https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1448778
--- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System ---
cockatrice-2.3.17-1.fc26 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 26.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-b23dedc563
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1448778
--- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System ---
cockatrice-2.3.17-1.fc25 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 25.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-54dfd06b53
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1448778
--- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System ---
cockatrice-2.3.17-1.fc24 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 24.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-8ccfa72ff5
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1448778
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1324863
--- Comment #23 from Fedora Update System ---
varnish-modules-0.12.1-2.fc25 has been pushed to the Fedora 25 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1324863
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1457395
Mattias Ellert changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1458247
--- Comment #2 from Vasiliy Glazov ---
Spec URL:
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/RussianFedora/translate-shell/master/translate-shell.spec
SRPM URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1448661
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1452985
--- Comment #13 from Gerd Pokorra ---
Thank you for your support so far Paul. I like the idea that the rakudo package
should provide a macro file. Thank you for the information and organisation
that someone is running
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1404883
Neal Gompa changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ngomp...@gmail.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1404883
--- Comment #2 from Neal Gompa ---
> BuildRequires: python3-pkgversion-macros
This package has been superseded by "python-srpm-macros" and thus doesn't build
in Rawhide anymore. Please replace.
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1445923
--- Comment #9 from Jan Kalina ---
Package update by fedora-review notes:
http://test.jazkor.cz/streameye-0.8-2.fc25.src.rpm
http://test.jazkor.cz/streameye.spec
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1404882
--- Comment #2 from Neal Gompa ---
> BuildRequires: python3-pkgversion-macros
This package has been superseded by "python-srpm-macros" and thus doesn't build
in Rawhide anymore. Please replace.
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1404882
Neal Gompa changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ngomp...@gmail.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1458441
Haïkel Guémar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1427510
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1458441
Bug ID: 1458441
Summary: Review Request: python-script - Bindings for the
scrypt key derivation function library
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1441728
--- Comment #14 from Jan Kalina ---
Thanks for update!
If you are not owner of upstream repo, please ignore my note about tagging - in
such case is using git hash to identity version OK. Just note that we have
following
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1456244
Neal Gompa changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1456244
--- Comment #2 from Neal Gompa ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
= MUST items =
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=812758
--- Comment #28 from John Zaitseff ---
I am not sure why I never received comment 27. I apologise: life has been
extremely busy the past year, but I am able to get back to this package.
To answer concerns in comment 27
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1457949
--- Comment #8 from srakitnican ---
This is much more like it:
$ rpm -qp --requires
/var/lib/mock/fedora-25-x86_64/result/libdxflib-3.17.0-2.fc25.x86_64.rpm
/sbin/ldconfig
/sbin/ldconfig
libc.so.6()(64bit)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1458355
--- Comment #1 from Troy Dawson ---
The spec file was missing %{dist}. Here is the updated spec and srpm
Spec URL: https://tdawson.fedorapeople.org/review/fedora-modular-repos.spec
SRPM URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1457395
--- Comment #2 from Tom "spot" Callaway ---
Fixed in -2:
Spec URL: https://spot.fedorapeople.org/R-futile.logger.spec
SRPM URL: https://spot.fedorapeople.org/R-futile.logger-1.4.3-2.fc26.src.rpm
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1457395
Mattias Ellert changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1418396
Björn "besser82" Esser changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1418396
--- Comment #11 from Jeremy Cline ---
Thanks for the review, I've addressed the issues.
SRPM URL: https://jcline.fedorapeople.org/the-new-hotness-0.8.1-2.fc27.src.rpm
Spec URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1457949
--- Comment #7 from srakitnican ---
I am actually wondering why it depends on Qt at all, I thought it is using it
just for the build system.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1409654
Randy Barlow changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1409654
Randy Barlow changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(randy@electronswe |
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1409654
Randy Barlow changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1456203
--- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System ---
jumpnbump-1.60-2.fc25 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 25.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-bf8d29889c
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1456203
--- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System ---
jumpnbump-1.60-2.fc24 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 24.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-2206fc38a0
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1456203
--- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System ---
jumpnbump-1.60-2.el7 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 7.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2017-7f7dd3851b
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1456203
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1456203
--- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System ---
jumpnbump-1.60-2.fc26 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 26.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-e6d3ae98ce
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1457949
--- Comment #6 from srakitnican ---
Under the same name/path?
I am asking because here's the case that library is called exactly the same for
both qt4 and qt5, in that case packages would conflict, is that OK?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1418396
--- Comment #10 from Björn "besser82" Esser ---
Created attachment 1284493
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1284493=edit
licensecheck from fedora-review
Package Review
==
Legend:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1458394
mgans...@alice.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1457949
--- Comment #5 from Antonio Trande ---
(In reply to srakitnican from comment #4)
> Thank you for your review!
>
> (In reply to Antonio Trande from comment #3)
> > SPEC url is not reachable with Fedora tools, please use
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1458394
Bug ID: 1458394
Summary: Re-Review Request: nuvolaruntime - Tight integration
of web apps with your desktop, renaming nuvolaplayer
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1457949
--- Comment #4 from srakitnican ---
Thank you for your review!
