https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1796271
Iñaki Ucar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1804346
Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||domi...@greysector.net
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1805043
Bug ID: 1805043
Summary: Review Request: maven-native - Compile c and c++
source under Maven
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1662777
--- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System ---
python-pytest-randomly-3.2.1-1.fc30 has been pushed to the Fedora 30 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1791588
--- Comment #10 from Luya Tshimbalanga ---
More fixes to resolves:
- Package must own all directories that it creates.
Note: Directories without known owners: /usr/lib64/vapoursynth
- Package does not own files or directories owned by
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1662777
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #13 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1798393
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #10 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1797271
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #8 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1796268
--- Comment #5 from Sergio Monteiro Basto ---
Fixing typos, the package isn't aproved yet
- Buildarch is noarch is correct , we don't want try to build where nodejs
doesn't exist, all other packages have the same [1]
-
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1803528
--- Comment #3 from Jerry James ---
These are the issues fedora-review found:
- If your application is a C or C++ application you must list a
BuildRequires against gcc, gcc-c++ or clang.
Note: No gcc, gcc-c++ or clang found in
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1801013
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System ---
date-2.4.1-1.20200207git9a0ee25.fc31, waybar-0.9.1-1.fc31 has been pushed to
the Fedora 31 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of
it in this bug report.
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1798811
--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System ---
date-2.4.1-1.20200207git9a0ee25.fc31, waybar-0.9.1-1.fc31 has been pushed to
the Fedora 31 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of
it in this bug report.
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1763145
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System ---
golang-bug-serial-1-1.0.0-2.fc31 has been pushed to the Fedora 31 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1763145
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1803528
Jerry James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1796268
Sergio Monteiro Basto changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1799753
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1801516
Elliott Sales de Andrade changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |POST
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1804981
--- Comment #1 from Josh Stone ---
This package built on koji:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=41670688
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1804981
Bug ID: 1804981
Summary: Review Request: rust-json - JSON implementation in
Rust
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: Package Review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1795045
Elliott Sales de Andrade changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |POST
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1804970
Bug ID: 1804970
Summary: Review Request: rust-pico-args - Ultra simple CLI
arguments parser
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: Package
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1804970
--- Comment #1 from Josh Stone ---
This package built on koji:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=41670682
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1803942
--- Comment #6 from Michael Cronenworth ---
Closer. Thanks.
Can you also adjust your changelog entries? The version formatting needs an
adjustment.
- 02.20200108git9cc7dad
+ 0-2.20200108git9cc7dad
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1791958
Josh Stone changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST|CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1760617
--- Comment #32 from Qianqian Fang ---
@Ankur, the error was caused by the lack of support of SSE instructions on ARM,
here is part of the log
```
Building built/xorshift128p_rand.o
cc -c -Wall -g -DMCX_EMBED_CL -fno-strict-aliasing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1803942
--- Comment #5 from Radka Janek ---
That's great, discovered other things that needed fixing. Both up here now:
Spec URL:
https://rhea.fedorapeople.org/package-review/dotnet-build-reference-packages/dotnet-build-reference-packages.spec
SRPM
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1662777
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST|MODIFIED
--- Comment #12 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1800675
--- Comment #12 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
(fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/golang-github-crewjam-saml
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1800675
Mark Goodwin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|POST
Flags|fedora-review?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1803097
--- Comment #8 from Artem ---
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/atim/playground/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/01245504-mangohud/mangohud.spec
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1803097
--- Comment #7 from Artem ---
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/atim/playground/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/01245476-mangohud/mangohud.spec
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1803942
--- Comment #4 from Michael Cronenworth ---
I hate being pedantic, but could you post a new spec and SRPM link in a new
comment? I see that the OP spec URL is updated, but the SRPM needs to be
regenerated.
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1791958
--- Comment #6 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
(fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rust-target-lexicon
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1803528
--- Comment #1 from Iñaki Ucar ---
I've solved the issue with the s390x arch.
