https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2074438
Maxwell G changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||needinfo?(jris...@redhat.co
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2095717
--- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2022-57dfeeb304 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 9 testing
repository.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2095233
--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2022-07a7d36ba6 has been pushed to the Fedora 35 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2092180
--- Comment #6 from Maxwell G ---
> You should add `%systemd_user_postun_with_restart darkman.service`
To be clear, you should add this under %postun.
On import, don't forget to do the following:
- [ ] Fix the systemd scriptlet issue.
- [
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2092180
Maxwell G changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|gotmax@e.email
Status|NEW
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2068492
--- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2022-4bb9a0f4de has been pushed to the Fedora 36 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2095233
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2092637
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|RAWHIDE |ERRATA
--- Comment #14 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2095717
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #15 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2097267
Ben Beasley changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|c...@musicinmybrain.net |nob...@fedoraproject.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2097267
Jarek Prokop changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jpro...@redhat.com
--- Comment #6
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2097267
--- Comment #5 from Ben Beasley ---
Benson, thank you for the preliminary review. It looks like we mostly found the
same things.
(In reply to Benson Muite from comment #3)
> Unofficial Review:
>
> […]
>
> Comments:
> 1) Can you check that
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2100567
Bug ID: 2100567
Summary: Review Request: golang-github-rabbitmq-amqp091 - An
AMQP 0-9-1 Go client maintained by the RabbitMQ team
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2097267
Ben Beasley changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(code@musicinmybra |needinfo?(iztok@iztok-jr-fi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2099677
--- Comment #2 from Andreas Schneider ---
We might not need this: https://github.com/openSUSE/cepces/pull/18
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2099857
--- Comment #1 from Andreas Schneider ---
We might not need this: https://github.com/openSUSE/cepces/pull/18
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2097925
--- Comment #8 from Andreas Schneider ---
We might want to wait for https://github.com/openSUSE/cepces/pull/18 being
merged.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2100555
Peter Robinson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2100555
Bug ID: 2100555
Summary: Review Request: rust-passwd - Bindings for libc
/etc/passwd password functions
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2085377
--- Comment #24 from jschm...@de.ibm.com ---
> good question, but I think the best option is to commit changes to github,
> make a new release (1.0.1) and use that for the next iteration in the review.
OK, I merged the pr and made a new
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2068492
--- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2022-4bb9a0f4de has been submitted as an update to Fedora 36.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-4bb9a0f4de
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2099677
--- Comment #1 from Julien Rische ---
Spec URL: https://pagure.io/rpm-python-k5test/raw/rawhide/f/python-k5test.spec
SRPM URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2095717
--- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2022-57dfeeb304 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 9.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-57dfeeb304
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2095717
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--- Comment #13 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2085444
--- Comment #12 from Daniel Berrangé ---
(In reply to xiangquan.liu from comment #11)
> So is it OK if all the SDK files are installed under directory /usr/share?
> Ex. /usr/share/intel/sgxsdk?
/usr/share is for architecture independent
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2085444
--- Comment #11 from xiangquan@intel.com ---
So is it OK if all the SDK files are installed under directory /usr/share? Ex.
/usr/share/intel/sgxsdk?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2085444
--- Comment #10 from Daniel Berrangé ---
(In reply to xiangquan.liu from comment #9)
> Thanks for the quick reply. Do you any suggestions where to install SDK?
Normal practice is to honour the locations for each type of content that are
set
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2100032
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2035222
--- Comment #30 from d...@secondstate.io ---
(In reply to Fabio Valentini from comment #29)
> Please make sure to fix the outstanding issues before importing the package
> to Fedora.
>
> Also note that while it's fine to develop the .spec
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2100032
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST|MODIFIED
--- Comment #3 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2097925
--- Comment #7 from Andreas Schneider ---
# Rename configuration files.
install -d -m 0755 %{buildroot}%{_sysconfdir}/%{name}/
install -m 644 %{buildroot}%{_sysconfdir}/%{name}/cepces.conf{.dist,}
rm -f
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2097925
--- Comment #6 from Ding-Yi Chen ---
(In reply to Rob Crittenden from comment #4)
> There are SELinux macros to simply the pre/post scripts. I'm not sure if
> you're future-proofing by support multiple variants but generally this is
> just
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2085444
--- Comment #9 from xiangquan@intel.com ---
(In reply to Daniel Berrangé from comment #8)
> (In reply to xiangquan.liu from comment #7)
> > Thanks all for your replies.
> > Just want to know if all the SGX SDK files all installed into some
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2085444
--- Comment #8 from Daniel Berrangé ---
(In reply to xiangquan.liu from comment #7)
> Thanks all for your replies.
> Just want to know if all the SGX SDK files all installed into some directory
> under /opt/fedora, can we just put all the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2097925
--- Comment #5 from Ding-Yi Chen ---
(In reply to Andreas Schneider from comment #3)
> It should be two lines:
>
> install -d -m 0755 path/to/dir
>
> install -m 0644 source dest
> install -m 0644 source dest
>
> This way you set correct
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Alfredo Moralejo has canceled Package Review
's request for Alfredo Moralejo
's needinfo:
Bug 1558683: Review Request: python-ucsmsdk - Python SDK for Cisco UCSM
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1558683
--- Comment #40
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1558683
Alfredo Moralejo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(amoralej@redhat.c |
|om)
37 matches
Mail list logo
