[Bug 1074149] New: Review Request: libepoxy - OpenGL pointer management library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1074149 Bug ID: 1074149 Summary: Review Request: libepoxy - OpenGL pointer management library Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: airl...@redhat.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: http://people.fedoraproject.org/~airlied/epoxy/libepoxy.spec SRPM URL: http://people.fedoraproject.org/~airlied/epoxy/libepoxy-1.1-0.1.fc20.src.rpm Description: OpenGL pointer management library Fedora Account System Username: airlied -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1074149] Review Request: libepoxy - OpenGL pointer management library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1074149 Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||cicku...@gmail.com Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|cicku...@gmail.com -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1073974] Review Request: python-pycadf - DMTF Cloud Audit (CADF) data model
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1073974
Alan Pevec ape...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC||ape...@gmail.com
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|ape...@gmail.com
Flags||fedora-review+
--- Comment #5 from Alan Pevec ape...@gmail.com ---
APPROVED
I'd suggest to remove requires.txt from egg-info and let RPM handle deps, maybe
that should go into Python Fedora guidelines?
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
= MUST items =
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one
supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: No rpmlint messages.
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s)
in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s)
for the package is included in %doc.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that
are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: %config files are marked noreplace or the reason is justified.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install' ' DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: No %config files under /usr.
[x]: Package do not use a name that already exist
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided
in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
Python:
[x]: Python eggs must not download any dependencies during the build process.
[x]: A package which is used by another package via an egg interface should
provide egg info.
[x]: Package meets the Packaging Guidelines::Python
[x]: Package contains BR: python2-devel or python3-devel
[x]: Binary eggs must be removed in %prep
= SHOULD items =
Generic:
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file
from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[?]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
architectures.
[!]: %check is present and all tests pass.
[x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files.
[x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file
[x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag
[x]: Reviewer should test that the
[Bug 1059708] Review Request: phodav - a WebDAV server using libsoup
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1059708 --- Comment #8 from Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com --- 1. Where did your source come from? 2. Have you read this carefully? https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:ScriptletSnippets#Systemd -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1010613] Review Request: ck - Concurrency Kit
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1010613 --- Comment #13 from Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com --- (In reply to Daniel Pocock from comment #12) Ganglia now depends on concurrency kit (for the upcoming ganglia 3.7.x release) Updating the Ganglia packages in Fedora and EPEL will depend on this review request. Just a question before updating this ticket, would you like to comaintain this library? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 894599] Review Request: coin-or-CoinMP - C-API interface to CLP, CBC and CGL
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=894599 Bug 894599 depends on bug 894588, which changed state. Bug 894588 Summary: Review Request: coin-or-Cgl - Cut Generation Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=894588 What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 894594] Review Request: coin-or-Bcp - Branch-Cut-Price Framework
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=894594 Bug 894594 depends on bug 894588, which changed state. Bug 894588 Summary: Review Request: coin-or-Cgl - Cut Generation Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=894588 What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 894588] Review Request: coin-or-Cgl - Cut Generation Library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=894588 Paulo Andrade paulo.cesar.pereira.de.andr...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Last Closed||2014-03-08 07:15:45 --- Comment #11 from Paulo Andrade paulo.cesar.pereira.de.andr...@gmail.com --- Package is now available in fedora. Took some time due to an %check issue and I forgot to close this bug after that. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 894608] Review Request: coin-or-SYMPHONY - Solver for mixed-integer linear programs
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=894608 Bug 894608 depends on bug 894588, which changed state. Bug 894588 Summary: Review Request: coin-or-Cgl - Cut Generation Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=894588 What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 894591] Review Request: coin-or-Bcps - Part of the COIN High Performance Parallel Search Framework
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=894591 Bug 894591 depends on bug 894588, which changed state. Bug 894588 Summary: Review Request: coin-or-Cgl - Cut Generation Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=894588 What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 894597] Review Request: coin-or-Cbc - Coin-or branch and cut
