https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1185582
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1185582
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
openambit-0.3-2.git5f2b784.fc21 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 21.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/openambit-0.3-2.git5f2b784.fc21
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1185019
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek zbys...@in.waw.pl changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1185019
Jerry James loganje...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1185020
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1185020
Jerry James loganje...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1185021
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1185020
Jerry James loganje...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||1185019
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1185021
Jerry James loganje...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||1185020
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=974756
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1186755
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=974756
--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
flatpack-4.0.0-2.fc21 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 21.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/flatpack-4.0.0-2.fc21
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1186755
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
dap2rpm-0.1.7-2.fc21 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 21.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/dap2rpm-0.1.7-2.fc21
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1171129
Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos nmavr...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1177009
--- Comment #13 from Steve Linabery slina...@redhat.com ---
jquery.js
-
The jquery.js file is a problem, because it is generated by sphinx. It's not in
the tarball.
When I build from the srpm locally, using mock against f20, I get
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1135465
Daniel Vrátil dvra...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1135465
Daniel Vrátil dvra...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|CURRENTRELEASE |RAWHIDE
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1135511
Daniel Vrátil dvra...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|CURRENTRELEASE |RAWHIDE
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1135528
Daniel Vrátil dvra...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1135470
Daniel Vrátil dvra...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|CURRENTRELEASE |RAWHIDE
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=974756
gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1186389
--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
python-mako1.0-1.0.1-2.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 6.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-mako1.0-1.0.1-2.el6
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1186389
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=855192
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=855192
--- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
felix-fileinstall-3.4.0-3.fc21 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 21.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/felix-fileinstall-3.4.0-3.fc21
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1135511
Daniel Vrátil dvra...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1135470
Daniel Vrátil dvra...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1175299
Daniel Vrátil dvra...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1175302
Bug 1175302 depends on bug 1175299, which changed state.
Bug 1175299 Summary: Review Request: libksysguard - KDE Frameworks 5 Tier 3
addon for process management
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1175299
What|Removed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1182958
Daniel Vrátil dvra...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1182962
Daniel Vrátil dvra...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1183001
Daniel Vrátil dvra...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=977017
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
dozer-5.5.1-1.fc21 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 21.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/dozer-5.5.1-1.fc21
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1171129
Mattias Ellert mattias.ell...@fysast.uu.se changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=977017
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1187224
Bug ID: 1187224
Summary: Review Request: python-backport_collections - Backport
of Python 2.7's collections module
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=974756
Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1186572
--- Comment #4 from Mamoru TASAKA mtas...@fedoraproject.org ---
https://mtasaka.fedorapeople.org/Review_request/gem-related/rubygem-rmagick-2.13.4-2.fc.src.rpm
https://mtasaka.fedorapeople.org/Review_request/gem-related/rubygem-rmagick.spec
*
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1171129
--- Comment #14 from Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos nmavr...@redhat.com ---
My updated spec and srpm. As far as I understand the only open issue is whether
obsoletes will provide version. I'll prefer not, but let me know if you insist
on having it.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1187030
Bug ID: 1187030
Summary: Review Request: giza - A scientific plotting library
for C/Fortran built on cairo
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1187030
--- Comment #1 from Joachim Frieben jfrie...@hotmail.com ---
Created attachment 985455
-- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=985455action=edit
Sample spec file from
https://build.opensuse.org/package/show/home:zhonghuaren/giza
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1186755
Tomas Radej tra...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1168333
Vít Ondruch vondr...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1187019
Referenced
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1168333
--- Comment #31 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
vagrant-libvirt-0.0.24-3.fc21 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 21.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/vagrant-libvirt-0.0.24-3.fc21
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1187030
--- Comment #2 from Joachim Frieben jfrie...@hotmail.com ---
Created attachment 985456
-- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=985456action=edit
Sample SRPM from https://build.opensuse.org/package/show/home:zhonghuaren/giza
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1148224
Michael Schwendt (Fedora Packager Sponsors Group) bugs.mich...@gmx.net
changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1186826
Matthias Runge mru...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1168333
--- Comment #33 from Michael Adam ma...@redhat.com ---
(In reply to James (purpleidea) from comment #30)
(In reply to Michael Adam from comment #29)
(In reply to James (purpleidea) from comment #27)
(In reply to Vít Ondruch from comment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1186346
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
golang-github-influxdb-hyperleveldb-go-0-0.1.gite24de94.fc21 has been submitted
as an update for Fedora 21.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1168333
--- Comment #32 from Vít Ondruch vondr...@redhat.com ---
If you are interested in the polkit issue, please continue discussion in bug
1187019.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1168333
--- Comment #34 from James (purpleidea) jshu...@redhat.com ---
(In reply to Vít Ondruch from comment #32)
If you are interested in the polkit issue, please continue discussion in bug
1187019.
