[Bug 1258182] Review Request: go-compilers - Go language compilers for various architectures

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258182 Kamil Páral changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED CC|

[Bug 1258182] Review Request: go-compilers - Go language compilers for various architectures

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258182 --- Comment #34 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- jchaloup's scratch build of go-memdb-9ea975b.tar.gz for cli-build/1454938967.533693.wYGVMBzT/go-memdb-9ea975b.tar.gz and f22-candidate failed

[Bug 1258182] Review Request: go-compilers - Go language compilers for various architectures

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258182 Bug 1258182 depends on bug 1258166, which changed state. Bug 1258166 Summary: Please remove macros.golang from golang https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258166 What|Removed |Added

[Bug 1258182] Review Request: go-compilers - Go language compilers for various architectures

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258182 Bug 1258182 depends on bug 1258166, which changed state. Bug 1258166 Summary: Please remove macros.golang from golang https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258166 What|Removed |Added

[Bug 1258182] Review Request: go-compilers - Go language compilers for various architectures

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258182 Bug 1258182 depends on bug 1258166, which changed state. Bug 1258166 Summary: Please remove macros.golang from golang https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258166 What|Removed |Added

[Bug 1258182] Review Request: go-compilers - Go language compilers for various architectures

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258182 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|CLOSED |ON_QA

[Bug 1258182] Review Request: go-compilers - Go language compilers for various architectures

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258182 Bug 1258182 depends on bug 1258166, which changed state. Bug 1258166 Summary: Please remove macros.golang from golang https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258166 What|Removed |Added

[Bug 1258182] Review Request: go-compilers - Go language compilers for various architectures

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258182 --- Comment #32 from Fedora Update System --- go-compilers-1-2.fc21 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 21. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-b9da8834ba -- You are receiving this mail

[Bug 1258182] Review Request: go-compilers - Go language compilers for various architectures

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258182 --- Comment #31 from Fedora Update System --- go-compilers-1-2.fc22 has been pushed to the Fedora 22 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving

[Bug 1258182] Review Request: go-compilers - Go language compilers for various architectures

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258182 Bug 1258182 depends on bug 1258166, which changed state. Bug 1258166 Summary: Please remove macros.golang from golang https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258166 What|Removed |Added

[Bug 1258182] Review Request: go-compilers - Go language compilers for various architectures

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258182 Bug 1258182 depends on bug 1258166, which changed state. Bug 1258166 Summary: Please remove macros.golang from golang https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258166 What|Removed |Added

[Bug 1258182] Review Request: go-compilers - Go language compilers for various architectures

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258182 --- Comment #29 from Fedora Update System --- go-compilers-1-2.fc22 has been pushed to the Fedora 22 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.\nIf you want to test the

[Bug 1258182] Review Request: go-compilers - Go language compilers for various architectures

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258182 --- Comment #27 from Fedora Update System --- go-compilers-1-2.fc22 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 22. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-15533 -- You are receiving this mail because:

[Bug 1258182] Review Request: go-compilers - Go language compilers for various architectures

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258182 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA

[Bug 1258182] Review Request: go-compilers - Go language compilers for various architectures

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258182 --- Comment #26 from Fedora Update System --- go-compilers-1-2.fc23 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 23. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-15532 -- You are receiving this mail because:

[Bug 1258182] Review Request: go-compilers - Go language compilers for various architectures

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258182 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA

[Bug 1258182] Review Request: go-compilers - Go language compilers for various architectures

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258182 --- Comment #21 from Jon Ciesla --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component

[Bug 1258182] Review Request: go-compilers - Go language compilers for various architectures

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258182 Jon Ciesla changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --

[Bug 1258182] Review Request: go-compilers - Go language compilers for various architectures

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258182 --- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System --- go-compilers-1-1.fc22 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 22. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-15464 -- You are receiving this mail because:

[Bug 1258182] Review Request: go-compilers - Go language compilers for various architectures

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258182 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug 1258182] Review Request: go-compilers - Go language compilers for various architectures

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258182 --- Comment #23 from Fedora Update System --- go-compilers-1-1.fc23 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 23. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-15466 -- You are receiving this mail because:

[Bug 1258182] Review Request: go-compilers - Go language compilers for various architectures

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258182 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA

[Bug 1258182] Review Request: go-compilers - Go language compilers for various architectures

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258182 --- Comment #25 from Fedora Update System --- go-compilers-1-1.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.\nIf you want to test the

[Bug 1258182] Review Request: go-compilers - Go language compilers for various architectures

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258182 --- Comment #17 from Jan Chaloupka --- Added new macro go_compiler which if set to 1 means that virtual provide compiler(go-compiler) is available. So distributions where there is no such provide can BuildRequire implicit

[Bug 1258182] Review Request: go-compilers - Go language compilers for various architectures

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258182 Jakub Čajka changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug 1258182] Review Request: go-compilers - Go language compilers for various architectures

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258182 Jan Chaloupka changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-cvs? ---

