On 27 May 2014, at 3:45 pm, K Mehta kiranmehta1...@gmail.com wrote:
No reason. Need to know which combination is expected to work.
The bets approach is to update both. That combination is sure to work.
using 0.9.26 with new 1.1.10 pacemaker
and 0.9.90 with old pacemaker has issues in
2014-05-27 7:34 GMT+02:00 Andrew Beekhof and...@beekhof.net:
On 27 May 2014, at 3:12 pm, Gao,Yan y...@suse.com wrote:
On 05/27/14 08:07, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
On 26 May 2014, at 10:47 pm, Christian Ciach derein...@gmail.com
wrote:
I am sorry to get back to this topic, but I'm
I've removed the location constraint and it seems the resources don't
move anymore if I reboot BX-1.
During reboot I noticed on crm_mon that resources for one second
appeared offline and then they stayed on BX-2. Does anyone know why that
happened?
I've tried reconfiguring my cluster
One more question.
With crmsh, it was easy to add constraint to avoid a resource from running
only a subset(say vsanqa11 and vsanqa12) of nodes using the following
command
crm configure location ms-${uuid}-nodes ms-$uuid rule -inf: \#uname ne
vsanqa11 and \#uname ne vsanqa12
[root@vsanqa11 ~]#
Hello,
The fast question:
Is it possible to have different logpriorities for cib than for lrmd or
pacemakerd?
The long explanation:
After upgrading to pacemaker 1.1.12rc1, and enabling pgsql Master/Slave
RA, I have lots of logs that are not informative, and would like to
adjust logging a
On 2014-05-27T10:02:44, Andrew Beekhof and...@beekhof.net wrote:
We are working on HA solutions for OpenStack(-related) services and figured
out that sometimes we need clones to be notified if one of the cluster
nodes running clone instances goes offline. E.g., we need this information
Hi,
On Mon, May 26, 2014 at 02:56:18PM +0200, Christian Ciach wrote:
Hello,
I am dealing with a three-node multi-site cluster using pacemaker and
corosync. The third node is a quorum-only node.
The three nodes form a single cluster and are connected using corosync over
the internet
On 28 May 2014, at 1:20 am, Lars Marowsky-Bree l...@suse.com wrote:
On 2014-05-27T10:02:44, Andrew Beekhof and...@beekhof.net wrote:
We are working on HA solutions for OpenStack(-related) services and figured
out that sometimes we need clones to be notified if one of the cluster
nodes
On 27 May 2014, at 7:20 pm, Christian Ciach derein...@gmail.com wrote:
2014-05-27 7:34 GMT+02:00 Andrew Beekhof and...@beekhof.net:
On 27 May 2014, at 3:12 pm, Gao,Yan y...@suse.com wrote:
On 05/27/14 08:07, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
On 26 May 2014, at 10:47 pm, Christian Ciach
On 28 May 2014, at 12:33 am, Bernardo Cabezas Serra bcabe...@apsl.net wrote:
Hello,
The fast question:
Is it possible to have different logpriorities for cib than for lrmd or
pacemakerd?
The long explanation:
After upgrading to pacemaker 1.1.12rc1, and enabling pgsql Master/Slave
On 27 May 2014, at 8:23 pm, Danilo Malcangio d.malcan...@eletech.it wrote:
I've removed the location constraint and it seems the resources don't move
anymore if I reboot BX-1.
During reboot I noticed on crm_mon that resources for one second appeared
offline and then they stayed on BX-2.
On 05/27/14 05:38, K Mehta wrote:
One more question.
With crmsh, it was easy to add constraint to avoid a resource from running only
a subset(say vsanqa11 and vsanqa12) of nodes using the following command
crm configure location ms-${uuid}-nodes ms-$uuid rule -inf: \#uname ne vsanqa11
and
Chris,
Here is the required information
[root@vsanqa11 ~]# rpm -qa | grep pcs ; rpm -qa | grep pacemaker ; uname -a
; cat /etc/redhat-release
pcs-0.9.90-2.el6.centos.2.noarch
pacemaker-cli-1.1.10-14.el6_5.3.x86_64
pacemaker-libs-1.1.10-14.el6_5.3.x86_64
pacemaker-1.1.10-14.el6_5.3.x86_64
On 27 May 2014, at 12:13 pm, renayama19661...@ybb.ne.jp wrote:
Hi All,
The attrd_updater command ignores the dampen parameter and updates an
attribute.
Step1) Start one node.
[root@srv01 ~]# crm_mon -1 -Af
Last updated: Tue May 27 19:36:35 2014
Last change: Tue May 27 19:34:59 2014
Hi Andrew,
Thank you for comment.
--- attrd/command.c -
(snip)
/* this only involves cluster nodes. */
if(v-nodeid == 0 (v-is_remote == FALSE)) {
if(crm_element_value_int(xml, F_ATTRD_HOST_ID, (int*)v-nodeid) ==
0) {
/* Create the name/id association */
Hi Andrew,
I'd expect that block to hit this clause though:
} else if(mainloop_timer_running(a-timer)) {
crm_info(Write out of '%s' delayed: timer is running, a-id);
return;
Which point of the source code does the suggested code mentioned above revise?
(Which
16 matches
Mail list logo
