https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1387835
--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System ---
python-binstruct-1.0.1-1.fc25, python-bitstruct-3.3.1-1.fc25,
python-evic-0.1-0.4.git20160814.f916017.fc25,
python-hidapi-0.7.99.post19-1.fc25 has been pushed to the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1383447
--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System ---
python-winrm-0.2.1-1.fc25 has been pushed to the Fedora 25 testing repository.
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1387834
--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System ---
python-binstruct-1.0.1-1.fc25, python-bitstruct-3.3.1-1.fc25,
python-evic-0.1-0.4.git20160814.f916017.fc25,
python-hidapi-0.7.99.post19-1.fc25 has been pushed to the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1387837
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System ---
python-binstruct-1.0.1-1.fc25, python-bitstruct-3.3.1-1.fc25,
python-evic-0.1-0.4.git20160814.f916017.fc25,
python-hidapi-0.7.99.post19-1.fc25 has been pushed to the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1387836
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System ---
python-binstruct-1.0.1-1.fc25, python-bitstruct-3.3.1-1.fc25,
python-evic-0.1-0.4.git20160814.f916017.fc25,
python-hidapi-0.7.99.post19-1.fc25 has been pushed to the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1355592
--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System ---
libvmi-0.11.0-1.20161003git5ad492c.fc25 has been pushed to the Fedora 25
testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this
bug report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1386563
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System ---
python-ruamel-yaml-0.12.14-3.fc25 has been pushed to the Fedora 25 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1383447
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System ---
python-winrm-0.2.1-1.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 testing repository.
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1387836
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1387835
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1387837
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System ---
python-binstruct-1.0.1-1.fc24, python-bitstruct-3.3.1-1.fc24,
python-evic-0.1-0.4.git20160814.f916017.fc24,
python-hidapi-0.7.99.post19-1.fc24 has been pushed to the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1387834
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1355592
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|CLOSED |ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1386563
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System ---
python-ruamel-yaml-0.12.14-3.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1385534
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System ---
python-ruamel-ordereddict-0.4.9-2.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7
testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this
bug report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1379709
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1350257
Bug 1350257 depends on bug 1382916, which changed state.
Bug 1382916 Summary: 64-bit interface version of openblas is not using 64-bit
integers
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1382916
What|Removed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1383447
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1382755
Christoph Junghans changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1388294
--- Comment #4 from Miro Hrončok ---
The GitHub is there just in case there's no tagged release. In this case, just
take that commit thing out of there.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1367825
Neal Gompa changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also|https://fedorahosted.org/fe |
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1367825
--- Comment #21 from Neal Gompa ---
(In reply to Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek from comment #20)
> https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/1614#comment-27728
>
> > We rejected this exception during the last meeting:
> > * REJECTED:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1388294
--- Comment #3 from Evan Klitzke ---
I was just trying to follow the GitHub packaging guidelines. I actually built
the SRPM using the tag v1.1, not the commit hash. What's the recommendation
here?
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=825495
David Hannequin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1382937
--- Comment #4 from David Hannequin ---
Hi Dominika,
I'fix issues.
Thank's for your review
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1382755
Björn "besser82" Esser changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1343977
Vít Ondruch changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(vondruch@redhat.c |
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1367825
--- Comment #20 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek ---
https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/1614#comment-27728
> We rejected this exception during the last meeting:
> * REJECTED: FHS exception for /snap (9:+ 0:- 0:0)
So, what the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1387291
--- Comment #4 from Jon Ciesla ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/python-lazr-delegates
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1387291
--- Comment #3 from Aurelien Bompard ---
Right, I'll fix this, I've already done so for another package. Thanks for the
review! :-)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1375222
Germano Massullo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On|1387376 |
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1355592
W. Michael Petullo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1388344
Michael Simacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1381661
--- Comment #6 from Neal Gompa ---
I've revised the spec with an updated license tag, and included a patch to
apply the clarifications to the package.
Spec URL: http://kinginuyasha.enanocms.org/downloads/obs-build.spec
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1381507
--- Comment #8 from Oliver Haessler ---
(In reply to Germano Massullo from comment #4)
> https://fedorapeople.org/~germano/package_reviews/darktable2_epel7/
> darktable2.spec
>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1381507
--- Comment #7 from Kalev Lember ---
I think this applies mostly to libraries in order to keep ABI/API stable in
EPEL. I don't think the policy is meant to keep leaf desktop apps on old,
unsupported versions forever.
--
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1381507
--- Comment #6 from Germano Massullo ---
(In reply to Kalev Lember from comment #5)
> Wouldn't it make sense to just update the existing darktable package to 2.0?
> I am not sure it's worth keeping around both 1.x
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1381507
Kalev Lember changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||klem...@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1060852
--- Comment #16 from Richard Shaw ---
SPEC: https://hobbes1069.fedorapeople.org/flnet.spec
SRPM: https://hobbes1069.fedorapeople.org/flnet-7.2.6-1.fc24.src.rpm
* Tue Oct 25 2016 Richard Shaw -
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1372670
Flavio Leitner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1355592
--- Comment #10 from Jon Ciesla ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/libvmi
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1382935
--- Comment #2 from Jon Ciesla ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/python-visitor
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1388396
Iryna Shcherbina changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||177841
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1388344
--- Comment #2 from Tomas Repik ---
Spec URL: https://trepik.fedorapeople.org/javapoet/v1/javapoet.spec
SRPM URL:
https://trepik.fedorapeople.org/javapoet/v0/javapoet-1.7.0-1.fc24.src.rpm
(In reply to Michael Simacek from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1376848
--- Comment #3 from Björn "besser82" Esser ---
Besides my previous comment, the package FTBFS:
> Executing(%build): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.H5Q6Wj
> + umask 022
> + cd /builddir/build/BUILD
> + cd captagent-6.2.0.2
>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1388396
--- Comment #2 from Iryna Shcherbina ---
Thank you for pointing this out. Links to the files:
Spec URL:
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/irushchyshyn/rpm_package/master/python-pynlpl.spec
SRPM URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1376848
Björn "besser82" Esser changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1350257
--- Comment #50 from Dave Love ---
(In reply to Antonio Trande from comment #48)
> If i'm not wrong, superlu_dist needs 'parmetis' that is not distributed
> under open license.
There is a scotch substitute for enough
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1381548
Petr Menšík changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1382875
--- Comment #13 from Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski ---
(In reply to Jens Lody from comment #11)
> Sorry for the delay.
>
> Looks good now.
>
> Maybe the temporary selinux-fix should get a comment in the spec
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1382875
--- Comment #12 from Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski ---
(In reply to Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek from comment #9)
> A bug should be filed against selinux-policy-targeted. I guess it'd help to
> run the daemon in
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1388396
Miro Hrončok changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mhron...@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1388396
Bug ID: 1388396
Summary: Review Request: python-pynlpl - A Python library for
Natural Language Processing
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1388294
Miro Hrončok changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mhron...@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1388294
Miro Hrončok changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mhron...@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1388344
--- Comment #1 from Michael Simacek ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
- You don't need to remove test deps from pom,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1388344
Michael Simacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1388344
Bug ID: 1388344
Summary: Review Request: javapoet - API for generating .java
sources
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity: medium
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1386735
--- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System ---
php-fedora-autoloader-0.1.2-1.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1385441
--- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System ---
rpmdeplint-1.2-2.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 testing repository.
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See
60 matches
Mail list logo