https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1735762
--- Comment #24 from Fedora Update System ---
fctxpd-0.1-1.20190813gitc195e67.el8 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 8
testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this
bug report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1754893
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1752139
--- Comment #13 from Josh Cogliati ---
(In reply to Robert-André Mauchin from comment #12)
> - Your doc subpackage should be noarch:
The doc subpackage is now noarch.
> %package doc
> Summary: Documentation for ucblogo
> Requires:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1750179
--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System ---
git-remote-gcrypt-1.2-1.fc31 has been pushed to the Fedora 31 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1757166
--- Comment #3 from "FeRD" (Frank Dana) ---
(In reply to Robert-André Mauchin from comment #2)
> - Use:
>
> Source0:
> https://github.com/editorconfig/editorconfig-gedit/archive/v%{version}/
> editorconfig-gedit-%{version}.tar.gz
>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1757256
Bug ID: 1757256
Summary: Review Request: vim-airline - Lean & mean
status/tabline for vim that's light as air
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1750179
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #10 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1756899
--- Comment #3 from J. Scheurich ---
- Why did you mark this as Invalid? AFAIK the packager did not include extra
license files.
[!]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
Sorry, error 8-(
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1756501
Bug 1756501 depends on bug 1756506, which changed state.
Bug 1756506 Summary: Review Request: gtk-layer-shell - Library to create
components for Wayland using the Layer Shell
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1756506
What
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1756506
Artem changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST|CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1757225
--- Comment #1 from Artem ---
https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/atim/awesome-vim-colorschemes/fedora-31-x86_64/01042943-awesome-vim-colorschemes/awesome-vim-colorschemes.spec
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1756494
--- Comment #7 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
(fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/wayfire
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1756501
--- Comment #3 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
(fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/wf-shell
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1756504
--- Comment #2 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
(fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/wayfire-config-manager
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1757225
Bug ID: 1757225
Summary: Review Request: awesome-vim-colorschemes - Collection
of color schemes for Neo/vim, merged for quick use
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1756506
--- Comment #2 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
(fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/gtk-layer-shell
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1756496
--- Comment #2 from Artem ---
https://github.com/WayfireWM/wf-config/issues/12
https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/atim/wayfire/fedora-31-x86_64/01042916-wf-config/wf-config.spec
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1756582
Christopher Engelhard changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(c...@lcts.de) |
--- Comment #11 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1754684
Jonny Heggheim changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1756907
--- Comment #4 from Jeremy Bertozzi ---
(In reply to Robert-André Mauchin from comment #1)
> - You're missing the Python provide macro. See
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/Python/
> #_the_python_provide_macro
>
>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1756907
--- Comment #3 from Jeremy Bertozzi ---
(In reply to Ege Güneş from comment #2)
> This is a informal review, I'm not in packagers group.
>
>
> Issues:
> ===
> - There are installation errors (see below).
> - The package has tests, run
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1741636
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |POST
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1741636
--- Comment #5 from Pat Riehecky ---
I've tossed a new build in copr with the suggested changes :
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/jcpunk/ocsinventory-review/package/ocsinventory-agent/
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1754684
--- Comment #4 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
(fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-shamir-mnemonic
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1757166
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||zebo...@gmail.com
--- Comment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1756494
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |POST
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1756494
--- Comment #4 from Robert-André Mauchin ---
> I just wanted somehow ship out of box at least example of config file like
> this one.
If it is an example, maybe include it with %doc instead?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1741636
--- Comment #4 from Robert-André Mauchin ---
>> - use perl not %{__perl}
>
>The snippet that generates "perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.3)" is using %{__perl}
>and I thought the %{__perl} macro was best practices based on the snippet
Snippet
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1754684
Jonny Heggheim changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|heg...@gmail.com|zebo...@gmail.com
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1756582
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1757166
--- Comment #1 from "FeRD" (Frank Dana) ---
Note: The package is an ARCH package — despite not having any binary
components, and with '%global debug_package %{nil}' set in the spec file —
because, as I explain in the comments at the top of
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1757166
Bug ID: 1757166
Summary: Review Request: gedit-plugin-editorconfig -
EditorConfig plugin for Gedit
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1754957
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||zebo...@gmail.com
--- Comment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1750938
Artem changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST|CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1756582
--- Comment #8 from Conrad Meyer ---
(In reply to Michal Schorm from comment #7)
> I belive this BZ doesn't deserve "FE-DEADREVIEW" status since it is days old
> and actively worked on.
> Haven't you meant different BZ?
> I did set the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1755084
--- Comment #9 from Andreas Schneider ---
Requires: wireshark
tshark is part of wireshark-cli!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1755084
--- Comment #8 from Andreas Schneider ---
Günther, you have to bump the release version and add changelog entries for
what you change. Then post a new spec and srpm urls in the format like in the
description :-)
Source0 should be:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1756899
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1756907
Ege Güneş changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egegu...@gmail.com
--- Comment #2 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1756908
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||zebo...@gmail.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1756907
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||zebo...@gmail.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1756906
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||zebo...@gmail.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1756905
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||zebo...@gmail.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1756901
--- Comment #1 from Robert-André Mauchin ---
- %build
ls
What is this ls doing here?
