https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1403417
--- Comment #93 from Fedora Update System ---
gsequencer-0.7.135-1.fc26 has been pushed to the Fedora 26 stable repository.
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1403417
--- Comment #92 from Fedora Update System ---
gsequencer-0.7.135-1.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 stable repository.
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1403417
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1403417
--- Comment #90 from Fedora Update System ---
gsequencer-0.7.135-1.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 testing repository.
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1403417
--- Comment #89 from Fedora Update System ---
gsequencer-0.7.135-1.fc26 has been pushed to the Fedora 26 testing repository.
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1403417
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|CLOSED |ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1403417
--- Comment #87 from Fedora Update System ---
gsequencer-0.7.135-1.fc26 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 26.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-51d26c53b7
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1403417
--- Comment #86 from Fedora Update System ---
gsequencer-0.7.135-1.fc25 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 25.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-449e7e286f
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1403417
--- Comment #85 from Fedora Update System ---
gsequencer-0.7.135-1.fc24 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 24.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-98c244ae54
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1403417
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1403417
--- Comment #83 from Fedora Update System ---
gsequencer-0.7.122.23-0.fc26 has been pushed to the Fedora 26 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1403417
--- Comment #82 from Fedora Update System ---
gsequencer-0.7.122.23-0.fc25 has been pushed to the Fedora 25 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1403417
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1403417
--- Comment #80 from Fedora Update System ---
gsequencer-0.7.122.23-0.fc26 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 26.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-681b4e46b8
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1403417
--- Comment #79 from Fedora Update System ---
gsequencer-0.7.122.23-0.fc25 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 25.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-1bcd5c0cba
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1403417
--- Comment #78 from Fedora Update System ---
gsequencer-0.7.122.23-0.fc24 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 24.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-cc3bcee128
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1403417
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1403417
--- Comment #77 from Fedora Update System ---
gsequencer-0.7.122.21-0.fc26 has been pushed to the Fedora 26 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1403417
--- Comment #76 from Fedora Update System ---
gsequencer-0.7.122.21-0.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1403417
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1403417
--- Comment #74 from Fedora Update System ---
gsequencer-0.7.122.21-0.fc26 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 26.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-09d4d08212
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1403417
--- Comment #73 from Fedora Update System ---
gsequencer-0.7.122.21-0.fc25 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 25.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-984ec2b3c1
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1403417
--- Comment #72 from Fedora Update System ---
gsequencer-0.7.122.21-0.fc24 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 24.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-3bbaddcd43
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1403417
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1403417
--- Comment #71 from Fedora Update System ---
gsequencer-0.7.122.20-0.fc26 has been pushed to the Fedora 26 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1403417
--- Comment #70 from Fedora Update System ---
gsequencer-0.7.122.20-0.fc25 has been pushed to the Fedora 25 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1403417
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1403417
--- Comment #68 from Fedora Update System ---
gsequencer-0.7.122.20-0.fc26 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 26.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-2345652754
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1403417
--- Comment #67 from Fedora Update System ---
gsequencer-0.7.122.20-0.fc25 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 25.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-01f5202c66
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1403417
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1403417
--- Comment #66 from Fedora Update System ---
gsequencer-0.7.122.20-0.fc24 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 24.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-7e4ee54060
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1403417
--- Comment #65 from Fedora Update System ---
gsequencer-0.7.122.7-2.fc25 has been pushed to the Fedora 25 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1403417
--- Comment #64 from Fedora Update System ---
gsequencer-0.7.122.7-2.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1403417
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1403417
--- Comment #62 from Fedora Update System ---
gsequencer-0.7.122.7-2.fc24 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 24.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-4e51beb07a
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1403417
--- Comment #61 from Fedora Update System ---
gsequencer-0.7.122.7-2.fc25 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 25.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-e8bc61
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1403417
--- Comment #60 from Fedora Update System ---
gsequencer-0.7.122.7-2.fc26 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 26.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-cf233b5047
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1403417
--- Comment #59 from Fedora Update System ---
gsequencer-0.7.122.7-1.fc25 has been pushed to the Fedora 25 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1403417
--- Comment #58 from Fedora Update System ---
gsequencer-0.7.122.7-1.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1403417
--- Comment #57 from Fedora Update System ---
gsequencer-0.7.122.7-0.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1403417
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1403417
--- Comment #55 from Fedora Update System ---
gsequencer-0.7.122.7-1.fc24 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 24.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-da19e9160d
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1403417
--- Comment #54 from Fedora Update System ---
gsequencer-0.7.122.7-1.fc25 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 25.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-ab05cb9c57
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1403417
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1403417
--- Comment #53 from Fedora Update System ---
gsequencer-0.7.122.7-1.fc26 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 26.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-f811608abd
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1403417
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1403417
--- Comment #51 from Fedora Update System ---
gsequencer-0.7.122.7-0.fc26 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 26.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-dabef7359d
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1403417
--- Comment #50 from Fedora Update System ---
gsequencer-0.7.122.7-0.fc25 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 25.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-d34e53331e
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1403417
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1403417
--- Comment #49 from Fedora Update System ---
gsequencer-0.7.122.7-0.fc24 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 24.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-3ca175034a
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1403417
--- Comment #48 from Joël Krähemann ---
hi
just noticed another test fails. So it is rather randomly, thought.
