https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1467716
Jonny Heggheim changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||1467724
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1469009
Igor Gnatenko changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|POST
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1421413
--- Comment #12 from Jaroslav Škarvada ---
Created attachment 1299753
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1299753=edit
Drop buildroot from build
Thanks, could you apply the attached patch? It removes the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1464797
Nathan Scott changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1470057
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1421413
--- Comment #15 from Frank Crawford ---
(In reply to Jaroslav Škarvada from comment #12)
> Created attachment 1299753 [details]
> Drop buildroot from build
>
> Thanks, could you apply the attached patch? It removes
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1471561
Bug 1471561 depends on bug 1471557, which changed state.
Bug 1471557 Summary: Review Request: python-olefile - Tools to analyze
Microsoft OLE2 files
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1471557
What|Removed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1470057
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1471557
Michal Ambroz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1426972
--- Comment #20 from Dusty Mabe ---
(In reply to Jan Chaloupka from comment #19)
> There is a vendor.json with all deps that can be used to check which
> dependencies in Fedora are outdated and which are up-to-date:
>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1471806
--- Comment #1 from Zamir SUN ---
The server side is https://dm.tuna.moe/?lang=en
It is open source as well but I am not packaging it at the moment.
https://github.com/tuna/gdanmaku-server
> danmaQ.x86_64: W:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1421413
--- Comment #14 from Frank Crawford ---
(In reply to Marek Cermak from comment #13)
> NOTES
> -
> sysusage.src:101: W: rpm-buildroot-usage %build DESTDIR=%{buildroot} -- see
> the comment above from Jaroslav
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1421413
--- Comment #16 from Jaroslav Škarvada ---
(In reply to Frank Crawford from comment #15)
> (In reply to Jaroslav Škarvada from comment #12)
> > Created attachment 1299753 [details]
> > Drop buildroot from build
> >
> >
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1409648
Michal Ambroz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1471561
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1471561
Michal Ambroz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||1409648
Referenced
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1471557
Michal Ambroz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|CURRENTRELEASE |DUPLICATE
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1471806
Bug ID: 1471806
Summary: Review Request: danmaQ - A small client side Qt
program to play danmaku on any screen
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1471806
Zamir SUN changed:
What|Removed |Added
Alias||danmaQ
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1468971
--- Comment #7 from Qixiang Wan ---
Updated some of the python- prefix packages per comments from Igor.
Spec URL: https://fedorapeople.org/~qwan/freshmaker/freshmaker.spec
SRPM URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1469009
--- Comment #7 from Jan Kaluža ---
Thanks for the review, Igor :).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1467417
--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System ---
python-plaster-0.5-1.fc25 has been pushed to the Fedora 25 stable repository.
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1421480
--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System ---
js-jquery-prettyphoto-3.1.6-1.fc25 has been pushed to the Fedora 25 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1469009
--- Comment #4 from Igor Gnatenko ---
Looks good apart from few things:
- a lot of python- prefixed packages, must be using python2- prefix if
available (six, sqlalchemy, pyopenssl are definitely available in that
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1469009
--- Comment #5 from Jan Kaluža ---
Thanks Igor, updated package is here:
Spec URL: http://jkaluza.fedorapeople.org/odcs.spec
SRPM URL: http://jkaluza.fedorapeople.org/odcs-0.0.3-3.fc24.src.rpm
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1359416
--- Comment #7 from David Kaspar [Dee'Kej] ---
(In reply to Andrew J. Schorr from comment #6)
> One immediate question pops to mind: I removed the README file, since it
> doesn't
> contain terribly much useful info. Should
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1421413
--- Comment #13 from Marek Cermak ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
Issues:
===
- Package does not use a name
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1439894
--- Comment #18 from Stanislav Kozina ---
Thanks! So what's the next step?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1439894
--- Comment #19 from Zdenek Dohnal ---
The process is described at
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_Review_Process . You are contributor and
you will need to make SCM admin request (about 8th step in instructions for
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1426972
--- Comment #22 from Jan Chaloupka ---
Rawhide build here:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=919471
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1426972
--- Comment #24 from Athos Ribeiro ---
koji Build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=20578755
%go_arches still includes ppc64, although there's no more support for the
go-compiler in such
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1359416
--- Comment #8 from David Kaspar [Dee'Kej] ---
Regarding the review itself:
1) %description
- the word 'indlude' seems redundant, but this is nothing serious
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x]
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1426972
--- Comment #21 from Athos Ribeiro ---
(In reply to Dusty Mabe from comment #18)
> Man I really wish I knew more about go.. This took me way too long to figure
> out:
> Can we get an updated version of
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1471885
Bug ID: 1471885
Summary: Review Request: oci-umount - OCI umount hook for
docker
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity: medium
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1426972
--- Comment #23 from Dusty Mabe ---
(In reply to Jan Chaloupka from comment #22)
> Rawhide build here:
> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=919471
works for me:
```
[vagrant@f26vanilla github.com]$
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1359416
--- Comment #9 from David Kaspar [Dee'Kej] ---
(In reply to David Kaspar [Dee'Kej] from comment #8)
s/indlude/include
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1470447
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System ---
php-robrichards-xmlseclibs3-3.0.0-1.fc25 has been submitted as an update to
Fedora 25. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-afb5bfeaf1
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1470447
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1468768
--- Comment #1 from Michael Cronenworth ---
I'll comment on what fedora-review flags as issues:
- Permissions on files are set properly.
Note: See rpmlint output
See:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1330833
--- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System ---
python-bitstring-3.1.5-1.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1470980
--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System ---
python-abclient-0.2.3-4.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1426193
--- Comment #37 from David Moreau Simard ---
Started slowly working on this. Turns out newer version of pytest landed in the
meantime and caused unit tests to fail on my attempts at building for rawhide.
This commit [1]
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1468768
--- Comment #2 from Ben Rosser ---
Apologies for not getting to this sooner.
* rpmlint complains that you are shipping a PEM certificate. However looking at
the domoticz documentation, it explicitly references that
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1468768
Ben Rosser changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review?
--
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1330833
--- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System ---
python-bitstring-3.1.5-1.fc25 has been pushed to the Fedora 25 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1469009
--- Comment #8 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/odcs
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1470057
--- Comment #2 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/perl-Locale-Utils-PlaceholderNamed
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1468665
--- Comment #12 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/gsettings-qt
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1465884
Athos Ribeiro changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1330833
--- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System ---
python-bitstring-3.1.5-1.fc26 has been pushed to the Fedora 26 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1470980
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1464797
Nathan Scott changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? needinfo+|fedora-review+
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1268360
--- Comment #20 from Ilya Gradina ---
Ok, thx.
new srpm:
https://github.com/ilgrad/fedora-packages/raw/master/rubygems/rubygem-simple_oauth-0.3.1-1.fc27.src.rpm
new spec:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1464797
Jonny Heggheim changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(heg...@gmail.com) |
--- Comment #4
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1330833
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1470980
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System ---
python-abclient-0.2.3-2.fc26 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 26.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-fce8843d41
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1470980
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1470980
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System ---
python-abclient-0.2.3-4.el7 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 7.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2017-d61e2e47b5
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1426972
--- Comment #19 from Jan Chaloupka ---
There is a vendor.json with all deps that can be used to check which
dependencies in Fedora are outdated and which are up-to-date:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1471598
Junwei Fang changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||177841
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1469009
Igor Gnatenko changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
60 matches
Mail list logo