https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1290513
--- Comment #30 from Jiri Konecny ---
Thank you very much Zbigniew.
I'm going to finish the reviews now, to spread the good news :).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1268716
--- Comment #47 from Stuart D Gathman ---
For EPEL, I am just requiring nacl-devel. The nacl SRPM from rawhide built
just fine for EPEL.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1268716
--- Comment #46 from Stuart D Gathman ---
Messed up the SRPM url:
Spec URL: http://gathman.org/linux/SPECS/cjdns.spec
SRPM URL: http://gathman.org/linux/f22/src/cjdns-17.3-7.fc22.src.rpm
I think I addressed all the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1284638
--- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System ---
bugyou-0.1-1.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 stable repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1284638
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1268716
--- Comment #45 from Stuart D Gathman ---
Not ready for another review yet, testing
- Add explicit systemd dependency
- Add selinux-policy-targeted dependency
- Add version to main package dependencies
- Remove use of
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1312408
--- Comment #2 from Jerry James ---
(In reply to Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek from comment #1)
> The description is unclear: is it classes for writing unit tests? Can you
> reword the description so it unambiguous what
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1305658
Jerry James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1284638
--- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System ---
bugyou-0.2-1.fc22 has been pushed to the Fedora 22 testing repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1309782
--- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System ---
bugyou_plugins-0.1-2.fc22 has been pushed to the Fedora 22 testing repository.
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1268716
--- Comment #44 from Stuart D Gathman ---
The chroot flag is a false positive:
void Security_chroot(char* root, struct Except* eh)
{
if (chdir(root)) {
Except_throw(eh, "chdir(%s) -> [%s]", root,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1284638
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1309782
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1269792
--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System ---
golang-github-shiena-ansicolor-0-0.1.gitd445752.fc23 has been pushed to the
Fedora 23 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it
in this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1269792
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|RAWHIDE
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1306571
--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System ---
python-flask-multistatic-1.0-1.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1306571
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1290513
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|POST
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1274742
--- Comment #3 from Tom Hughes ---
Spec file does not match the one in the srpm.
The BR on mocha seems to be unnecessary, but it does need BRs on:
npm(code-point-at)
npm(is-fullwidth-code-point)
npm(strip-ansi)
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1274742
Tom Hughes changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1313477
François Cami changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ktdre...@ktdreyer.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1308354
--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System ---
erlang-hamcrest-0.1.0-2.fc23 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 23.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-ee6c679b3c
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1202063
--- Comment #18 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek ---
?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1275438
--- Comment #9 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek ---
?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1244658
--- Comment #5 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek ---
?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1310796
--- Comment #5 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek ---
Still fails in mock, same error as above. I'm using fedora-rawhide-i386 mock.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1298665
--- Comment #12 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
alexva's scratch build of libvma-7.0.14-1.fc24.src.rpm for rawhide failed
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=13191401
--
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1297514
--- Comment #10 from Orion Poplawski ---
Spec URL: http://www.cora.nwra.com/~orion/fedora/python3-numpy.spec
SRPM URL:
http://www.cora.nwra.com/~orion/fedora/python3-numpy-1.10.4-4.el7.src.rpm
%changelog
* Tue Mar 1 2016
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1083962
--- Comment #22 from Oden Eriksson ---
No, I didn't try to build it until now. I was unable to install rawhide so used
f23, but I get:
cd /home/oden/RPM/BUILD/MaxScale-1.3.0/server/core && /usr/bin/cmake -E
cmake_link_script
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1305154
Boris Ranto changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bra...@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1268716
--- Comment #43 from Jared Smith ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
Issues: ===
- Package contains BR:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1313477
François Cami changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review?
