[Bug 1627084] Review Request: mutter328 - Window and compositing manager based on Clutter
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1627084 Fabio Valentini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|CLOSED Resolution|--- |NEXTRELEASE Last Closed||2018-09-10 17:26:28 --- Comment #5 from Fabio Valentini --- Built on fedora 29 and rawhide. https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=1143527 https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=1143530 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1503915] Review Request: roca-detect - test RSA public keys for ROCA vulnerability
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1503915
--- Comment #35 from Stuart D Gathman ---
(In reply to Miro Hrončok from comment #34)
> I really don't get this conditional now:
>
> %if 0%{?rhel} >= 7
> Requires: python-dateutil
> %else
> Requires: %{python}-dateutil
> %endif
>
> What is it that you are trying to express? On RHEL7+, require
> python-dateutil, but on RHEL6, require python3-dateutil? Why?
python-dateutil.noarch 1.5-7.el7 @base
python2-dateutil.noarch 1.5-0.el7 epel
python34-dateutil.noarch 1:2.4.2-3.el7 epel
I'll just remove all rhel7 support from the package review, and sneak it in
after Fedora is approved. I didn't get el6 to work, and may not spend time on
it.
I'll try your other recommendations after I get a day job trouble ticket taken
care of. The pathfix.py looks quite handy - I need to do that a lot.
I only put in the python3dist(six) because you thought I needed it. The actual
substance is met by Requires: %{python}-future. I put the software through its
paces in mock, or in a minimal install where network is needed
(roca-detect-tls) to verify dependencies. I will try the autodependency, but
I've had mixed results in the past. But it's been a few years, maybe it'll
work for this.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1503915] Review Request: roca-detect - test RSA public keys for ROCA vulnerability
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1503915
--- Comment #34 from Miro Hrončok ---
I really don't get this conditional now:
%if 0%{?rhel} >= 7
Requires:python-dateutil
%else
Requires:%{python}-dateutil
%endif
What is it that you are trying to express? On RHEL7+, require python-dateutil,
but on RHEL6, require python3-dateutil? Why?
--
Requires:%{python}-future %{python}-cryptography %{python}-pgpdump
# Not required in normal usage, but recommended by upstream.
Requires:python3dist(six)
This mixes 2 types of specifying Python dependencies. As well as this doesn't
work with your python macros specified on top. Also, submit a pull request to
upstream if the six dependency is bogus.
I recommend you switch to
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Python#Automatically_generated_dependencies
--
# fix env shbang in CLI scripts
sed -i -e '1,1 s,^#!.*$,#!%{__python} %{py_shbang_opts},' \
`find roca -name "*.py" | xargs grep -l '^#!.*env python'`
You might very well just use pathfix.py as a one-liner.
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Make_ambiguous_python_shebangs_error#Using_pathfix.py_to_fix_shebangs
--
find . -name .gitignore | xargs rm
Why not just -delete?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1627084] Review Request: mutter328 - Window and compositing manager based on Clutter
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1627084 --- Comment #4 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/mutter328 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1503915] Review Request: roca-detect - test RSA public keys for ROCA vulnerability
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1503915 --- Comment #33 from Stuart D Gathman --- Spec URL: https://gathman.org/linux/SPECS/roca-detect.spec SRPM URL: https://gathman.org/linux/f28/src/roca-detect-1.2.12-2.fc28.src.rpm Fix the shebangs and permissions of the CLI test scripts, just in case user want to run individual tests without python3 -m (and to keep rpmlint happy). Fix bogus changelog version. Remove version control files left by upstream. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1627084] Review Request: mutter328 - Window and compositing manager based on Clutter
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1627084 --- Comment #3 from Fabio Valentini --- Thanks so much for the quick review! I requested a repository with master and f29 branches: https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/8084 https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/8085 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1627510] Review Request: jitterentropy - cpu based entropy extraction library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1627510 Neil Horman changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-review? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1627510] New: Review Request: jitterentropy - cpu based entropy extraction library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1627510 Bug ID: 1627510 Summary: Review Request: jitterentropy - cpu based entropy extraction library Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: nhor...@redhat.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: https://nhorman.fedorapeople.org/jitterentropy.spec SRPM URL: https://nhorman.fedorapeople.org/jitterentropy-2.1.2-1.fc28.src.rpm Description: Library implementing the CPU jitter entropy source Fedora Account System Username: nhorman -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1627084] Review Request: mutter328 - Window and compositing manager based on Clutter
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1627084 Neal Gompa changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |POST Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #2 from Neal Gompa --- Review notes: [x] Package is functionally identical to mutter [x] Package builds and is installable [x] Package follows guidelines for compatibility packages PACKAGE APPROVED. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1503915] Review Request: roca-detect - test RSA public keys for ROCA vulnerability
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1503915
Miro Hrončok changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|mhron...@redhat.com
Flags||fedora-review?
--- Comment #32 from Miro Hrončok ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
Issues:
===
- Packages MUST NOT have dependencies (either build-time or runtime) on
packages named with the unversioned python- prefix unless no properly
versioned package exists. Dependencies on Python packages instead MUST
use names beginning with python2- or python3- as appropriate.
Note: Unversionned Python dependency found.
See: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Python#Dependencies
Note: "%if 0%{?rhel} <= 7" is true on Fedora.
- Missing requirement on python3dist(six) (upstream says it needs it).
