https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1021719
Bug 1021719 depends on bug 1123184, which changed state.
Bug 1123184 Summary: Review Request: libasr - Asynchronous DNS resolving library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1123184
What|Removed |Added
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1021719
Christopher Meng i...@cicku.me changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||1123184
Referenced
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1021719
Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1021719
--- Comment #34 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1021719
Denis Fateyev de...@fateyev.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs?
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1021719
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|opensmtpd-5.4.2p1-1.fc20
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1021719
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|opensmtpd-5.4.1p1-1.el6
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1021719
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|opensmtpd-5.4.2p1-1.fc19
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1021719
--- Comment #29 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
opensmtpd-5.4.2p1-1.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/opensmtpd-5.4.2p1-1.fc20
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1021719
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|opensmtpd-5.4.1p1-1.fc18
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1021719
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|opensmtpd-5.4.1p1-1.fc20
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1021719
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|opensmtpd-5.4.1p1-1.fc19
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1021719
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1021719
Terje Røsten terje...@phys.ntnu.no changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1021719
--- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
opensmtpd-5.4.1p1-1.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 18.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/opensmtpd-5.4.1p1-1.fc18
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1021719
--- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
opensmtpd-5.4.1p1-1.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 19.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/opensmtpd-5.4.1p1-1.fc19
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1021719
--- Comment #23 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
opensmtpd-5.4.1p1-1.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/opensmtpd-5.4.1p1-1.fc20
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1021719
--- Comment #24 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
opensmtpd-5.4.1p1-1.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 6.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/opensmtpd-5.4.1p1-1.el6
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1021719
Denis Fateyev de...@fateyev.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1021719
--- Comment #19 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1021719
Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1021719
Denis Fateyev de...@fateyev.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1021719
--- Comment #13 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com ---
All the issues from comment 11 appear fixed. ;)
However, I see a few new rpmlint complaints:
opensmtpd.i686: E: missing-call-to-chdir-with-chroot /usr/sbin/smtpctl
opensmtpd.i686: E:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1021719
--- Comment #14 from Denis Fateyev de...@fateyev.com ---
Interesting, these errors don't appear on 64bit version of packages, so I
haven't seen them last time checking with 'rpmlint'. OK, I'll contact upstream
regarding this issue.
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1021719
--- Comment #15 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com ---
Yeah, I just happened to check with a 32bit build this time... so yeah, could
be a difference somehow between the two arches.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1021719
Michael Scherer m...@zarb.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||m...@zarb.org
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1021719
Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1021719
--- Comment #12 from Denis Fateyev de...@fateyev.com ---
All fixed, please look at the latest scratch build:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=6267548 . This is the
recently released 5.4.1 stable version.
Current spec
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1021719
--- Comment #11 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com ---
Sorry for the delay here...
Outstanding things to fix (mentioned in more detail below with !):
1. You need to own the /etc/opensmtpd and /usr/libexec/opensmtpd directories.
You can
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1021719
--- Comment #10 from Denis Fateyev de...@fateyev.com ---
Updates: prerelease tag assigned as suggested; libexecdir detection/usage and
path substitution were corrected in upstream. PIE support along with various
small fixes also recently added
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1021719
--- Comment #9 from Denis Fateyev de...@fateyev.com ---
Quick updates:
Why a prerelease? Is there some compelling thing in the prerelease thats
needed over the last stable?
The thing is the latest stable caused a lot of portable issues
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1021719
Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1021719
--- Comment #8 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com ---
some general quick questions:
- Why a prerelease? Is there some compelling thing in the prerelease thats
needed over the last stable?
- Prerelease versioning is a bit off. See:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1021719
Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ke...@scrye.com
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1021719
--- Comment #5 from Denis Fateyev de...@fateyev.com ---
Introduced `shadow-utils` and `chkconfig` in Requires section (since
`alternatives` is located in `chkconfig`). Changed macro binary calls to direct
calls.
Updated spec:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1021719
Matthias Runge mru...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||aal...@gmail.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1021719
--- Comment #3 from Denis Fateyev de...@fateyev.com ---
Thanks for reviewing. 1,3,4,7,8 are fixed, packages and updated spec are
available on the same location from the first post.
2: I haven't found any recommendations in guidelines. Do
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1021719
--- Comment #4 from Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com ---
2: I haven't found any recommendations in guidelines. Do these macros
violate any rules or anything?
No. But now we dont use it. As these are often used in old RPM, I will have a
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1021719
Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||cicku...@gmail.com
39 matches
Mail list logo