[Bug 1258182] Review Request: go-compilers - Go language compilers for various architectures

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258182 --- Comment #19 from Jan Chaloupka --- Thanks Jakub. These could be fixed: go-compilers.src:27: W: unversioned-explicit-provides compiler(go-compiler) go-compilers.src:28: W: unversioned-explicit-provides

[Bug 1258182] Review Request: go-compilers - Go language compilers for various architectures

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258182 Jakub Čajka changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ---

[Bug 1258182] Review Request: go-compilers - Go language compilers for various architectures

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258182 Bug 1258182 depends on bug 1258166, which changed state. Bug 1258166 Summary: Please remove macros.golang from golang https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258166 What|Removed |Added

[Bug 1258182] Review Request: go-compilers - Go language compilers for various architectures

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258182 --- Comment #15 from Jan Chaloupka --- Proposed form and use of ExclusiveArchs and BuildRequires for various architectures and distributions with or without go-srpm-macros packaged.

[Bug 1258182] Review Request: go-compilers - Go language compilers for various architectures

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258182 --- Comment #16 from Jan Chaloupka --- Again, minimized number of macros in macros.golang/gcc-go-compilers and redefined gobuild/gotest: macros.golang-compiler: # Define commands for building # BUILD_ID can be generated

[Bug 1258182] Review Request: go-compilers - Go language compilers for various architectures

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258182 --- Comment #10 from Jan Chaloupka --- > And why are you creating platform specific subpackages? They are never created > both on single platform if I understand it correctly, so what is the point > then? So I can

[Bug 1258182] Review Request: go-compilers - Go language compilers for various architectures

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258182 --- Comment #9 from Vít Ondruch --- (In reply to Vít Ondruch from comment #8) The downside is that you have to replace/expand the %{golang_build}, %{gcc_go_build}, %{golang_test} and %{gcc_go_test} macros in the template,

[Bug 1258182] Review Request: go-compilers - Go language compilers for various architectures

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258182 Vít Ondruch changed: What|Removed |Added CC||vondr...@redhat.com

[Bug 1258182] Review Request: go-compilers - Go language compilers for various architectures

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258182 --- Comment #7 from Vít Ondruch --- And why are you creating platform specific subpackages? They are never created both on single platform if I understand it correctly, so what is the point then? -- You are receiving

[Bug 1258182] Review Request: go-compilers - Go language compilers for various architectures

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258182 Jan Chaloupka changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|

[Bug 1258182] Review Request: go-compilers - Go language compilers for various architectures

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258182 --- Comment #8 from Vít Ondruch --- I would also suggest to include the "macros.go-compilers" files as a SOURCE instead creating them on the fly. One could easier compare them with current state for example and you can

[Bug 1258182] Review Request: go-compilers - Go language compilers for various architectures

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258182 --- Comment #13 from Jan Chaloupka --- What would the use of go-compilers and go-srpm-macros macros? 1) %if 0%{?go_arches:1} ExclusiveArch: %{go_arches} %else ExclusiveArch: %{ix86} x86_64 %{arm} %endif If not being

[Bug 1258182] Review Request: go-compilers - Go language compilers for various architectures

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258182 Vít Ondruch changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|needinfo?(vondruch@redhat.c |

[Bug 1258182] Review Request: go-compilers - Go language compilers for various architectures

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258182 --- Comment #14 from Jan Chaloupka --- At the same time there will be no support for debug info with the current definition of gobuild. Of course, the definition can be updated and generate debuginfo no matter what (as

[Bug 1258182] Review Request: go-compilers - Go language compilers for various architectures

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258182 --- Comment #5 from Jan Chaloupka --- As it stands, go-srpm-macros can not be removed from minimal buildroot if %{go_arches} macro is about to be used with ExclusiveArch. Reasoning: Building of rpm has three phases: 1)

[Bug 1258182] Review Request: go-compilers - Go language compilers for various architectures

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258182 --- Comment #4 from Jan Chaloupka --- Plus gobuild and gotest macros takes only -o option. For other options rpm reports an error but the building phase continue without any problems. At this point only -o option is

[Bug 1258182] Review Request: go-compilers - Go language compilers for various architectures

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258182 --- Comment #3 from Jan Chaloupka --- Correction: it is 'unset -f', not 'undef -f' -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and

[Bug 1258182] Review Request: go-compilers - Go language compilers for various architectures

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258182 --- Comment #2 from Jan Chaloupka --- Updated definition of gobuild and gotest - added 'undef -f gobuild' and 'undef -f gotest' so both functions are not redefined if %gobuild/%gotest macros are used multi times.

[Bug 1258182] Review Request: go-compilers - Go language compilers for various architectures

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258182 --- Comment #1 from Jan Chaloupka --- After discussion with Jakub, compile.sh removed, definition of gobuild and gotest moved to macros. macros.go-compilers now contains: %gobuild() \ function gobuild { \ local

[Bug 1258182] Review Request: go-compilers - Go language compilers for various architectures

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258182 Jan Chaloupka jchal...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||fpoko...@redhat.com,