[Bug 886903] Review Request: xonotic - Multiplayer, deathmatch oriented first person shooter
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=886903 --- Comment #15 from Erik Schilling ablu.erikschill...@googlemail.com --- Ok. After asking some questions to the dev team it looks like you have to do this for darkplaces: make DP_CRYPTO_STATIC_LIBDIR=/usr/local/lib DP_CRYPTO_RIJNDAEL_STATIC_LIBDIR=/usr/local/lib release However i get linking errors with that: http://sprunge.us/hiiY I am still waiting for reply from dev team for which target to use for compiling Regards and a Merry Christmas Erik -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=kvJtOnqs27a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 857440] Review Request: kio-upnp-ms - UPnP mediaserver kio slave
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=857440 --- Comment #2 from Kevin Kofler ke...@tigcc.ticalc.org --- So, as for kio_mtp, same question here: Shouldn't this be named kio_upnp_ms? I wish we had an agreed-on consistent naming convention for kio_* and kcm_* packages, we're having this discussion for every single package (and naming is currently not consistent). :-( -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=hN8Z1MvKBza=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 874105] Review Request: qpid-proton - Proton is a high performance, lightweight messaging library
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=874105
Mamoru TASAKA mtas...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review+
--- Comment #10 from Mamoru TASAKA mtas...@fedoraproject.org ---
One remaining issue
* Directory ownership issue
- As the directory %{proton_datadir}/docs/ is owned by the main
package and python-qpid-proton-doc uses this directory, please
make python-qpid-proton-doc also have
Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release}
-
This package (qpid-proton) is APPROVED by mtasaka
-
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=1s640HmJe0a=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 874249] Review Request: rubygem-inifile - INI file reader and writer
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=874249 Mamoru TASAKA mtas...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-review+ --- Comment #9 from Mamoru TASAKA mtas...@fedoraproject.org --- Okay. This package (rubygem-inifile) is APPROVED by mtasaka -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=Lf6JuC5KCka=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 770534] Review Request: rubygem-imagesize - Measure image size(GIF, PNG, JPEG ,,, etc)
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=770534 --- Comment #6 from Mamoru TASAKA mtas...@fedoraproject.org --- Spec URL: http://mtasaka.fedorapeople.org/Review_request/rubygem-imagesize/rubygem-imagesize.spec SRPM URL: http://mtasaka.fedorapeople.org/Review_request/rubygem-imagesize/rubygem-imagesize-0.1.1-7.fc.src.rpm * Mon Dec 24 2012 Mamoru TASAKA mtas...@fedoraproject.org - 0.1.1-7 - Kill bogus license tag for setup.rb -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=kNDzjElpIVa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 882512] Review Request: plasma-widget-menubar - Show window menubars
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=882512 --- Comment #12 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=wY6QnUX47Ta=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 889351] Review Request: czmq - High-level C binding for 0MQ (ZeroMQ)
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=889351 --- Comment #3 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=rI2jJodW4Pa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 739398] Review Request: openblas - An optimized BLAS library based on GotoBLAS2
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=739398 --- Comment #19 from Susi Lehtola susi.leht...@iki.fi --- I've fixed everything else except the unused-direct-shlib-dependency stuff. I'll contact upstream about it. http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/openblas.spec http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/openblas-0.2.5-6.fc18.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=xoioHft0nBa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 889476] Review Request: kio-mtp - An MTP KIO slave for KDE
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=889476 --- Comment #4 from Kevin Kofler ke...@tigcc.ticalc.org --- (See also the kio-upnp-ms review.) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=ouJWkQ2dGUa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 868947] Review Request: nepomuktvnamer - Nepomuk TV shows manager
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=868947 Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||limburg...@gmail.com --- Comment #8 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- devel exists, can you please submit a Package Change request for the other branches, due to a outage-related error? Thanks, and sorry for the churn! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=BB8Krgvmn2a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 868947] Review Request: nepomuktvnamer - Nepomuk TV shows manager
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=868947 --- Comment #9 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Clearing flag. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=iqb9o4akYTa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 858998] wxsqlite3 - C++ wrapper around the SQLite 3.x database
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=858998 --- Comment #41 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- wxsqlite3-3.0.1-3.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/wxsqlite3-3.0.1-3.fc17 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=BO3G4N4ttia=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 858998] wxsqlite3 - C++ wrapper around the SQLite 3.x database
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=858998 --- Comment #42 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- wxsqlite3-3.0.1-3.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 18. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/wxsqlite3-3.0.1-3.fc18 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=0VYgjU6bX8a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 883501] Review Request: nepomuk-widgets - Nepomuk widgets collection
