https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1404043
--- Comment #42 from Honggang LI ---
(In reply to Honggang LI from comment #41)
> It is more complex than that.
>
> 1) Individual packages do not exist any more. They are RDMA hardware
> usr-space drivers which has been
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1404043
Hanns-Joachim Uhl changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1404043
--- Comment #41 from Honggang LI ---
(In reply to Vít Ondruch from comment #40)
> Shouldn't the independent libibverbs [1] and librdmacm [2] packages be
> retired now?
>
>
> [1]
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1404043
Vít Ondruch changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vondr...@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1404043
Honggang LI changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1404043
Kevin Fenzi changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(ke...@scrye.com) |
--- Comment #38 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1404043
Honggang LI changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1404043
--- Comment #36 from Honggang LI ---
Created attachment 1310973
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1310973=edit
Use %{?systemd_requires} macro
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1404043
--- Comment #35 from Honggang LI ---
(In reply to Kevin Fenzi from comment #33)
> Slightly longer term, we have put in a PR to make lorax not prune perl:
> https://github.com/rhinstaller/lorax/pull/228 once thats merged
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1404043
--- Comment #34 from Honggang LI ---
(In reply to Jarod Wilson from comment #30)
> And now the build fails on ppc64le, while successful on all other arches:
>
> bin/ib_acme: error while loading shared libraries:
>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1404043
Kevin Fenzi changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ke...@scrye.com
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1404043
--- Comment #32 from Honggang LI ---
(In reply to Dennis Gilmore from comment #25)
> this package is broken and untagged, scripts in /usr/bin that use perl for
> instance, with missing Requires on perl.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1404043
--- Comment #31 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek ---
(In reply to Jarod Wilson from comment #29)
> That makes the build fail:
> error: line 178: Unknown tag: %systemd_requires
It should be "%{?systemd_requires}", see
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1404043
--- Comment #30 from Jarod Wilson ---
And now the build fails on ppc64le, while successful on all other arches:
bin/ib_acme: error while loading shared libraries:
/builddir/build/BUILD/rdma-core-14/lib/libibverbs.so.1:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1404043
--- Comment #29 from Jarod Wilson ---
(In reply to Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek from comment #27)
> systemd-units is long gone. You should replace:
> Requires(post): systemd-units
> Requires(preun): systemd-units
>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1404043
--- Comment #28 from Jarod Wilson ---
Pushed an rdma-core v14 build just now.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1404043
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1404043
--- Comment #26 from Jarod Wilson ---
(In reply to Dennis Gilmore from comment #25)
> this package is broken and untagged, scripts in /usr/bin that use perl for
> instance, with missing Requires on perl.
Say what now?
$
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1404043
--- Comment #25 from Dennis Gilmore ---
this package is broken and untagged, scripts in /usr/bin that use perl for
instance, with missing Requires on perl. rdma-core-12-0.1.rc3.1.fc26 broke the
compose process with
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1404043
--- Comment #24 from Jarod Wilson ---
(In reply to Jon Ciesla from comment #23)
> Package request has been approved:
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/rdma-core
Whoops, I just filed a new package request
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1404043
--- Comment #23 from Jon Ciesla ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/rdma-core
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1404043
Honggang LI changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review+
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1404043
--- Comment #21 from Jarod Wilson ---
(In reply to Honggang LI from comment #20)
> (In reply to Jarod Wilson from comment #19)
>
> > On another note, the +rsyslog portion is actually the opposite direction we
> > need to go
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1404043
--- Comment #20 from Honggang LI ---
(In reply to Jarod Wilson from comment #19)
> On another note, the +rsyslog portion is actually the opposite direction we
> need to go here. Have discussed that with upstream, and
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1404043
--- Comment #19 from Jarod Wilson ---
That's.. Odd. I can remove the comments, but surprising that it's those that
cause the problem.