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=894597 Bug 894597 depends on bug 894588, which changed state. Bug 894588 Summary: Review Request: coin-or-Cgl - Cut Generation Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=894588 What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 894596] Review Request: coin-or-Blis - BLIS (BiCePS Linear Integer Solver)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=894596 Bug 894596 depends on bug 894588, which changed state. Bug 894588 Summary: Review Request: coin-or-Cgl - Cut Generation Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=894588 What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 894589] Review Request: coin-or-Alps - COIN-OR High-Performance Parallel Search Framework
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=894589 Bug 894589 depends on bug 894588, which changed state. Bug 894588 Summary: Review Request: coin-or-Cgl - Cut Generation Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=894588 What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 894606] Review Request: coin-or-Couenne -Couenne, an exact solver for nonconvex MINLPs
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=894606 Bug 894606 depends on bug 894588, which changed state. Bug 894588 Summary: Review Request: coin-or-Cgl - Cut Generation Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=894588 What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 894602] Review Request: coin-or-Dip - Decomposition for Integer Programming
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=894602 Bug 894602 depends on bug 894588, which changed state. Bug 894588 Summary: Review Request: coin-or-Cgl - Cut Generation Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=894588 What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 894605] Review Request: coin-or-Bonmin - Basic Open-source Nonlinear Mixed INteger programming
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=894605 Bug 894605 depends on bug 894588, which changed state. Bug 894588 Summary: Review Request: coin-or-Cgl - Cut Generation Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=894588 What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 894603] Review Request: coin-or-FlopC++ - Algebraic modelling language
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=894603 Bug 894603 depends on bug 894588, which changed state. Bug 894588 Summary: Review Request: coin-or-Cgl - Cut Generation Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=894588 What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 894589] Review Request: coin-or-Alps - COIN-OR High-Performance Parallel Search Framework
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=894589 --- Comment #3 from Paulo Andrade paulo.cesar.pereira.de.andr...@gmail.com --- After quite some time and significant communication with upstream a new release that should fix all build issues on the tarball without bundled subprojects is available. Update: - Update to latest upstream release. Spec URL: http://pcpa.fedorapeople.org/coin-or/coin-or-Alps.spec SRPM URL: http://pcpa.fedorapeople.org/coin-or/coin-or-Alps-1.4.10-1.fc21.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1070230] Review Request: python-django15 - A high-level Python Web framework
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1070230 --- Comment #9 from Lars Kellogg-Stedman l...@redhat.com --- Matthias, I've put a modified spec file here: - https://gist.github.com/larsks/9430481 This dramatically reduces the complexity of the %files sections by moving all the locale files into a -locale subpackage, which lets us make much better use of wildcards and the %exclude option. This spec file also tries to fix permissions as correctly as possible without too much special-casing. Take a look and tell me what you think. With this spec file, the only errors from rpmlint are: python-django15.noarch: E: script-without-shebang /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/Django-1.5.5-py2.7.egg/django/bin/profiling/gather_profile_stats.py python-django15.noarch: E: script-without-shebang /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/Django-1.5.5-py2.7.egg/django/bin/profiling/__init__.py python3-django15.noarch: E: script-without-shebang /usr/lib/python3.3/site-packages/Django-1.5.5-py3.3.egg/django/bin/profiling/gather_profile_stats.py python3-django15.noarch: E: script-without-shebang /usr/lib/python3.3/site-packages/Django-1.5.5-py3.3.egg/django/contrib/admin/bin/compress.py python3-django15.noarch: E: script-without-shebang /usr/lib/python3.3/site-packages/Django-1.5.5-py3.3.egg/django/bin/profiling/__init__.py ...and this is largely because Django's file organization is insane, so I'm inclined to ignore these last few items. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1063038] Review Request: rubygem-cookiejar - The Ruby CookieJar is a library to help manage client-side cookies in pure Ruby
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1063038 --- Comment #4 from Nitesh Narayan Lal niteshnara...@fedoraproject.org --- Hi, I had updated the SPECS, thanks for holding on with this and helping. SPEC:http://niteshnarayan.fedorapeople.org/SPECS/rubygem-cookiejar.spec SRPMS:http://niteshnarayan.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/rubygem-cookiejar-0.3.1-2.fc20.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 728302] Review Request: pjproject - Libraries written in C language for building embedded/non-embedded VoIP applications
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=728302 Colin Macdonald c...@m.fsf.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC|c...@m.fsf.org | --- Comment #70 from Anthony Messina amess...@messinet.com --- (In reply to Jared Smith from comment #69) Since Asterisk doesn't use any of the pjmedia-codec support at all, I'm tempted to build this package without ilbc support in order to get this in and packaged sooner rather than later. That being said, I know there are probably other potential users of this library (sflphone, for example), that might want this built with ilbc support. Thoughts? Concerns? This sounds reasonable for the initial package. Since this package doesn't exist yet, it's primarily the update to Asterisk 12 that will require it as a dep. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 977638] Review Request: python-espeak - Python bindings for espeak
