https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1680194
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System ---
R-remotes-2.0.2-1.fc29 has been pushed to the Fedora 29 testing repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1680253
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System ---
R-generics-0.0.2-1.fc29 has been pushed to the Fedora 29 testing repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1491492
--- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System ---
coturn-4.5.1.0-1.fc29 has been pushed to the Fedora 29 testing repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1680254
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System ---
R-ellipsis-0.1.0-1.fc29 has been pushed to the Fedora 29 testing repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1677481
--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System ---
R-askpass-1.1-1.fc29 has been pushed to the Fedora 29 stable repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1677481
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1680254
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #6 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1491492
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #19 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1680194
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #6 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1680253
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #6 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1680435
Bug ID: 1680435
Summary: Review Request: wp-cli - The command line interface
for WordPress
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1449328
--- Comment #4 from Orion Poplawski ---
Thanks for the review. Upstream is aware of the issue an is looking to rework
the names.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1483262
--- Comment #17 from Shawn Iwinski ---
THANKS for the review!
SCM requests:
https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/9986
https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/9987
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1680307
--- Comment #2 from Shawn Iwinski ---
THANKS for the review!
SCM requests:
https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/9981
https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/9982
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1680308
--- Comment #2 from Shawn Iwinski ---
THANKS for the review!
SCM requests:
https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/9977
https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/9978
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1680192
Elliott Sales de Andrade changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST|CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1680194
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System ---
R-remotes-2.0.2-1.fc28 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 28.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-2d58df3197
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1680194
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST|MODIFIED
--- Comment #4 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1680253
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System ---
R-generics-0.0.2-1.fc28 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 28.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-7f6e22625a
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1680253
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST|MODIFIED
--- Comment #4 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1545479
--- Comment #11 from Felix Schwarz ---
I'm mostly done with the review (still hoping that someone more experienced
will join here :-). Some questions+bikeshedding and one bigger issue.
Let's start with the most important one:
.so files in
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1680254
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System ---
R-ellipsis-0.1.0-1.fc28 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 28.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-652d93f447
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1680254
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST|MODIFIED
--- Comment #4 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1668010
--- Comment #4 from Felix Schwarz ---
unfortunately both links in comment 3 are dead (404). Can you please upload
them again/trigger a new build?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1670656
Mark Goodwin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||needinfo?(quantum.analyst@g
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1449328
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|POST
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1680397
--- Comment #2 from Antonio Trande ---
Thank you.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1563831
Raphael Groner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1680302
--- Comment #3 from Randy Barlow ---
https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/9972
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1449328
--- Comment #2 from Orion Poplawski ---
Looks like upstream cleaned up cache.h and memory.h, though bitstream.h
remains. I've filed https://github.com/LLNL/zfp/issues/49
Spec URL: https://www.cora.nwra.com/~orion/fedora/zfp.spec
SRPM URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1469767
Raphael Groner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(bunnyapocalypse@p |
|rotonmail.com)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1469767
--- Comment #15 from Raphael Groner ---
(In reply to Robert-André Mauchin from comment #14)
> Any update here?
(In reply to Raphael Groner from comment #11)
> Well, as far as I can understand there's nothing to block an official
> approval.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1678387
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |POST
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1680372
--- Comment #5 from Björn 'besser82' Esser ---
(In reply to Robert-André Mauchin from comment #4)
> I have to go.
>
> Package approved, but add the missing BR before import.
Thank you very much for doing all the reviews!!!
Your remarks
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1563831
--- Comment #5 from Robert-André Mauchin ---
Is it ok to review now?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1469767
--- Comment #14 from Robert-André Mauchin ---
Any update here?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1680372
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|POST
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1680375
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|POST
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1680373
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|POST
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1680372
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1680375
--- Comment #5 from Björn 'besser82' Esser ---
Your remarks have been addressed.
***
=== Updated package ===
Changelog:
* Sun Feb 24 2019 Björn Esser - 0.140-0.3
- Changes as suggested in review (#1680375)
- Add a set of explicit
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1680375
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1680373
--- Comment #9 from Björn 'besser82' Esser ---
(In reply to Robert-André Mauchin from comment #7)
> - CONTRIBUTORS should be in %doc not %license
I think the list of the contributors (and thus the copyright holders) are a
part of the actual
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1680373
--- Comment #8 from Robert-André Mauchin ---
Sorry, don't add BuildRequires: perl(HTTP::Tiny::Multipart)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1680373
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1680397
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |POST
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1680376
--- Comment #8 from Björn 'besser82' Esser ---
(In reply to Robert-André Mauchin from comment #7)
> (In reply to Björn 'besser82' Esser from comment #6)
> > I'd be happy if you would review the other dependencies of devscripts, too.