- Incoherent version in changelog, see rpmlint output bellow.
- Wrong (unneeded) shebangs, see rpmlint output bellow.
- Packaged .gitignore, see rpmlint output bellow.
= MUST items =
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[!]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[!]: Requires correct, justified where necessary. (python-dateutil, six
missing)
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
Note: Documentation size is 276480 bytes in 5 files.
[?]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package must not depend on deprecated() packages.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
Python:
[x]: Python eggs must not download any dependencies during the build
process.
[x]: A package which is used by another package via an egg interface should
provide egg info.
[?]: Package meets the Packaging Guidelines::Python
[x]: Package contains BR: python2-devel or python3-devel
[x]: Binary eggs must be removed in %prep
= SHOULD items =
Generic:
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[!]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[?]: Package functions as described.
[?]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[x]: Patches
[Bug 1627507] New: Review Request: rust-decimal - Decimal floating point arithmetic for Rust
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1627507 Bug ID: 1627507 Summary: Review Request: rust-decimal - Decimal floating point arithmetic for Rust Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: i.gnatenko.br...@gmail.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: https://ignatenkobrain.fedorapeople.org/for-review/rust-decimal.spec SRPM URL: https://ignatenkobrain.fedorapeople.org/for-review/rust-decimal-2.0.4-1.fc30.src.rpm Description: Decimal floating point arithmetic for Rust. Fedora Account System Username: ignatenkobrain -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1627505] New: Review Request: rust-matrixmultiply - General matrix multiplication of f32 and f64 matrices in Rust
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1627505 Bug ID: 1627505 Summary: Review Request: rust-matrixmultiply - General matrix multiplication of f32 and f64 matrices in Rust Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: i.gnatenko.br...@gmail.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: https://ignatenkobrain.fedorapeople.org/for-review/rust-matrixmultiply.spec SRPM URL: https://ignatenkobrain.fedorapeople.org/for-review/rust-matrixmultiply-0.1.14-1.fc30.src.rpm Description: General matrix multiplication of f32 and f64 matrices in Rust. Fedora Account System Username: ignatenkobrain -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1627504] New: Review Request: rust-abomonation - High performance and very unsafe serialization library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1627504 Bug ID: 1627504 Summary: Review Request: rust-abomonation - High performance and very unsafe serialization library Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: i.gnatenko.br...@gmail.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: https://ignatenkobrain.fedorapeople.org/for-review/rust-abomonation.spec SRPM URL: https://ignatenkobrain.fedorapeople.org/for-review/rust-abomonation-0.5.0-1.fc30.src.rpm Description: High performance and very unsafe serialization library. Fedora Account System Username: ignatenkobrain -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1503915] Review Request: roca-detect - test RSA public keys for ROCA vulnerability
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1503915 --- Comment #31 from Miro Hrončok --- > I'd like to explore whether replacing EASY scripts with symlinks should be a > more accepted packaging option. Try https://pagure.io/packaging-committee/issues but be prepared to have some arguments. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1626922] Review Request: rust-shell-words - Process command line according to parsing rules of UNIX shell
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1626922 Igor Gnatenko changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|CLOSED Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Last Closed||2018-09-10 13:42:56 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1626949] Review Request: rust-gir-format-check - File format checker
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1626949 Igor Gnatenko changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|CLOSED Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Last Closed||2018-09-10 13:42:50 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1503915] Review Request: roca-detect - test RSA public keys for ROCA vulnerability
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1503915 --- Comment #30 from Stuart D Gathman --- Spec URL: https://gathman.org/linux/SPECS/roca-detect.spec SRPM URL: https://gathman.org/linux/f28/src/roca-detect-1.2.12-1.fc28.src.rpm Moved to latest upstream tag. Symlink option is no longer default since EASY scripts now work. If I think of it after getting my other work done, I'd like to explore whether replacing EASY scripts with symlinks should be a more accepted packaging option. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1627030] Review Request: rust-approx - Approximate floating point equality comparisons and assertions
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1627030 Igor Gnatenko changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Last Closed||2018-09-10 13:42:44 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1627067] Review Request: rust-recycler - Small Rust library for recycling types containing owned memory
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1627067 Igor Gnatenko changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Last Closed||2018-09-10 13:31:57 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1627042] Review Request: rust-alga_derive - Derive attribute for implementing algebraic traits from the alga crate
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1627042 Igor Gnatenko changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Last Closed||2018-09-10 13:31:28 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1627064] Review Request: rust-rawpointer - Extra methods for raw pointers
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1627064 Igor Gnatenko changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Last Closed||2018-09-10 13:31:00 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1627061] Review Request: rust-ord_subset - Tools for working with the Ord subset of certain PartialOrd types , like floats