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=977638 Eduardo Mayorga e...@mayorgalinux.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #38 from Eduardo Mayorga e...@mayorgalinux.com --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: python-espeak Short Description: Python bindings for espeak Owners: mayorga Branches: f19 f20 el6 InitialCC: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 728302] Review Request: pjproject - Libraries written in C language for building embedded/non-embedded VoIP applications
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=728302 --- Comment #71 from Anthony Messina amess...@messinet.com --- Asterisk 12 will fail to build if the pj/config_site.h file is not present :( /usr/include/pj/config.h:287:28: fatal error: pj/config_site.h: No such file or directory -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 894589] Review Request: coin-or-Alps - COIN-OR High-Performance Parallel Search Framework
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=894589 --- Comment #4 from Antonio Trande anto.tra...@gmail.com --- Hi Paulo. The compilation fails. There should be a missing BR package (bzip2-devel?). ... /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lbz2 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1074046] Review Request: telegram-cli - Linux Command-line interface for Telegram
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1074046 Antonio Trande anto.tra...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Review Request: telegram - |Review Request: |Private, fast and open |telegram-cli - Linux |platform for instant|Command-line interface for |messaging |Telegram --- Comment #2 from Antonio Trande anto.tra...@gmail.com --- Spec URL: http://sagitter.fedorapeople.org/telegram/telegram-cli.spec SRPM URL: http://sagitter.fedorapeople.org/telegram/telegram-cli-0-0.2.20140307git8b78b6.fc20.src.rpm Package renamed in telegram-cli. Summary tag changed. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1073978] Review Request: photocollage - An image assembler with a Gtk GUI
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1073978
--- Comment #4 from Adrien Vergé adrienve...@gmail.com ---
Hi Christopher, thank you for the review.
I've created an AppData file and removed the unnecessary lines.
I thought the line
%{__install} -d %{buildroot}%{_datadir}/icons
was needed to install icons to /usr/share, it appears that I was wrong :)
The spec and SRPM have been updated.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1036320] Review Request: nftables - Netfilter Tables userspace utillites
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1036320 --- Comment #14 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com --- Updated: Spec URL: http://www.scrye.com/~kevin/fedora/review/nftables/nftables.spec SRPM URL: http://www.scrye.com/~kevin/fedora/review/nftables/nftables-0-0.5.20140307git.fc21.src.rpm Just a version update to sync it up with the libnftnl. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1073974] Review Request: python-pycadf - DMTF Cloud Audit (CADF) data model
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1073974 Pádraig Brady p...@draigbrady.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #6 from Pádraig Brady p...@draigbrady.com --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: python-pycadf Short Description: DMTF Cloud Audit (CADF) data model Owners: pbrady Branches: f19 f20 el6 epel7 InitialCC: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1070482] Review Request: reaver-wps - Brute force attack against Wifi Protected Setup
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1070482 Fabian Affolter m...@fabian-affolter.ch changed: What|Removed |Added CC||m...@fabian-affolter.ch Blocks||563471 (FE-SECLAB) Alias||reaver-wps Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=563471 [Bug 563471] Tracker: Review Requests for Fedora Security Lab related packages -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1063047] Review Request: rubygem-em-websocket-client - A WebSocket client implementation for EventMachine
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1063047 --- Comment #4 from Nitesh Narayan Lal niteshnara...@fedoraproject.org --- Hi, I had updated the SPECS, thanks for holding on with this and helping. SPEC:http://niteshnarayan.fedorapeople.org/SPECS/rubygem-em-websocket-client.spec SRPMS:niteshnarayan.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/rubygem-websocket-1.1.2-2.fc20.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 894589] Review Request: coin-or-Alps - COIN-OR High-Performance Parallel Search Framework
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=894589 --- Comment #5 from Paulo Andrade paulo.cesar.pereira.de.andr...@gmail.com --- Hi Antonio. Sorry for the problem, now properly pre checked with fedora-review -r -n coin-or-Alps Update: - Add missing bzip2-devel and texlive-epstopdf build requires. Spec URL: http://pcpa.fedorapeople.org/coin-or/coin-or-Alps.spec SRPM URL: http://pcpa.fedorapeople.org/coin-or/coin-or-Alps-1.4.10-2.fc21.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1070125] Review Request: python-selenium - Python bindings for Selenium
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1070125 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- python-selenium-2.40.0-2.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-selenium-2.40.0-2.fc20 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1069124] Review Request: python-netlib - Collection of network utility classes
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1069124 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- python-netlib-0.10-3.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-netlib-0.10-3.fc20 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1021719] Review Request: opensmtpd - Minimalistic but powerful smtp server
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1021719 --- Comment #29 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- opensmtpd-5.4.2p1-1.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/opensmtpd-5.4.2p1-1.fc20 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 894589] Review Request: coin-or-Alps - COIN-OR High-Performance Parallel Search Framework
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=894589
--- Comment #6 from Antonio Trande anto.tra...@gmail.com ---
- /usr/include/coin has still not any owner.
