https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=812758
--- Comment #56 from Fedora Update System ---
trader-7.11-1.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 stable repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=812758
--- Comment #55 from Fedora Update System ---
trader-7.11-1.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 stable repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=812758
--- Comment #54 from Fedora Update System ---
trader-7.11-1.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 stable repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=812758
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=812758
--- Comment #52 from John Zaitseff ---
(In reply to Jason Tibbitts from comment #51)
> You don't need to CC this ticket on updates made to your package after the
> initial release.
True, but this was done automatically:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=812758
--- Comment #51 from Jason Tibbitts ---
You don't need to CC this ticket on updates made to your package after the
initial release.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=812758
--- Comment #50 from Fedora Update System ---
trader-7.11-1.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 testing repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=812758
--- Comment #49 from Fedora Update System ---
trader-7.11-1.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 testing repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=812758
--- Comment #48 from Fedora Update System ---
trader-7.11-1.fc25 has been pushed to the Fedora 25 testing repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=812758
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|CLOSED |ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=812758
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=812758
--- Comment #45 from Fedora Update System ---
trader-7.10-2.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 testing repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=812758
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=812758
--- Comment #43 from Fedora Update System ---
trader-7.10-2.el6 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 6.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2017-1e4cce6a22
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=812758
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=812758
--- Comment #42 from Fedora Update System ---
trader-7.10-2.el7 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 7.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2017-132cea1f3a
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=812758
--- Comment #41 from Fedora Update System ---
trader-7.10-2.fc26 has been pushed to the Fedora 26 testing repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=812758
--- Comment #40 from Fedora Update System ---
trader-7.10-2.fc25 has been pushed to the Fedora 25 testing repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=812758
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=812758
--- Comment #38 from Fedora Update System ---
trader-7.10-2.fc24 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 24.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-2d2cc6027d
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=812758
--- Comment #37 from Fedora Update System ---
trader-7.10-2.fc25 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 25.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-697e3c9cea
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=812758
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=812758
--- Comment #36 from Fedora Update System ---
trader-7.10-2.fc26 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 26.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-59d8832418
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=812758
--- Comment #35 from John Zaitseff ---
(In reply to Tom "spot" Callaway from comment #34)
> Hopefully that makes sense. :)
It does, thanks! The linked instructions said "Update Your Branches (if
desired)" (section
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=812758
--- Comment #34 from Tom "spot" Callaway ---
(In reply to John Zaitseff from comment #33)
> I've imported the sources and done a "fedpkg build" as per the
> documentation. Is there anything more I need to do for this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=812758
--- Comment #33 from John Zaitseff ---
I've imported the sources and done a "fedpkg build" as per the documentation.
Is there anything more I need to do for this review request?
The documentation at
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=812758
--- Comment #32 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/trader
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=812758
Tom "spot" Callaway changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR) |
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=812758
--- Comment #30 from John Zaitseff ---
Thank you very much, Tom! At last we make progress :-)
My FAS username is "zaitseff".
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=812758
Tom "spot" Callaway changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=812758
--- Comment #28 from John Zaitseff ---
I am not sure why I never received comment 27. I apologise: life has been
extremely busy the past year, but I am able to get back to this package.
To answer concerns in comment 27
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=812758
Ben Rosser changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1364745
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=812758
Ben Rosser changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rosser@gmail.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=812758
William Moreno changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|williamjmore...@gmail.com |
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=812758
William Moreno changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=812758
John Zaitseff changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(j.zaits...@zap.or |
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=812758
--- Comment #23 from John Zaitseff ---
Adding a .desktop file and a .xml.appdata file are probably good ideas. I'll
try to do so in the near future, although I hope it won't hold up the inclusion
of the current package
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=812758
William Moreno changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||182235
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=812758
Tom "spot" Callaway changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=812758
William Moreno changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=812758
--- Comment #21 from John Zaitseff ---
(In reply to William Moreno from comment #18)
> # Author: John Zaitseff
>
> There is not need to put you as author for the same reason than be do not
> use
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=812758
--- Comment #19 from John Zaitseff ---
(In reply to William Moreno from comment #16)
> I can take your review request to become a sponsor if you agree to do some
> informal reviews.
Absolutely. Thank you for taking the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=812758
--- Comment #20 from John Zaitseff ---
(In reply to William Moreno from comment #17)
> # This file is distributed under the same licence as Star Traders itself:
> # the GNU General Public License, version 3 or later.
>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=812758
--- Comment #17 from William Moreno ---
# This file is distributed under the same licence as Star Traders itself:
# the GNU General Public License, version 3 or later.
Not, you can not, specs are software for the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=812758
--- Comment #18 from William Moreno ---
# Author: John Zaitseff
There is not need to put you as author for the same reason than be do not use
the Packager tag in rpm spes, it is very clear
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=812758
William Moreno changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=812758
Michael Schwendt changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=812758
Miroslav Suchý msu...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||msu...@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=812758
--- Comment #13 from John Zaitseff j.zaits...@zap.org.au ---
Unfortunately, I have not heard anything from Jason Tibbitts since 2012. His
comments have certainly been helpful, but I'm wondering whether he is MIA.
Could someone else be
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=812758
Christopher Meng i...@cicku.me changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ti...@math.uh.edu
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=812758
--- Comment #12 from John Zaitseff j.zaits...@zap.org.au ---
For some reason, both I and others have let this packaging request remain
unresolved. Could someone please include this simple game as part of Fedora.
The latest version is
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=812758
--- Comment #11 from John Zaitseff j.zaits...@zap.org.au ---
Given that gperf(1) MIGHT be needed (depending on timestamps), I've included it
as a build-time dependency.
I've posted the updated packages at:
Spec URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=812758
--- Comment #10 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu ---
Sorry for not responding sooner; I must have skipped right over your previous
two messages.
If there's any chance that gperf is needed, you should definitely add a build
dependency on it.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=812758
--- Comment #8 from John Zaitseff j.zaits...@zap.org.au ---
After months of being out of Internet access , I'm back and able to work on
Star Traders...
I have simplified the RPM spec file per Jason Tibbitts' suggestions; it is now
available at:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=812758
--- Comment #9 from John Zaitseff j.zaits...@zap.org.au ---
Actually, the dependency on gperf(1) MIGHT be needed, depending on timestamps:
if any of the files lib/iconv_open-*.h appear to be older than the
corresponding lib/iconv_open-*.gperf,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=812758
Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=812758
--- Comment #5 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu ---
By the way, if I were to submit this, the spec would look something like the
following, which is about as simple as a spec can get for a package with
translations:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=812758
--- Comment #6 from John Zaitseff j.zaits...@zap.org.au ---
Thank you, Jason, for your detailed comments: I do appreciate them!
Unfortunately, you've caught me at a bad time: I will be overseas and out of
e-mail/web contact for almost seven
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=812758
--- Comment #7 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu ---
It's no problem. I'll be out of the country in a couple of weeks as well.
This ticket isn't going anywhere.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=812758
--- Comment #3 from John Zaitseff j.zaits...@zap.org.au 2012-05-09 09:13:39
EDT ---
I have released Star Traders 7.4, and
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=812758
John Zaitseff j.zaits...@zap.org.au changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=812758
--- Comment #2 from John Zaitseff j.zaits...@zap.org.au 2012-04-16 04:58:29
EDT ---
To possibly preempt some comments on
62 matches
Mail list logo