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1627061 Igor Gnatenko changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Last Closed||2018-09-10 13:30:31 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1626992] Review Request: rust-libm - libm in pure Rust
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1626992 Igor Gnatenko changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Last Closed||2018-09-10 13:29:59 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1627057] Review Request: rust-mint - Math interoperability standard types
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1627057 Igor Gnatenko changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Last Closed||2018-09-10 13:29:26 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1503915] Review Request: roca-detect - test RSA public keys for ROCA vulnerability
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1503915 --- Comment #29 from Miro Hrončok --- "release" is just a github thing built on top of tags. I recommend asking upstream whether they consider the "releases" to be somehow more or of they just sometimes forget to create them. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1626824] Review Request: rust-tokio-uds - Unix Domain sockets for Tokio
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1626824 Igor Gnatenko changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|CLOSED Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Last Closed||2018-09-10 13:13:40 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1626825] Review Request: rust-parity-wasm - WebAssembly binary format serialization/ deserialization/interpreter
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1626825 Igor Gnatenko changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|CLOSED Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Last Closed||2018-09-10 13:13:34 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1503915] Review Request: roca-detect - test RSA public keys for ROCA vulnerability
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1503915 --- Comment #28 from Stuart D Gathman --- 1.2.1 is the latest release. There are more recent tags (not releases). SHould I use the latest tag: 1.2.12 ? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1503915] Review Request: roca-detect - test RSA public keys for ROCA vulnerability
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1503915 --- Comment #27 from Miro Hrončok --- That is an upstream bug that was fixed in 1.2.6 https://github.com/crocs-muni/roca/issues/43 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1503915] Review Request: roca-detect - test RSA public keys for ROCA vulnerability
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1503915 --- Comment #26 from Stuart D Gathman --- Spec URL: https://gathman.org/linux/SPECS/roca-detect.spec SRPM URL: https://gathman.org/linux/f28/src/roca-detect-1.2.1-7.fc28.src.rpm Add build option to use broken EASY entry point provided by upstream. Not enabled by default since it doesn't work. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1503915] Review Request: roca-detect - test RSA public keys for ROCA vulnerability
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1503915
--- Comment #25 from Stuart D Gathman ---
For posterity, here is how the "EASY" entry point breaks:
roca-detect-tls
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/bin/roca-detect-tls", line 11, in
load_entry_point('roca-detect==1.2.1', 'console_scripts',
'roca-detect-tls')()
File "/usr/lib/python3.6/site-packages/pkg_resources/__init__.py", line 476,
in load_entry_point
return get_distribution(dist).load_entry_point(group, name)
File "/usr/lib/python3.6/site-packages/pkg_resources/__init__.py", line 2700,
in load_entry_point
return ep.load()
File "/usr/lib/python3.6/site-packages/pkg_resources/__init__.py", line 2318,
in load
return self.resolve()
File "/usr/lib/python3.6/site-packages/pkg_resources/__init__.py", line 2324,
in resolve
module = __import__(self.module_name, fromlist=['__name__'], level=0)
File "/usr/lib/python3.6/site-packages/roca/detect_tls.py", line 23, in
from detect import RocaFingerprinter, logger, LOG_FORMAT
ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'detect'
The problem is that the actual CLI scripts expect to be run directly, and when
loaded as a module by EASY, relative imports break. If I patch the import,
then that breaks running the entry script directly. Some sort of conditional
logic is needed on the imports for the EASY introducer to work correctly. It
is insane to debug and workround the EASY bugs - when a symlink accomplishes
the intended result on Fedora systems.
I am making the symlinks a conditional build option for building with and
without EASY. Since EASY is broken as is, I am making the symlinks the
default.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1627057] Review Request: rust-mint - Math interoperability standard types
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1627057 --- Comment #2 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rust-mint -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1626825] Review Request: rust-parity-wasm - WebAssembly binary format serialization/ deserialization/interpreter
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1626825 --- Comment #2 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rust-parity-wasm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1626824] Review Request: rust-tokio-uds - Unix Domain sockets for Tokio
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1626824 --- Comment #2 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rust-tokio-uds -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1627030] Review Request: rust-approx - Approximate floating point equality comparisons and assertions
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1627030 --- Comment #2 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rust-approx -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1626992] Review Request: rust-libm - libm in pure Rust
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1626992 --- Comment #2 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rust-libm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1627042] Review Request: rust-alga_derive - Derive attribute for implementing algebraic traits from the alga crate
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1627042 --- Comment #2 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rust-alga_derive -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1627067] Review Request: rust-recycler - Small Rust library for recycling types containing owned memory
