https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1982619
--- Comment #7 from Christopher Engelhard ---
(In reply to Otto Urpelainen from comment #6)
> If you get in touch with upstream about phpunit 9 support,
> you could take care of this warning that is currently emitted:
Will do.
> I will take
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1989357
--- Comment #7 from Neal Gompa ---
The SRPM is not updated, fedora-review continues to fail. :(
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1981114
--- Comment #8 from Stuart D Gathman ---
I did a scratch build with all %{rust_arches}.
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=73652213
It all but armv7hl have finished and unit tests run with no errors as I write.
I think
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1986953
--- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2021-ddae0be390 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 8 stable
repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1977110
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #5 from
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Package Review has canceled Package
Review 's request for Jared Smith
's needinfo:
Bug 1676544: Review Request: nodejs-event-stream - Construct pipes of streams
of events
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1676544
---
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Package Review has canceled Package
Review 's request for Thomas Sailer
's needinfo:
Bug 1673956: Review Request: octave-openems - An electromagnetic field solver
for octave
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1673956
---
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Package Review has canceled Package
Review 's request for Jared Smith
's needinfo:
Bug 1269001: Review Request: tinycbor - Concise Binary Object Representation
(CBOR) Library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1269001
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1979736
--- Comment #3 from Mohamed El Morabity ---
Hello Hirotaka, thanks for the review.
(In reply to Hirotaka Wakabayashi from comment #2)
> Could you add a license text to logstash-conf-init.el like logstash-conf.el
> or
> ask the upstream to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1977132
Rémi Lauzier changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Status|POST
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1981114
Fabio Valentini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||decatho...@gmail.com
--- Comment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1984114
Fabio Valentini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1991267
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1991292
Fabio Valentini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||decatho...@gmail.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1989357
--- Comment #6 from Owen Taylor ---
Added the python3-devel BuildRequires (same URLs).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1979081
--- Comment #8 from Georg Sauthoff ---
>> I revisited it again, the rspec build-requires comes from my modified
>> gem2rpm fedora template. So, I take this back:
> no, that one should be there since that's what the test suite needs to run
>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1989357
--- Comment #5 from Neal Gompa ---
You're missing "BuildRequires: python3-devel", so the macros don't exist to
build the package.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1896742
--- Comment #24 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
(fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-radexreader
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1970050
--- Comment #29 from Peter Hunt ---
Spec URL: https://haircommander.fedorapeople.org/cri-o.spec
SRPM URL: https://haircommander.fedorapeople.org/cri-o-1.21.2-1.fc32.src.rpm
(note, I ended up dropping the ln -sf from the spec, as the Makefile
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1989357
--- Comment #4 from Owen Taylor ---
Spec file and SRPM have been updated to fix the identified problems. Thanks for
the review!
Spec URL:
https://pagure.io/fedora-third-party/raw/main/f/fedora-third-party.spec
SRPM URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1992232
--- Comment #1 from Davide Cavalca ---
This package built on koji:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=73639746
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1992232
Bug ID: 1992232
Summary: Review Request: disciplining-minipod - Disciplining
algorithm for Atomic Reference Time Card
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1989386
Link Dupont changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|l...@sub-pop.net
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1991085
Rémi Lauzier changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1991198
Rémi Lauzier changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |NOTABUG
Status|NEW
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1989360
--- Comment #2 from Neal Gompa ---
This package looks fairly trivial.
There are only two issues:
* Release needs to be "1%{?dist}" to include the DistTag
* Missing license file
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1989360
Neal Gompa changed:
What|Removed |Added
Comment|0 |updated
--- Comment #0 has been edited
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1988465
Link Dupont changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Review Request: yggd - |Review Request: yggdrasil -
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1989386
Link Dupont changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||needinfo?(obu...@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1980562
--- Comment #5 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
(fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/catch22
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1977132
--- Comment #2 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
(fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rust-gtk4
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1988465
Neal Gompa changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review?
Status|NEW
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1989357
Neal Gompa changed:
What|Removed |Added
Comment|0 |updated
--- Comment #0 has been edited
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1989357
--- Comment #3 from Neal Gompa ---
> Release: 1
This should be "Release: 1%{?dist}" as we require the DistTag to be present.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1989360
Neal Gompa changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1982741
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1989357
--- Comment #2 from Neal Gompa ---
Initial review notes:
> %autosetup -p1 -n fedora-third-party-0.1
This should be "%autosetup -p1" or "%autosetup -p1 -n %{name}-%{version}" (the
-n stuff is optional since name-version matches the package
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1991138
--- Comment #3 from Mikel Olasagasti Uranga ---
Spec URL:
https://mikel.olasagasti.info/tmp/fedora/python-pytest-postgresql.spec
SRPM URL:
https://mikel.olasagasti.info/tmp/fedora/python-pytest-postgresql-3.1.1-2.fc34.src.rpm
- Fixed license
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1991135
--- Comment #3 from Mikel Olasagasti Uranga ---
Spec URL: https://mikel.olasagasti.info/tmp/fedora/python-mirakuru.spec
SRPM URL:
https://mikel.olasagasti.info/tmp/fedora/python-mirakuru-2.4.1-2.fc34.src.rpm
- Removed unneeded bits
- Added
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1991096
--- Comment #4 from Mikel Olasagasti Uranga ---
Spec URL: https://mikel.olasagasti.info/tmp/fedora/python-port-for.spec
SRPM URL:
https://mikel.olasagasti.info/tmp/fedora/python-port-for-0.6.1-2.fc34.src.rpm
- Added PR reference to Patch0
-
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1979736
--- Comment #2 from Hirotaka Wakabayashi ---
Hello Mohamed,
Could you add a license text to logstash-conf-init.el like logstash-conf.el or
ask the upstream to add a license file?
This package doesn't have %license and the license of
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1308742
Ruben Kerkhof changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |WONTFIX
Status|ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1931183
--- Comment #10 from Andy Mender ---
Looks like the PR linked above was merged and hdmf is at version 3.1.1:
https://github.com/hdmf-dev/hdmf/releases/tag/3.1.1
I think we can proceed as soon as the python-h5py package is updated in Fedora,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1982306
Michal Ruprich changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mrupr...@redhat.com
--- Comment #17
42 matches
Mail list logo
