[Bug 1816858] Review Request: kata-agent - kata containers guest agent

2020-04-01 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1816858 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|---

[Bug 1816858] Review Request: kata-agent - kata containers guest agent

2020-03-25 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1816858 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #10 from

[Bug 1816858] Review Request: kata-agent - kata containers guest agent

2020-03-25 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1816858 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED --- Comment #9 from

[Bug 1816858] Review Request: kata-agent - kata containers guest agent

2020-03-25 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1816858 --- Comment #8 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/kata-agent -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified

[Bug 1816858] Review Request: kata-agent - kata containers guest agent

2020-03-25 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1816858 --- Comment #7 from Cole Robinson --- (In reply to Christophe de Dinechin from comment #5) > Reviewed the spec file rapidly. Looks good to me with two notes: > > 1) Do we need the -Sgit option for autosetup? > If using git format-patch

[Bug 1816858] Review Request: kata-agent - kata containers guest agent

2020-03-25 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1816858 --- Comment #6 from Cole Robinson --- (In reply to Fabiano Fidêncio from comment #3) > (In reply to Fabiano Fidêncio from comment #2) > > > So, comments made, may I ask your take on those? Is there some specific > > reason behind the dir

[Bug 1816858] Review Request: kata-agent - kata containers guest agent

2020-03-25 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1816858 --- Comment #5 from Christophe de Dinechin --- Reviewed the spec file rapidly. Looks good to me with two notes: 1) Do we need the -Sgit option for autosetup? 2) I would use the same DESTDIR for both make and make install. Often, makefiles

[Bug 1816858] Review Request: kata-agent - kata containers guest agent

2020-03-25 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1816858 Fabiano Fidêncio changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ -- You are

[Bug 1816858] Review Request: kata-agent - kata containers guest agent

2020-03-25 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1816858 --- Comment #4 from Fabiano Fidêncio --- Package Review == Legend: [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated = MUST items = C/C++: [-]: Package does not contain kernel modules. [-]: Package

[Bug 1816858] Review Request: kata-agent - kata containers guest agent

2020-03-25 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1816858 Fabiano Fidêncio changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|needinfo?(crobinso@redhat.c | |om)

[Bug 1816858] Review Request: kata-agent - kata containers guest agent

2020-03-25 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1816858 Fabiano Fidêncio changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||needinfo?(crobinso@redhat.c

[Bug 1816858] Review Request: kata-agent - kata containers guest agent

2020-03-24 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1816858 Fabiano Fidêncio changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-review? -- You are

[Bug 1816858] Review Request: kata-agent - kata containers guest agent

2020-03-24 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1816858 Cole Robinson changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC|