[Bug 1021719] Review Request: opensmtpd - Minimalistic but powerful smtp server

2014-07-25 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1021719 Bug 1021719 depends on bug 1123184, which changed state. Bug 1123184 Summary: Review Request: libasr - Asynchronous DNS resolving library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1123184 What|Removed |Added

[Bug 1021719] Review Request: opensmtpd - Minimalistic but powerful smtp server

2014-07-24 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1021719 Christopher Meng i...@cicku.me changed: What|Removed |Added Depends On||1123184 Referenced

[Bug 1021719] Review Request: opensmtpd - Minimalistic but powerful smtp server

2014-07-01 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1021719 Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You

[Bug 1021719] Review Request: opensmtpd - Minimalistic but powerful smtp server

2014-07-01 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1021719 --- Comment #34 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component

[Bug 1021719] Review Request: opensmtpd - Minimalistic but powerful smtp server

2014-06-30 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1021719 Denis Fateyev de...@fateyev.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? ---

[Bug 1021719] Review Request: opensmtpd - Minimalistic but powerful smtp server

2014-03-24 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1021719 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|opensmtpd-5.4.2p1-1.fc20

[Bug 1021719] Review Request: opensmtpd - Minimalistic but powerful smtp server

2014-03-18 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1021719 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|opensmtpd-5.4.1p1-1.el6

[Bug 1021719] Review Request: opensmtpd - Minimalistic but powerful smtp server

2014-03-18 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1021719 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|opensmtpd-5.4.2p1-1.fc19

[Bug 1021719] Review Request: opensmtpd - Minimalistic but powerful smtp server

2014-03-08 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1021719 --- Comment #29 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- opensmtpd-5.4.2p1-1.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/opensmtpd-5.4.2p1-1.fc20 -- You are receiving this mail

[Bug 1021719] Review Request: opensmtpd - Minimalistic but powerful smtp server

2014-01-02 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1021719 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|opensmtpd-5.4.1p1-1.fc18

[Bug 1021719] Review Request: opensmtpd - Minimalistic but powerful smtp server

2013-12-22 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1021719 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|opensmtpd-5.4.1p1-1.fc20

[Bug 1021719] Review Request: opensmtpd - Minimalistic but powerful smtp server

2013-12-22 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1021719 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|opensmtpd-5.4.1p1-1.fc19

[Bug 1021719] Review Request: opensmtpd - Minimalistic but powerful smtp server

2013-12-21 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1021719 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|

[Bug 1021719] Review Request: opensmtpd - Minimalistic but powerful smtp server

2013-12-13 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1021719 Terje Røsten terje...@phys.ntnu.no changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug 1021719] Review Request: opensmtpd - Minimalistic but powerful smtp server

2013-12-13 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1021719 --- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- opensmtpd-5.4.1p1-1.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 18. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/opensmtpd-5.4.1p1-1.fc18 -- You are receiving this mail

[Bug 1021719] Review Request: opensmtpd - Minimalistic but powerful smtp server

2013-12-13 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1021719 --- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- opensmtpd-5.4.1p1-1.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 19. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/opensmtpd-5.4.1p1-1.fc19 -- You are receiving this mail

[Bug 1021719] Review Request: opensmtpd - Minimalistic but powerful smtp server

2013-12-13 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1021719 --- Comment #23 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- opensmtpd-5.4.1p1-1.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/opensmtpd-5.4.1p1-1.fc20 -- You are receiving this mail

[Bug 1021719] Review Request: opensmtpd - Minimalistic but powerful smtp server

2013-12-13 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1021719 --- Comment #24 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- opensmtpd-5.4.1p1-1.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 6. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/opensmtpd-5.4.1p1-1.el6 -- You are receiving this mail

[Bug 1021719] Review Request: opensmtpd - Minimalistic but powerful smtp server

2013-12-12 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1021719 Denis Fateyev de...@fateyev.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED

[Bug 1021719] Review Request: opensmtpd - Minimalistic but powerful smtp server

2013-12-11 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1021719 --- Comment #19 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component

[Bug 1021719] Review Request: opensmtpd - Minimalistic but powerful smtp server

2013-12-11 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1021719 Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You

[Bug 1021719] Review Request: opensmtpd - Minimalistic but powerful smtp server

2013-12-10 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1021719 Denis Fateyev de...@fateyev.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-cvs? ---

