https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=858381
--- Comment #11 from Clément DAVID c.davi...@gmail.com ---
Hi gil, thanks for taking the review,
[!]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present.
Note: Missing: 'Requires: %%{name} =' in: %package doc
Fixed to avoid outdated
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=848388
Tomas Mraz tm...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|tm...@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=804125
--- Comment #4 from Gianluca Sforna gia...@gmail.com ---
Updated package:
http://giallu.fedorapeople.org/rdkit-2012.06-1.fc17.src.rpm
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=852174
--- Comment #9 from Volker Fröhlich volke...@gmx.at ---
COPYING is not necessary in the main package, as it requires the libs package,
which has it.
?_isa also applies in a few more locations, like in the main and devel package:
Requires:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=862531
--- Comment #3 from Marek Goldmann mgold...@redhat.com ---
Fixed both issues, upgraded to 1.1.0.GA and removed maven R.
Spec URL:
http://goldmann.fedorapeople.org/package_review/jbossws-parent/1.1.0-1/jbossws-parent.spec
SRPM URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=860503
Marek Goldmann mgold...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=797203
--- Comment #3 from Fabian Deutsch fabian.deut...@gmx.de ---
(In reply to comment #1)
Scratch build:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=4567102
It fails for f18. From build.log:
cd tests ./augeas.vala
Package gobject-2.0
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=859675
Matthias Runge mru...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=860503
--- Comment #1 from Marek Goldmann mgold...@redhat.com ---
Package Review
==
Key:
[x] = Pass
[!] = Fail
[-] = Not applicable
[?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
Issues:
===
[!]: Package consistently uses macro is
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=860503
--- Comment #2 from Marek Goldmann mgold...@redhat.com ---
As a note - you can use POM macros instead patching things manually:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Akurtakov/JavaPackagingDraftUpdate#Patching_Maven_pom.xml_files
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=863983
Bug ID: 863983
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
Severity: medium
Version: rawhide
Priority: medium
CC: nott...@redhat.com,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=863985
Bug ID: 863985
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
Severity: medium
Version: rawhide
Priority: medium
CC: nott...@redhat.com,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=772362
--- Comment #22 from Hans de Goede hdego...@redhat.com ---
(In reply to comment #15)
Created attachment 576293 [details]
diff between sigil and upstream libtidy
Hans, I'm working on the review again, sorry for the delays.
These are the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=772362
--- Comment #23 from Dan Horák d...@danny.cz ---
btw latest sigil is packaged at
http://fedora.danny.cz/danny/development/SRPMS/repoview/sigil.html
I've also tried to create a patch for usign system spelling dictionaries, but
the issue
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=772362
--- Comment #24 from Hans de Goede hdego...@redhat.com ---
Bundling exception request is here:
https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/219
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=772362
--- Comment #25 from Dan Horák d...@danny.cz ---
re tidy - it has a new life at http://w3c.github.com/tidy-html5/
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=848466
Jiri Popelka jpope...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs+ |
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=858381
--- Comment #12 from gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it ---
hi Clément,
please update the source rpm.
there are still the same problems discussed above
thanks regards
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=859032
Lakshmi Narasimhan lakshminaras2...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=859032
--- Comment #3 from Shakthi Kannan shakthim...@gmail.com ---
Upstream hasn't responded. So, as per the guidelines, I have included it, and
have also sent the same to the author to include it in the next release.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=863437
--- Comment #6 from Christian Fredrik Kalager Schaller cscha...@redhat.com ---
Updated SRPM to match current spec file
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=859032
--- Comment #4 from Lakshmi Narasimhan lakshminaras2...@gmail.com ---
Ok.Thanks
[+]MUST: rpmlint must be run onevery package. The output should be posted in
the review.
rpmlint -i ghc-data-memocombinators-0.4.3-1.fc17.x86_64.rpm
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=859032
Lakshmi Narasimhan lakshminaras2...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=854458
Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=853687
Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=859032
Lakshmi Narasimhan lakshminaras2...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|ON_DEV
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=817779
Matthias Runge mru...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mru...@redhat.com
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=817779
--- Comment #14 from Dmitry Butskoy dmi...@butskoy.name ---
I don't even want to imagine the interest for seamonkey stuf
Sadly. I have the interest in seamonkey-enigmail. Certainly it would be wrong
idea to provide the same binary/code in
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=841746
Lakshmi Narasimhan lakshminaras2...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ON_DEV
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=860424
--- Comment #2 from Thomas Sailer t.sai...@alumni.ethz.ch ---
(In reply to comment #1)
The spec templates include the initial cleaning of %{buildroot}:
rm -rf %{buildroot}
Thank you for your input.
