https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=822881
Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=816071
Volker Fröhlich volke...@gmx.at changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=823806
Matthias Runge mru...@matthias-runge.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=823886
Oron Peled o...@actcom.co.il changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||o...@actcom.co.il
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=821732
--- Comment #7 from Jan Horak jho...@redhat.com ---
Oh! I'm sorry about it, wrong copypaste.
http://xhorak.fedorapeople.org/scantailor-0.9.11.1-1.fc16.src.rpm
http://xhorak.fedorapeople.org/scantailor.spec
I hope it's fixed now.
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=818401
MERCIER Jonathan bioinfornat...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=823806
Bohuslav Slavek Kabrda bkab...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=823967
Terje Røsten terje...@phys.ntnu.no changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=823886
--- Comment #6 from Elad Alfassa el...@doom.co.il ---
Sure, go ahead and review it :)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=821511
--- Comment #4 from Marek Goldmann mgold...@redhat.com ---
Hi Michael!
(In reply to comment #3)
Hi,
I am quickly looking at the spec, here is a few comments :
- patch should be annoted, ie, do they come from upstream, if not, have they
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=823886
Oron Peled o...@actcom.co.il changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|o...@actcom.co.il
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=824083
Petr Šabata psab...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||psab...@redhat.com
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=822629
Marek Goldmann mgold...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=821511
Mikolaj Izdebski mizde...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=821511
--- Comment #6 from Mikolaj Izdebski mizde...@redhat.com ---
- the devel subpackage need to have the license in %doc, as it can be
installed without the main package
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=821511
Stanislav Ochotnicky socho...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=822424
Patryk Obara pob...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=812526
Jeroen van Meeuwen kana...@kanarip.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=821511
--- Comment #8 from Marek Goldmann mgold...@redhat.com ---
Spec URL:
http://goldmann.fedorapeople.org/package_review/hornetq/2.2.13-3/hornetq.spec
SRPM URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=824330
Bug ID: 824330
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
Severity: medium
Version: rawhide
Priority: unspecified
CC: mgold...@redhat.com, nott...@redhat.com,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=824334
Bug ID: 824334
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
Severity: medium
Version: rawhide
Priority: medium
CC: nott...@redhat.com,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=824334
Jeroen van Meeuwen kana...@kanarip.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=823886
--- Comment #8 from Hans de Goede hdego...@redhat.com ---
Hi,
Thanks for the review!
I've fixed the URL field and send a mail upstream about
fixing the UTF-8 issue for example/*.c
[?]: MUST Changelog in prescribed format.
* The .spec file
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=822424
Marek Goldmann mgold...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Review Request: |Review Request:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=824348
Bug ID: 824348
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
Severity: unspecified
Version: 17
Priority: unspecified
CC: nott...@redhat.com,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=824357
Bug ID: 824357
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
Severity: unspecified
Version: 17
Priority: unspecified
CC: nott...@redhat.com,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=822629
--- Comment #1 from Marek Goldmann mgold...@redhat.com ---
Package Review
==
Key:
- = N/A
x = Check
! = Problem
? = Not evaluated
=== REQUIRED ITEMS ===
[!] Rpmlint output:
$ rpmlint SPECS/cxf-build-utils.spec
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=824361
Bug ID: 824361
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
Severity: unspecified
Version: 17
Priority: unspecified
CC: nott...@redhat.com,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=822629
--- Comment #2 from Patryk Obara pob...@redhat.com ---
http://dreamertan.fedorapeople.org/srpm/cxf-build-utils/2.4.1-2/cxf-build-utils.spec
http://dreamertan.fedorapeople.org/srpm/cxf-build-utils/2.4.1-2/cxf-build-utils-2.4.1-2.fc17.src.rpm
All
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=822629
Marek Goldmann mgold...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=822635
Marek Goldmann mgold...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=797146
Mary Ellen Foster mefos...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=822424
Patryk Obara pob...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=823967
--- Comment #2 from gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it ---
for the moment no.apacheds.jdbm is a BR for Infinispan...
if anyone is interested in DStudio you/i can try to package it
thanks
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=822629
Patryk Obara pob...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--- Comment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=822424
Marek Goldmann mgold...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=821511
Mary Ellen Foster mefos...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=821511
Mary Ellen Foster mefos...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|mefos...@gmail.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=821511
--- Comment #9 from Mary Ellen Foster mefos...@gmail.com ---
I will review this package
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=821511
Mary Ellen Foster mefos...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review?
--
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=784596
Marek Goldmann mgold...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=818401
Kalev Lember kalevlem...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=824393
Bug ID: 824393
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
Severity: medium
Version: rawhide
Depends On: 823989
Priority: unspecified
CC: nott...@redhat.com,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=820855
Mikolaj Izdebski mizde...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=822394
Bug 822394 depends on bug 820855, which changed state.
Bug 820855 Summary: Review Request: apache-juddi - Client API for UDDI
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=820855
What|Removed |Added
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=823989
Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||824393
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=816559
Petr Šabata psab...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=821511
--- Comment #10 from Mary Ellen Foster mefos...@gmail.com ---
Issues:
[!]: MUST All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any
that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
Note: These BR are not
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=819134
--- Comment #5 from Jay Dobies jason.dob...@redhat.com ---
%define - %global change made:
Spec URL: http://jdob.fedorapeople.org/okaara-src/python-okaara.spec
SRPM URL:
http://jdob.fedorapeople.org/okaara-src/python-okaara-1.0.19-1.fc16.src.rpm
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=822896
--- Comment #10 from Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org ---
(In reply to comment #9)
(In reply to comment #8)
I think the conflict does not matter much, as pari-gp is a pari
subpackage.
