Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=866982
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=866982
--- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
rubygem-gem-patch-0.1.3-1.fc17 has been pushed to the Fedora 17 stable
repository.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=859795
--- Comment #19 from Matthias Runge mru...@redhat.com ---
(In reply to comment #18)
In general, there's no we as we control and decide which kind of package
comes in or not in Fedora. If there's anybody interested and needing
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=877167
--- Comment #5 from leigh scott leigh123li...@googlemail.com ---
I have added br python
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=855710
Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=866495
Glauber Costa glom...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=866495
--- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
vzctl-4.1-2.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/vzctl-4.1-2.fc17
--
You are receiving this mail
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=866495
--- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
vzctl-4.1-2.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 18.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/vzctl-4.1-2.fc18
--
You are receiving this mail
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=819951
Michel Alexandre Salim michel+...@sylvestre.me changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review?
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=876865
Terje Røsten terje...@phys.ntnu.no changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=876865
--- Comment #2 from Terje Røsten terje...@phys.ntnu.no ---
Some more:
* use %{version} in source url
* ctest don't seems to do anything useful, remove
* no need for %{_docdir}/%{name}-%{version} in %files
* app seems to ship
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=876645
--- Comment #6 from Pádraig Brady p...@draigbrady.com ---
I disagree re changelog. That should be consumer facing IMHO rather that
developer facing, so there is no point in documenting the changes captured here
in the changelog.
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=876645
--- Comment #7 from Pádraig Brady p...@draigbrady.com ---
Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~pbrady/python-fixtures/python-fixtures.spec
SRPM URL:
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=876645
Matthias Runge mru...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=857484
--- Comment #6 from Massimo Paladin massimo.pala...@gmail.com ---
Hello Tomas,
thank you very much for the review, sorry but I have been away for a couple of
weeks.
Regarding consistent macro usage I will change it.
Regarding
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=829809
--- Comment #12 from Matthias Runge mru...@redhat.com ---
Package Review
==
Key:
[x] = Pass
[!] = Fail
[-] = Not applicable
[?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
Issues:
===
[!]: Large documentation
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=876645
--- Comment #9 from Pádraig Brady p...@draigbrady.com ---
Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~pbrady/python-fixtures/python-fixtures.spec
SRPM URL:
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=871339
--- Comment #3 from Siddharth Sharma siddharth@gmail.com ---
(In reply to comment #2)
Package Review
==
Key:
[x] = Pass
[!] = Fail
[-] = Not applicable
[?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=877396
Bug ID: 877396
Summary: Review Request: HepMC - C++ Event Record for Monte
Carlo Generators
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=876069
--- Comment #4 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=877403
Bug ID: 877403
Summary: Review Request: svnkit - Pure Java Subversion client
library
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=876409
--- Comment #3 from Michal Ingeli m...@v3.sk ---
Blah, you are right (should have corrected myself after correcting myself).
Requires are only auto generated for install, not for build. Anyway, don't pull
pull in explicitly
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=873738
Ismael Olea ism...@olea.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||877403
--
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=877403
Ismael Olea ism...@olea.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||858578
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=877403
Mikolaj Izdebski mizde...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=876069
Bohuslav Slavek Kabrda bkab...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=877403
--- Comment #2 from Ismael Olea ism...@olea.org ---
It's online now.
O:-)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=877403
--- Comment #3 from Mikolaj Izdebski mizde...@redhat.com ---
You should clean it up a bit before submiting for review.
* rm -rf %{buildroot}
* %defattr
* fully versioned dependenncies
* comment sources
--
You are receiving this
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=871216
Kevin Kofler ke...@tigcc.ticalc.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=871216
--- Comment #16 from Kevin Kofler ke...@tigcc.ticalc.org ---
ExcludeArch: ppc ppc64
rings a big alarm bell for me. How about you fix your code to be
endianness-safe instead?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=877403
--- Comment #4 from Ismael Olea ism...@olea.org ---
It's a back to life package. I've changed/removed just the minimal I need for
OmegaT requirements but keeping the rest of the configuration for other needs
out of my scope, for
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=877403
--- Comment #5 from Mikolaj Izdebski mizde...@redhat.com ---
Let's take for example dependency of subpackage javahl.
Packaging guidelines [1] says When a subpackage requires the base package, it
MUST do so using a fully versioned
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=829809
--- Comment #13 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
SRPM:
http://fedorapeople.org/~limb/review/python-svg/python-svg-0.2.2b-2.fc17.src.rpm
SPEC: http://fedorapeople.org/~limb/review/python-svg/python-svg.spec
Addressed.