New Spec URL:
https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/iucar/rstudio/fedora-31-x86_64/01244761-rstudio/rstudio.spec
New SRPM URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1803942
--- Comment #3 from Radka Janek ---
Indeed it's missing, and that should now be there, thank you!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=827289
Michel Alexandre Salim changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1794971
Michel Alexandre Salim changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|mic...@michel-slm.name
--
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1803097
--- Comment #6 from Artem ---
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/atim/playground/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/01245399-mangohud/mangohud.spec
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1170875
Michel Alexandre Salim changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1803097
--- Comment #5 from Artem ---
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/atim/playground/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/01245389-mangohud/mangohud.spec
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1803097
--- Comment #4 from Artem ---
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/atim/playground/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/01245383-mangohud/mangohud.spec
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1803097
--- Comment #3 from Artem ---
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/atim/playground/fedora-31-x86_64/01245375-mangohud/mangohud.spec
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1803097
Artem changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Review Request: mango-hud - |Review Request: mangohud -
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1800790
--- Comment #1 from Remi Collet ---
Updated to 8.0.1
Spec URL:
https://git.remirepo.net/cgit/rpms/php/phpunit/php-phpunit-php-code-coverage8.git/plain/php-phpunit-php-code-coverage8.spec?id=e937e221a07c384ab518b6914aeba9972c63dfc0
SRPM URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1800779
Remi Collet changed:
What|Removed |Added
Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1804307
Erich Eickmeyer changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Review Request: |Review Request:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1801352
Erich Eickmeyer changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||needinfo?(ngomp...@gmail.co
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1804307
Erich Eickmeyer changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(erich@ericheickme |
|yer.com)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1804768
--- Comment #1 from Olivier Samyn ---
Once this is accepted, I suppose a patch to the podman package will be needed
to depend on this one.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1803945
--- Comment #2 from Erich Eickmeyer ---
SRPM URL:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/eeickmeyer/Jam-Incoming/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/01242996-zita-ajbridge/zita-ajbridge-0.8.2-3.fc33.src.rpm
First one was a miscopy from my copr
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1802177
--- Comment #2 from harshjain...@gmail.com ---
here is a successful koji build:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=41655269
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1801580
Mario Torre changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||neug...@redhat.com
--- Comment #15
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1804450
--- Comment #3 from Ben Rosser ---
Thanks for the review, Jared!
I'll build the package in Rawhide and F32. Once it's built, I'll submit a PR to
update nodejs-http-errors.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1804450
--- Comment #2 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
(fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/nodejs-toidentifier
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1804257
--- Comment #10 from jiri vanek ---
I had sponsored you to packager group. Please, you try your new powers and use
them wisely
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1804257
jiri vanek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|POST
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1804257
--- Comment #8 from jandrlik ---
updated the specfile and srpm, hopefully handled all of your objections
Thanks!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1804768
Bug ID: 1804768
Summary: Review Request: catatonit - A signal-forwarding
process manager for containers
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1801580
--- Comment #14 from jiri vanek ---
thank you, Do you mind to elaborate on: "openjfx N runs on openjdk N-1 " it is
very hard to accept:(
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1800675
Andreas Gerstmayr changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(agerstmayr@redhat |
|.com)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1800675
Bug 1800675 depends on bug 1804467, which changed state.
Bug 1804467 Summary: Review Request: golang-github-crewjam-httperr - A golang
error object that speaks HTTP
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1804467
What
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1804467
Andreas Gerstmayr changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST|CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1804467
--- Comment #2 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
(fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/golang-github-crewjam-httperr
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1778530
--- Comment #14 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
(fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/libfido2
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1801580
--- Comment #13 from Nicolas De Amicis ---
(In reply to jiri vanek from comment #3)
> > No matching package to install: 'mvn(org.codehaus.mojo:native-maven-plugin)'
> >
> valid for f32+ on f31 dependency is satisfied. I can run review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1771338
Sumit changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sumitx.srivas...@intel.com
--- Comment #4
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1804683
Jan Grulich changed:
What|Removed |Added
Alias||plasma-thunderbolt
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1804683
Jan Grulich changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||656997 (kde-reviews)
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1804683
Bug ID: 1804683
Summary: Review Request: plasma-thunderbolt - Plasma
integration for controlling Thunderbolt devices
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1804346
Nils Philippsen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1801580
--- Comment #12 from jiri vanek ---
>
> For the coexistence, you are right: openjfx is only for jdk8. openjfx
> (JavaFX) is included into JDK8 but compiled separately into two projects:
> openjdk and openjfx. That's why there is a subpackage
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1801580
--- Comment #11 from Nicolas De Amicis ---
(In reply to jiri vanek from comment #6)
> btw, there is openjfx package. Do yo mind to clarify the coexistence of
> those two? I guess openjfx is, and will rewamin for jdk8, where this
> openjfx-11
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1804636
--- Comment #1 from Jens Petersen ---
This unsubpackages rio from ghc-yesod-core.