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=883501 --- Comment #4 from Kevin Kofler ke...@tigcc.ticalc.org --- Please note that ./utils/daterange.cpp and ./utils/daterange.h show as GPLv1 license. That's a bug of the license checker you used. The actual license of those files is GPLv2 or GPLv3 or whatever later version(s) KDE e.V. approves. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=Nj48Gk7G2Ma=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 886903] Review Request: xonotic - Multiplayer, deathmatch oriented first person shooter
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=886903 --- Comment #16 from Erik Schilling ablu.erikschill...@googlemail.com --- Ah it works when you compile d0_blind without openssl support. So ./configure --without-openssl and then use the make line from above for darkplaces. Also use release as make target instead of nexuiz. I think it should be possible to write the specfile without mentioning nexuiz once. This is also why i am sceptical if it is really right to obsolote nexuiz... -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=rhWfJY2xYya=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 883501] Review Request: nepomuk-widgets - Nepomuk widgets collection
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=883501 Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #5 from Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: nepomuk-widgets Short Description: Nepomuk widgets collection Owners: rdieter kkofler jreznik than ltinkl rnovacek Branches: f18 InitialCC: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=lLHtXMqOeia=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 889351] Review Request: czmq - High-level C binding for 0MQ (ZeroMQ)
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=889351 --- Comment #4 from Jose Pedro Oliveira j...@di.uminho.pt --- Haïkel Guémar, Thanks for the review. I've already imported czmq for rawhide, f18, f17 and el6 but I've only built it for rawhide. I'm only planning in building it for the other branches after ZeroMQ3 3.2.2 arrives there. Please see and/or track bug 867182 for zeromq3 updates. Regards, jpo -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=60JXLpJRz4a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 883501] Review Request: nepomuk-widgets - Nepomuk widgets collection
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=883501 --- Comment #6 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=tODKOuJXXha=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 889130] Review Request: openpgm - An implementation of the PGM reliable multicast protocol
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=889130 Jose Pedro Oliveira j...@di.uminho.pt changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||867182 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=CjFt1piwafa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 889351] Review Request: czmq - High-level C binding for 0MQ (ZeroMQ)
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=889351 Jose Pedro Oliveira j...@di.uminho.pt changed: What|Removed |Added Depends On||867182 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=rr5wnVAsLsa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 857440] Review Request: kio-upnp-ms - UPnP mediaserver kio slave
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=857440 Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #3 from Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: kio-upnp-ms Short Description: UPnP mediaserver kio slave Owners: rdieter jgrulich Branches: f16 f17 f18 InitialCC: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=k63OGLnSBIa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 857440] Review Request: kio-upnp-ms - UPnP mediaserver kio slave
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=857440 --- Comment #4 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=VAZe7omMtAa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 883501] Review Request: nepomuk-widgets - Nepomuk widgets collection
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=883501 Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Last Closed||2012-12-24 12:33:25 --- Comment #7 from Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu --- imported -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=YNRG9XUtsma=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 857440] Review Request: kio-upnp-ms - UPnP mediaserver kio slave
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=857440 Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Last Closed||2012-12-24 12:33:53 --- Comment #5 from Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu --- imported -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=YGONh9aqlla=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 885038] Review Request: pentobi - Program that plays the board game Blokus
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=885038
Antonio Trande trp...@katamail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||trp...@katamail.com
--- Comment #3 from Antonio Trande trp...@katamail.com ---
Hi Christophe.
I'm not an official packager. Following is an 'unofficial package review' that
is not valid and could contain some (my) errors.
Package Review
==
Key:
[x] = Pass
[!] = Fail
[-] = Not applicable
[?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
Issues:
===
[!]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s)
in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s)
for the package is included in %doc.
Note: Cannot find license.html in rpm(s)
See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/LicensingGuidelines#License_Text
See below.
= MUST items =
C/C++:
[x]: Header files in -devel subpackage, if present.
[x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la)
[-]: Package does not contain kernel modules.
[x]: Package contains no static executables.
[x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs.
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one
supported primary architecture.
[x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that
are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[x]: Each %files section contains %defattr if rpm 4.4
[!]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
You can use: %{name} is a computer program to play the board game Blokus
[x]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[x]: Package installs a %{name}.desktop using desktop-file-install if there is
such a file.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[-]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package is not known to require ExcludeArch.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Spec file lacks Packager, Vendor, PreReq tags.
