideo