https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1668387
--- Comment #7 from Neal Gompa ---
(In reply to Orion Poplawski from comment #6)
> Neal - any progress here?
I'm waiting to resolve bug 1666293. Once that's done, I can process the rest of
it.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1689486
--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System ---
python-numcodecs-0.6.3-3.fc28 has been pushed to the Fedora 28 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1691609
--- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System ---
python-yapf-0.26.0-2.fc30 has been pushed to the Fedora 30 testing repository.
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1692999
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System ---
python-aioresponses-0.6.0-1.fc30 has been pushed to the Fedora 30 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1689486
--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System ---
python-numcodecs-0.6.3-2.fc30 has been pushed to the Fedora 30 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1691188
--- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System ---
python-libpysal-4.0.1-2.fc29 has been pushed to the Fedora 29 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1691172
--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System ---
R-forcats-0.4.0-1.fc29 has been pushed to the Fedora 29 stable repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1684719
--- Comment #35 from Fedora Update System ---
netdata-1.13.0-2.fc29 has been pushed to the Fedora 29 stable repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1691609
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #14 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1692999
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #6 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1689486
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #9 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1668387
Orion Poplawski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||or...@nwra.com
--- Comment #6 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1691172
--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System ---
R-forcats-0.4.0-1.fc28 has been pushed to the Fedora 28 stable repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1691188
--- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System ---
python-libpysal-4.0.1-2.fc28 has been pushed to the Fedora 28 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1684719
--- Comment #34 from Fedora Update System ---
netdata-1.13.0-2.fc28 has been pushed to the Fedora 28 stable repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1694894
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||zebo...@gmail.com
--- Comment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1694894
--- Comment #1 from Michal Ambroz ---
This package built on koji:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=33879121
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1694894
Bug ID: 1694894
Summary: Review Request: aeskeyfind - Locate 128-bit and
256-bit AES keys in a captured memory image
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1694498
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|POST
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1693914
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST|MODIFIED
--- Comment #3 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1692593
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1691521
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1692582
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1692582
Bug 1692582 depends on bug 1691521, which changed state.
Bug 1691521 Summary: Review Request: python-flake8-polyfill - Compatibility
helpers for flake8 plugins
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1691521
What|Removed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1684719
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|NEXTRELEASE |ERRATA
--- Comment #33 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1691022
--- Comment #6 from Robert-André Mauchin ---
- Group is not used in Fedora
- BuildRequires: systemd-units → BuildRequires: systemd-rpm-macros or
BuildRequires: systemd for older Fedora
- Redundant: libcap-ng is a dependency of
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1691022
--- Comment #5 from Robert-André Mauchin ---
- The obsoleted version should be the version the obsoleted package would have
been if it was bumped
Obsoletes: openvswitch-ovn-common < 2.11.0-3
and so on for all the Obsoletes.
- Use
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1694805
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1694246
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1694498
--- Comment #6 from Jonny Heggheim ---
(In reply to Jonny Heggheim from comment #5)
> (In reply to Robert-André Mauchin from comment #3)
>
> Looks like we fixed it at the same time, I used the patch from Debian:
>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1694498
--- Comment #5 from Jonny Heggheim ---
(In reply to Robert-André Mauchin from comment #3)
Looks like we fixed it at the same time, I used the patch from Debian:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1694498
--- Comment #4 from Jonny Heggheim ---
(In reply to Robert-André Mauchin from comment #2)
> BUILDSTDERR:
> --
> BUILDSTDERR: Ran 0 tests in 0.000s
> BUILDSTDERR: OK
>
>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1694735
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||zebo...@gmail.com
--- Comment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1694498
--- Comment #3 from Robert-André Mauchin ---
For the tests, you need:
Patch0:
https://github.com/python/typing/commit/1f49677868a60ed697b0eafb2fb56471233b4ea5.patch#/0001-Run-the-tests-using-the-current-Python-executable.patch
[…]
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1694295
--- Comment #3 from Artem ---
You right, this BR packages not needed.