(In reply to Antonio Trande from comment #3)
> SPEC url is not reachable with Fedora tools, please use that one from copr
> or a direct link to the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1438673
--- Comment #86 from Fedora Update System ---
openjfx-8.0.152-10.b04.fc26 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 26.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-2f213a60e5
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1418396
Björn "besser82" Esser changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1438673
--- Comment #85 from Fedora Update System ---
openjfx-8.0.152-10.b04.fc25 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 25.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-b9d1a0520b
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1421366
Bug 1421366 depends on bug 1438673, which changed state.
Bug 1438673 Summary: Review Request: openjfx - Rich client application platform
for Java
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1438673
What|Removed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1426243
Bug 1426243 depends on bug 1438673, which changed state.
Bug 1438673 Summary: Review Request: openjfx - Rich client application platform
for Java
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1438673
What|Removed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1438673
Jonny Heggheim changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1457949
--- Comment #3 from Antonio Trande ---
SPEC url is not reachable with Fedora tools, please use that one from copr or a
direct link to the file as a plain text.
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] =
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1418396
--- Comment #8 from Jeremy Cline ---
Updated to latest upstream
SRPM URL: https://jcline.fedorapeople.org/the-new-hotness-0.8.1-1.fc27.src.rpm
Spec URL: https://jcline.fedorapeople.org/the-new-hotness.spec
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1458355
Troy Dawson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|sgall...@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1442497
--- Comment #2 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/nodejs-is-plain-object
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1438673
--- Comment #84 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/openjfx
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1437036
Jonny Heggheim changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||heg...@gmail.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1438673
Jonny Heggheim changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|652183 (FE-JAVASIG) |
Referenced
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1438673
--- Comment #83 from Jonny Heggheim ---
(In reply to Michal Vala from comment #82)
> please remove commented-out code from spec before submit.
>
> approved. Thank you for great job!
Great, thanks!
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1458355
Bug ID: 1458355
Summary: Review Request: fedora-modular-repos - Fedora Modular
package repositories
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1451075
Haïkel Guémar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1441728
--- Comment #13 from c72...@yahoo.de ---
Dear Jan,
thank you very much for your valuable feedback and the review.
The spec file has been updated according to your suggestions:
* Fri Jun 02 2017 Wolfgang Stöggl -
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1457447
--- Comment #2 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/R-matrixStats
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1457405
--- Comment #2 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/R-R6
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1457404
--- Comment #4 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/R-magrittr
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1457393
--- Comment #2 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/R-lambda.r
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1457391
--- Comment #2 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/R-futile.options
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1457390
--- Comment #2 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/R-snow
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1456973
--- Comment #2 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/R-GenomeInfoDbData
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1457949
Tom "spot" Callaway changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1448778
--- Comment #14 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/cockatrice
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1420100
--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-Mail-Box-3.002-1.fc26 perl-Mail-Transport-3.000-2.fc26 has been submitted
as an update to Fedora 26.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-fda53d1ef7
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1420100
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1445923
--- Comment #8 from Jan Kalina ---
Third informal review: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1441728#c12
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1441728
Jan Kalina changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jkal...@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1448041
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1448041
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System ---
python-metakernel-0.20.2-2.fc26 python-ipyparallel-6.0.2-2.fc26 has been
submitted as an update to Fedora 26.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1448040
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1448040
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System ---
python-metakernel-0.20.2-2.fc26 python-ipyparallel-6.0.2-2.fc26 has been
submitted as an update to Fedora 26.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1457447
José Matos changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1457447
José Matos changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=886112
Jan Kalina changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jkal...@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1171746
Jan Kalina changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jkal...@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1458247
Vitaly Zaitsev changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1438673
Michal Vala changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review+
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1448041
--- Comment #4 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/python-metakernel
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1448040
--- Comment #4 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/python-ipyparallel
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1438842
--- Comment #10 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/matrix-synapse
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1457405
José Matos changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1457404
--- Comment #3 from José Matos ---
Replying to myself again:
(In reply to José Matos from comment #1)
>
> Note: License file LICENSE is not marked as %license
>
> it is marked as %doc.
LICENSE is not really a license
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1457404
José Matos changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1458247
Bug ID: 1458247
Summary: Review Request: translate-shell - a command-line
online translator
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Assignee:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1458243
Matej Habrnal changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||177841
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1458243
Bug ID: 1458243
Summary: Review Request: abrt-addon-python3 - catching and
analyzing Python 3 exceptions
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1452985
--- Comment #12 from Paul Howarth ---
I think perl6 code in rpms should be in the vendor directories rather than the
site directories.
I think the precompiling of the code should happen in the rpm, as is done for
python
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1457404
José Matos changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1457405
José Matos changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jama...@fc.up.pt
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1457404
José Matos changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jama...@fc.up.pt
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1457929
Pavel Raiskup changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1427341
--- Comment #31 from Miro Hrončok ---
(In reply to VincentS from comment #30)
> I'm sorry about no news and thank you for all your work on it, actually I'm
> waiting a response from le...@lists.fedoraproject.org about
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1438673
--- Comment #81 from Jonny Heggheim ---
(In reply to Michal Vala from comment #77)
> Issues:
> ===
> - %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
> Note: I don't see this as an issue as I would
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1457929
Pavel Raiskup changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1457949
Antonio Trande changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||182235
1 - 100 of 115 matches
Mail list logo