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1627067 --- Comment #2 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rust-recycler -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1627064] Review Request: rust-rawpointer - Extra methods for raw pointers
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1627064 --- Comment #2 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rust-rawpointer -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1627061] Review Request: rust-ord_subset - Tools for working with the Ord subset of certain PartialOrd types , like floats
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1627061 --- Comment #4 from Igor Gnatenko --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rust-ord_subset -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1503915] Review Request: roca-detect - test RSA public keys for ROCA vulnerability
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1503915 --- Comment #24 from Stuart D Gathman --- No problem. The need for this package is decaying anyway, as it is being incorporated into key generation software. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1626922] Review Request: rust-shell-words - Process command line according to parsing rules of UNIX shell
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1626922 --- Comment #2 from Igor Gnatenko --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rust-shell-words -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1627057] Review Request: rust-mint - Math interoperability standard types
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1627057 Vitaly Zaitsev changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||vit...@easycoding.org Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|vit...@easycoding.org Flags||fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Vitaly Zaitsev --- License: OK. Latest version packaged: OK. Builds in mock: OK. No rpmlint errors: OK. Rust packaging guidelines: OK. Package approved. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1627030] Review Request: rust-approx - Approximate floating point equality comparisons and assertions
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1627030 Vitaly Zaitsev changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||vit...@easycoding.org Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|vit...@easycoding.org Flags||fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Vitaly Zaitsev --- License: OK. Latest version packaged: OK. Builds in mock: OK. No rpmlint errors: OK. Rust packaging guidelines: OK. Package approved. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1626992] Review Request: rust-libm - libm in pure Rust
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1626992 Vitaly Zaitsev changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||vit...@easycoding.org Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|vit...@easycoding.org Flags||fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Vitaly Zaitsev --- License: OK. Latest version packaged: OK. Builds in mock: OK. No rpmlint errors: OK. Rust packaging guidelines: OK. Package approved. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1627042] Review Request: rust-alga_derive - Derive attribute for implementing algebraic traits from the alga crate
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1627042 Vitaly Zaitsev changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||vit...@easycoding.org Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|vit...@easycoding.org Flags||fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Vitaly Zaitsev --- License: OK. Latest version packaged: OK. Builds in mock: OK. No rpmlint errors: OK. Rust packaging guidelines: OK. Package approved. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1626949] Review Request: rust-gir-format-check - File format checker
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1626949 Robert-André Mauchin changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |POST CC||zebo...@gmail.com Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|zebo...@gmail.com Flags||fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Robert-André Mauchin --- - License ok - Latest version packaged - Builds in mock - No rpmlint errors - Conforms to Packaging Guidelines Package approved. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1627061] Review Request: rust-ord_subset - Tools for working with the Ord subset of certain PartialOrd types , like floats
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1627061 Vitaly Zaitsev changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||vit...@easycoding.org Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|vit...@easycoding.org Flags||fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Vitaly Zaitsev --- License: OK. Latest version packaged: OK. Builds in mock: OK. No rpmlint errors: OK. Rust packaging guidelines: OK. Package approved. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1627064] Review Request: rust-rawpointer - Extra methods for raw pointers
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1627064 Vitaly Zaitsev changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||vit...@easycoding.org Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|vit...@easycoding.org Flags||fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Vitaly Zaitsev --- License: OK. Latest version packaged: OK. Builds in mock: OK. No rpmlint errors: OK. Rust packaging guidelines: OK. Package approved. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1627067] Review Request: rust-recycler - Small Rust library for recycling types containing owned memory
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1627067 Vitaly Zaitsev changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||vit...@easycoding.org Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|vit...@easycoding.org Flags||fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Vitaly Zaitsev --- License: OK. Latest version packaged: OK. Builds in mock: OK. No rpmlint errors: OK. Rust packaging guidelines: OK. Package approved. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1626922] Review Request: rust-shell-words - Process command line according to parsing rules of UNIX shell
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1626922 Robert-André Mauchin changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |POST CC||zebo...@gmail.com Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|zebo...@gmail.com Flags||fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Robert-André Mauchin --- - License ok - Latest version packaged - Builds in mock - No rpmlint errors - Conforms to Packaging Guidelines Package approved. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1626902] Review Request: ghc-optparse-simple - Simple interface to optparse-applicative
