https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1460917
--- Comment #32 from Fedora Update System ---
rpkg-client-0.8-1.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 stable repository.
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1460917
--- Comment #31 from Fedora Update System ---
rpkg-client-0.8-1.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 stable repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1460917
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1460917
--- Comment #29 from Fedora Update System ---
rpkg-client-0.8-1.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 testing repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1460917
--- Comment #28 from Fedora Update System ---
rpkg-client-0.8-1.fc26 has been pushed to the Fedora 26 testing repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1460917
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|CLOSED |ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1460917
--- Comment #26 from cl...@redhat.com ---
(In reply to Orion Poplawski from comment #24)
> %install
> rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
>
> is no longer needed (for a long time).
>
> I would suggest using the newer %py2_build/%py2_install macros
>
>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1460917
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1460917
Orion Poplawski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1460917
--- Comment #23 from Fedora Update System ---
rpkg-client-0.6-1.fc26 has been pushed to the Fedora 26 testing repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1460917
--- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System ---
rpkg-client-0.6-1.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 testing repository.
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1460917
--- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System ---
rpkg-client-0.6-1.fc25 has been pushed to the Fedora 25 testing repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1460917
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1460917
--- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System ---
rpkg-client-0.6-1.fc25 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 25.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-52327d89db
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1460917
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1460917
--- Comment #18 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/rpkg-client
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1460917
Jakub Kadlčík changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review+
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1460917
--- Comment #17 from Jakub Kadlčík ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
= MUST items =
Generic:
[x]: Package
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1460917
--- Comment #16 from Jakub Kadlčík ---
Spec URL:
https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/clime/rpkg-client/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/00576706-rpkg-client/rpkg-client.spec
SRPM URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1460917
--- Comment #15 from cl...@redhat.com ---
*directories (that is fedora-rawhide-x86_64 e.g.)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1460917
--- Comment #14 from cl...@redhat.com ---
Successful COPR build:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/clime/rpkg-client/build/576706/
You can find the up-to-date srpm and .spec in the linked COPR directory.
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1460917
--- Comment #13 from Jakub Kadlčík ---
Well, ok.
But unfortunately I can't build the package now. Please see the following
error.
+ install -d
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1460917
--- Comment #12 from cl...@redhat.com ---
Done.
Spec URL: http://clime.cz/rpkg-client.spec
SRPM URL: http://clime.cz/rpkg-client-0.5-1.fc25.src.rpm
I needed to move the configuration file out of /etc/rpkg and place it directly
in /etc/ (that
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1460917
--- Comment #11 from Jakub Kadlčík ---
I am sorry clime, I was about to approve this request, but then I noticed one
more thing.
> [?]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
> Note:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1460917
--- Comment #10 from cl...@redhat.com ---
> Would you prefer to provide new srpm and spec at public share after this fix?
> Yes please.
Spec URL: http://clime.cz/rpkg-client.spec
SRPM URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1460917
--- Comment #9 from Jakub Kadlčík ---
> Would you prefer to provide new srpm and spec at public share after this fix?
Yes please.
But otherwise LGTM. Does anyone else see any issues or can proceed to the next
steps of
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1460917
--- Comment #8 from cl...@redhat.com ---
> It is not docummented, how can we obtain this archive. In the first version
> of your spec file there was a
>
> # Source is created by:
> # git clone https://pagure.io/rpkg-client.git
> # cd
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1460917
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Kadlčík ---
> There are packages that depend on binary package 'rpkg' (which was removed
from fedora). So the point is to provide 'rpkg' again without changing other
packages (e.g. to avoid
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1460917
Pavel Raiskup changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1460917
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Kadlčík ---
> What about the name dist-git-client?
Personally I have no problem with both rpkg-client and dist-git-client. May
clime use what he likes best (even some other name)
> Source0:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1460917
--- Comment #4 from cl...@redhat.com ---
Hello, here are changes according to review:
Spec URL: http://clime.cz/rpkg-client.spec
SRPM URL: http://clime.cz/rpkg-client-0.1-1.git.4.6a6.fc25.src.rpm
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1460917
--- Comment #3 from Pavel Raiskup ---
> May I suggest naming it rpkg-client as the upstream project names?
Good point, unfortunately rename is needed. What about the name
dist-git-client?
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1460917
Neal Gompa changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ngomp...@gmail.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1460917
Jakub Kadlčík changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1460917
Jakub Kadlčík changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
35 matches
Mail list logo