https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1372785
--- Comment #7 from Orion Poplawski ---
It's definitely a bit of a mixed bag (especially since some packages are
python3 only like this one and some are mixed) - but for the most part we've
been treating the python3 stack
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1369708
--- Comment #22 from Dmitrij S. Kryzhevich ---
There is no way to get sources via URL in Source0 tag. Moreover, sources in
src.rpm differs from upstream.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1364777
Mukundan Ragavan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1372785
--- Comment #6 from Jim Perrin ---
Correct. I was intentionally matching what available for python 2.x in the base
distro (and initially starting from that srpm). I wanted to keep the
features/function consistent between
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1372785
--- Comment #5 from Orion Poplawski ---
actually the latest is 16.1.0.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1372785
Orion Poplawski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1374075
Kevin Fenzi changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1374073
Kevin Fenzi changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1374068
Kevin Fenzi changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1374055
Kevin Fenzi changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1374510
--- Comment #1 from Guido Aulisi ---
There was an old review request for this package, see
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=788717 it was closed because of f16
eol.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1374510
Guido Aulisi changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||177841
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1374510
Bug ID: 1374510
Summary: Review Request: lv2-ir-plugins - LV2 Plugin:
low-latency, realtime, high performance signal
convolver
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1371635
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System ---
adobe-source-serif-pro-fonts-1.017-2.fc25 has been pushed to the Fedora 25
stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this
bug report.
--
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1371635
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1334611
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1334611
--- Comment #33 from Fedora Update System ---
python-cvss-1.4-1.fc25 has been pushed to the Fedora 25 stable repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1229903
--- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System ---
NetworkManager-sstp-1.2.0-1.fc25 has been pushed to the Fedora 25 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1229903
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1372785
--- Comment #3 from Jim Perrin ---
Changes made, updated spec and packages are now in
https://people.centos.org/jperrin/python3-pyOpenSSL/
if you'd care to take another look.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1343661
--- Comment #15 from Jan Pokorný ---
More pleasant to read, bugzilla friendly version
(s/rhbz#\([0-9]*\)/[bug \1]/g):
Bug fixes
=
! ccs2pcs* conversion now properly propagates or adds monitor action
[resolves:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1343661
Jan Pokorný changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(jpokorny@redhat.c |
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1374055
--- Comment #2 from Kevin Fenzi ---
Ugh. Right you are... I thought I checked, but I must have checked the wrong
thing. ;(
Thanks for catching this. Will ponder if we want to just repoint this to fedora
or drop it.
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1349380
David Tardon changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST|CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1372785
--- Comment #2 from Jim Perrin ---
Thanks for taking a look at this.
It's reasonably minimal editing from the base el7 pyOpenSSL src.rpm, so I take
no responsibility for the lack of license file. If it's in the el7 srpm,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1370291
--- Comment #6 from Jon Ciesla ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/python-tenacity
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1324020
Bug 1324020 depends on bug 1341272, which changed state.
Bug 1341272 Summary: undefined symbol: sigar_skip_token
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1341272
What|Removed |Added
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1366845
--- Comment #2 from gil cattaneo ---
Spec URL: https://gil.fedorapeople.org/reactor.spec
SRPM URL: https://gil.fedorapeople.org/reactor-2.0.8-1.fc24.src.rpm
- add testng in core pom file
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1336552
--- Comment #8 from Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski ---
Please post both spec and srpm URL each time you make a revision.
Issues found in current revision:
%install
[...]
cp %{S:1} %{S:2}
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1366843
--- Comment #3 from gil cattaneo ---
(In reply to Michael Simacek from comment #2)
> Issues
> --
> - The full license text of ASL 2.0 must be included in the package
Done
> - The POM is under LGPLv3+
Done
> - There's
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1373004
Vít Ondruch changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vondr...@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1349380
--- Comment #8 from Jon Ciesla ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/libzmf
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1373001
Vít Ondruch changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ggill...@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1209299
Vít Ondruch changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1373003
Vít Ondruch changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vondr...@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1372999
Vít Ondruch changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vondr...@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1268369
Vít Ondruch changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1268371
Vít Ondruch changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||1372999
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1268371
Bug 1268371 depends on bug 1268369, which changed state.
Bug 1268369 Summary: Review Request: rubygem-http_parser.rb - Simple
callback-based HTTP request/response parser
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1268369
What
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1372999
Vít Ondruch changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1268371
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1373005
Vít Ondruch changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=823351
Vít Ondruch changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||yguen...@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1369720
--- Comment #7 from Igor Gnatenko ---
(In reply to yunying.sun from comment #6)
> Updated SPEC again, to restrict builds to ix86 & x86_64 only by adding:
> ExclusiveArch: %{ix86} x86_64
> Reason for this change is tool
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1366845
Michael Simacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1149176
--- Comment #19 from Piotr Kliczewski ---
Michael thank you for your feedback. Will follow your suggestions.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1366843
Michael Simacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1374055
Remi Collet changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1370291
Javier Peña changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |POST
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1149176
--- Comment #18 from Michael Simacek ---
Looks much better now.
Issues I found so far:
- There are missing BuildRequires, so the package doesn't build in mock. Most
notably "maven-local" package which provides mvn_build.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1361659
Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1361659
Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1065058
--- Comment #7 from Fabio Alessandro Locati ---
That is true. I forgot to remove the blocking status from this repo when I got
accepted as a packager. Good catch Parag :) and thanks!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1065058
Parag AN(पराग) changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR) |
--- Comment #6
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1334611
Viliam Križan changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vkri...@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1369720
--- Comment #6 from yunying@intel.com ---
Updated SPEC again, to restrict builds to ix86 & x86_64 only by adding:
ExclusiveArch: %{ix86} x86_64
Reason for this change is tool does not support big endian arch, and has been
verified only on
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1369708
--- Comment #21 from yunying@intel.com ---
(In reply to yunying.sun from comment #20)
> (In reply to Dmitrij S. Kryzhevich from comment #18)
> > There are still *.la files in -devel. They must not be included.
> *.la removed from SPEC.
> >
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1373913
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1373913
--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System ---
golint-0-0.1.gitc7bacac.fc25 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 25.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-e7f18dc222
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1344276
--- Comment #2 from Parag AN(पराग) ---
Suggestions:
As per current packaging guidelines given on
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines
1) use %global instead of %define, See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1349380
--- Comment #7 from Igor Gnatenko ---
(In reply to Ralf Corsepius from comment #6)
> @Igor, all these macros do is to obscure what they actually do. This is
> featuritis and serves no technical purpose.
>
> Enforcing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1372415
Arie Bregman changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1349380
--- Comment #6 from Ralf Corsepius ---
@Igor, all these macros do is to obscure what they actually do. This is
featuritis and serves no technical purpose.
Enforcing them is infantile bureaucracy.
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=673585
Parag AN(पराग) changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1374024
Igor Gnatenko changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Review Request: plotcat - |Review Request:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1374024
--- Comment #4 from Parag AN(पराग) ---
Issues:
===
1) Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
Note: plotcat.spec should be python-plotcat.spec
See:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1349380
--- Comment #5 from Igor Gnatenko ---
#--
# Tested features of make
# Output syncronization for parallel make:
%_make_output_sync %(! %{__make}
66 matches
Mail list logo