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1626902
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |POST
CC||zebo...@gmail.com
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|zebo...@gmail.com
Flags||fedora-review+
--- Comment #2 from Robert-André Mauchin ---
Package approved.
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
= MUST items =
C/C++:
[x]: Package does not contain kernel modules.
[x]: Package contains no static executables.
[x]: Development (unversioned) .so files in -devel subpackage, if present.
Note: Unversioned so-files in private %_libdir subdirectory (see
attachment). Verify they are not in ld path.
[x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la)
[x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs.
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
found: "BSD (3 clause)", "Unknown or generated". 6 files have unknown
license. Detailed output of licensecheck in /home/bob/packaging/review
/ghc-optparse-simple/review-ghc-optparse-simple/licensecheck.txt
[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[x]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[-]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
Note: Documentation size is 225280 bytes in 39 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
= SHOULD items =
Generic:
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[?]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[x]: Scriptlets must be sane, if used.
[-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[x]: Package should compile
[Bug 1626666] Review Request: python-async-generator - Async generators and context managers
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=162 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System --- python-async-generator-1.10-1.fc27 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 27. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-fa586fb5cd -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1626666] Review Request: python-async-generator - Async generators and context managers
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=162 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System --- python-async-generator-1.10-1.fc28 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 28. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-7122a888e1 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1626666] Review Request: python-async-generator - Async generators and context managers
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=162 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System --- python-async-generator-1.10-1.fc29 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 29. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-7b00f28832 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1626666] Review Request: python-async-generator - Async generators and context managers
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=162 Carl George changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|CLOSED Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Last Closed||2018-09-10 11:08:12 --- Comment #3 from Carl George --- https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=1143461 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1266594] Review Request: playerctl - Command-line MPRIS-compatible Media Player Controller
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1266594 Dridi Boukelmoune changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dridi.boukelmo...@gmail.com --- Comment #1 from Dridi Boukelmoune --- Hello Jan, I was about to submit a spec [1] and srpm [2] for playerctl and found this submission. Are you still interested in maintaining playerctl in Fedora? If yes, we could be co-maintainers, I've been using it for a few weeks now and I already adopted it! Dridi [1] https://dridi.fedorapeople.org/review/playerctl.spec [2] https://dridi.fedorapeople.org/review/playerctl-0.6.1-1.fc28.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1627084] Review Request: mutter328 - Window and compositing manager based on Clutter
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1627084 Neal Gompa changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ngomp...@gmail.com Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|ngomp...@gmail.com Flags||fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Neal Gompa --- Taking this review. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1625561] Review Request: phan - A static analyzer for PHP
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1625561 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System --- phan-1.0.4-1.fc29 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 29. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-f01ad541d9 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1625561] Review Request: phan - A static analyzer for PHP
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1625561 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |MODIFIED --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System --- phan-1.0.4-1.fc28 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 28. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-86a7e15fac -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1624921] Review Request: mozjs60 - JavaScript interpreter and libraries
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1624921 --- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System --- abattis-cantarell-fonts-0.111-1.fc29 adwaita-icon-theme-3.30.0-1.fc29 aisleriot-3.22.6-1.fc29 amtk-5.0.0-2.fc29 anjuta-3.28.0-7.fc29 at-spi2-atk-2.30.0-1.fc29 at-spi2-core-2.30.0-2.fc29 atk-2.30.0-1.fc29 atomix-3.30.0.1-1.fc29 baobab-3.30.0-1.fc29 bijiben-3.30.0-1.fc29 cheese-3.30.0-2.fc29 dconf-0.30.0-1.fc29 dconf-editor-3.30.0-1.fc29 devhelp-3.30.0-2.fc29 epiphany-3.30.0-1.fc29 evince-3.30.0-2.fc29 file-roller-3.30.0-1.fc29 five-or-more-3.30.0-1.fc29 gdk-pixbuf2-2.38.0-4.fc29 gdm-3.30.0-3.fc29 gedit-3.30.0-2.fc29 gedit-plugins-3.30.0-1.fc29 gjs-1.54.0-2.fc29 glib-networking-2.58.0-2.fc29 glib2-2.58.0-1.fc29 gnome-2048-3.30.0-1.fc29 gnome-backgrounds-3.30.0-1.fc29 gnome-boxes-3.30.0-2.fc29 gnome-builder-3.30.0-2.fc29 gnome-calculator-3.30.0-1.fc29 gnome-calendar-3.30.0-1.fc29 gnome-characters-3.29.91-1.fc29 gnome-chess-3.30.0-1.fc29 gnome-clocks-3.30.0-2.fc29 gnome-color-manager-3.30.0-1.fc29 gnome-contacts-3.30-1.fc29 gnome-control-center-3.30.0-1.fc29 