https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1375986
--- Comment #23 from Fedora Update System ---
golang-github-klauspost-cpuid-1.0-1.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24
stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this
bug report.
--
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1425074
Parag AN(पराग) changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1441024
Roman Joost changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review+
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1441024
Roman Joost changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1447517
sanford rockowitz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||177841
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1447517
Bug ID: 1447517
Summary: Review Request: ddcutil - control monitor settings
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity: medium
Assignee:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1447401
Neal Gompa changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ngomp...@gmail.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=615669
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1441024
--- Comment #8 from matt jia ---
I've fixed the errors reported by rpmlint and bumped it to 0.1.1-2.
Spec URL: https://mjia.fedorapeople.org/waiverdb.spec
SRPM URL: https://mjia.fedorapeople.org/waiverdb-0.1.1-2.fc24.src.rpm
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1431763
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1427634
Bug 1427634 depends on bug 1431763, which changed state.
Bug 1431763 Summary: Review Request: golang-github-oschwald-geoip2-golang -
GeoIP2 lookup library for Go
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1431763
What|Removed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1375986
--- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System ---
golang-github-klauspost-cpuid-1.0-1.fc25 has been pushed to the Fedora 25
stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this
bug report.
--
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1432076
Jaroslav Škarvada changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1297524
--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System ---
golang-github-asaskevich-govalidator-6-1.fc26 has been submitted as an update
to Fedora 26. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-41ddc6a4a3
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1297524
--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System ---
golang-github-asaskevich-govalidator-6-1.el7 has been submitted as an update to
Fedora EPEL 7.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2017-91c6250e8a
--
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1297524
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1297524
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System ---
golang-github-asaskevich-govalidator-6-1.fc25 has been submitted as an update
to Fedora 25. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-a847f52882
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1446568
--- Comment #3 from Tom Hughes ---
A few rpmlint warnings:
nodejs-opener.noarch: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) webpages -> web pages,
web-pages, passages
and:
nodejs-opener.noarch: E: wrong-script-interpreter
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1446568
Tom Hughes changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1444766
--- Comment #3 from Tom Hughes ---
The tests are really enabled so setting enable_tests is a bit misleading - the
real test can be run with "mocha test.js" and do pass but they require assume
which isn't packaged.
I suggest
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1444766
Tom Hughes changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1437471
--- Comment #2 from Athos Ribeiro ---
Hi Fabio,
I am taking this review.
- The examples directory contains usage examples, shouldn't its content be
packaged in %doc or not packaged at all?
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1437471
Athos Ribeiro changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1444822
--- Comment #3 from Tom Hughes ---
Is there a particular reason for not packaging from github so that the tests
can be run? They seem to pass OK for me although it seems to hang at the end
for some reason...
In any case if
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1444822
Tom Hughes changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1245962
Athos Ribeiro changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1444765
Tom Hughes changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1444765
Tom Hughes changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1447229
Tom Hughes changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1447229
Tom Hughes changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1411962
--- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System ---
golang-github-milochristiansen-lua-1.1.3-1.fc24 has been submitted as an update
to Fedora 24. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-17e1e108f9
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1411962
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1411962
--- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System ---
golang-github-milochristiansen-lua-1.1.3-1.fc25 has been submitted as an update
to Fedora 25. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-6dd45a7b01
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1445887
--- Comment #4 from Merlin Mathesius ---
Thank you for the feedback!
> * Any reason to define an additional macro, %srcname, instead of simply
> using %name, which happens to be identical in this case?
There is
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1437403
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1431740
Bug 1431740 depends on bug 1431568, which changed state.
Bug 1431568 Summary: Review Request: golang-github-edsrzf-mmap-go - Portable
mmap package for Go
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1431568
What|Removed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1431568
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1427634
Bug 1427634 depends on bug 1437403, which changed state.
Bug 1437403 Summary: Review Request: golang-github-xtaci-smux - Simple Stream
Multiplexing for golang
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1437403
What|Removed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1437471
Bug 1437471 depends on bug 1375986, which changed state.