See your comment https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=894586#c7
- I think, -doc sub-package can be independent by main package.
- Please, fix the parallel make %{?_smp_mflags} macro
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
= MUST items =
C/C++:
[x]: Package does not contain kernel modules.
[x]: Package contains no static executables.
[x]: Header files in -devel subpackage, if present.
[x]: ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required.
[x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la)
[x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs.
[x]: Development (unversioned) .so files in -devel subpackage, if present.
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found:
Unknown or generated. 79 files have unknown license. Detailed output of
licensecheck in /home/sagitter/894589-coin-or-Alps/licensecheck.txt
[?]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[!]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
Note: No known owner of /usr/include/coin
[!]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
Note: Directories without known owners: /usr/include/coin
[x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[x]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
Note: Documentation size is 20480 bytes in 4 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one
supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s)
in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s)
for the package is included in %doc.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that
are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install' ' DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package do not use a name that already exist
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided
in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
= SHOULD items =
Generic:
[!]: Uses parallel make %{?_smp_mflags} macro.
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file
from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[x]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable.
Note: No Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release} in coin-or-
Alps-doc
[ ]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[Bug 1064656] Review Request: elk - FP-LAPW Code
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1064656 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|elk-2.2.10-3.fc19 |elk-2.2.10-3.el6 --- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- elk-2.2.10-3.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 231772] Review Request: Siege - Siege is an http regression testing and benchmarking utility
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=231772 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version||siege-3.0.0-2.el5 Resolution|NEXTRELEASE |ERRATA --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- siege-3.0.0-2.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 894589] Review Request: coin-or-Alps - COIN-OR High-Performance Parallel Search Framework
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=894589
--- Comment #7 from Paulo Andrade paulo.cesar.pereira.de.andr...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to Antonio Trande from comment #6)
- /usr/include/coin has still not any owner.
See your comment https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=894586#c7
It has an owner, the problem should be that the -devel
requires does not explicitly require the owner of the
directory, what should be fixed now.
$ rpm -qf /usr/include/coin
coin-or-CoinUtils-devel-2.9.7-3.fc21.x86_64
- I think, -doc sub-package can be independent by main package.
I am following an earlier advice from Jerry James, because
doxygen documentation is (frequently) quite large, and is better
not being owned by the main or devel packages on those cases.
- Please, fix the parallel make %{?_smp_mflags} macro
Correct this case, and I also made a review in all of
my packages, found and corrected, a few other cases I
misspelled it.
Update:
- Correct misspelling of _smp_mflags.
- Make devel subpackage require coin-or-CoinUtils-devel.
Spec URL: http://pcpa.fedorapeople.org/coin-or/coin-or-Alps.spec
SRPM URL:
http://pcpa.fedorapeople.org/coin-or/coin-or-Alps-1.4.10-3.fc21.src.rpm
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 894589] Review Request: coin-or-Alps - COIN-OR High-Performance Parallel Search Framework
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=894589
--- Comment #8 from Antonio Trande anto.tra...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to Paulo Andrade from comment #7)
(In reply to Antonio Trande from comment #6)
- /usr/include/coin has still not any owner.
See your comment https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=894586#c7
It has an owner, the problem should be that the -devel
requires does not explicitly require the owner of the
directory, what should be fixed now.
$ rpm -qf /usr/include/coin
coin-or-CoinUtils-devel-2.9.7-3.fc21.x86_64
coin-or-CoinUtils-devel owns that directory only in the package f21; I checked
in Fedora 20 (2.9.0-3) instead. :P
- I think, -doc sub-package can be independent by main package.
I am following an earlier advice from Jerry James, because
doxygen documentation is (frequently) quite large, and is better
not being owned by the main or devel packages on those cases.
I agree; I mean -doc may even not require '%{name} = %{version}-%{release}'.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 894589] Review Request: coin-or-Alps - COIN-OR High-Performance Parallel Search Framework
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=894589
--- Comment #9 from Paulo Andrade paulo.cesar.pereira.de.andr...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to Antonio Trande from comment #8)
(In reply to Paulo Andrade from comment #7)
(In reply to Antonio Trande from comment #6)
- /usr/include/coin has still not any owner.