gnome-desktop3-3.30.0-2.fc29 gnome-disk-utility-3.30.0-1.fc29 gnome-font-viewer-3.30.0-1.fc29 gnome-getting-started-docs-3.30.0-1.fc29 gnome-initial-setup-3.29.92-1.fc29 gnome-logs-3.30.0-1.fc29 gnome-maps-3.30.0-1.fc29 gnome-mines-3.30.0-1.fc29 gnome-multi-writer-3.30.0-1.fc29 gnome-music-3.30.0-1.fc29 gnome-nibbles-3.24.1-1.fc29 gnome-online-accounts-3.30.0-3.fc29 gnome-online-miners-3.30.0-1.fc29 gnome-packagekit-3.30.0-1.fc29 gnome-photos-3.30.0-1.fc29 gnome-power-manager-3.30.0-1.fc29 gnome-screenshot-3.30.0-1.fc29 gnome-session-3.30.0-1.fc29 gnome-settings-daemon-3.30.0-1.fc29 gnome-shell-3.30.0-1.fc29 gnome-shell-extensions-3.30.0-1.fc29 gnome-software-3.30.0-1.fc29 gnome-sudoku-3.30.0-2.fc29 gnome-taquin-3.30.0-1.fc29 gnome-tweaks-3.30.0-1.fc29 gnome-user-docs-3.30.0-1.fc29 gobject-introspection-1.58.0-2.fc29 gpaste-3.30.1-1.fc29 gsettings-desktop-schemas-3.28.1-2.fc29 gtk-doc-1.29-1.fc29 gtk3-3.24.0-3.fc29 gtksourceview3-3.24.9-4.fc29 gtksourceview4-4.0.3-2.fc29 gucharmap-11.0.2-2.fc29 gvfs-1.38.0-1.fc29 iagno-3.30.0-1.fc29 jsonrpc-glib-3.30.0-2.fc29 libdazzle-3.30.0-1.fc29 librsvg2-2.44.2-2.fc29 libsoup-2.64.0-2.fc29 lightsoff-3.30.0-1.fc29 mozjs60-60.1.0-1.fc29 mutter-3.30.0-1.fc29 nautilus-3.30.0-2.fc29 orca-3.29.92-1.fc29 polari-3.30.0-1.fc29 pyatspi-2.30.0-1.fc29 pygobject3-3.30.0-1.fc29 rygel-0.36.2-2.fc29 seahorse-3.30-1.fc29 shotwell-0.29.92-1.fc29 simple-scan-3.30.0-1.fc29 sushi-3.30.0-1.fc29 swell-foop-3.30.0-1.fc29 sysprof-3.30.0-1.fc29 template-glib-3.30.0-2.fc29 tracker-2.1.4-3.fc29 tracker-miners-2.1.4-2.fc29 vala-0.42.0-1.fc29 webkit2gtk3-2.22.0-3.fc29 yelp-3.30.0-1.fc29 yelp-xsl-3.30.0-1.fc29 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 29. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-85d637c544 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1624921] Review Request: mozjs60 - JavaScript interpreter and libraries
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1624921 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|MODIFIED --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System --- abattis-cantarell-fonts-0.111-1.fc29 adwaita-icon-theme-3.30.0-1.fc29 aisleriot-3.22.6-1.fc29 amtk-5.0.0-2.fc29 anjuta-3.28.0-7.fc29 at-spi2-atk-2.30.0-1.fc29 at-spi2-core-2.30.0-2.fc29 atk-2.30.0-1.fc29 atomix-3.30.0.1-1.fc29 baobab-3.30.0-1.fc29 bijiben-3.30.0-1.fc29 cheese-3.30.0-2.fc29 dconf-0.30.0-1.fc29 dconf-editor-3.30.0-1.fc29 devhelp-3.30.0-2.fc29 epiphany-3.30.0-1.fc29 evince-3.30.0-2.fc29 file-roller-3.30.0-1.fc29 five-or-more-3.30.0-1.fc29 gdk-pixbuf2-2.38.0-4.fc29 gdm-3.30.0-3.fc29 gedit-3.30.0-2.fc29 gedit-plugins-3.30.0-1.fc29 gjs-1.54.0-2.fc29 glib-networking-2.58.0-2.fc29 glib2-2.58.0-1.fc29 gnome-2048-3.30.0-1.fc29 gnome-backgrounds-3.30.0-1.fc29 gnome-boxes-3.30.0-2.fc29 gnome-builder-3.30.0-2.fc29 gnome-calculator-3.30.0-1.fc29 gnome-calendar-3.30.0-1.fc29 gnome-characters-3.29.91-1.fc29 gnome-chess-3.30.0-1.fc29 gnome-clocks-3.30.0-2.fc29 gnome-color-manager-3.30.0-1.fc29 gnome-contacts-3.30-1.fc29 gnome-control-center-3.30.0-1.fc29 gnome-desktop3-3.30.0-2.fc29 gnome-disk-utility-3.30.0-1.fc29 gnome-font-viewer-3.30.0-1.fc29 gnome-getting-started-docs-3.30.0-1.fc29 gnome-initial-setup-3.29.92-1.fc29 gnome-logs-3.30.0-1.fc29 gnome-maps-3.30.0-1.fc29 gnome-mines-3.30.0-1.fc29 gnome-multi-writer-3.30.0-1.fc29 gnome-music-3.30.0-1.fc29 gnome-nibbles-3.24.1-1.fc29 gnome-online-accounts-3.30.0-3.fc29 gnome-online-miners-3.30.0-1.fc29 gnome-packagekit-3.30.0-1.fc29 gnome-photos-3.30.0-1.fc29 gnome-power-manager-3.30.0-1.fc29 gnome-screenshot-3.30.0-1.fc29 gnome-session-3.30.0-1.fc29 gnome-settings-daemon-3.30.0-1.fc29 gnome-shell-3.30.0-1.fc29 gnome-shell-extensions-3.30.0-1.fc29 gnome-software-3.30.0-1.fc29 gnome-sudoku-3.30.0-2.fc29 gnome-taquin-3.30.0-1.fc29 gnome-tweaks-3.30.0-1.fc29 gnome-user-docs-3.30.0-1.fc29 gobject-introspection-1.58.0-2.fc29 gpaste-3.30.1-1.fc29 gsettings-desktop-schemas-3.28.1-2.fc29 gtk-doc-1.29-1.fc29 gtk3-3.24.0-3.fc29 gtksourceview3-3.24.9-4.fc29 gtksourceview4-4.0.3-2.fc29 gucharmap-11.0.2-2.fc29 gvfs-1.38.0-1.fc29 iagno-3.30.0-1.fc29 jsonrpc-glib-3.30.0-2.fc29 libdazzle-3.30.0-1.fc29 librsvg2-2.44.2-2.fc29 libsoup-2.64.0-2.fc29 lightsoff-3.30.0-1.fc29 mozjs60-60.1.0-1.fc29 mutter-3.30.0-1.fc29 nautilus-3.30.0-2.fc29 orca-3.29.92-1.fc29 polari-3.30.0-1.fc29 pyatspi-2.30.0-1.fc29 pygobject3-3.30.0-1.fc29 rygel-0.36.2-2.fc29 seahorse-3.30-1.fc29 shotwell-0.29.92-1.fc29 simple-scan-3.30.0-1.fc29 sushi-3.30.0-1.fc29 swell-foop-3.30.0-1.fc29 sysprof-3.30.0-1.fc29 template-glib-3.30.0-2.fc29 tracker-2.1.4-3.fc29 tracker-miners-2.1.4-2.fc29 vala-0.42.0-1.fc29 webkit2gtk3-2.22.0-3.fc29 yelp-3.30.0-1.fc29 yelp-xsl-3.30.0-1.fc29 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 29. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-85d637c544 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1627061] Review Request: rust-ord_subset - Tools for working with the Ord subset of certain PartialOrd types , like floats
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1627061 --- Comment #2 from Igor Gnatenko --- New Spec URL: https://ignatenkobrain.fedorapeople.org/for-review/rust-ord_subset.spec New SRPM URL: https://ignatenkobrain.fedorapeople.org/for-review/rust-ord_subset-3.1.1-1.fc30.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1627084] New: Review Request: mutter328 - Window and compositing manager based on Clutter
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1627084 Bug ID: 1627084 Summary: Review Request: mutter328 - Window and compositing manager based on Clutter Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: decatho...@gmail.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: https://decathorpe.fedorapeople.org/packages/mutter328.spec SRPM URL: https://decathorpe.fedorapeople.org/packages/mutter328-3.28.3-4.fc28.src.rpm Description: Mutter is a window and compositing manager that displays and manages your desktop via OpenGL. Mutter combines a sophisticated display engine using the Clutter toolkit with solid window-management logic inherited from the Metacity window manager. While Mutter can be used stand-alone, it is primarily intended to be used as the display core of a larger system such as GNOME Shell. For this reason, Mutter is very extensible via plugins, which are used both to add fancy visual effects and to rework the window management behaviors to meet the needs of the environment. Fedora Account System Username: decathorpe koji scratch build for rawhide: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=29597663 Packager's Notes: = This package is based on the f28 branch of the main mutter package, and has