https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1501522
--- Comment #134 from David Vásquez ---
Hi, sorry the delay; if you want offensive (In reply to Dominik 'Rathann'
Mierzejewski from comment #133)
> (In reply to Pavlo Rudyi from comment #132)
> > > But we want AAC support in Fedora proper
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1501522
--- Comment #133 from Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
---
(In reply to Pavlo Rudyi from comment #132)
> > But we want AAC support in Fedora proper without need to enable third-party
> > repos. The goal is to be able to play MP4s
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1501522
Pavlo Rudyi changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||paulcarr...@riseup.net
--- Comment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1501522
--- Comment #131 from Michael Catanzaro ---
Red Hat legal says this is GPL-compatible. That should be more than good enough
for Fedora.
(In reply to Kevin Kofler from comment #130)
> As far as shipping this fork in Fedora goes, I still agree
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1501522
--- Comment #130 from Kevin Kofler ---
As far as shipping this fork in Fedora goes, I still agree with kwizart and
consider it a huge mistake to ship a broken-by-design, non-functional (see bug
1711040) codec in Fedora instead of just letting
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1501522
--- Comment #129 from David Vásquez ---
(In reply to Kevin Kofler from comment #128)
> The FFmpeg developers consider it illegal to distribute a build configured
> with --enable-gpl --enable-nonfree. So you are blatantly ignoring the
>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1501522
--- Comment #128 from Kevin Kofler ---
The FFmpeg developers consider it illegal to distribute a build configured with
--enable-gpl --enable-nonfree. So you are blatantly ignoring the upstream
licenses.
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1501522
--- Comment #127 from David Vásquez ---
(In reply to Kevin Kofler from comment #125)
> (In reply to David Vásquez from comment #121)
> > UnitedRPMs is already using fdk-aac-free (updated commit stripped3) in
> > ffmpeg and
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1501522
--- Comment #126 from David Vásquez ---
(In reply to Michael Catanzaro from comment #122)
> BTW the source repo is already created nine months ago:
> https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/fdk-aac-free
>
> The package already exists in Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1501522
--- Comment #125 from Kevin Kofler ---
(In reply to David Vásquez from comment #121)
> UnitedRPMs is already using fdk-aac-free (updated commit stripped3) in
> ffmpeg and gstreamer1-plugins-bad-free; and it works fine :)
Why would a
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1501522
--- Comment #124 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) ---
> "Step 15: Consider enabling Upstream Release Monitoring for the package."
> This is essential to prevent our fork from bitrotting.
This is already the case as upstream fdk-aac official
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1501522
Michael Catanzaro changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1501522
--- Comment #122 from Michael Catanzaro ---
BTW the source repo is already created nine months ago:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/fdk-aac-free
The package already exists in Fedora and is installable with 'sudo dnf install
fdk-aac-free'.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1501522
--- Comment #121 from David Vásquez ---
UnitedRPMs is already using fdk-aac-free (updated commit stripped3) in ffmpeg
and gstreamer1-plugins-bad-free; and it works fine :)
We continue the discussion for years, or we put our hands to it.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1501522
--- Comment #120 from Neal Gompa ---
Well, ignoring the technical problems with fdk-aac-free, I don't see anything
wrong with getting it in now. Since the ball is rolling to remove an obsolete
clause, and it's not triggered by any reasonable
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1501522
Tom "spot" Callaway changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(tcallawa@redhat.c |
|om)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1501522
--- Comment #118 from Christian Fredrik Kalager Schaller
---
I don't think its a waste of time the way the question is framed, and I don't
want to put words in Tom's mouth here, but my answer would be 'yes of course
people should feel free
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1501522
--- Comment #117 from Michael Catanzaro ---
I think this question is a waste of Tom's time.
We have review approval and legal approval for the current license. Let's
proceed so we can get AAC support into Fedora!
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1501522
Neal Gompa changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ngomp...@gmail.com
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1501522
--- Comment #115 from Christian Fredrik Kalager Schaller
---
(In reply to Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) from comment #113)
> I see nothing new under the sun, but lets move on.
>
> - Since the clause 3 is a "no op" in the fdk-aac-free fork,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1501522
--- Comment #114 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) ---
(I will ask advises on several interested upstream parties on the last item).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1501522
--- Comment #113 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) ---
I see nothing new under the sun, but lets move on.
- Since the clause 3 is a "no op" in the fdk-aac-free fork, Please expunge such
statement from the whole fdk-aac-free codesource.
- Please
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1501522
--- Comment #112 from Tom "spot" Callaway ---
(With my "Fedora Legal" hat on...)
The Fedora Project is aware that the Free Software Foundation has stated that
the Fraunhofer FDK AAC license is GPL incompatible, specifically, because of
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1501522
Bastien Nocera changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bnoc...@redhat.com
--- Comment #111
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1501522
--- Comment #110 from Christian Fredrik Kalager Schaller
---
I doubt the problem they have is what Kevin pointed to in Comment #16. As
Richard Fontana pointed out in #48 that restriction is true for GPL too. It is
probably more a question of
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1501522
--- Comment #109 from Michael Catanzaro ---
I see now that Kevin warned us about this in comment #16, and we failed to pay
attention. :/
Since it's GPL-incompatible, it would be extremely problematic to have it in a
GStreamer plugin, which
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1501522
Tom "spot" Callaway changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|182235 (FE-Legal) |
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1501522
--- Comment #108 from Tom "spot" Callaway ---
The FSF issued their determination on this license: it is free, but
GPL-incompatible.
https://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.html#fdk
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1501522
--- Comment #107 from Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
---
Fixed that for you. For future reference: click on the "gear" icon and tick the
"Tracked by Koschei" box.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1501522
Fabio Valentini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||decatho...@gmail.com
--- Comment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1501522
--- Comment #105 from Wim Taymans ---
I saw this here:
https://apps.fedoraproject.org/koschei/package/fdk-aac-free
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1501522
--- Comment #104 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) ---
(In reply to Wim Taymans from comment #103)
> Is there something else that needs to happen for this to become available in
> Rawhide?
I don't see anything wrong at least from the koji side:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1501522
--- Comment #103 from Wim Taymans ---
Is there something else that needs to happen for this to become available in
Rawhide?
Package is currently ineligible for scheduling due to following reasons:
* Package is not tracked
* Package
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1501522
--- Comment #102 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
(fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/fdk-aac-free
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1501522
--- Comment #101 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) ---
Minors comments (not need to re-upload)
- Group can be removed
- post/postun can be replaced with %ldconfig_scriptlets
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Removing_ldconfig_scriptlets
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1501522
--- Comment #100 from Wim Taymans ---
New links
https://people.freedesktop.org/~wtay/SPECS/fdk-aac-free.spec
https://people.freedesktop.org/~wtay/SRPMS/fdk-aac-free-0.1.5-4.fc28.src.rpm
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1501522
Wim Taymans changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Review Request: fdk-aac - |Review Request:
37 matches
Mail list logo
