https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1356048
--- Comment #32 from Fedora Update System ---
rtlsdr-scanner-1.0.22298.18049-2.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1356048
--- Comment #31 from Fedora Update System ---
rtlsdr-scanner-1.0.22298.18049-2.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1356048
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1356048
--- Comment #30 from Fedora Update System ---
rtlsdr-scanner-1.0.22298.18049-2.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1356048
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|CLOSED |ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1356048
Jaroslav Škarvada changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1356048
--- Comment #28 from Fedora Update System ---
rtlsdr-scanner-1.0.22298.18049-2.fc23 has been submitted as an update to Fedora
23. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-3dfdda0cb3
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1356048
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1356048
--- Comment #27 from Fedora Update System ---
rtlsdr-scanner-1.0.22298.18049-2.fc24 has been submitted as an update to Fedora
24. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-3b377966e7
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1356048
--- Comment #26 from Jon Ciesla ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/rtlsdr-scanner
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1356048
--- Comment #25 from Jaroslav Škarvada ---
(In reply to Antonio Trande from comment #24)
> (In reply to Jaroslav Škarvada from comment #20)
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > %package doc
> > > > > > Summary:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1356048
Antonio Trande changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1356048
--- Comment #22 from Jaroslav Škarvada ---
(In reply to Jaroslav Škarvada from comment #12)
> Well, I have now a dilemma, whether the resulting license is GPLv3 or GPLv3+
> as stated on the different place of the sources.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1356048
--- Comment #23 from Jaroslav Škarvada ---
(In reply to Jaroslav Škarvada from comment #22)
> (In reply to Jaroslav Škarvada from comment #12)
> > Well, I have now a dilemma, whether the resulting license is GPLv3 or
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1356048
--- Comment #21 from Jaroslav Škarvada ---
Is there still any blocker?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1356048
--- Comment #20 from Jaroslav Škarvada ---
(In reply to Antonio Trande from comment #19)
> (In reply to Jaroslav Škarvada from comment #18)
> > (In reply to Antonio Trande from comment #17)
> > > (In reply to Jaroslav
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1356048
--- Comment #19 from Antonio Trande ---
(In reply to Jaroslav Škarvada from comment #18)
> (In reply to Antonio Trande from comment #17)
> > (In reply to Jaroslav Škarvada from comment #16)
> > > (In reply to Antonio
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1356048
--- Comment #18 from Jaroslav Škarvada ---
(In reply to Antonio Trande from comment #17)
> (In reply to Jaroslav Škarvada from comment #16)
> > (In reply to Antonio Trande from comment #15)
> > > (In reply to Jaroslav
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1356048
--- Comment #17 from Antonio Trande ---
(In reply to Jaroslav Škarvada from comment #16)
> (In reply to Antonio Trande from comment #15)
> > (In reply to Jaroslav Škarvada from comment #12)
> > > (In reply to Antonio
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1356048
--- Comment #16 from Jaroslav Škarvada ---
(In reply to Antonio Trande from comment #15)
> (In reply to Jaroslav Škarvada from comment #12)
> > (In reply to Antonio Trande from comment #11)
> >
> > Why it should provide
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1356048
--- Comment #15 from Antonio Trande ---
(In reply to Jaroslav Škarvada from comment #12)
> (In reply to Antonio Trande from comment #11)
>
> Why it should provide its own license file? The docs are licensing under the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1356048
--- Comment #14 from Jaroslav Škarvada ---
Opened upstream ticket regarding the resulting license:
https://github.com/EarToEarOak/RTLSDR-Scanner/issues/26
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1356048
--- Comment #12 from Jaroslav Škarvada ---
(In reply to Antonio Trande from comment #11)
Thanks for the review.
> - hicolor-icon-theme as Requires package is missing
>
Also it was wrongly packaged to own directories it
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1356048
--- Comment #13 from Jaroslav Škarvada ---
Spec URL: https://jskarvad.fedorapeople.org/rtlsdr-scanner/rtlsdr-scanner.spec
SRPM URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1356048
--- Comment #11 from Antonio Trande ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
Issues =
- hicolor-icon-theme as
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1356048
--- Comment #10 from Jaroslav Škarvada ---
(In reply to Antonio Trande from comment #9)
> (In reply to Jaroslav Škarvada from comment #8)
> > > >
> > > > Yes, it's for Fedora; it is a modest work but useful.
> > >
> > >
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1356048
--- Comment #9 from Antonio Trande ---
(In reply to Jaroslav Škarvada from comment #8)
> > >
> > > Yes, it's for Fedora; it is a modest work but useful.
> >
> > Nothing against, I was just lazy/busy :) Maybe I will
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1356048
--- Comment #8 from Jaroslav Škarvada ---
(In reply to Jaroslav Škarvada from comment #6)
> (In reply to Antonio Trande from comment #5)
> > (In reply to Jaroslav Škarvada from comment #4)
> > > (In reply to Antonio
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1356048
--- Comment #7 from Jaroslav Škarvada ---
I forwarded the patch (including description of ideas behind) and desktop file
to the upstream.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1356048
--- Comment #6 from Jaroslav Škarvada ---
(In reply to Antonio Trande from comment #5)
> (In reply to Jaroslav Škarvada from comment #4)
> > (In reply to Antonio Trande from comment #3)
> > > (In reply to Jaroslav
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1356048
--- Comment #5 from Antonio Trande ---
(In reply to Jaroslav Škarvada from comment #4)
> (In reply to Antonio Trande from comment #3)
> > (In reply to Jaroslav Škarvada from comment #2)
> > > (In reply to Antonio Trande
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1356048
--- Comment #4 from Jaroslav Škarvada ---
(In reply to Antonio Trande from comment #3)
> (In reply to Jaroslav Škarvada from comment #2)
> > (In reply to Antonio Trande from comment #1)
> > Thanks for taking the review.
>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1356048
--- Comment #3 from Antonio Trande ---
(In reply to Jaroslav Škarvada from comment #2)
> (In reply to Antonio Trande from comment #1)
> Thanks for taking the review.
>
> >
> > - Create an appdata file.
> Sorry, what
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1356048
--- Comment #2 from Jaroslav Škarvada ---
(In reply to Antonio Trande from comment #1)
Thanks for taking the review.
> - Please, leave a comment about the patch-
This is fedora distro specific patch updating paths and
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1356048
Antonio Trande changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
35 matches
Mail list logo