been cleaned up for best practices and new Guidelines. The package is needed as a compat package for gala, wingpanel, and future versions pantheon-greeter due to an API and ABI bump in mutter with versions 3.29.4+ (libmutter-2 -> libmutter-3). In addition, I've added Conflicts tags to the packages where they conflict with the main mutter package. It looks like gala does not require any of mutter's data files to be present, but only requires the shared libraries (and possibly GSettings keys, etc.) - that's why I split them out into a new -libs sub-package. It boils down to this: - mutter328-devel is only needed as BuildRequires for gala and pantheon-greeter. This package is not parallel-installable with mutter-devel 3.30 in f29 and rawhide (this is expected). - mutter328-libs is only needed as runtime requirement of gala, wingpanel, and pantheon-greeter. This package is parallel-installable with mutter 3.30 in f29 and rawhide, and depends on the main mutter package for the data files (e.g. GSettings schemas). - mutter328 and mutter328-tests are expected to conflict with the main mutter package, and should never be installed manually (and should not be pulled in as dependencies automatically). I checked that this works as expected with rebuilt packages from my COPR repositories (decathorpe/elementary-staging for stable builds, decathorpe/elementary-nightly for builds from git master). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1244678] Review Request: duperemove - Tools for deduping file systems
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1244678 Jonathan Dieter changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jdie...@gmail.com --- Comment #15 from Jonathan Dieter --- Not sure if anyone is still interested in packaging this, but I have updated packages that unbundle xxhash. https://www.jdieter.net/downloads/duperemove.spec https://www.jdieter.net/downloads/duperemove-0.11-1.fc28.src.rpm If Francesco isn't interested, but someone is interested in reviewing, I would be happy to take this. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1627067] New: Review Request: rust-recycler - Small Rust library for recycling types containing owned memory
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1627067 Bug ID: 1627067 Summary: Review Request: rust-recycler - Small Rust library for recycling types containing owned memory Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: i.gnatenko.br...@gmail.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: https://ignatenkobrain.fedorapeople.org/for-review/rust-recycler.spec SRPM URL: https://ignatenkobrain.fedorapeople.org/for-review/rust-recycler-0.1.4-1.fc30.src.rpm Description: Small Rust library for recycling types containing owned memory. Fedora Account System Username: ignatenkobrain -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1627064] New: Review Request: rust-rawpointer - Extra methods for raw pointers
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1627064 Bug ID: 1627064 Summary: Review Request: rust-rawpointer - Extra methods for raw pointers Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: i.gnatenko.br...@gmail.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: https://ignatenkobrain.fedorapeople.org/for-review/rust-rawpointer.spec SRPM URL: https://ignatenkobrain.fedorapeople.org/for-review/rust-rawpointer-0.1.0-1.fc30.src.rpm Description: Extra methods for raw pointers. Fedora Account System Username: ignatenkobrain -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1627061] Review Request: rust-ord_subset - Tools for working with the Ord subset of certain PartialOrd types , like floats
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1627061 --- Comment #1 from Igor Gnatenko --- New Spec URL: https://ignatenkobrain.fedorapeople.org/for-review/rust-ord_subset.spec New SRPM URL: https://ignatenkobrain.fedorapeople.org/for-review/rust-ord_subset-3.1.0-1.fc30.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1627061] New: Review Request: rust-ord_subset - Tools for working with the Ord subset of certain PartialOrd types , like floats
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1627061 Bug ID: 1627061 Summary: Review Request: rust-ord_subset - Tools for working with the Ord subset of certain PartialOrd types, like floats Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: i.gnatenko.br...@gmail.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: https://ignatenkobrain.fedorapeople.org/for-review/rust-ord_subset.spec SRPM URL: https://ignatenkobrain.fedorapeople.org/for-review/rust-ord_subset-3.1.0-1.fc30.src.rpm Description: Tools for working with the Ord subset of certain PartialOrd types, like floats. Fedora Account System Username: ignatenkobrain -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1627057] New: Review Request: rust-mint - Math interoperability standard types
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1627057 Bug ID: 1627057 Summary: Review Request: rust-mint - Math interoperability standard types Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: i.gnatenko.br...@gmail.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: https://ignatenkobrain.fedorapeople.org/for-review/rust-mint.spec SRPM URL: https://ignatenkobrain.fedorapeople.org/for-review/rust-mint-0.5.1-1.fc30.src.rpm Description: Math interoperability standard types. Fedora Account System Username: ignatenkobrain -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1627042] New: Review Request: rust-alga_derive - Derive attribute for implementing algebraic traits from the alga crate
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1627042 Bug ID: 1627042 Summary: Review Request: rust-alga_derive - Derive attribute for implementing algebraic traits from the alga crate Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: i.gnatenko.br...@gmail.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: https://ignatenkobrain.fedorapeople.org/for-review/rust-alga_derive.spec SRPM URL: https://ignatenkobrain.fedorapeople.org/for-review/rust-alga_derive-0.7.0-1.fc30.src.rpm Description: Derive attribute for implementing algebraic traits from the alga crate. Fedora Account System Username: ignatenkobrain -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1627030] New: Review Request: rust-approx - Approximate floating point equality comparisons and assertions
