https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1718684
--- Comment #47 from Fedora Update System ---
cc65-2.18-4.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 stable repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1718684
--- Comment #46 from Fedora Update System ---
cc65-2.18-4.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 stable repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1718684
--- Comment #45 from Fedora Update System ---
cc65-2.18-2.fc29 has been pushed to the Fedora 29 stable repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1718684
--- Comment #44 from Fedora Update System ---
cc65-2.18-4.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 testing repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1718684
--- Comment #43 from Fedora Update System ---
cc65-2.18-4.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 testing repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1718684
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1718684
--- Comment #41 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2019-af1858df1c has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 7.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2019-af1858df1c
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1718684
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |MODIFIED
--- Comment #40 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1718684
--- Comment #39 from Fedora Update System ---
cc65-2.18-2.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 testing repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1718684
--- Comment #38 from Fedora Update System ---
cc65-2.18-2.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 testing repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1718684
--- Comment #37 from Fedora Update System ---
cc65-2.18-2.fc29 has been pushed to the Fedora 29 testing repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1718684
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #36 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1718684
--- Comment #35 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2019-d45997d037 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 29.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-d45997d037
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1718684
--- Comment #34 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2019-54c8fbdce0 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 30.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-54c8fbdce0
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1718684
--- Comment #33 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2019-af1858df1c has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 7.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2019-af1858df1c
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1718684
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |MODIFIED
--- Comment #32 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1718684
--- Comment #31 from Dan Horák ---
(In reply to Björn 'besser82' Esser from comment #26)
> (In reply to Dan Horák from comment #21)
> > (In reply to Björn 'besser82' Esser from comment #19)
> > > Many thanks for digging up the link.
> > >
>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1718684
--- Comment #30 from Fedora Update System ---
cc65-2.18-1.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 testing repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1718684
--- Comment #29 from Fedora Update System ---
cc65-2.18-1.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 testing repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1718684
--- Comment #28 from Fedora Update System ---
cc65-2.18-1.fc29 has been pushed to the Fedora 29 testing repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1718684
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #27 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1718684
--- Comment #26 from Björn 'besser82' Esser ---
(In reply to Dan Horák from comment #21)
> (In reply to Björn 'besser82' Esser from comment #19)
> > Many thanks for digging up the link.
> >
> > @Dan Horák Can we lift FE-LEGAL, then, and
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1718684
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST|MODIFIED
--- Comment #23 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1718684
--- Comment #25 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2019-af1858df1c has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 7.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2019-af1858df1c
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1718684
--- Comment #22 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
(fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/cc65
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1718684
Dan Horák changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|182235 (FE-Legal) |
--- Comment #21 from Dan Horák ---
(In
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1718684
--- Comment #20 from Björn 'besser82' Esser ---
Updated package:
Changelog:
* Tue Jun 11 2019 Björn Esser - 2.18-0.6
- Add a link for clarifying the actual license
- Remove the %%{name} prefix from binaries in the utils package
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1718684
--- Comment #19 from Björn 'besser82' Esser ---
Many thanks for digging up the link.
@Dan Horák Can we lift FE-LEGAL, then, and proceed?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1718684
--- Comment #18 from Dan Horák ---
Thanks for digging it up, this clears my concerns.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1718684
--- Comment #17 from Robert-André Mauchin ---
Message #55 received at 714...@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):
From: j...@jrd.org
To: 714...@bugs.debian.org
Cc: John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
Subject: CC65 licensing
Date: Mon, 4 May 2015
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1718684
--- Comment #16 from Robert-André Mauchin ---
Debian to the rescue:
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=714058#30
Message #30 received at 714...@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):
From: j...@jrd.org
To:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1718684
--- Comment #15 from Björn 'besser82' Esser ---
(In reply to Robert-André Mauchin from comment #9)
> - Don't use %{__install} %{__mv} %{__mkdir_p} %{__make} etc., these macros
> don't bring anything useful. Use regular commands.
It's
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1718684
--- Comment #14 from Robert-André Mauchin ---
The problematic parts would be this:
https://github.com/cc65/cc65/blob/master/src/cc65/copyleft.jrd
https://github.com/cc65/cc65/blob/master/doc/cc65.sgml#L1561
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1718684
--- Comment #13 from Dan Horák ---
There is a long history why cc65 wasn't permitted in Fedora because of
licensing issues. cc65/expr.c has no copyright info at all and I think Ullrich
von Bassewitz wasn't the original author of the file and
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1718684
--- Comment #12 from Robert-André Mauchin ---
(In reply to Dan Horák from comment #8)
> From what I can see nothing changed for
> https://github.com/cc65/cc65/blob/master/src/cc65/expr.c, there should be
> details from the past either in a
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1718684
--- Comment #11 from Dan Horák ---
the original thread from legal -
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/le...@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/BGIWJ3FJRNE4TVDCA7S45Q5IALPMELBE/
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1718684
Dan Horák changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||182235 (FE-Legal)
--- Comment #10 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1718684
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |POST
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1718684
--- Comment #8 from Dan Horák ---
From what I can see nothing changed for
https://github.com/cc65/cc65/blob/master/src/cc65/expr.c, there should be
details from the past either in a thread on legal list or in an old review bug
or in the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1718684
Dan Horák changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||d...@danny.cz
--- Comment #7 from Dan
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1718684
--- Comment #6 from Björn 'besser82' Esser ---
Updated package:
Changelog:
* Tue Jun 11 2019 Björn Esser - 2.18-0.5
- Fix use of a macro
- Remove hiphen separator from binaries in utils package
- Fix an entry in %%changelog
*
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1718684
--- Comment #5 from Björn 'besser82' Esser ---
Updated package:
Changelog:
* Mon Jun 10 2019 Björn Esser - 2.18-0.4
- Update Patch1000
Scratch build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=35463149
Urls:
Spec URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1718684
--- Comment #4 from Björn 'besser82' Esser ---
Updated package:
Changelog:
* Mon Jun 10 2019 Björn Esser - 2.18-0.3
- Adapt BUILD_ID to be architecture independent
- Drop Patches 1001 and 2000 as they not needed anymore
* Sun Jun
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1718684
--- Comment #3 from Björn 'besser82' Esser ---
Updated package:
Changelog:
* Sun Jun 09 2019 Björn Esser - 2.18-0.2
- Add downstream patch to undefine a macro mangling version string
* Sat Jun 08 2019 Björn Esser - 2.18-0.1
-
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1718684
--- Comment #2 from Björn 'besser82' Esser ---
Temporary COPR for testing:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/besser82/cc65/
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1718684
Björn 'besser82' Esser changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Review Request: -|based systems
--
You
46 matches
Mail list logo
