https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1372938
--- Comment #4 from Christopher Atherton ---
Actually we need libdrm version of at least 2.4.63 ...
New Spec: https://cjatherton.fedorapeople.org/xorg-x11-drv-amdgpu.spec (same)
New SRPM:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1372938
--- Comment #3 from Christopher Atherton ---
Thanks for the help!
Fixes applied here ...
New Spec: https://cjatherton.fedorapeople.org/xorg-x11-drv-amdgpu.spec (same)
New SRPM:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1372938
--- Comment #2 from Neal Gompa ---
First pass comments:
* "s390s" is not a valid architecture, as far as I know. Shouldn't it be
"s390x"?
* Is there a URL and a URL path for the Source? URL-less sources are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1372938
Neal Gompa changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ngomp...@gmail.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1372938
Bug ID: 1372938
Summary: Review Request: xorg-x11-drv-amdgpu - X.Org X11 amdgpu
video driver
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1361340
--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System ---
python-fadvise-5.0.0-1.fc25 has been pushed to the Fedora 25 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1229903
--- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System ---
NetworkManager-sstp-1.2.0-1.fc25 has been pushed to the Fedora 25 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1361340
--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System ---
python-fadvise-5.0.0-1.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1229903
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1361340
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1372866
--- Comment #16 from Jason Taylor ---
here is the latest scratch build (successful)
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=15490876
I believe the directory ownership is corrected as well.
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1366881
--- Comment #27 from Fedora Update System ---
ispc-1.9.1-7.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 stable repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1372866
--- Comment #15 from gil cattaneo ---
directory /usr/include/hs/ is still unowned.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1372866
--- Comment #14 from gil cattaneo ---
(In reply to Jason Taylor from comment #13)
> Hi gil/ralf thank you for the feedback. Working through a your comments. I
> am
> reviewing the comment from ralf:
>
> Remove these 2
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1372866
--- Comment #13 from Jason Taylor ---
Hi gil/ralf thank you for the feedback. Working through a your comments. I am
reviewing the comment from ralf:
Remove these 2 lines from your spec:
export CFLAGS="$RPM_OPT_FLAGS
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1268758
--- Comment #2 from Ilya Gradina ---
New Spec:
https://github.com/ilgrad/fedora-packages/raw/master/rubygems/rubygem-rubocop.spec
New SRPM:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1372918
Ilya Gradina changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1372926
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1372926
Ilya Gradina changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||1372918
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1372926
Ilya Gradina changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1268758
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1268758
Ilya Gradina changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||1372926
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1372926
Bug ID: 1372926
Summary: Review Request: rubygem-ruby-progressbar -
Ruby/ProgressBar is a flexible text progress bar
library for Ruby
Product: Fedora
Version:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1372918
Bug ID: 1372918
Summary: Review Request: rubygem-rspectacular -RSpec Support
And Matchers
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1372866
--- Comment #12 from gil cattaneo ---
Created attachment 1197506
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1197506=edit
spec file
Build fails. Task info:Task info:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1268703
--- Comment #1 from Ilya Gradina ---
New SPEC:
https://github.com/ilgrad/fedora-packages/raw/master/rubygems/rubygem-powerpack.spec
New SRPM:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1372866
--- Comment #11 from gil cattaneo ---
Sorry, mkdir -p %{buildroot}%{_libdir} what is it? Please, remove
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1268703
Ilya Gradina changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1268758
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1268758
Ilya Gradina changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||1268703
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1268745
--- Comment #1 from Ilya Gradina ---
New Spec:
https://github.com/ilgrad/fedora-packages/raw/master/rubygems/rubygem-parser.spec
New SRPM:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1372429
--- Comment #7 from gil cattaneo ---
Thanks for the review!
create new SCM request/s:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/requests/7647
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/requests/7648
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1372429
Jason Taylor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1372429
--- Comment #6 from gil cattaneo ---
(In reply to Jason Taylor from comment #5)
> Looks good then, I see you opened a couple of tickets with upstream
> regarding the misc licensing fixes.
>
> Must and Should components
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1268744
--- Comment #1 from Ilya Gradina ---
New Spec:
https://github.com/ilgrad/fedora-packages/raw/master/rubygems/rubygem-ast.spec
New SRPM:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1372429
Jason Taylor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1268742
--- Comment #1 from Ilya Gradina ---
New Spec:
https://github.com/ilgrad/fedora-packages/raw/master/rubygems/rubygem-bacon-colored_output.spec
New SRPM:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1352408
--- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System ---
lasem-0.4.3-4.fc25 has been pushed to the Fedora 25 stable repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1372866
--- Comment #10 from gil cattaneo ---
Build fails. Task info:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=15485494
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1126983
Christoph Junghans changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1372403
Christoph Junghans changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1367699
Julien Enselme changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Review Request: |Review Request:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1264546
--- Comment #67 from Paulo Andrade
---
Hi Gustavo,
About the changelog, feel free to to how you think is
better.