[Bug 1021719] Review Request: opensmtpd - Minimalistic but powerful smtp server

2013-12-08 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1021719 --- Comment #13 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com --- All the issues from comment 11 appear fixed. ;) However, I see a few new rpmlint complaints: opensmtpd.i686: E: missing-call-to-chdir-with-chroot /usr/sbin/smtpctl opensmtpd.i686: E:

[Bug 1021719] Review Request: opensmtpd - Minimalistic but powerful smtp server

2013-12-08 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1021719 --- Comment #14 from Denis Fateyev de...@fateyev.com --- Interesting, these errors don't appear on 64bit version of packages, so I haven't seen them last time checking with 'rpmlint'. OK, I'll contact upstream regarding this issue. -- You

[Bug 1021719] Review Request: opensmtpd - Minimalistic but powerful smtp server

2013-12-08 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1021719 --- Comment #15 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com --- Yeah, I just happened to check with a 32bit build this time... so yeah, could be a difference somehow between the two arches. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list

[Bug 1021719] Review Request: opensmtpd - Minimalistic but powerful smtp server

2013-12-08 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1021719 Michael Scherer m...@zarb.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||m...@zarb.org ---

[Bug 1021719] Review Request: opensmtpd - Minimalistic but powerful smtp server

2013-12-08 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1021719 Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ---

[Bug 1021719] Review Request: opensmtpd - Minimalistic but powerful smtp server

2013-12-07 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1021719 --- Comment #12 from Denis Fateyev de...@fateyev.com --- All fixed, please look at the latest scratch build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=6267548 . This is the recently released 5.4.1 stable version. Current spec

[Bug 1021719] Review Request: opensmtpd - Minimalistic but powerful smtp server

2013-11-30 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1021719 --- Comment #11 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com --- Sorry for the delay here... Outstanding things to fix (mentioned in more detail below with !): 1. You need to own the /etc/opensmtpd and /usr/libexec/opensmtpd directories. You can

[Bug 1021719] Review Request: opensmtpd - Minimalistic but powerful smtp server

2013-11-19 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1021719 --- Comment #10 from Denis Fateyev de...@fateyev.com --- Updates: prerelease tag assigned as suggested; libexecdir detection/usage and path substitution were corrected in upstream. PIE support along with various small fixes also recently added

[Bug 1021719] Review Request: opensmtpd - Minimalistic but powerful smtp server

2013-11-01 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1021719 --- Comment #9 from Denis Fateyev de...@fateyev.com --- Quick updates: Why a prerelease? Is there some compelling thing in the prerelease thats needed over the last stable? The thing is the latest stable caused a lot of portable issues

[Bug 1021719] Review Request: opensmtpd - Minimalistic but powerful smtp server

2013-10-29 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1021719 Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug 1021719] Review Request: opensmtpd - Minimalistic but powerful smtp server

2013-10-29 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1021719 --- Comment #8 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com --- some general quick questions: - Why a prerelease? Is there some compelling thing in the prerelease thats needed over the last stable? - Prerelease versioning is a bit off. See:

[Bug 1021719] Review Request: opensmtpd - Minimalistic but powerful smtp server

2013-10-28 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1021719 Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ke...@scrye.com ---

[Bug 1021719] Review Request: opensmtpd - Minimalistic but powerful smtp server

2013-10-23 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1021719 --- Comment #5 from Denis Fateyev de...@fateyev.com --- Introduced `shadow-utils` and `chkconfig` in Requires section (since `alternatives` is located in `chkconfig`). Changed macro binary calls to direct calls. Updated spec:

[Bug 1021719] Review Request: opensmtpd - Minimalistic but powerful smtp server

2013-10-22 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1021719 Matthias Runge mru...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||aal...@gmail.com

[Bug 1021719] Review Request: opensmtpd - Minimalistic but powerful smtp server

2013-10-22 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1021719 --- Comment #3 from Denis Fateyev de...@fateyev.com --- Thanks for reviewing. 1,3,4,7,8 are fixed, packages and updated spec are available on the same location from the first post. 2: I haven't found any recommendations in guidelines. Do

[Bug 1021719] Review Request: opensmtpd - Minimalistic but powerful smtp server

2013-10-22 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1021719 --- Comment #4 from Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com --- 2: I haven't found any recommendations in guidelines. Do these macros violate any rules or anything? No. But now we dont use it. As these are often used in old RPM, I will have a

[Bug 1021719] Review Request: opensmtpd - Minimalistic but powerful smtp server

2013-10-21 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1021719 Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||cicku...@gmail.com