I have corrected this:
Spec URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=841746
Lakshmi Narasimhan lakshminaras2...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=817779
--- Comment #15 from Remi Collet fed...@famillecollet.com ---
Latest SRPM:
http://download1.rpmfusion.org/free/fedora/development/rawhide/source/SRPMS/thunderbird-enigmail-1.4.4-2.fc19.src.rpm
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=817779
--- Comment #16 from Dmitry Butskoy dmi...@butskoy.name ---
Remi,
Do you have a plan to rename to mozilla-enigmail?
AFAIK it is not so easy to rename a package in Fedora, hence it would be better
to add an already renamed one...
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=817779
--- Comment #17 from Remi Collet fed...@famillecollet.com ---
I need to think about it.
Perhaps we need
- mozilla-enigmail (the binary)
- thunderbird-enigmail : for thunderbird with the version requirement (and
conflicts)
- seamonkey-enigmail.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=841746
Shakthi Kannan shakthim...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_DEV |RELEASE_PENDING
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=859032
Shakthi Kannan shakthim...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_DEV |RELEASE_PENDING
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=817779
--- Comment #18 from Remi Collet fed...@famillecollet.com ---
(In reply to comment #14)
I plan to use it under Seamonkey under RHEL6, for which I now adding the
latest
Seamonkey-2.12.1.
Will probably make updates more complicated, as Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=861893
--- Comment #14 from Milan Bartos mbar...@redhat.com ---
Spec URL:
http://mbartos.fedorapeople.org/libmongo-client-0.1.5-6/libmongo-client.spec
SRPM URL:
http://mbartos.fedorapeople.org/libmongo-client-0.1.5-6/libmongo-client-0.1.5-6.fc17.src.rpm
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=854690
--- Comment #11 from Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com ---
*** Bug 648898 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=861893
--- Comment #15 from Milan Bartos mbar...@redhat.com ---
New Package SCM Request
===
Package Name: libmongo-client
Short Description: Alternative C driver for MongoDB
Owners: mbartos
Branches: f17 f18
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=861893
Milan Bartos mbar...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=861893
--- Comment #16 from Miloslav Trmač m...@redhat.com ---
(In reply to comment #14)
Spec URL:
http://mbartos.fedorapeople.org/libmongo-client-0.1.5-6/libmongo-client.spec
Fixed. Thanks for review.
ACK
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=817779
--- Comment #19 from Dmitry Butskoy dmi...@butskoy.name ---
it only work with exact thunderbird version
According to the install.rdf file, it should... I'll try to test it.
Will SeaMonkey 2.13 be available at same time than Th 16 ?
I think
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=817779
--- Comment #20 from Dmitry Butskoy dmi...@butskoy.name ---
Maybe:
for Fedora: mozilla-enigmail with just versioning subpackages
([thunderburd,seamonkey]-enigmail)
for EPEL: mozilla-enigmail source package with different result binary
packages
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=858381
Clément DAVID c.davi...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
--- Comment #13
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=817779
--- Comment #21 from Dmitry Butskoy dmi...@butskoy.name ---
Ups. Why thunderburd? Thunderbird. :)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=859994
--- Comment #2 from Imre Farkas ifar...@redhat.com ---
Hi Vít,
Thanks for the review! Your comments was really valuable. I updated the spec
file and the source rpm accordingly. You can find them at:
Spec URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=847811
Mahaveer Darade mah.dar...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=848388
Mahaveer Darade mah.dar...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=847811
Mahaveer Darade mah.dar...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=848388
Mahaveer Darade mah.dar...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=720857
--- Comment #52 from John D. Ramsdell ramsd...@mitre.org ---
I still time out when the https_proxy var is set.