Don't know what you mean by that. I was wondering
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=816559
--- Comment #1 from Petr Šabata psab...@redhat.com ---
Package Review
==
Key:
- = N/A
x = Pass
! = Fail
? = Not evaluated
Generic
[x]: MUST Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=822897
--- Comment #2 from Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org ---
Based on feedback for the pari-elldata package (Bug #822896), I've updated this
one to add a dist tag, ensure sane permissions using %{_fixperms} and conflict
with incompatible old versions
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=797146
--- Comment #8 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Review summary package name and SCM package name don't match, please fix.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=801058
--- Comment #6 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=820995
Tomas Radej tra...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=822898
--- Comment #2 from Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org ---
Based on feedback for the pari-elldata package (Bug #822896), I've updated this
one to add a dist tag, ensure sane permissions using %{_fixperms} and conflict
with incompatible old versions
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=822424
--- Comment #5 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=824430
Bug ID: 824430
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
Severity: medium
Version: rawhide
Depends On: 823523, 823989, 824393
Priority: unspecified
CC: nott...@redhat.com,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=822629
--- Comment #5 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=823523
Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||824430
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=823989
Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||824430
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=824393
Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||824430
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=822881
--- Comment #3 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=823806
--- Comment #7 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=797146
Mary Ellen Foster mefos...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=797146
--- Comment #10 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=815624
Simone Caronni negativ...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=757156
Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=823886
Oron Peled o...@actcom.co.il changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review+
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=816559
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On|809931 |
--- Comment #2 from Petr
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=809931
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|816559 |
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=799597
--- Comment #13 from Dan Horák d...@danny.cz ---
And thanks for the update :-)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=816559
Petr Šabata psab...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=821838
--- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
gitolite3-3.03-1.fc16 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 16.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/gitolite3-3.03-1.fc16
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=821838
--- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
gitolite3-3.03-1.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/gitolite3-3.03-1.fc17
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=821838
--- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
gitolite3-3.03-1.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 6.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/gitolite3-3.03-1.el6
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=823886
Hans de Goede hdego...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Review Request: libusbx - |Review Request:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=769919
--- Comment #29 from Michal Ambroz re...@seznam.cz ---
Hello Athmane,
please leave the release number (9) as it is now, but for next upstream
versions the release should always reset to 1.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=824083
Ben Rosser rosser@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rosser@gmail.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=823886
--- Comment #11 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=816559
--- Comment #4 from Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com ---
New Package SCM Request
===
Package Name: perl-Test-Module-Used
Short Description: Test required module is really used and vice versa between
lib/t and META.yml
Owners:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=816559
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=816559
--- Comment #5 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=818401
--- Comment #15 from pcpa paulo.cesar.pereira.de.andr...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to comment #13)
They are since many time a spec for 0ad at
http://repos.fedorapeople.org/repos/bioinfornatics/0ad/
(not yet updated to latest release alpha X)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=824357
Praveen Kumar kumarpraveen.nit...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=818401
--- Comment #16 from MERCIER Jonathan bioinfornat...@gmail.com ---
s3tc lib are in rpm-fusion if it is legal in your state
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=824478
Bug ID: 824478
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
Severity: medium
Version: rawhide
Priority: medium
CC: nott...@redhat.com,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=821184
--- Comment #4 from Michal Ambroz re...@seznam.cz ---
Does this package have an active upstream?
The latest date in ChangeLog is from 2001, so my guess would be this package
is dead.
Let's assume the package is not dead, but it is perfect and
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=816559
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Fixed In
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=823811
Tomas Mlcoch tmlc...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(tmlc...@redhat.co |
|m)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=821184
--- Comment #5 from Ralf Corsepius rc040...@freenet.de ---
(In reply to comment #4)
Let's assume the package is not dead, but it is perfect and stable :).
Not much of a problem if the Fedora maintainer is willing to cope with the
anachronisms a
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=823811
--- Comment #6 from Dan Horák d...@danny.cz ---
please increase Release for every published iteration of spec and srpm, not
doing so makes it much harder for the reviewer to see what changed, also never
release a tarbal with changed content under
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=784596
--- Comment #10 from Marek Goldmann mgold...@redhat.com ---
Package Review
==
Key:
- = N/A
x = Check
! = Problem
? = Not evaluated
=== REQUIRED ITEMS ===
[x] Rpmlint output:
$ rpmlint SPECS/jabref.spec
0 packages and 1 specfiles
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=823811
--- Comment #7 from Ralf Corsepius rc040...@freenet.de ---
Some recommendations:
- Please add %{?dist} to your Release:-tag
- Please consider to use xz-compressed tarballs instead of *.bz2 compressed
Blocker:
- The package does not honor
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=822424
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=822424
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
jboss-jaxrs-1.1-api-1.0.1-2.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/jboss-jaxrs-1.1-api-1.0.1-2.fc17
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=818401
--- Comment #17 from pcpa paulo.cesar.pereira.de.andr...@gmail.com ---
You mean squish? Then would need to check if can use that instead of the
bundled version in nvidia-texture-tools.
Maybe the proper approach would be to just package 0ad in
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=738589
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=822878
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=824507
Bug ID: 824507
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
Severity: medium
Version: rawhide
Priority: medium
CC: nott...@redhat.com,
1 - 100 of 149 matches
Mail list logo