> > ^_^
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1680372
Björn 'besser82' Esser changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||1680376
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1680376
Björn 'besser82' Esser changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1680372
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1680376
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|1680371, 1680372|
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1680372
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On|1680376 |
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1680372
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||1680376
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1680376
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|POST
Blocks|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1680372
Björn 'besser82' Esser changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On|1680376 |
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1680376
Björn 'besser82' Esser changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|1680371 |
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1680373
Björn 'besser82' Esser changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|1680371 |
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1680376
Björn 'besser82' Esser changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|1680372 |
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1680374
Björn 'besser82' Esser changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|1680371 |
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1680375
Björn 'besser82' Esser changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|1680371 |
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1680374
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|POST
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1680372
Björn 'besser82' Esser changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1680375
Björn 'besser82' Esser changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1680373
Björn 'besser82' Esser changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1680376
--- Comment #6 from Björn 'besser82' Esser ---
I'd be happy if you would review the other dependencies of devscripts, too.
^_^
[1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1680373
[2] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1680375
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1680375
Björn 'besser82' Esser changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1680397
Bug ID: 1680397
Summary: Review Request: combblas - The Combinatorial BLAS
Library
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1680372
Björn 'besser82' Esser changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1680373
Björn 'besser82' Esser changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1680376
--- Comment #5 from Björn 'besser82' Esser ---
(In reply to Robert-André Mauchin from comment #3)
> Add BR for tests:
>
> BuildRequires: perl(TestLogging)
I don't think this a valid BR, thus removing it again.
See:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1680376
--- Comment #4 from Björn 'besser82' Esser ---
Thank you for the review!
(In reply to Robert-André Mauchin from comment #3)
> - %{__perl} → perl
I think that is a matter of personal preference.
Your other remarks have been addressed.
***
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1680374
--- Comment #4 from Björn 'besser82' Esser ---
Thank you for the review!
(In reply to Robert-André Mauchin from comment #3)
> - %{__perl} → perl
I think that is a matter of personal preference.
Your other remarks have been addressed.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1680376
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1680374
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1483262
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |POST
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1662573
--- Comment #20 from Raphael Groner ---
(In reply to Igor Gnatenko from comment #19)
…
> But how is Expat relevant here? Project is licensed under MIT. Plus one file
> which has been copied from other project which is BSD.
See comment #10.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1680336
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |POST
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1680335
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |POST
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1680081
--- Comment #3 from Robert-André Mauchin ---
- The Appdata file must now be installed in /usr/share/metainfo aka
%{_metainfodir} not /usr/share/appdata
- The Appdata fide must be validated:
BuildRequires: libappstream-glib
[…]
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1680373
--- Comment #5 from Raphael Groner ---
> %{perl_vendorlib}/*
> %{_mandir}/man3/*
Please add %{name} macro somehow. We've this policy in Python, no idea if it's
relevant for Perl as well. You'd be automatically notified in a new build run
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1680373
--- Comment #4 from Raphael Groner ---
Are you interested in a review swap? Maybe take a look into bug #1469767.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1680307
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |POST
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1680308
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |POST
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1662573
--- Comment #19 from Igor Gnatenko ---
(In reply to Raphael Groner from comment #18)
> (In reply to Igor Gnatenko from comment #17)
> > (In reply to Raphael Groner from comment #15)
> > > OK, looks good now. APPROVED
> > >
> > > Question:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1662573
--- Comment #18 from Raphael Groner ---
(In reply to Igor Gnatenko from comment #17)
> (In reply to Raphael Groner from comment #15)
> > OK, looks good now. APPROVED
> >
> > Question: What's the difference between MIT and Expat licenses?
>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1662573
Igor Gnatenko changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST|CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1680373
Raphael Groner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1680375
Raphael Groner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1662573
--- Comment #16 from Igor Gnatenko ---
(fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-aiorpcx
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1680372
Raphael Groner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1680192
--- Comment #3 from Igor Gnatenko ---
(fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/R-cliapp
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1680194
--- Comment #3 from Igor Gnatenko ---
(fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/R-remotes
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1680298
Igor Gnatenko changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1679795
Igor Gnatenko changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST|CLOSED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1680253
--- Comment #3 from Igor Gnatenko ---
(fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/R-generics
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1680254
--- Comment #3 from Igor Gnatenko ---
(fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/R-ellipsis
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1671571
--- Comment #19 from Neal Gompa ---
(In reply to Dridi Boukelmoune from comment #18)
>
> Now there are a few things I'm not too happy with in this spec at a single
> glance:
>
> The main package should not need to require the -libs
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1680376
--- Comment #2 from Björn 'besser82' Esser ---
=== Updated package ===
Changelog:
* Sun Feb 24 2019 Björn Esser - 0.003003-0.2
- Added explicit perl module compat requires
Urls:
Spec URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1680375
--- Comment #2 from Björn 'besser82' Esser ---
=== Updated package ===
Changelog:
* Sun Feb 24 2019 Björn Esser - 0.140-0.2
- Added explicit perl module compat requires
Urls:
Spec URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1680374
--- Comment #2 from Björn 'besser82' Esser ---
=== Updated package ===
Changelog:
* Sun Feb 24 2019 Björn Esser - 0.004015-0.2
- Added explicit perl module compat requires
Urls:
Spec URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1680373
--- Comment #3 from Björn 'besser82' Esser ---
=== Updated package ===
Changelog:
* Sun Feb 24 2019 Björn Esser - 0.08-0.3
- Added explicit perl module compat requires
Urls:
Spec URL:
1 - 100 of 124 matches
Mail list logo