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1627030 Bug ID: 1627030 Summary: Review Request: rust-approx - Approximate floating point equality comparisons and assertions Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: i.gnatenko.br...@gmail.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: https://ignatenkobrain.fedorapeople.org/for-review/rust-approx.spec SRPM URL: https://ignatenkobrain.fedorapeople.org/for-review/rust-approx-0.3.0-1.fc30.src.rpm Description: Approximate floating point equality comparisons and assertions. Fedora Account System Username: ignatenkobrain -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1625552] Review Request: php-felixfbecker-advanced-json-rpc3 - A more advanced JSONRPC implementation
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1625552 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System --- php-felixfbecker-advanced-json-rpc3-3.0.3-1.fc28 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 28. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-9b5f5eb8dd -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1625552] Review Request: php-felixfbecker-advanced-json-rpc3 - A more advanced JSONRPC implementation
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1625552 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |MODIFIED --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System --- php-felixfbecker-advanced-json-rpc3-3.0.3-1.fc29 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 29. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-6aa360c8fb -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 886328] Review Request: mingw-liboauth - MinGW build of OAuth library functions
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=886328 Bug 886328 depends on bug 886322, which changed state. Bug 886322 Summary: Review Request: mingw-nss - MinGW build of Network Security Services https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=886322 What|Removed |Added Status|CLOSED |NEW Resolution|WONTFIX |--- -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 886322] Review Request: mingw-nss - MinGW build of Network Security Services
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=886322 Christophe Fergeau changed: What|Removed |Added Status|CLOSED |NEW Resolution|WONTFIX |--- Keywords||Reopened --- Comment #10 from Christophe Fergeau --- Keeping this open as I was planning to move forward with this after my holidays ( https://teuf.fedorapeople.org/mingw-nss/ ) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 914790] Review Request: mingw-libcacard - CAC (Common Access Card) library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=914790 Bug 914790 depends on bug 886322, which changed state. Bug 886322 Summary: Review Request: mingw-nss - MinGW build of Network Security Services https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=886322 What|Removed |Added Status|CLOSED |NEW Resolution|WONTFIX |--- -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1626992] New: Review Request: rust-libm - libm in pure Rust
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1626992 Bug ID: 1626992 Summary: Review Request: rust-libm - libm in pure Rust Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: i.gnatenko.br...@gmail.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: https://ignatenkobrain.fedorapeople.org/for-review/rust-libm.spec SRPM URL: https://ignatenkobrain.fedorapeople.org/for-review/rust-libm-0.1.2-1.fc30.src.rpm Description: libm in pure Rust. Fedora Account System Username: ignatenkobrain -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1503915] Review Request: roca-detect - test RSA public keys for ROCA vulnerability
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1503915 Miro Hrončok changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEW Assignee|mhron...@redhat.com |nob...@fedoraproject.org --- Comment #23 from Miro Hrončok --- My resistence is based on a fact that you are trying to workaround what I see as a no-problem and that you are diverging from upstream. No, there is no rule that you cannot remove one part of upstream software and replace it with something else because you think it's better. However I always though that this is something that is discouraged in Fedora and all our downstream changes must be highly justifiable, or on it's way to upstream. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Staying_close_to_upstream_projects If you are unwilling to accept this, I am unwilling to accept the package and am stepping down form the review. I guess there will be others who are not so prudent. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1626949] New: Review Request: rust-gir-format-check - File format checker
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1626949 Bug ID: 1626949 Summary: Review Request: rust-gir-format-check - File format checker Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: i.gnatenko.br...@gmail.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: https://ignatenkobrain.fedorapeople.org/for-review/rust-gir-format-check.spec SRPM URL: https://ignatenkobrain.fedorapeople.org/for-review/rust-gir-format-check-0.1.1-1.fc30.src.rpm Description: File format checker. Fedora Account System Username: ignatenkobrain -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1501522] Review Request: fdk-aac - Third-Party Modified Version of the Fraunhofer FDK AAC Codec Library for Android
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1501522 --- Comment #95 from Wim Taymans --- (In reply to Yaakov Selkowitz from comment #94) > (In reply to Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski from comment #93) > > Done, sorry for the delay. > > Wim, are you going to request the repo again? Can you re-approve the bug again? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1626922] New: Review Request: rust-shell-words - Process command line according to parsing rules of UNIX shell
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1626922 Bug ID: 1626922 Summary: Review Request: rust-shell-words - Process command line according to parsing rules of UNIX shell Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: i.gnatenko.br...@gmail.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: https://ignatenkobrain.fedorapeople.org/for-review/rust-shell-words.spec SRPM URL: https://ignatenkobrain.fedorapeople.org/for-review/rust-shell-words-0.1.0-1.fc30.src.rpm Description: Process command line according to parsing rules of UNIX shell. Fedora Account System Username: ignatenkobrain -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1626666] Review Request: python-async-generator - Async generators and context managers
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=162 --- Comment #2 from Igor Gnatenko --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-async-generator -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