FAIL: ags_xorg_application_context_test
Bests,
Joël
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1403417
--- Comment #47 from Joël Krähemann ---
Hi Mukundan
The build fails sometimes by a crashed test:
FAIL: ags_functional_audio_test
It uses JACK Audio Connection Kit but it is known that sometimes if no
soundcard
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1403417
--- Comment #46 from Mukundan Ragavan ---
(In reply to Joël Krähemann from comment #45)
> I have just requested the package. I have found some useful documentation in
> the fedora wiki. And for sure you are added as a
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1403417
--- Comment #45 from Joël Krähemann ---
I have just requested the package. I have found some useful documentation in
the fedora wiki. And for sure you are added as a co-maintainer.
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1403417
--- Comment #44 from Mukundan Ragavan ---
I have added you to packagers.
Please add me as a co-maintainer for this package so that I can help you with
anything that is necessary.
Welcome!
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1403417
--- Comment #43 from Mukundan Ragavan ---
(In reply to Joël Krähemann from comment #41)
> Hi
>
> I'm going to pick some packages and do the unofficial reviews.
> So far I did it for my own package as you see above.
>
>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1403417
--- Comment #42 from Joël Krähemann ---
Hi
here is the new SRPM some patches were removed. Further xvfb-run is a new build
dependency in order to run `make check`.
Spec URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1403417
--- Comment #41 from Joël Krähemann ---
Hi
I'm going to pick some packages and do the unofficial reviews.
So far I did it for my own package as you see above.
Note there is a new upstream package available 0.7.122.7
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1403417
Mukundan Ragavan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1403417
--- Comment #39 from Joël Krähemann ---
Hi
Here you are
Spec URL: http://gsequencer.org/fedora/rpmbuild/SPECS/gsequencer.spec
SRPM URL:
http://gsequencer.org/fedora/rpmbuild/SRPMS/gsequencer-0.7.122.6-3.fc25.src.rpm
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1403417
--- Comment #38 from Mukundan Ragavan ---
Can you post links to updated spec and srpm.
Also, please add some text to explain the patches as I indicated in a previous
comment. Comments make it much easier for someone
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1403417
--- Comment #37 from Joël Krähemann ---
Hi
just updated gsequencer.spec to make the docs noarch.
Bests,
Joël
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1403417
--- Comment #36 from Michael Schwendt ---
> Note there are some additional patches, now.
Simply moving the lib in %install would have done the job. Anything beyond that
could have been postponed to a future update of
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1403417
--- Comment #35 from Mukundan Ragavan ---
Changes made -
- package does not install private library.
# rpm -ql gsequencer
/usr/bin/gsequencer
/usr/bin/midi2xml
/usr/lib64/libags.so.0
/usr/lib64/libags.so.0.0.7
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1403417
--- Comment #34 from Mukundan Ragavan ---
Michael, sorry for the non-response. Several excellent points. I was able to
launch the application in my VM and that's why I marked that it as [x]. I will
check what I did
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1403417
--- Comment #33 from Joël Krähemann ---
Hi
This does install libgsequencer.so in %{_libdir}, provides its the headers in
/usr/include/ags/X and the API reference is generated, too.
Note there are some additional
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1403417
--- Comment #32 from Michael Schwendt ---
> You are right it doesn't work anymore. However I have tested it and it was
> working for that package.
Probably prior to deleting the RPATH from the program?
> The library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1403417
--- Comment #31 from Joël Krähemann ---
Hi
(In reply to Michael Schwendt from comment #29)
> > It's not a "true" devel file.
>
> That's much too vague.
>
> This review item is about avoiding a conflict between
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1403417
--- Comment #30 from Michael Schwendt ---
Truncated comment:
[...] it's more that in the repos, a single noarch build of package can be
linked from within all other arched repos.
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1403417
--- Comment #29 from Michael Schwendt ---
> It's not a "true" devel file.
That's much too vague.
This review item is about avoiding a conflict between multiple non-versioned
runtime libs with the same name. It would
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1403417
Mukundan Ragavan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1403417
--- Comment #28 from Mukundan Ragavan ---
(In reply to Michael Schwendt from comment #27)
> > --> License file is installed as part of the gsequencer package.
> > -devel package has versioned requires for the base
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1403417
--- Comment #27 from Michael Schwendt ---
> --> License file is installed as part of the gsequencer package.
> -devel package has versioned requires for the base packages.