--
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1310796
--- Comment #4 from Matthew Barnes ---
Updated the spec and srpm. The tests now pass in F-23 mock for me.
diff --git a/python-etcd.spec b/python-etcd.spec
index 176e270..23f04f8 100644
--- a/python-etcd.spec
+++
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1313477
François Cami changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|f...@fcami.net
--
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1313477
Bug ID: 1313477
Summary: Review Request: ceph-ansible - Ansible playbooks for
Ceph
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity: medium
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1298665
--- Comment #11 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
alexva's scratch build of libvma-7.0.14-1.fc24.src.rpm for rawhide failed
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=13190047
--
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1305154
--- Comment #4 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
ktdreyer's scratch build of python-notario-0.0.11-1.fc25.src.rpm for rawhide
completed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1305154
--- Comment #3 from Ken Dreyer ---
New version:
* Tue Mar 01 2016 Ken Dreyer - 0.0.11-1
- Update to latest upstream release
- Drop older python macros.
Spec URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1309782
--- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System ---
bugyou_plugins-0.1-2.fc23 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 23.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-b29969f0fd
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1309782
--- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System ---
bugyou_plugins-0.1-2.fc22 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 22.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-6482409f6e
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1309782
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1309782
--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System ---
bugyou_plugins-0.1-2.el7 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 7.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2016-049e8bb10b
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1289970
--- Comment #11 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek ---
I think packaging openstackdocstheme would be the way forward. After all,
staying on an old version of openstacksdk is not attractive.
Commit
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1289970
--- Comment #10 from Javier Peña ---
(In reply to Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek from comment #9)
> You don't need to repeat the Summary text. After the first instance you can
> refer the the previous one with %{summary}. And
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1290199
Antonio Trande changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1268716
--- Comment #42 from Stuart D Gathman ---
Both links are now valid. :-)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1311152
Jared Smith changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1312654
Jared Smith changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1274742
Bug 1274742 depends on bug 1312654, which changed state.
Bug 1312654 Summary: Review Request: nodejs-is-fullwidth-code-point - Check if
given Unicode code point is fullwidth
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1312654
What
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1083962
--- Comment #21 from Honza Horak ---
Does it build fine for you in koji/mock? Because it does not for me:
In rawhide I see this error: "Could not find liblzma"
In f23 I see this error instead:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1268716
--- Comment #41 from Jared Smith ---
And, of course, I messed up the link for the SRPM file :-(
Let's try this again:
Spec URL: http://gathman.org/linux/SPECS/cjdns.spec
SRPM URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1268716
--- Comment #40 from Jared Smith ---
When doing package reviews, it's customary to provide links to the spec file
and SRPM again in the following format, so that the fedora-review tool can find
them:
Spec URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1310092
--- Comment #13 from Ralf Senderek ---
To resolve the postfix issue, I changed the requirement to MTA.
On a system without an MTA installed the default "exim" will be installed
alongside the cryptobone package.
If postfix
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1310092
--- Comment #12 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
senderek's scratch build of cryptobone-1.0.1-4.fc23.src.rpm for f23 completed
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=13188782
--
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1309795
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1309795
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System ---
qr_mumps-1.2-2.fc23 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 23.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-0f30aedb60
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1313155
Patrick Uiterwijk changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1313157
Patrick Uiterwijk changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1313159
Patrick Uiterwijk changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1284638
--- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System ---
bugyou-0.2-1.fc23 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 23.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-cf1bc9bfd0
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1284638
--- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System ---
bugyou-0.2-1.fc22 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 22.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-0d09777334
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1284638
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1284638
--- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System ---
bugyou-0.2-1.el7 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 7.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2016-e53437451e
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1306258
Charalampos Stratakis changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|RAWHIDE
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1306258
Charalampos Stratakis changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1298665
--- Comment #10 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
alexva's scratch build of libvma-7.0.14-1.fc24.src.rpm for rawhide failed
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=13187585
--
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1312939
--- Comment #9 from Remi Collet ---
as bug #1313018 is i386 only, enable the test suite (x86_64 only)
https://github.com/remicollet/remirepo/commit/0d34bb45f7a52f1ebd59230e249b2fcd8b41f400
Spec:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1312939
--- Comment #8 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
remi's scratch build of mongo-c-driver-1.3.3-2.remi.src.rpm for rawhide
completed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=13187254
68 matches
Mail list logo