--
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=811661
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=811661
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
scirenderer-1.0.2-2.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 18.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/scirenderer-1.0.2-2.fc18
--
You are receiving
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=859795
--- Comment #20 from Steve Grubb sgr...@redhat.com ---
We have other file duplication finding utils, like fdupes.
I took a look in the code of duff and its simply using the sha package as a
library rather than the standalone
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=871216
--- Comment #17 from Gustav Gonzalez xting...@gmail.com ---
Don't worry, this weekend I will focus on the error related to the compilation
for ppc platforms. This fix requires some additional work but I will do it to
remove the
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=875299
--- Comment #4 from Fabian Affolter m...@fabian-affolter.ch ---
Thanks for your informal review.
(In reply to comment #2)
- In %setup you can use '%setup -q -n %{name}-%{version}'
Well, there is no benefit from using '-n
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=811661
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
scirenderer-1.0.2-2.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/scirenderer-1.0.2-2.fc17
--
You are receiving
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=846008
--- Comment #18 from Pierre-YvesChibon pin...@pingoured.fr ---
Ok so here are the final comments:
Package Review
==
Key:
[x] = Pass [!] = Fail [-] = Not applicable [?] = Not evaluated
= MUST items =
C/C++:
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=875893
Pierre-YvesChibon pin...@pingoured.fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=839056
--- Comment #5 from Pierre-YvesChibon pin...@pingoured.fr ---
Sorry for the (very) low reaction time.
I see upstream fixed the licensing issue, but your koji build has timed-out.
Could you please re-upload the spec file?
Thanks
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=875893
Ralph Bean rb...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=875893
--- Comment #4 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=859795
--- Comment #21 from Guillermo Gómez guillermo.go...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to comment #19)
(In reply to comment #18)
In general, there's no we as we control and decide which kind of package
comes in or not in Fedora. If
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=872958
Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=872958
--- Comment #4 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Summary name and SCM request name don't match.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=872958
Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=875893
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
python-cloud-sptheme-1.5-1.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-cloud-sptheme-1.5-1.fc17
--
You
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=875893
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=872958
Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=875893
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
python-cloud-sptheme-1.5-1.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 18.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-cloud-sptheme-1.5-1.fc18
--
You
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=875893
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
python-cloud-sptheme-1.5-1.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL
6.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-cloud-sptheme-1.5-1.el6
--
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=846008
--- Comment #19 from Christophe Burgun jo...@fedoraproject.org ---
I have change the spec as your recommendations
new urls :
SPEC: http://jouty.fedorapeople.org/dsqlite.spec
SRPM:
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=846008
--- Comment #20 from Pierre-YvesChibon pin...@pingoured.fr ---
There is still one thing:
%global debug_package %{nil}
The guideline says
If your D package contains static libraries, you must disable debuginfo
generation, by
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=872958
--- Comment #6 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=876069
--- Comment #5 from Miroslav Suchý msu...@redhat.com ---
Thanks. But may I kindly ask for builds for F17, F18 and EPEL as well?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=846008
--- Comment #21 from Christophe Burgun jo...@fedoraproject.org ---
new urls :
SPEC: http://jouty.fedorapeople.org/dsqlite.spec
SRPM: http://jouty.fedorapeople.org/dsqlite-1.0-4.src.rpm
--
You are receiving this mail because:
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=852174
Elad Alfassa el...@doom.co.il changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=852174
Elad Alfassa el...@doom.co.il changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=825557
--- Comment #15 from greg.helli...@gmail.com ---
I've renamed the packages and removed the boost and pthreads dependencies. The
library now builds a multi-threaded version.
Spec is at the same URL as above.
SRPM is at
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=861923
Lakshmi Narasimhan lakshminaras2...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=865976
--- Comment #5 from Alex G. mr.nuke...@gmail.com ---
GPLv2+ and BSD completely misses the GPLv3+, which is the resulting license
of the package. I can't help but imagine this might cause some confusion.
From the licensing
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=865976
--- Comment #6 from Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu ---
Depends on how each license is used in the combined work. It's the packager's
perrogative whether to list a simple aggregated license or to list them all (I
personally
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=852174
--- Comment #18 from Ondrej Kozina okoz...@redhat.com ---
New Package SCM Request
===
Package Name: snapper
Short Description: Tool for filesystem snapshot management
Owners: lvm-team okozina agk
Branches:
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=852174
Ondrej Kozina okoz...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=852174
--- Comment #19 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
lvm-team is not in the packager group.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=852174
--- Comment #20 from Alasdair Kergon a...@redhat.com ---
That's because it's not a 'person' and so cannot legally sign the agreement.
(Ref. spot.)
Nevertheless, it's the owner of our team's packages.
--
You are receiving this
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=852174
--- Comment #21 from Alasdair Kergon a...@redhat.com ---
(Background: I got lvm-team added to the package group some time ago, but spot
removed it citing the reason I gave.)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=852174
--- Comment #22 from Alasdair Kergon a...@redhat.com ---
(And the owner has to be set to the lvm-team alias so that that mailing list -
not any individual - owns the component in bugzilla.)
--
You are receiving this mail
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=825557
--- Comment #16 from Kalev Lember kalevlem...@gmail.com ---
Fedora review of mingw-clucene-2.3.3.4-3.fc17.src.rpm 2012-11-16
+ OK
! needs attention
rpmlint output:
$ rpmlint mingw-clucene-2.3.3.4-3.fc18.src.rpm \
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=852174
--- Comment #23 from Ondrej Kozina okoz...@redhat.com ---
(In reply to comment #19)
lvm-team is not in the packager group.
Please, could you be more specific (or any admin who would look into it) on why
'lvm-team' can't be set
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=852174
Ondrej Kozina okoz...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=852174
--- Comment #24 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=852174
Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=852174
--- Comment #26 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Unsetting flag
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=825557
--- Comment #17 from greg.helli...@gmail.com ---
I have addressed all of the above, I believe.
The patch did not originate with me, so I don't want to be responsible for
submitting it upstream. The rest of the problems which can
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=847389
--- Comment #6 from Major Hayden ma...@mhtx.net ---
Good catch. I missed that line in the rpmlint output about tabs/spaces.
http://majorhayden.com/RPMS/python-supernova/python-supernova-0.7.5-2.fc17.src.rpm
--
You are
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=825557
Kalev Lember kalevlem...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=825557
Kalev Lember kalevlem...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR) |
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=825557
--- Comment #20 from greg.helli...@gmail.com ---
I've put up a new -5 srpm as above along with an updated .spec file that uses
%{summary} in the binary packages.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=825557
greg.helli...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=876995
--- Comment #1 from Sandro Mani manisan...@gmail.com ---
I'll do an unofficial review since I'm not sponsored. Based on fedora-review
output.
Package Review
==
Key:
[x] = Pass
[!] = Fail
[-] = Not applicable
[?] =
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=825557
--- Comment #22 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=846008
Pierre-YvesChibon pin...@pingoured.fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=863571
Volker Fröhlich volke...@gmx.at changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=866183
Volker Fröhlich volke...@gmx.at changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=863571
--- Comment #32 from Erik Schilling ablu.erikschill...@googlemail.com ---
Hi :)
First thank you a lot for the review!
Now I made the directory listing a bit shorter/more flexible after Kevins
comment. I am not that familiar with
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=863571
--- Comment #33 from Kevin Kofler ke...@tigcc.ticalc.org ---
AFAIK, the way most people handle this is that they import the version that was
reviewed, then commit and push the fix and then do their first build.
--
You are
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=870631
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=870631
--- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
libnatspec-0.2.6-5.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 stable repository.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=811661
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=811661
--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
scirenderer-1.0.2-2.fc18 has been pushed to the Fedora 18 testing repository.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=876645
Eduardo Echeverria echevemas...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review?
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=842199
--- Comment #2 from Shawn Iwinski shawn.iwin...@gmail.com ---
Updated to upstream version 1.2.1 + several fixes
SPEC URL: http://siwinski.fedorapeople.org/rpmbuild/SPECS/php-Monolog.spec
SRPM URL:
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=842199
Shawn Iwinski shawn.iwin...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Review Request: php-monolog
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=876865
--- Comment #3 from Pete Travis m...@petetravis.com ---
(In reply to comment #1)
Some comments:
* I am confused by your release tag usage, why the rc prefix and why not
increase on update?
Please consult:
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=863571
Erik Schilling ablu.erikschill...@googlemail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=877607
Bug ID: 877607
Summary: Review Request: pythia8 - Pythia Event Generator for
High Energy Physics
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=877396
Mattias Ellert mattias.ell...@fysast.uu.se changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|
1 - 100 of 102 matches
Mail list logo
