https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1063060
--- Comment #3 from Vít Ondruch vondr...@redhat.com ---
* .spec file naming.
- Please remove the version from the .spec file name, since per
guidelines [1], the .spec file naming should be %{name}.spec
* test suite
- Please execute
+ follows fonts packaging guidelines.
+ fontconfig file is present at priority 65.
+ Appdata metainfo file is present.
Suggestions:
1) I propose to follow
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:NamingGuidelines#Pre-Release_packages
with following changes
%global checkout 20150430
Release
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532231
Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also|
/Packaging:NamingGuidelines#Pre-Release_packages
with following changes
%global checkout 20150430
Release:0.2.%{checkout}%{?dist}
also add changelog that uses 5.01-0.2.20150430
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532816
Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1210753
--- Comment #14 from Daniel Kopeček dkope...@redhat.com ---
(In reply to Michael Schwendt (Fedora Packager Sponsors Group) from comment
#13)
It's already packaged and submitted.
I've given feedback during its updates-testing period, which
/Packaging:NamingGuidelines#Pre-Release_packages
with following changes
%global checkout 20150430
Release:0.2.%{checkout}%{?dist}
also add changelog that uses 7.45-0.2.20150430
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1210753
--- Comment #17 from Michael Schwendt (Fedora Packager Sponsors Group)
bugs.mich...@gmx.net ---
Even if a bit unclean, you could omit the Obsoletes tag, since no build has
been released yet, and this is a new package. The F22 update is on its
20150430
Release:0.2.%{checkout}%{?dist}
also add changelog that uses 5.03-0.2.20150430
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1210753
Michael Schwendt (Fedora Packager Sponsors Group) bugs.mich...@gmx.net
changed:
What|Removed |Added
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1210753
--- Comment #18 from Daniel Kopeček dkope...@redhat.com ---
Ah, ok great. Will do that for the json package too. Thanks!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1215071
--- Comment #1 from gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it ---
Spec URL: https://gil.fedorapeople.org/querydsl.spec
SRPM URL: https://gil.fedorapeople.org/querydsl-3.6.3-1.fc20.src.rpm
- update to 3.6.3
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1063060
Vít Ondruch vondr...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vondr...@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1063060
Vít Ondruch vondr...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1210753
Daniel Kopeček dkope...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=804125
--- Comment #34 from Gianluca Sforna gia...@gmail.com ---
Updated spec and srpm:
http://giallu.fedorapeople.org/rdkit-2015.03.1-1.fc21.src.rpm
http://giallu.fedorapeople.org/rdkit.spec
Added the ?_isa bit on subpackages, will fix the python
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1208833
--- Comment #4 from Alexander Ploumistos alex.ploumis...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to Parag AN(पराग) from comment #2)
1) Please package per family only and corresponding fontconfig file for that
font. Drop Nilus* and Gardiner* files,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1210753
--- Comment #19 from Daniel Kopeček dkope...@redhat.com ---
diff --git a/spdlog.spec b/spdlog.spec
index 56095e1..f7a48ec 100644
--- a/spdlog.spec
+++ b/spdlog.spec
@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@
Name: spdlog
Version:0
-Release:
changes
%global checkout 20150430
Release:0.2.%{checkout}%{?dist}
a) Why is the leading zero necessary?
b) Is it OK to use the date on which I downloaded the font as opposed to the
date on which it was updated?
The reason why I am not considering 7.15 as version is that it can
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1215807
--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
umockdev-0.8.8-3.fc22 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 22.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/umockdev-0.8.8-3.fc22
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1215807
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1209971
Bug 1209971 depends on bug 1210753, which changed state.
Bug 1210753 Summary: Review Request: spdlog - Super fast C++ logging library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1210753
What|Removed |Added
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1210753
Daniel Kopeček dkope...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1210969
--- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
python-munch-2.0.2-2.fc20 has been pushed to the Fedora 20 stable repository.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1199298
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|liblas-1.8.0-3.fc22
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1209971
Petr Lautrbach plaut...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review+
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1209971
Daniel Kopeček dkope...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1211362
Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1208833
--- Comment #5 from Alexander Ploumistos alex.ploumis...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to Alexander Ploumistos from comment #4)
Is there a way to let users know that they might be interested in the other
two (not yet created) packages, that works
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1210969
--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
python-munch-2.0.2-2.fc22 has been pushed to the Fedora 22 stable repository.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1210969
--- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
python-munch-2.0.2-2.fc21 has been pushed to the Fedora 21 stable repository.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1211362
--- Comment #26 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459979
Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||limburg...@gmail.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1173625
--- Comment #4 from Symeon Huang hzwhu...@gmail.com ---
I've addressed the issues you mentioned. Please kindly check updated spec file
and source RPM package.