Bug 1375986 Summary: Review Request: golang-github-klauspost-cpuid - CPU
feature identification for Go
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1375986
What|Removed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1376749
Bug 1376749 depends on bug 1375986, which changed state.
Bug 1375986 Summary: Review Request: golang-github-klauspost-cpuid - CPU
feature identification for Go
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1375986
What|Removed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1375986
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1447401
Bug ID: 1447401
Summary: Review Request: pantheon-agent-polkit - Pantheon
Polkit Agent
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1438842
Igor Gnatenko changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|ignate...@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1447089
--- Comment #2 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/python-XStatic-Patternfly-Bootstrap-Treeview
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1445411
--- Comment #8 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/python-cysignals
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1444925
Tomas Orsava changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tors...@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1414004
Mamoru TASAKA changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1444618
--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System ---
buildah-0.0.1-1.gita0a5333.fc26 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 26.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-afa3a2f3f7
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1444618
--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System ---
buildah-0.0.1-1.gita0a5333.fc25 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 25.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-a70f3f8faf
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1444618
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1438673
--- Comment #17 from jiri vanek ---
(In reply to Jonny Heggheim from comment #15)
> (In reply to jiri vanek from comment #13)
> > is the https://jonny.fedorapeople.org/openjfx-8.0.152-4.b00.fc25.src.rpm
> > semi stable? Can
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1376387
--- Comment #3 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/golang-github-Unknwon-com
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1376387
--- Comment #2 from Matthias Runge ---
Thank you, I will update the spec before submitting anything to build.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1445321
--- Comment #15 from Oliver Gutiérrez ---
Spec URL:
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/olivergs/freeipa-desktop-profile/master/freeipa-desktop-profile.spec
SRPM URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1426785
Iryna Shcherbina changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1297524
--- Comment #7 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/golang-github-asaskevich-govalidator
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1444618
--- Comment #10 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/buildah
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1438673
--- Comment #16 from Jonny Heggheim ---
(In reply to jiri vanek from comment #14)
> Btw - the .spec of yours - javafxpackager and javapackager are not on path.
> Is it intentional?
>
> If not, I would recommend to link
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1438673
--- Comment #15 from Jonny Heggheim ---
(In reply to jiri vanek from comment #13)
> is the https://jonny.fedorapeople.org/openjfx-8.0.152-4.b00.fc25.src.rpm
> semi stable? Can I add symliks to openjdk8 in rawhide?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1445321
--- Comment #14 from Oliver Gutiérrez ---
Spec URL:
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/olivergs/freeipa-desktop-profile/master/freeipa-desktop-profile.spec
SRPM URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1438673
--- Comment #14 from jiri vanek ---
Btw - the .spec of yours - javafxpackager and javapackager are not on path. Is
it intentional?
If not, I would recommend to link them to %{_bindir}/
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1445349
--- Comment #13 from Rex Dieter ---
I'm skeptical, but I guess I'll take your word for it. If that is true, it is
even more unfortunate the compat-openssl10-devel maintainer chose to not make
it parallel-installable
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1445887
--- Comment #3 from Petr Šabata ---
* Any reason to define an additional macro, %srcname, instead of simply
using %name, which happens to be identical in this case?
