https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1104746
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|soscleaner-0.2-1.el6
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1104746
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1104746
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ppi...@redhat.com
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1104746
--- Comment #21 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Review flag not set.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1104746
Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1104746
Jamie Duncan jdun...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review+
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1104746
--- Comment #22 from Jamie Duncan jdun...@redhat.com ---
setting flags back to what they're supposed to be.
fedora-review was ack'd in c#14.
resetting fedora-cvs flag to ?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1104746
--- Comment #23 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1104746
Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1104746
--- Comment #24 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
soscleaner-0.2-1.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/soscleaner-0.2-1.fc20
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1104746
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1104746
--- Comment #25 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
soscleaner-0.2-1.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 6.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/soscleaner-0.2-1.el6
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1104746
--- Comment #16 from Jamie Duncan jdun...@redhat.com ---
weird md5sum mismatch...
SRPM URL:
http://people.redhat.com/jduncan/soscleaner/soscleaner-0.2-1.fc20.src.rpm
Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/jduncan/soscleaner/soscleaner.spec
--
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1104746
Tom spot Callaway tcall...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR) |
--- Comment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1104746
Jamie Duncan jdun...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ppi...@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1104746
--- Comment #18 from Jamie Duncan jdun...@redhat.com ---
New Package SCM Request
===
Package Name: soscleaner
Short Description: analyse and scrub sensitive sosreport data
Upstream URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1104746
--- Comment #19 from Paul W. Frields pfrie...@redhat.com ---
Spot, I was just talking to Jamie in IRC, apparently while you were working on
this. I'm happy to {co-,}sponsor him for this package. I had set up a watch
on his email and hadn't
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1104746
Paul W. Frields pfrie...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|cvs |Package Review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1104746
Tom spot Callaway tcall...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1104746
--- Comment #15 from Jamie Duncan jdun...@redhat.com ---
SRPM URL:
http://people.redhat.com/jduncan/soscleaner/soscleaner-0.2-1.el7.src.rpm
Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/jduncan/soscleaner/soscleaner.spec
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1104746
Jamie Duncan jdun...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo? |fedora-review?
--
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1104746
Jamie Duncan jdun...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||needinfo?
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1104746
Jamie Duncan jdun...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||needinfo?
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1104746
Jamie Duncan jdun...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo? |
--- Comment #13
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1104746
--- Comment #9 from Christopher Meng i...@cicku.me ---
1. Why was the release bumped to 12 suddenly?
2. %doc /usr/share/doc/%{name}-%{version}/LICENSE
%doc /usr/share/man/man8/%{name}.8.gz
/usr/share -- %{_datadir}
/usr/share/doc --
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1104746
--- Comment #10 from Michael Schwendt bugs.mich...@gmx.net ---
Christopher, that's
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Macros
with a few explanations. Nowadays it is not mandatory anymore to use path
macros.
For paths
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1104746
--- Comment #11 from Jamie Duncan jdun...@redhat.com ---
Michael, Christopher, et al,
Thanks again for the continued feedback. I've made the above changes and things
continue to look cleaner.
koji builds cleanly, and fedora-review now shows
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1104746
--- Comment #1 from Jamie Duncan jdun...@redhat.com ---
EL6 Candidate Koji Build:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1104746
F20 Koji Build:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1104746
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1104746
--- Comment #2 from Jamie Duncan jdun...@redhat.com ---
don't know what happened there...
EL6:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=6924175
F20:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=6924156
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1104746
Jamie Duncan jdun...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||177841
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1104746
--- Comment #3 from Michael Schwendt bugs.mich...@gmx.net ---
Spec URL:
http://people.redhahttp://people.redhat.com/jduncan/soscleaner/soscleaner.spec
Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/jduncan/soscleaner/soscleaner.spec
During review,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1104746
--- Comment #4 from Jamie Duncan jdun...@redhat.com ---
Michael,
Thanks for the feedback. The spec file is *almost* 100% how it came from
distutils.
I will make the above changes and also take advantage of the tools you mention.
Thanks
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1104746
--- Comment #5 from Jamie Duncan jdun...@redhat.com ---
Michael and everyone else.
It's amazing how much more sense the Packaging Guide makes when you have a
little push in the right direction and a goal.
I've refactored the spec file to be
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1104746
--- Comment #6 from Jamie Duncan jdun...@redhat.com ---
Created attachment 902362
-- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=902362action=edit
f-e review.txt
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1104746
--- Comment #7 from Jamie Duncan jdun...@redhat.com ---
SRPM URL:
http://people.redhat.com/jduncan/soscleaner/soscleaner-0.1-12.fc20.src.rpm
Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/jduncan/soscleaner/soscleaner.spec
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1104746
--- Comment #8 from Jamie Duncan jdun...@redhat.com ---
have gone through fedora-review a few times and it looks solid to me at this
point. Definitely a learning experience.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for
36 matches
Mail list logo
