https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1824156
Neal Gompa changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ngomp...@gmail.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1824156
--- Comment #5 from Eric Sandeen ---
Note that there has been a request upstream to rename this to something like
exfatprogs to avoid the name clash, not sure if that will happen.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1824156
--- Comment #4 from Neal Gompa ---
(In reply to Simone Caronni from comment #2)
> I've set the Epoch to 1 and obsoleted the fuse implementation, so it
> correctly obsoletes both exfat-utils and fuse-exfat that are shipped in
> RPMFusion.
I'm
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1809974
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1812855
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1809884
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1819554
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1821069
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1809974
--- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2020-51763899a3 has been pushed to the Fedora 30 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1823091
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2020-217b6928cc has been pushed to the Fedora 31 testing repository.
In short time you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf install
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1815727
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #5 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1815728
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #6 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1823001
--- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2020-660e1e4ca3 has been pushed to the Fedora 31 testing repository.
In short time you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf install
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1815725
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2020-cd3e0f6413 has been pushed to the Fedora 31 testing repository.
In short time you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf install
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1820852
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #8 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1815726
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #9 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1823151
Fabian Affolter changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(mail@fabian-affol |
|ter.ch)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1823265
--- Comment #7 from Bob Hepple ---
What about neatvnc:include/sys/queue.h: SPDX-License-Identifier: BSD-3-Clause
It's not one I've seen before nor is it in the list at
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1824076
Miro Hrončok changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1824076
--- Comment #1 from Miro Hrončok ---
First of all, the bug name should contain the source package name. That is
python-colorzero, not colorzero. There is (or might be) automation that checks
that once the package is approved.
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1820846
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |MODIFIED
--- Comment #4 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1823265
--- Comment #8 from Bob Hepple ---
wrt:
> %meson --buildtype=release
... removing that yields -O2 instead of -O3 and upstream recommends it:
'Setting the buildtype flag is not required but it is recommended as there are
significant
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1824076
Bug ID: 1824076
Summary: Review Request: colorzero - Yet another Python color
library.
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1823265
--- Comment #4 from Aleksei Bavshin ---
Unnecessary BRs: pkgconfig(glib), pkgconfig(libglvnd),
pkgconfig(wayland-eglstream). Build passes without all of those.
> %meson --buildtype=release
Please, remove --buildtype. %meson macro already
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1824076
--- Comment #3 from Miro Hrončok ---
Notable rpmlint issue:
python-colorzero.src: W: summary-ended-with-dot C Yet another Python color
library.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1824076
--- Comment #6 from thrnc...@redhat.com ---
Spec URL:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/thrnciar/python-colorzero/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/01338477-python-colorzero/python-colorzero.spec
SRPM URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1746587
Juan Orti Alcaine changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST|CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1824076
--- Comment #5 from Miro Hrončok ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
Please:
- remove the dot at the end of summary (not a sentence)
- add a dot to the end of
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1815727
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--- Comment #4 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1824076
--- Comment #2 from Miro Hrončok ---
If you target rawhide only (I think you should), please drop the manual
%{?python_provide:%python_provide python3-%{srcname}} (like you did in pip).
As a matter of style, I suggest changing:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1815728
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--- Comment #4 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1815728
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--- Comment #4 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1824076
--- Comment #4 from thrnc...@redhat.com ---
Spec URL:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/thrnciar/python-colorzero/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/01338440-python-colorzero/python-colorzero.spec
SRPM URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1824076
Miro Hrončok changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1822989
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1824076
Miro Hrončok changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|POST
Flags|fedora-review?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1815726
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--- Comment #7 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1815726
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2020-11b468e6fb has been submitted as an update to Fedora 32.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-11b468e6fb
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1809994
--- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2020-8d15d6255b has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 8 stable
repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1808276
--- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2020-ae4bb70b45 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 8 stable
repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1536230
Pragyan Pathi changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pragyansri.pa...@intel.com
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1811775
--- Comment #5 from Breno ---
Spec URL:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/brandfbb/puppet6-stable-el8-fedora/epel-8-x86_64/01339252-rubygem-semantic_puppet/rubygem-semantic_puppet.spec
SRPM URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1824347
Bug ID: 1824347
Summary: Review Request: bowtie2 -
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Component: Package Review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1823265
--- Comment #10 from Bob Hepple ---
Thanks again for your thoughtful and in-depth review. I'm learning a lot!