See your comment https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=894586#c7
It has an owner, the problem should be that the -devel
requires does not explicitly require the owner of the
directory, what should be fixed now.
$ rpm -qf /usr/include/coin
coin-or-CoinUtils-devel-2.9.7-3.fc21.x86_64
coin-or-CoinUtils-devel owns that directory only in the package f21; I
checked in Fedora 20 (2.9.0-3) instead. :P
I can make an update. Just that I am still half way in
adding coin-or-* projects/packages to Fedora, so I did not
bother earlier to update f20, sorry :-(
- I think, -doc sub-package can be independent by main package.
I am following an earlier advice from Jerry James, because
doxygen documentation is (frequently) quite large, and is better
not being owned by the main or devel packages on those cases.
I agree; I mean -doc may even not require '%{name} = %{version}-%{release}'.
That is something to think about :-) but usually if someone
wants documentation, also wants devel and runtime.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1064995] Review Request: perl-File-Slurp-Tiny - A simple, sane and efficient file slurper
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1064995 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- perl-File-Slurp-Tiny-0.003-3.fc19 has been pushed to the Fedora 19 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1067098] Review Request: perl-TAP-Harness-Env - Parsing harness related environmental variables where appropriate
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1067098 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||perl-TAP-Harness-Env-3.30-3 ||.fc20 Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2014-03-08 23:34:34 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- perl-TAP-Harness-Env-3.30-3.fc20, perl-Module-Build-Tiny-0.035-1.fc20 has been pushed to the Fedora 20 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1064995] Review Request: perl-File-Slurp-Tiny - A simple, sane and efficient file slurper
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1064995 --- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- perl-File-Slurp-Tiny-0.003-3.fc20 has been pushed to the Fedora 20 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1068842] Review Request: perl-Time-Out - Easily timeout long running operations
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1068842 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||perl-Time-Out-0.11-1.fc20 Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2014-03-08 23:36:35 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- perl-Time-Out-0.11-1.fc20 has been pushed to the Fedora 20 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1069797] Review Request: perl-Module-Extract-Namespaces - Extract the package declarations from a module
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1069797 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- perl-Module-Extract-Namespaces-1.02-3.fc19 has been pushed to the Fedora 19 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1069797] Review Request: perl-Module-Extract-Namespaces - Extract the package declarations from a module
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1069797 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- perl-Module-Extract-Namespaces-1.02-3.fc20 has been pushed to the Fedora 20 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1067917] Review Request: sensible-utils - Utilities for sensible alternative selection
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1067917 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||sensible-utils-0.0.9-1.fc20 Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2014-03-08 23:40:54 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- sensible-utils-0.0.9-1.fc20 has been pushed to the Fedora 20 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1069495] Review Request: uncommons-maths - Random number generators library for Java
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1069495 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||uncommons-maths-1.2.3-1.fc2 ||0 Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2014-03-08 23:41:24 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- uncommons-maths-1.2.3-1.fc20 has been pushed to the Fedora 20 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1069871] Review Request: akka - JVM actor toolkit
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1069871 Bug 1069871 depends on bug 1069495, which changed state. Bug 1069495 Summary: Review Request: uncommons-maths - Random number generators library for Java https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1069495 What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1063140] Review Request: tofrodos - Converts text files between MSDOS and Unix file formats
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1063140 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||tofrodos-1.7.13-2.fc20 Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2014-03-08 23:45:10 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- tofrodos-1.7.13-2.fc20 has been pushed to the Fedora 20 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1063140] Review Request: tofrodos - Converts text files between MSDOS and Unix file formats
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1063140 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|tofrodos-1.7.13-2.fc20 |tofrodos-1.7.13-2.fc19 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- tofrodos-1.7.13-2.fc19 has been pushed to the Fedora 19 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1074242] New: Review Request: perl-X11-GUITest - Provides GUI testing/interaction routines
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1074242 Bug ID: 1074242 Summary: Review Request: perl-X11-GUITest - Provides GUI testing/interaction routines Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: dd...@cpan.org QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: http://ddick.fedorapeople.org/packages/perl-X11-GUITest.spec SRPM URL: http://ddick.fedorapeople.org/packages/perl-X11-GUITest-0.27-1.fc20.src.rpm Description: Provides GUI testing/interaction routines Fedora Account System Username: ddick -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