$ https_proxy=http://gatekeeper.mitre.org:80/ fedpkg -v build
Creating repo object from /home/ramsdell/fedora/datalog
Running: rpm -q
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=859994
--- Comment #3 from Vít Ondruch vondr...@redhat.com ---
(In reply to comment #1)
* .yard-doc
- There is no such folder in the gem. Please drop the .yard-doc line from
the
%files section, since the package builds just fine without it in
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=859994
--- Comment #4 from Imre Farkas ifar...@redhat.com ---
Thanks, fixed again, hopefully without introducing any new issue.
Spec URL:
https://raw.github.com/ifarkas/fedora_rpm_specs/master/rubygem-simple_form.spec
SRPM URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=830328
--- Comment #21 from Debarshi Ray debars...@redhat.com ---
Can we close this now?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=864066
Bug ID: 864066
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
Severity: medium
Version: rawhide
Priority: medium
CC: nott...@redhat.com,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=864066
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||863988
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=864066
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=859994
--- Comment #5 from Vít Ondruch vondr...@redhat.com ---
BTW it builds in koji just fine:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=4570875
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=864084
Bug ID: 864084
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
Severity: medium
Version: rawhide
Priority: medium
CC: nott...@redhat.com,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=864084
gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||652183 (FE-JAVASIG)
--
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=859994
Vít Ondruch vondr...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=864089
Bug ID: 864089
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
Severity: medium
Version: rawhide
Priority: medium
CC: nott...@redhat.com,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=864090
Bug ID: 864090
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
Severity: medium
Version: rawhide
Priority: medium
CC: nott...@redhat.com,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=864090
Luke Macken lmac...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Review Request: |Review Request:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=830328
Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=864089
leigh scott leigh123li...@googlemail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=862531
Stanislav Ochotnicky socho...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=862531
Marek Goldmann mgold...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|652183 (FE-JAVASIG) |
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=844070
Martin Gieseking martin.giesek...@uos.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #623502||review+
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=864089
Wolfgang Ulbrich chat-to...@raveit.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=844070
Martin Gieseking martin.giesek...@uos.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #623502|review+ |
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=844070
Martin Gieseking martin.giesek...@uos.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=864089
--- Comment #2 from leigh scott leigh123li...@googlemail.com ---
(In reply to comment #1)
Yeah, i can do the review.
Thank you.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=856858
--- Comment #8 from Luis Bazan bazanlui...@gmail.com ---
Ping, any progress here?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=860352
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=860352
--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
empathy-3.6.0.3-1.fc18,folks-0.8.0-1.fc18,libnice-0.1.3-1.fc18,telepathy-farstream-0.6.0-1.fc18,farstream02-0.2.1-1.fc18
has been submitted as an update for Fedora 18.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=864090
Ralph Bean rb...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=836821
Valent Turkovic valent.turko...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=864090
--- Comment #2 from Ralph Bean rb...@redhat.com ---
Since you are upstream, could you include a LICENSE file? The license
shortname GPLV3+ appears in the specfile, but is not mentioned anywhere in
Source0.
We obviously know this is correct, but
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=836821
--- Comment #6 from Volker Fröhlich volke...@gmx.at ---
As soon as the review is done, it can go to F16 and up.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=858381
--- Comment #14 from gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it ---
hi,
[!]: Dist tag is present.
if use
%if 0%{?pkg_rc:1}
%global pkg_release 0.%{baserelease}.%{pkg_rc}%{?dist}
%else
%global pkg_release %{baserelease}%{?dist}
%endif
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=843775
--- Comment #6 from Maros Zatko mza...@redhat.com ---
Hi, could you get it into F17 as well, please?
I need it in F17 as a dependency for other gems.
Thank you.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=750139
--- Comment #18 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=841746
--- Comment #5 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=864125
Bug ID: 864125
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
Severity: medium
Version: rawhide
Priority: medium
CC: nott...@redhat.com,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=847811
--- Comment #12 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=847817
--- Comment #10 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=848388
--- Comment #15 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=848466
--- Comment #10 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=851891
--- Comment #14 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=853687
--- Comment #5 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=854458
--- Comment #4 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=859032
--- Comment #7 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=860001
--- Comment #5 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=861893
--- Comment #17 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=862531
--- Comment #6 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=862850
--- Comment #22 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=863437
--- Comment #7 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu ---
bpebble is not a valid account name.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=863719
--- Comment #6 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
1 - 100 of 197 matches
Mail list logo