>
> However, -devel-doc does not depend on
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1403417
--- Comment #26 from Mukundan Ragavan ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
= MUST items =
C/C++:
[x]:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1403417
--- Comment #25 from Mukundan Ragavan ---
(In reply to Michael Schwendt from comment #24)
> > 3/ from the %files section
> >
> > %{_bindir}/*
> > %{_mandir}/man1/*
> >
> >
> > This is a no-no. This package simply
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1403417
--- Comment #24 from Michael Schwendt ---
> 3/ from the %files section
>
> %{_bindir}/*
> %{_mandir}/man1/*
>
>
> This is a no-no. This package simply cannot own all packages
> under /usr/bin and /usr/share/man.
As
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1403417
--- Comment #23 from Joël Krähemann ---
Hi
- modified manpage expression
- modified binary expression
- removed CFLAGS and BINDIR flags of make_build
I have modified the release to start with 1:
Spec URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1403417
--- Comment #22 from Mukundan Ragavan ---
(In reply to Joël Krähemann from comment #21)
> Hi
>
> About directory /usr/share/gtk-doc I just read here:
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines
>
> Didn't
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1403417
--- Comment #21 from Joël Krähemann ---
Hi
About directory /usr/share/gtk-doc I just read here:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines
Didn't I understand the sentence correctly?
"Solution: the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1403417
--- Comment #20 from Mukundan Ragavan ---
Some initial comments that would be good to address before I run fedora-review.
1/
Release: 0%{?dist}
I suggest starting with release tag 1 instead of 0.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1403417
Mukundan Ragavan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1403417
--- Comment #18 from Michael Schwendt ---
Since Nov 2015 any packager may do the needed review. It need not be a sponsor
anymore. And sorry, I'm kind of picky nowadays.
Feel free to continue.
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1403417
Mukundan Ragavan changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1403417
--- Comment #16 from Joël Krähemann ---
Hi
Just corrected spec location
Spec URL: http://gsequencer.org/fedora/rpmbuild/SPECS/gsequencer.spec
SRPM URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1403417
--- Comment #15 from Joël Krähemann ---
Hi
Providing a version with improved stability:
Spec URL: http://gsequencer.org/fedora/rpmbuild/gsequencer.spec
SRPM URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1403417
--- Comment #14 from Joël Krähemann ---
Hi
Just some performance improvements for interfacing ALSA MIDI and soundcard
Spec URL: http://gsequencer.org/fedora/rpmbuild/gsequencer.spec
SRPM URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1403417
--- Comment #13 from Joël Krähemann ---
Hi Michael
(In reply to Michael Schwendt from comment #8)
> > - Sources used to build the package match the upstream source,
> > as provided in the spec URL.
> > Note: Upstream
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1403417
--- Comment #12 from Joël Krähemann ---
Hi
Since there was a problem with Makefile.am and `install` there was a need for
an additional package.
Spec URL: http://gsequencer.org/fedora/rpmbuild/gsequencer.spec
SRPM URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1403417
--- Comment #11 from Joël Krähemann ---
The new SRPM is here:
I just implemented export to specified soundcard. I'm happy now with the
package.
In order to build htmlhelp it has a need for a patch.
Spec URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1403417
--- Comment #10 from Michael Schwendt ---
> Added about 8000 lines of code doing properties of task objects.
* Let me advise you to separate package review and upstream development and
restrict yourself to packaging
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1403417
--- Comment #9 from Joël Krähemann ---
Hi
Just fixed experimental MIDI hardware support and tested it manually with my
keyboard.
Added about 8000 lines of code doing properties of task objects.
The new SRPM is here:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1403417
--- Comment #8 from Michael Schwendt ---
> - Sources used to build the package match the upstream source,
> as provided in the spec URL.
> Note: Upstream MD5sum check error, diff is in
>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1403417
--- Comment #7 from Joël Krähemann ---
Hi
Just updated gsequencer.spec and have taken a look at the review. About certain
points I'm unsure.
This is a review *template*. Besides handling the [ ]-marked tests you are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1403417
Michael Schwendt changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1403417
--- Comment #5 from Joël Krähemann ---
Hi
The new SRPM is here:
Spec URL: http://gsequencer.org/fedora/rpmbuild/gsequencer.spec
SRPM URL:
http://gsequencer.org/fedora/rpmbuild/SRPMS/gsequencer-0.7.115-0.fc25.src.rpm
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1403417
--- Comment #4 from Joël Krähemann ---
Hi
Just fixed copyright notice in upstream:
gsequencer-devel.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address
So I provide a new package 0.7.115
Bests,
Joël
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1403417
--- Comment #3 from Joël Krähemann ---
Hi all
Just updated the files gsequencer.spec and gsequencer-0.7.114-0.fc25.src.rpm
about %{_datadir}/xml/gsequencer/ I'm unsure
Bests,
Joël
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1403417
--- Comment #2 from Michael Schwendt ---
$ fedora-review -b 1403417
INFO: Processing bugzilla bug: 1403417
...
INFO: Downloading .spec and .srpm files
error: %changelog entries must start with *
So, the fedora-review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1403417
Michael Schwendt changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||177841
99 matches
Mail list logo