- You're missing the Python provide macro. See
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/Python/#_the_python_provide_macro
%package -n
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1755084
Guenther Deschner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(gdeschner@redhat. |
|com)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1756901
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||zebo...@gmail.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1756494
--- Comment #3 from Artem ---
(In reply to Robert-André Mauchin from comment #2)
> install -Dpm0644 wayfire.ini.default
> %{buildroot}%{_sysconfdir}/xdg/%{name}.ini.default
>
> - Are you sure this is supposed to go there? Shouldn't this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1756504
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |POST
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1756501
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |POST
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1756331
Petr Šplíchal changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST|CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1741805
josef radinger changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST|CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1756506
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |POST
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1755870
Yanko Kaneti changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1757117
Bug ID: 1757117
Summary: Review Request: perl-TOML-Parser - Simple toml parser
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1756506
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1756501
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1756501
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||zebo...@gmail.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1756494
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||zebo...@gmail.com
--- Comment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1756582
Michal Schorm changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||zebo...@gmail.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1741636
--- Comment #3 from Pat Riehecky ---
monitor-edid is now within the release. I believe this package is viable now.
Pat
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1755870
--- Comment #4 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
(fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Test-Deep-Fuzzy
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1750938
--- Comment #4 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
(fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rust-failure-tools
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1756496
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||zebo...@gmail.com
--- Comment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1756331
--- Comment #9 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
(fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/tmt
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1741805
--- Comment #11 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
(fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/lolcat
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1752139
--- Comment #12 from Robert-André Mauchin ---
- Your doc subpackage should be noarch:
%package doc
Summary: Documentation for ucblogo
Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release}
BuildArch: noarch
%description doc
This package
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1756582
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||201449 (FE-DEADREVIEW)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1260845
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1752233
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1752158
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1756331
--- Comment #8 from Petr Šplíchal ---
Thanks for the feedback. I've updated the spec to build python3 packages only.
Warnings have been fixed as well. Waiting for the repo and branches.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1754957
--- Comment #11 from Andreas Schneider ---
Spec URL: https://xor.cryptomilk.org/rpm/lua-luv/lua-luv.spec
SRPM URL: https://xor.cryptomilk.org/rpm/lua-luv/lua-luv-1.30.1-3.fc32.src.rpm
Thanks. I've fixed it.
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1756582
--- Comment #5 from Michal Schorm ---
2.5)
Personally, I see as the most important having an usefull error message on a
expected and easy-to-find place.
The program provides such message, so I'm absolutelly fine with that.
I primarly wanted
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1735762
--- Comment #23 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2019-513373fe60 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 8.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2019-513373fe60
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1741805
--- Comment #10 from josef radinger ---
great
sorry for the late answer, i was in hospital and afk
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1756899
J. Scheurich changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||muft...@web.de
--- Comment #1 from J.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1754957
Tomas Krizek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|tomas.kri...@nic.cz |nob...@fedoraproject.org
--- Comment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1756582
--- Comment #4 from Christopher Engelhard ---
Hi Michal, thanks for the review & detailed feedback.
Issues:
===
1) The package does not own '/usr/libexec/sshguard' directory
Reply: Fixed.
2) systemd vs sysvinit
2.1) Fix the condition
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1756331
--- Comment #7 from Miro Hrončok ---
(In reply to Petr Šplíchal from comment #6)
> Thinking about it a little bit more, we could probably just go
> with Python 3. Only RHEL7 would be Python 2. What do you think?
I recommend enabling python3
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1756899
Jeremy Bertozzi changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Review Request: Universal |Review Request: upt -
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1756331
--- Comment #6 from Petr Šplíchal ---
> > Unfortunately we still have a couple of tools in process of
> > migration to Python 3 so the Python 2 subpackage is necessary.
> > Hopefully soon we'll have everything Python 3 only and the spec
> >
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1755870
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #3 from Petr
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1756908
Bug ID: 1756908
Summary: Review Request: python-upt-rubygems
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: Package Review
Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1756907
Bug ID: 1756907
Summary: Review Request: python-upt-pypi
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: Package Review
Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1756906
Bug ID: 1756906
Summary: Review Request: python-upt-fedora
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: Package Review
Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1756905
Bug ID: 1756905
Summary: Review Request: python-spdx-lookup
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: Package Review
Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1756901
Bug ID: 1756901
Summary: Review Request: python-spdx
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: Package Review
Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1756899
Bug ID: 1756899
Summary: Review Request: Universal Packaging Tool
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: Package Review
Assignee:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1756331
--- Comment #5 from Miro Hrončok ---
(In reply to Petr Šplíchal from comment #4)
> (In reply to Miro Hrončok from comment #2)
> > I'm surprised by the complexity of the %bcond options.
> >
> > What's the point of the Python 2 subpackage on
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1754957
Andreas Schneider changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||a...@scampersand.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1754957
--- Comment #8 from Andreas Schneider ---
Spec URL: https://xor.cryptomilk.org/rpm/lua-luv/lua-luv.spec
SRPM URL: https://xor.cryptomilk.org/rpm/lua-luv/lua-luv-1.30.1-2.fc32.src.rpm
Rawhide build:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1756331
--- Comment #4 from Petr Šplíchal ---
(In reply to Miro Hrončok from comment #2)
> I'm surprised by the complexity of the %bcond options.
>
> What's the point of the Python 2 subpackage on Fedora 29?
Unfortunately we still have a couple of
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1756331
--- Comment #3 from Petr Šplíchal ---
(In reply to Robert-André Mauchin from comment #1)
> - Remove hidden files in %prep:
>
> tmt.noarch: W: hidden-file-or-dir /usr/share/doc/tmt/examples/convert/.fmf
> tmt.noarch: W: hidden-file-or-dir
92 matches
Mail list logo