Spec URL: https://atim.fedorapeople.org/for-review/gwe.spec
SRPM URL: https://atim.fedorapeople.org/for-review/gwe-0.12.3-7.fc30.src.rpm
So now waiting for PR merge... ⏳
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1694498
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1694231
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|POST
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1692584
--- Comment #3 from Robert Scheck ---
Branching for f30 has been requested via
https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/10822
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1694292
--- Comment #3 from Artem ---
Done.
Spec URL: https://atim.fedorapeople.org/for-review/yacreader.spec
SRPM URL:
https://atim.fedorapeople.org/for-review/yacreader-9.5.0-3.fc30.src.rpm
---
BTW how did you find so easy which license this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1694231
--- Comment #5 from Artem ---
Done.
Spec URL: https://atim.fedorapeople.org/for-review/libunarr.spec
SRPM URL:
https://atim.fedorapeople.org/for-review/libunarr-1.0.1-3.fc30.src.rpm
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1694438
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |POST
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1694366
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1691609
--- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System ---
python-yapf-0.26.0-2.fc29 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 29.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-41c1edd422
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1691609
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST|MODIFIED
--- Comment #12 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1694231
--- Comment #4 from Robert-André Mauchin ---
It's documented here:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy#Rawhide_.2F_devel_.2F_master
"When a proposed update contains an ABI or API change: notify a week in advance
both fedora-devel
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1694231
--- Comment #3 from Robert-André Mauchin ---
(In reply to Artem from comment #2)
> Quick fix:
>
> Spec URL: https://atim.fedorapeople.org/for-review/libunarr.spec
> SRPM URL:
>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1694295
--- Comment #2 from Robert-André Mauchin ---
Also package should probably be noarch.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1694295
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||zebo...@gmail.com
--- Comment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1691609
--- Comment #11 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
(fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-yapf
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1694292
--- Comment #2 from Robert-André Mauchin ---
- No:
%global debug_package %{nil}
- qmake-qt5 → %qmake_qt5
This will pass Fedora build flags and solve the previous problem.
- Just use:
{_datadir}/%{name}
instead of listing all files
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1694231
--- Comment #2 from Artem ---
Quick fix:
Spec URL: https://atim.fedorapeople.org/for-review/libunarr.spec
SRPM URL:
https://atim.fedorapeople.org/for-review/libunarr-1.0.1-2.fc30.src.rpm
But i still need to work on this:
> In order to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1364631
Piotr Popieluch changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|piotr1...@gmail.com |nob...@fedoraproject.org
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1691609
Luis Bazan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Alias||python-yapf
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1691609
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|POST
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1694292
Artur Iwicki changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||fed...@svgames.pl
--- Comment #1 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1694278
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||zebo...@gmail.com
--- Comment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1691609
--- Comment #9 from Luis Bazan ---
I removed this line
find . -type f -name "*.py" -exec sed -i '/^#![ ]*\/usr\/bin\/env.*$/ d' {}
';'
is ok?
Cheers,
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1691609
--- Comment #8 from Luis Bazan ---
SPEC: https://lbazan.fedorapeople.org/python-yapf.spec
SRPM: https://lbazan.fedorapeople.org/python-yapf-0.26.0-2.fc29.src.rpm
- Please don't mix tabs and space in the SPEC. (FIXED)
- The source is 404.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1694231
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1693913
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |POST
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1693514
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |POST
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1691609
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1694805
--- Comment #1 from Georg Sauthoff ---
Forgot the most important part:
Spec URL:
https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/gsauthof/fedora/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/00874061-python-zeep/python-zeep.spec
SRPM URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1694805
Bug ID: 1694805
Summary: Review Request: python-zeep - A fast and modern Python
SOAP client
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1692999
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System ---
python-aioresponses-0.6.0-1.fc30 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 30.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-17e53fa70e
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1692999
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST|MODIFIED
--- Comment #4 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1578223
Luis Bazan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|DEFERRED|NOTABUG
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1691609
--- Comment #6 from Luis Bazan ---
(In reply to Robert-André Mauchin from comment #4)
> (In reply to Luis Bazan from comment #3)
> > (In reply to Robert-André Mauchin from comment #1)
> > > Already exists at
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1578223
Luis Bazan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1693987
--- Comment #15 from Severin Gehwolf ---
(In reply to jiri vanek from comment #14)
> One expect digit in the middle.
I'm curious: What expects it? A human? Some tooling?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1693987
--- Comment #14 from jiri vanek ---
One expect digit in the middle.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1694553
--- Comment #7 from Luya Tshimbalanga ---
Updated
SPECS:
https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/luya/LuxCoreRender/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/00876179-oidn/oidn.spec
SRPMS:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1693987
--- Comment #13 from Severin Gehwolf ---
(In reply to Severin Gehwolf from comment #11)
> (In reply to jiri vanek from comment #8)
> > One more idea to consult with java sig:
> > /usr/lib/jvm/java-12-openjdk-12.0.0.33-3.rolling.fc29.x86_64/
>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1693987
--- Comment #12 from jiri vanek ---
Personally I disagree on this, but do not have exactly strongest opinion.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1693987
--- Comment #11 from Severin Gehwolf ---
(In reply to jiri vanek from comment #8)
> One more idea to consult with java sig:
> /usr/lib/jvm/java-12-openjdk-12.0.0.33-3.rolling.fc29.x86_64/
>
> Maybe change the suffix to latest or sts? From
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1691245
--- Comment #3 from Petr Menšík ---
Thanks, fixed in COPR.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1691245
--- Comment #2 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
(fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/nsdiff
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1693987
--- Comment #10 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
(fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/java-latest-openjdk
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1694735
--- Comment #1 from Richard Shaw ---
Scratch build:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=33817221
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1694735
Bug ID: 1694735
Summary: Review Request: js8call - Fork of WSJT-X which allows
QSOs
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: Package Review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1665614
--- Comment #6 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
(fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/libsecp256k1
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1692999
--- Comment #3 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
(fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-aioresponses
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1693914
--- Comment #2 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
(fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-pplpy
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1689634
--- Comment #4 from Jan Staněk ---
(In reply to Timothée Floure from comment #3)
> I suspect you checked the upstream's master branch [0] instead of the v1.2
> tag [1]? Otherwise I don't undestand the above points since version 1.2 does
> not
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1694553
--- Comment #6 from Vasiliy Glazov ---
Change
%{_libdir}/libOpenImageDenoise.so*
to
%{_libdir}/libOpenImageDenoise.so.*
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1689486
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System ---
python-numcodecs-0.6.3-2.fc28 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 28.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-92e5900abf
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1689486
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST|MODIFIED
--- Comment #6 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1689486
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System ---
python-numcodecs-0.6.3-2.fc29 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 29.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-c8e5057d70
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1694553
--- Comment #5 from Luya Tshimbalanga ---
Updated files
SPECS:
https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/luya/LuxCoreRender/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/00876155-oidn/oidn.spec
SRPMS:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1694553
--- Comment #4 from Vasiliy Glazov ---
You wrong move libs.
All versioned so-files must be in -libs subpackage. And only unversioned
so-file must be in -devel subpackage.
It should be like this:
%files libs
%{_libdir}/cmake/OpenImageDenoise
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1694553
--- Comment #3 from Luya Tshimbalanga ---
1. Done
2. Filed bug to upstream https://github.com/OpenImageDenoise/oidn/issues/24
3. Done
4. Fixed
5. Done
6. Done. I also added verbose=1
SPECS:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1693987
Severin Gehwolf changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sgehw...@redhat.com
--- Comment #9
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1694553
--- Comment #2 from Vasiliy Glazov ---
6. Change %cmake to %cmake .
(With path to curent directory - dot)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1694553
--- Comment #1 from Vasiliy Glazov ---
1. You must move /usr/lib64/libOpenImageDenoise.so to devel subpackage.
2. shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/libOpenImageDenoise.so.0.8.2
exit@GLIBC_2.2.5
So you should bugreport about this issue to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1694553
Vasiliy Glazov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
95 matches
Mail list logo