I'll pick up the -O2/3 issue with upstream. Meanwhile here is a plain %meson
version:
SPEC URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1824016
--- Comment #2 from Bob Hepple ---
Thanks again. Here is the rebuild:
SPEC URL:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/wef/wayvnc/fedora-31-x86_64/01339314-neatvnc/neatvnc.spec
SRPM URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1823091
--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2020-a729ac8728 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 8 testing
repository.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1823001
--- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2020-129d21b52d has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 8 testing
repository.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1824348
--- Comment #1 from Jun Aruga ---
This is a package for the genome sequencing.
I tested following things.
* Check by `rpmlint`: ok
* Check the binary RPMs installation: ok
* Scratch build: ok
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1811775
--- Comment #4 from Breno ---
Spec URL:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/brandfbb/puppet6-stable-el8-fedora/epel-8-x86_64/01339252-rubygem-semantic_puppet/rubygem-semantic_puppet.spec
SRPM URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1823091
--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2020-06730065a6 has been pushed to the Fedora 30 testing repository.
In short time you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf install
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1824348
Bug ID: 1824348
Summary: Review Request: bowtie2 - A read aligner for genome
sequencing
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1821172
--- Comment #1 from Bob Hepple ---
Results of self-review:
* remove call to git
* improve BR using pkgconfig
SPEC URL:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/wef/wl-gammactl/fedora-31-x86_64/01339307-wl-gammactl/wl-gammactl.spec
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1823265
--- Comment #5 from Till Hofmann ---
Just chipping in here:
(In reply to Aleksei Bavshin from comment #1)
>
> Would be nice to declare that sway >= 1.4 is necessary for wayvnc without
> making it hard dependency.
I think you could do this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1823265
Till Hofmann changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||thofm...@fedoraproject.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1824156
Bug ID: 1824156
Summary: Review Request: exfat-utils - Userspace utilities for
exFAT filesystems
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1824156
--- Comment #2 from Simone Caronni ---
I've set the Epoch to 1 and obsoleted the fuse implementation, so it correctly
obsoletes both exfat-utils and fuse-exfat that are shipped in RPMFusion.
If and when the review will be approved, the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1819968
--- Comment #3 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
(fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-cppy
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1808635
--- Comment #3 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
(fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/golang-github-gohugoio-testmodbuilder
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1820852
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--- Comment #6 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1824156
Simone Caronni changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||182235 (FE-Legal)
Referenced
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1536230
--- Comment #9 from Neil Horman ---
ping, its been another week, will the srpm and spec files be getting posted
here?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1824156
Simone Caronni changed:
What|Removed |Added
Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1824076
--- Comment #8 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
(fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-colorzero
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1822971
David Cantrell changed:
What|Removed |Added
Whiteboard||BuildFails
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1823265
--- Comment #9 from Aleksei Bavshin ---
RPM documentation[1] says that rich dependencies should be enclosed with
parenthesis, because otherwise RPM will treat this as a 3 separate package
clauses:
Requires: (sway >= 1.4 if sway)
I confirmed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1824269
Fabian Affolter changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1823316
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1824269
Bug ID: 1824269
Summary: Review Request: python-korean-lunar-calendar - Convert
Korean lunar-calendar to Gregorian calendar
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1820852
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2020-ee5e49b06d has been submitted as an update to Fedora 31.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-ee5e49b06d
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
67 matches
Mail list logo