http://file.librehat.com/fcitx-qt5.spec
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1199298
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1199296
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1177453
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|jxmpp-0.4.1-1.fc22
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1199296
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|laszip-2.2.0-4.fc22
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1217276
--- Comment #2 from Simon A. Erat erat.si...@gmail.com ---
Some changes for better review:
Spec URL: http://sea.fedorapeople.org/review/tui/tui.spec
SRPM URL: http://sea.fedorapeople.org/review/tui/tui-0.7.6-1.fc22.src.rpm
rpmlint-src:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1063060
Nitesh Narayan Lal niteshnarayanlal...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1209971
Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1209971
--- Comment #22 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1208833
--- Comment #6 from Alexander Ploumistos alex.ploumis...@gmail.com ---
Updated files:
https://alexpl.fedorapeople.org/packages/fonts/gdouros/gdouros-aegyptus-fonts/gdouros-aegyptus-fonts.spec
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1208835
--- Comment #4 from Alexander Ploumistos alex.ploumis...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to Alexander Ploumistos from comment #3)
a) Why is the leading zero necessary?
Never mind, I figured it out, I was looking at the wrong versioning example.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1208842
--- Comment #20 from Alexander Ploumistos alex.ploumis...@gmail.com ---
I have brought all the packages over to the naming scheme you suggested,
changed cp to cp -p (can't believe I had missed that) in all %prep sections
and I have added the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1211362
--- Comment #30 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
wildmagic5-5.13-9.el7 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 7.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/wildmagic5-5.13-9.el7
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1211362
--- Comment #27 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
wildmagic5-5.13-9.fc22 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 22.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/wildmagic5-5.13-9.fc22
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1208838
--- Comment #3 from Alexander Ploumistos alex.ploumis...@gmail.com ---
Updated files:
https://alexpl.fedorapeople.org/packages/fonts/gdouros/gdouros-alexander-fonts/gdouros-alexander-fonts.spec
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1208833
--- Comment #7 from Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to Alexander Ploumistos from comment #4)
(In reply to Parag AN(पराग) from comment #2)
1) Please package per family only and corresponding fontconfig file for that
font.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1173625
--- Comment #5 from Robin Lee robinlee.s...@gmail.com ---
Changes:
- Update to 1.0.2
- License tag revised
- BR: libxkbcommon-devel
Spec URL: http://cheeselee.fedorapeople.org/fcitx-qt5.spec
SRPM URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1208830
--- Comment #4 from Alexander Ploumistos alex.ploumis...@gmail.com ---
Updated files:
https://alexpl.fedorapeople.org/packages/fonts/gdouros/gdouros-aegean-fonts/gdouros-aegean-fonts.spec
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1211362
--- Comment #28 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
wildmagic5-5.13-9.fc21 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 21.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/wildmagic5-5.13-9.fc21
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1211362
--- Comment #29 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
wildmagic5-5.13-9.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 6.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/wildmagic5-5.13-9.el6
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1211362
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1015868
Yajo yajo@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(yajo@gmail.co |
|m)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1208840
--- Comment #2 from Alexander Ploumistos alex.ploumis...@gmail.com ---
Updated files:
https://alexpl.fedorapeople.org/packages/fonts/gdouros/gdouros-musica-fonts/gdouros-musica-fonts.spec
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1091657
Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ke...@scrye.com
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1217196
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1078368
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|js-jquery-2.1.3-1.el6
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1078371
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|js-jquery-2.1.3-1.el6
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1015868
Raphael Groner projects...@smart.ms changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|tchollingswo...@gmail.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1078368
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1078371
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1208582
--- Comment #4 from Mohammed Isam mohammed_isam1...@yahoo.com ---
BUILD/ licensecheck.txt review.txt srpm-unpacked/
build.log report.xml rpmlint.txtupstream/
dependencies/ results/
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1211362
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1208582
--- Comment #3 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek zbys...@in.waw.pl ---
Just download the files from comment #c1, and run fedora-review -n trojita.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1173625
--- Comment #6 from Antti Järvinen antti.jarvi...@katiska.org ---
Very well. Those problem-items I identified have indeed been fixed in latest
version. I'm still not member of packagers group so I can set this
review-request as passed but I
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1208582
--- Comment #5 from Mohammed Isam mohammed_isam1...@yahoo.com ---
(In reply to Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek from comment #3)
Just download the files from comment #c1, and run fedora-review -n trojita.
thanx for the tip!