It is also needed for stack via rio-prettyprint.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1801580
--- Comment #10 from jiri vanek ---
You maintain opejfx(8) now right?
Is debuginfo/debugsources omitted with reason? (seeying %global debug_package
%{nil} on place)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1760617
--- Comment #31 from Ankur Sinha (FranciscoD) ---
I forgot to say. Please run a scratch build on koji to test if it builds on all
architectures. When I tried it here, it didn't compile on them all.
koji build rawhide --scratch
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1801580
--- Comment #9 from jiri vanek ---
>
> I wrote the poms based on the build.gradle file provided by openjfx
I see. Cool. It would be nice to upstream them, and to get rid of that gradle
of theirs (me, just wishes:) ). On contrary, gradle
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1801580
--- Comment #8 from jiri vanek ---
fyi https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1438673
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1804636
Bug ID: 1804636
Summary: Review Request: ghc-rio - A standard library for
Haskell
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: Package Review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1760617
--- Comment #30 from Ankur Sinha (FranciscoD) ---
Orion answered the query on the mailing list. I've opened another PR that seems
to do the trick. Please have a look. Cheers
```
(ins)>> pkg list
Package Name | Version | Installation
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1801580
--- Comment #7 from Nicolas De Amicis ---
(In reply to jiri vanek from comment #1)
> Hi!
>
> On first glance, the spec looks good. Where the poms come from?
> I tried to run fedora-review but the build fails. So I run it manually, and
>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1801580
--- Comment #6 from jiri vanek ---
btw, there is openjfx package. Do yo mind to clarify the coexistence of those
two? I guess openjfx is, and will rewamin for jdk8, where this openjfx-11 will
be for jdk11...and up?
In that moment the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1801580
--- Comment #5 from Nicolas De Amicis ---
(In reply to jiri vanek from comment #2)
> Is really both
> BuildRequires: pkgconfig(gtk+-2.0)
> BuildRequires: pkgconfig(gtk+-3.0)
>
> needed?
I think yes, because they are two libs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1801580
--- Comment #4 from Nicolas De Amicis ---
(In reply to jiri vanek from comment #3)
> > No matching package to install: 'mvn(org.codehaus.mojo:native-maven-plugin)'
> >
> valid for f32+ on f31 dependency is satisfied. I can run review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1801580
--- Comment #3 from jiri vanek ---
> No matching package to install: 'mvn(org.codehaus.mojo:native-maven-plugin)'
>
valid for f32+ on f31 dependency is satisfied. I can run review against f31,
but you will need to fix it (thus likely adopt
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1804538
--- Comment #1 from Jens Petersen ---
(sorry about the utf8 corruption above - my bad, not a package issue)
This is needed for stack, also via http-download and pantry.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1801580
--- Comment #2 from jiri vanek ---
Is really both
BuildRequires: pkgconfig(gtk+-2.0)
BuildRequires: pkgconfig(gtk+-3.0)
needed?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1801580
jiri vanek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jva...@redhat.com
--- Comment #1 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1804346
Pierre-YvesChibon changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pin...@pingoured.fr
Doc
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1804538
Jens Petersen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Review Request: ghc-path-io |Review Request: ghc-path-io
89 matches
Mail list logo