On another note, the +rsyslog portion is actually the opposite direction we
need to go
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1404043
--- Comment #18 from Honggang LI ---
(In reply to Jarod Wilson from comment #17)
> I haven't touched the ldconfig issue just yet, no clue how to address that,
> will have to get some upstream input there.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1404043
--- Comment #17 from Jarod Wilson ---
Working through some of the issues, have posted a few new iterations of patches
upstream, with a few more pending. I've disabled building libibumad on 32-bit
arm, as there's memory
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1404043
--- Comment #16 from Honggang LI ---
Hi, Jarod
1) systemd-udev is new sub-package of systemd for FC >= 24. It owns
"/etc/udev/rules.d" and "/usr/lib/udev/rules.d/". rdma-core package installs
three files into those
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1404043
--- Comment #15 from Jarod Wilson ---
SRPM and spec updated, based on proposed patch and upstream review discussion.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1404043
--- Comment #14 from Honggang LI ---
Created attachment 1234802
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1234802=edit
proposed patch against the SPEC file linked in comment #6.
proposed patch against the SPEC
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1404043
--- Comment #13 from Honggang LI ---
(In reply to Jarod Wilson from comment #6)
> http://people.redhat.com/~jwilson/pkgreview/rdma-core/rdma-core.spec
>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1404043
--- Comment #12 from Jarod Wilson ---
Found the part of the packaging guidelines that says why we need BR: systemd
for Fedora and verified it myself. Holding off on an srpm update until
tomorrow, pending some additional
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1404043
--- Comment #10 from Jarod Wilson ---
(In reply to Honggang LI from comment #8)
> (In reply to Jarod Wilson from comment #5)
> >
> > > honli: systemd and dracut also needed.
> >
> > These already get pulled in.
>
> No,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1404043
--- Comment #11 from Jarod Wilson ---
(In reply to Honggang LI from comment #9)
> (In reply to Jarod Wilson from comment #6)
>
> > http://people.redhat.com/~jwilson/pkgreview/rdma-core/rdma-core.spec
> >
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1404043
--- Comment #9 from Honggang LI ---
(In reply to Jarod Wilson from comment #6)
> http://people.redhat.com/~jwilson/pkgreview/rdma-core/rdma-core.spec
>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1404043
--- Comment #8 from Honggang LI ---
(In reply to Jarod Wilson from comment #5)
>
> > honli: systemd and dracut also needed.
>
> These already get pulled in.
No, you missed systemd. As a result, your new srpm can't be
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1404043
--- Comment #7 from Honggang LI ---
(In reply to Jarod Wilson from comment #3)
>
> > Comment 1:
> > /etc/rc.d/init.d/srpd (delete it as RHEL7 and FC26 use systemd.)
>
> Confused here, I don't see this in the build. Or did
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1404043
--- Comment #6 from Jarod Wilson ---
(In reply to Jarod Wilson from comment #3)
...
> > Issue 4: broken soft link (librdmacm-12-1.fc26.x86_64.rpm)?
> > /usr/lib64/rsocket
> > [honli@dhcp47-85 rsocket]$ ll
> > total 0
> >
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1404043
--- Comment #5 from Jarod Wilson ---
(In reply to Jarod Wilson from comment #4)
> Spec file comments from honli:
>
> Url: https://github.com/linux-rdma/rdma-core
> honli:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:
>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1404043
--- Comment #4 from Jarod Wilson ---
Spec file comments from honli:
Url: https://github.com/linux-rdma/rdma-core
honli:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:SourceURL#When_Upstream_uses_Prohibited_Code
honli: Please add
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1404043
--- Comment #3 from Jarod Wilson ---
(In reply to Jarod Wilson from comment #2)
> From honli via email, pasting here for all to see:
>
> Issue 1: see line 11
>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1404043
--- Comment #2 from Jarod Wilson ---
From honli via email, pasting here for all to see:
Issue 1: see line 11
honli@dhcp47-85:~/b1404043/1404043-rdma-core/srpm-unpacked/rdma-core-12$ cat -n
MAINTAINERS
1
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1404043
Honggang LI changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1404043
--- Comment #1 from Jarod Wilson ---
There isn't an upstream rdma-core release just yet, so the tarball was
generated using:
$ git archive --prefix rdma-core-12/ --output
~/rpmbuild/SOURCES/rdma-core-12.tgz HEAD
A release
44 matches
Mail list logo