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426251
Jiri Kastner jkast...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jkast...@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1208582
--- Comment #6 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek zbys...@in.waw.pl ---
(In reply to Mohammed Isam from comment #4)
This is a review *template*. Besides handling the [ ]-marked tests you are
also supposed to fix the template before pasting
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1206737
--- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
python-crypto2.1-2.1.0-4.el6, python-paramiko1.10-1.10.1-2.el6 has been
submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 6.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1206737
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
is better 7.13-0.2.20150430 that will say that packaged font archive is
downloaded on 20150430 date and inside font information say 7.13 as also
archive tarball is not versioned and there is no information in other
supporting text files in that tarball.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1208833
--- Comment #8 from Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to Alexander Ploumistos from comment #5)
(In reply to Alexander Ploumistos from comment #4)
Is there a way to let users know that they might be interested in the other
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1173625
--- Comment #7 from Robin Lee robinlee.s...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to Antti Järvinen from comment #6)
Very well. Those problem-items I identified have indeed been fixed in latest
version. I'm still not member of packagers group so I can set
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1215762
Raphael Groner projects...@smart.ms changed:
What|Removed |Added
Whiteboard|BuildFails |
--- Comment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1208582
Raphael Groner projects...@smart.ms changed:
What|Removed |Added
Whiteboard||NotReady
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1208582
--- Comment #8 from Raphael Groner projects...@smart.ms ---
New upload.
SPEC https://raphgro.fedorapeople.org/review/qt/trojita/trojita.spec
SRPM
https://raphgro.fedorapeople.org/review/qt/trojita/trojita-0.5-4.fc22.src.rpm
test builds:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1215762
--- Comment #28 from gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
Issues:
===
- POM files have correct Maven
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1215762
--- Comment #29 from gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it ---
ISSUES:
[?]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
py4j-9a8ab938b4024af8f0455edb54f80fdb5195968b/py4j-java/src/py4j/Base64.java
[!]: Uses parallel make
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1215762
--- Comment #26 from gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it ---
And another thing, please, increase the Release number when make changes in the
spec file
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1215762
--- Comment #25 from gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it ---
Please, add reference for the correct src rpm
build still fails with py4j-0.9-0.1.pre.20141101git9a8ab93.fc21.src.rpm
Task info:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=676129
--- Comment #44 from Ivan Romanov dr...@land.ru ---
Package Change Request
===
Package Name: qconf
Owners: ivanromanov
New Branches: epel7
InitialCC: ivanromanov
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1215762
--- Comment #30 from gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it ---
Forgotten
invalid-url URL: https://py4j.sf.net urlopen error [Errno 111] Connection
refused
Please, use http://py4j.sourceforge.net/
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=676129
Ivan Romanov dr...@land.ru changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs?
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1215762
--- Comment #27 from Raphael Groner projects...@smart.ms ---
Sorry, I moved my builder to fc22.
SPEC https://raphgro.fedorapeople.org/review/py/py4j/py4j.spec
SRPM
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529323
Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1208582
Mohammed Isam mohammed_isam1...@yahoo.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1208839
--- Comment #2 from Alexander Ploumistos alex.ploumis...@gmail.com ---
Updated files:
https://alexpl.fedorapeople.org/packages/fonts/gdouros/gdouros-analecta-fonts/gdouros-analecta-fonts.spec
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1209974
Bug 1209974 depends on bug 1209971, which changed state.
Bug 1209971 Summary: Review Request: usbguard - A tool for implementing USB
device usage policy
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1209971
What|Removed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1209971
Daniel Kopeček dkope...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1208830
Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530190
Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1208833
Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1217563
Bug ID: 1217563
Summary: Review Request: bonecp - JDBC Connection Pool
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity: medium
Priority: medium
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1091657
--- Comment #4 from Orion Poplawski or...@cora.nwra.com ---
I'm really hoping Slavek takes this over as he's been driving this lately.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about
96 matches
Mail list logo