* These roles execute quite a lot of stuff which the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1441828
--- Comment #19 from mgans...@alice.de ---
(In reply to Vít Ondruch from comment #18)
> (In reply to mgans...@alice.de from comment #17)
> > - Add RR %%{_bindir}/waf-3
>
> Actually, this should be BR of course. Sorry for
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1445321
--- Comment #13 from Oliver Gutiérrez ---
Spec URL:
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/olivergs/freeipa-desktop-profile/master/freeipa-desktop-profile.spec
SRPM URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1444615
--- Comment #8 from Lumír Balhar ---
(In reply to Miro Hrončok from comment #7)
> (In reply to Lumír Balhar from comment #5)
> > > [!]: If the package is under multiple licenses, the licensing breakdown
> > > must be
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1438673
jiri vanek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jva...@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1441828
--- Comment #18 from Vít Ondruch ---
(In reply to mgans...@alice.de from comment #17)
> - Add RR %%{_bindir}/waf-3
Actually, this should be BR of course. Sorry for me mistyping it in my previous
comment :/
Why the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1441828
--- Comment #17 from mgans...@alice.de ---
Spec URL: https://martinkg.fedorapeople.org/Review/SPECS/nuvolaplayer.spec
SRPM URL:
https://martinkg.fedorapeople.org/Review/SRPMS/nuvolaplayer-3.1.3-1.fc25.src.rpm
%changelog
*
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1446927
František Dvořák changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1414004
--- Comment #2 from František Dvořák ---
Spec URL:
http://scientific.zcu.cz/fedora/rubygem-rspec-pending_for-0.1.5-1/rubygem-rspec-pending_for.spec
SRPM URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1245962
--- Comment #3 from Jan Chaloupka ---
Spec URL:
https://jchaloup.fedorapeople.org/reviews/golang-github-petar-GoLLRB/golang-github-petar-GoLLRB.spec
SRPM URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1245962
--- Comment #2 from Jan Chaloupka ---
Done
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1246278
Jan Chaloupka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1447089
Haïkel Guémar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |POST
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1443076
Jan Kurik changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jku...@redhat.com
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1445366
--- Comment #4 from Parag AN(पराग) ---
1) Fix following rpmlint issues
unicode-emoji.src: E: description-line-too-long C Unicode Emoji Data Files are
the machine-readable emoji data files associated with
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1441828
Vít Ondruch changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1441828
--- Comment #16 from Vít Ondruch ---
Actually, checking the waf, there is "waf-python3" package which executes waf
using Python 3. So for the time being "Requires: %{_bindir}/waf-3" is the best
solution IMO.
I also
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1447230
--- Comment #1 from Parag Nemade ---
This package built on koji:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=19364014
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1447230
Bug ID: 1447230
Summary: Review Request: nodejs-ecstatic - A static file server
middleware that works with core http, express or on
the CLI
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1447229
--- Comment #1 from Parag Nemade ---
This package built on koji:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=19363931
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1447229
Bug ID: 1447229
Summary: Review Request: nodejs-url-join - Join all arguments
together and normalize the resulting url
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1447224
--- Comment #1 from Parag Nemade ---
This package built on koji:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=19363434
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1447224
Bug ID: 1447224
Summary: Review Request: nodejs-he - A robust HTML entity
encoder/decoder written in JavaScript
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1441828
--- Comment #15 from Vít Ondruch ---
(In reply to mgans...@alice.de from comment #14)
This might help you to get further:
"rm branding/default.json"
There does not appear to be anything in that file ATM.
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1415686
--- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System ---
php-phpmyadmin-sql-parser-4.1.3-2.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7
testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this
bug report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1446916
--- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System ---
x509viewer-0.1.0-1.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 testing repository.
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1446916
--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System ---
x509viewer-0.1.0-1.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 testing repository.
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1447213
Bug ID: 1447213
Summary: Review Request: gimp-wavelet-decompose - Decomposing
image plug-in for Gimp
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1431365
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1442310
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1431364
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1441841
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1442309
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1442976
--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System ---
switchboard-plug-onlineaccounts-0.3.0.1-1.20170417.git5a0270a.fc26 has been
pushed to the Fedora 26 testing repository. If problems still persist, please
make note of it
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1415394
--- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System ---
php-google-recaptcha-1.1.3-1.fc26 has been pushed to the Fedora 26 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1440006
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1446916
--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System ---
x509viewer-0.1.0-1.fc26 has been pushed to the Fedora 26 testing repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1415686
--- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System ---
php-phpmyadmin-sql-parser-4.1.3-2.fc26 has been pushed to the Fedora 26 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See
1 - 100 of 114 matches
Mail list logo