For now there isn't much logs in the changelog, but if
you kept that way, soon
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1372866
--- Comment #9 from gil cattaneo ---
(In reply to Ralf Corsepius from comment #8)
> MUSTFIXES:
>
> - Package does not honor RPM_OPT_FLAGS:
> Your spec appends Fedora incompatible compilation flags to CFLAGS/CXXFLAGS.
>
>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1372429
--- Comment #4 from gil cattaneo ---
(In reply to Jason Taylor from comment #1)
> Hi gil,
>
> looks like Source0 could be updated to
>
> https://github.com/jboss/%{name}/archive/%{name}-%{namedversion}.tar.gz
for me
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1372429
--- Comment #3 from gil cattaneo ---
(In reply to Jason Taylor from comment #2)
> I don't see a line installing the pom.xml. According to
> https://fedorahosted.org/released/javapackages/doc/ it looks like there
> should
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1372403
Igor Gnatenko changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|POST
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1307271
--- Comment #10 from Diogo Melo ---
Hi Giovanni. Thank you for the review. I'm looking into it. I will get back as
soon as possible.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1372403
--- Comment #5 from Christoph Junghans ---
(In reply to Igor Gnatenko from comment #4)
> (In reply to Christoph Junghans from comment #3)
> > (In reply to Igor Gnatenko from comment #1)
> > > > %global debug_package
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1336552
--- Comment #7 from Christoph Junghans ---
(In reply to Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski from comment #6)
> The spec file URL stays the same, but the SRPM should be different due to
> bumped Release field.
Done
New SPRM
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1368790
--- Comment #11 from Giovanni ---
Updates: upgrade of version for sake of README consistency
SRPM:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1367569
--- Comment #12 from Giovanni ---
Hi there.
I did a version bump of this package, which has basically the only purpose of
having the README files in sync between upstream and the new spec.
There is no other change
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1361942
Rex Dieter changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1361941
Rex Dieter changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1361940
Rex Dieter changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1268745
Ilya Gradina changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1268758
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1268758
Ilya Gradina changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||1268745
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1372893
Igor Gnatenko changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1372894
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1372892
Igor Gnatenko changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1372893
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1372893
Igor Gnatenko changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||1372889
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1372889
Igor Gnatenko changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1372893
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1372893
Bug ID: 1372893
Summary: Review Request: python-parquet - Python implementation
of the Parquet file format
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1372892
Igor Gnatenko changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||1372890
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1372892
Bug ID: 1372892
Summary: Review Request: python-backports-csv - Backport of
Python 3's csv module for Python 2
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1367699
--- Comment #5 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek ---
Yeah, that sounds good.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1336552
--- Comment #6 from Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski ---
The spec file URL stays the same, but the SRPM should be different due to
bumped Release field.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1336552
--- Comment #5 from Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski ---
After each change during review process, you should increase the Release:
field, describe the changes in %changelog and post a new set of URLs for the
spec file
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1372888
Igor Gnatenko changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||1372886, 1372887
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1372888
Igor Gnatenko changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1372889
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1372889
Igor Gnatenko changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||1372888
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1372889
Bug ID: 1372889
Summary: Review Request: python-thriftpy - Pure Python
implementation of Apache Thrift
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1372454
Daniel Walsh changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dwa...@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1372888
Bug ID: 1372888
Summary: Review Request: python-toro - Synchronization
primitives for Tornado coroutines
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1372888
Igor Gnatenko changed:
What|Removed |Added
Alias||python-toro
--
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1372881
Bug ID: 1372881
Summary: Review Request: nodejs-stream-shift - Returns the next
buffer/object in a stream's readable queue
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1372881
--- Comment #1 from Parag Nemade ---
This package built on koji:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=15479773
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1372403
--- Comment #4 from Igor Gnatenko ---
(In reply to Christoph Junghans from comment #3)
> (In reply to Igor Gnatenko from comment #1)
> > > %global debug_package %{nil}
> > BuildArch: noarch
> Was already there!
No, spec
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1308985
Igor Gnatenko changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
75 matches
Mail list logo