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s)
in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s)
for the package is included in %doc.
Note: Cannot find license.html in rpm(s)
[!]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found:
Unknown or generated. 1 files have unknown license. Detailed output of
licensecheck in /home/sagitter/885038-pentobi/licensecheck.txt
The license should be GPLv3+ (GPLv3 or later)
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:LicensingGuidelines?rd=Packaging/LicensingGuidelines#.22or_later_version.22_licenses
[!]: Package consistently uses macro is (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
You can use %{name} in place of 'pentobi' in spec file. For example:
%{_datadir}/icons/hicolor/16x16/apps/%{name}.png instead of
%{_datadir}/icons/hicolor/16x16/apps/pentobi.png
and so on.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
Note: Package contains no Conflicts: tag(s)
[x]: Package do not use a name that already exist
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[-]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: CheckResultdir
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: No rpmlint messages.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided
in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
BuildRequires and Requires entries should be listed one-by-one.
BuildRequires:boost-devel
BuildRequires: qt-devel
BuildRequires: cmake
BuildRequires: desktop-file-utils
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[-]: Package
[Bug 889351] Review Request: czmq - High-level C binding for 0MQ (ZeroMQ)
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=889351 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=eY5jcZWuf2a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 889351] Review Request: czmq - High-level C binding for 0MQ (ZeroMQ)
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=889351 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- czmq-1.3.2-1.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 18. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/czmq-1.3.2-1.fc18 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=MVcSVEjttIa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 889351] Review Request: czmq - High-level C binding for 0MQ (ZeroMQ)
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=889351 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- czmq-1.3.2-1.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/czmq-1.3.2-1.fc17 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=Sw1Qxc965Oa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 889351] Review Request: czmq - High-level C binding for 0MQ (ZeroMQ)
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=889351 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- czmq-1.3.2-1.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 6. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/czmq-1.3.2-1.el6 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=QnkvvFoJTEa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 823334] Review Request: rubygem-mixlib-config - class-based config mixin for ruby scripts
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=823334 --- Comment #2 from Julian C. Dunn jd...@aquezada.com --- Hi Josef, I have fixed the package in accordance with your suggestions and the revised one is here: http://jdunn.fedorapeople.org/rubygem-mixlib-config/rubygem-mixlib-config-1.1.2-2.fc19.src.rpm http://jdunn.fedorapeople.org/rubygem-mixlib-config/rubygem-mixlib-config.spec The chatty test output was already fixed upstream in master but not yet released. I have applied the same patch. Could you review at your convenience? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=Qi4K5wW7Vxa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 823333] Review Request: rubygem-mixlib-cli - a ruby gem mixin for CLI support, including option parsing
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=82
--- Comment #2 from Julian C. Dunn jd...@aquezada.com ---
(In reply to comment #1)
* Remove Requires: ruby for other Ruby interpretations to be used with in f19
* Rakefile, NOTICE and README.rdoc are not require during runtime
- Please consider moving them into the -doc subpackage
* Please consider moving specs into the -doc subpackage rather than exclude
them
* I would suggest you to exclude %{gem_cache} as it's not needed
All of the above have been corrected.
* Tests print:
You must supply -r!
Usage: /usr/local/bin/rspec (options)
-r
..
- Tests shouldn't print STDOUT like this. It could be fixed by something
suggested on stackoverflow [1].
I added a patch for this to the SRPM, though I don't know if it'll be accepted
upstream -- it's a matter of taste and the fix is kind of dirty. But it will
silence output to STDOUT on the tests.
Please have a look:
http://jdunn.fedorapeople.org/rubygem-mixlib-cli/rubygem-mixlib-cli.spec
http://jdunn.fedorapeople.org/rubygem-mixlib-cli/rubygem-mixlib-cli-1.2.2-2.fc19.src.rpm
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=8JPnbVnrtTa=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 828720] Review Request: brainfuck - An interpreter of the brainf*ck language
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=828720 Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||haskell-devel@lists.fedorap ||roject.org --- Comment #15 from Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com --- Not sure why haskell-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org removed itself. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=t2c9zTOJ0ba=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 736586] Review Request: ghc-vector - Efficient Arrays for Haskell
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=736586 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- ghc-primitive-0.4.0.1-1.el6, ghc-vector-0.9.1-7.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 6. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2012-13689/ghc-primitive-0.4.0.1-1.el6,ghc-vector-0.9.1-7.el6 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=oiNKxVb73aa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