Awesome! And thanks for work on the packaging
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1186346
--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
golang-github-influxdb-hyperleveldb-go-0-0.1.gite24de94.fc20 has been submitted
as an update for Fedora 20.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1186345
--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
golang-github-influxdb-rocksdb-0-0.1.git7adff3e.fc20 has been submitted as an
update for Fedora 20.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1186345
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1186346
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1186345
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
golang-github-influxdb-rocksdb-0-0.1.git7adff3e.fc21 has been submitted as an
update for Fedora 21.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1187082
Samuel Gyger gy...@fsfe.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1162234
--- Comment #11 from Michael Schwendt (Fedora Packager Sponsors Group)
bugs.mich...@gmx.net ---
SRPM/Spec download links are not working currently:
Error 524 Ray ID: 1b0478f441c31497
A timeout occurred
Consider requesting fedorapeople
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=977017
Michael Simacek msima...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1096807
Vasiliy Glazov vasc...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vasc...@gmail.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=855192
Michael Simacek msima...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1182761
Golo Fuchert packa...@golotop.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|packa...@golotop.de
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1182761
Golo Fuchert packa...@golotop.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1142407
Matěj Chalk mch...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1182761
--- Comment #3 from MartinKG mgans...@alice.de ---
(In reply to Golo Fuchert from comment #2)
Is there any particular reason why the package is not called
vdr-plugin-weatherforecast? That would allow to use the %{name} macro in a
more
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1186572
--- Comment #2 from Mamoru TASAKA mtas...@fedoraproject.org ---
Well,
(In reply to František Dvořák from comment #1)
Interesting package with many tricks, and it looks good (exact launch of the
tests, package rename, ...).
Issues to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1187082
Bug ID: 1187082
Summary: Review Request: python-slowaes - An Implementation of
AES in python
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1162234
--- Comment #12 from Giuseppe Paterno' gpate...@gpaterno.com ---
I asked for space in the fedoraproject.
I had a DDoS on the server, now should be up.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1187084
Samuel Gyger gy...@fsfe.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1187082
Samuel Gyger gy...@fsfe.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1187084
Referenced
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1187084
Bug ID: 1187084
Summary: Review Request: electrum - a lightweight Bitcoin
client
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity: medium
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=855192
gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=977017
gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1182761
Golo Fuchert packa...@golotop.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||packa...@golotop.de
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=866273
Michael Simacek msima...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1186572
--- Comment #3 from František Dvořák val...@civ.zcu.cz ---
(In reply to Mamoru TASAKA from comment #2)
- %define is considered less predictable than %global (although I don't
understand the details)
- For parametrized macro, %define
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1187175
Bug ID: 1187175
Summary: Review Request: perl-Cwd-utf8 - Fully UTF-8 aware Cwd
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity: medium
Priority: medium
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1186572
--- Comment #1 from František Dvořák val...@civ.zcu.cz ---
Interesting package with many tricks, and it looks good (exact launch of the
tests, package rename, ...).
Issues to consider:
1) %global should be preferred over %define
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1184040
Vojtech Trefny vtre...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1186889
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek zbys...@in.waw.pl changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=974756
--- Comment #10 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1187232
Bug ID: 1187232
Summary: Review Request: perl-inc-latest - Use modules bundled
in inc/ if they are newer than installed ones
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1187232
Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1184830
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1187175
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1180497
Referenced
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1187170
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1180497
Referenced
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=974756
--- Comment #4 from Michael Simacek msima...@redhat.com ---
It would be better to remove the site directories from the SRPM.
%pom_xpath_replace -r jexcelapi:jxl net.sourceforge.jexcelapi:jxl::provided
I think you wanted to use
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=974756
--- Comment #2 from Michael Simacek msima...@redhat.com ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
Issues:
===
- there are some logos in site
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1162234
--- Comment #13 from Giuseppe Paterno' gpate...@gpaterno.com ---
New location of SPEC/SRPM, thanks to fedorapeople.org:
SPEC: https://gpaterno.fedorapeople.org/nss-securepass.spec
SRPM:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=974756
--- Comment #3 from gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it ---
Spec URL: http://gil.fedorapeople.org/flatpack.spec
SRPM URL: http://gil.fedorapeople.org/flatpack-4.0.0-2.fc20.src.rpm
- remove logos in site directories
- fix installation of main
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1187170
Bug ID: 1187170
Summary: Review Request: perl-File-Find-utf8 - Fully UTF-8
aware File::Find
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=974756
--- Comment #5 from gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it ---
(In reply to Michael Simacek from comment #4)
It would be better to remove the site directories from the SRPM.
%pom_xpath_replace -r jexcelapi:jxl
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1186964
b...@redhat.com b...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1185019
--- Comment #3 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek zbys...@in.waw.pl ---
(In reply to Jerry James from comment #2)
Thank you for taking this review.
(In reply to Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek from comment #1)
1. gzip --best is slow, and not
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1185019
--- Comment #5 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek zbys...@in.waw.pl ---
Actually:
ls -1 data/*.tom | parallel --no-notice -j12 gzip --best
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1185019
--- Comment #4 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek zbys...@in.waw.pl ---
Actually parallel might be a better option:
ls data/*.tom | parallel gzip --best
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1185019
--- Comment #1 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek zbys...@in.waw.pl ---
Package is nice and clean. But compression could be improved.
1. gzip --best is slow, and not very efficient. Would it be possible to switch
to xz?
$ ls -1s tms13.tom*
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1185019
--- Comment #2 from Jerry James loganje...@gmail.com ---
Thank you for taking this review.
(In reply to Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek from comment #1)
1. gzip --best is slow, and not very efficient. Would it be possible to
switch to xz?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1135528
Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|i...@cicku.me
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1135528
Daniel Vrátil dvra...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=855192
Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1171129
--- Comment #16 from Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos nmavr...@redhat.com ---
(In reply to Mattias Ellert from comment #15)
It is mostly OK. But...
Obsoleting a package that continues to exist in the destribution is a
packaging bug. (See today's
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=855192
--- Comment #13 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
1 - 100 of 224 matches
Mail list logo
