[Bug 1806017] Review Request: opae - a sdk for fpga hardware

2020-02-28 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1806017

Elliott Sales de Andrade  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||quantum.anal...@gmail.com



--- Comment #5 from Elliott Sales de Andrade  ---
%make_build already includes %{?_smp_mflags}.

> [x]: Patches link to upstream bugs/comments/lists or are otherwise
>  justified.

They are not linked or commented.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1808278] Review request: libevDevPlus - a c++ wrapper around libevdev

2020-02-28 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1808278



--- Comment #1 from Bob Hepple  ---
Changes in response to review of libuInputPlus at
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1808276

Note: no test is included as it would require sudo.

Spec URL:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/wef/ydotool/fedora-31-x86_64/01260043-libevdevPlus/libevdevPlus.spec
SRPM URL:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/wef/ydotool/fedora-31-x86_64/01260043-libevdevPlus/libevdevPlus-0.1.1-1.fc31.src.rpm
Description: a c++ wrapper around libevdev
FAS Username: wef

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1808276] Review request: libuInputPlus - a c++ wrapper around libuinput

2020-02-28 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1808276



--- Comment #3 from Bob Hepple  ---
I should mention that I did _not_ include a %ctest section as the test program
requires sudo

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1808276] Review request: libuInputPlus - a c++ wrapper around libuinput

2020-02-28 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1808276



--- Comment #2 from Bob Hepple  ---
Thanks for the comprehensive review. (I will apply these points to the
libevdevPlus and ydotool specs too.)

The new spec file now passes rpmlint without errors or warnings and I have used
the updated version 0.1.4 since released by upstream.

SRPM URL:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/wef/ydotool/fedora-31-x86_64/01260041-libuInputPlus/libuInputPlus-0.1.4-1.fc31.src.rpm
SPEC URL:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/wef/ydotool/fedora-31-x86_64/01260041-libuInputPlus/libuInputPlus.spec

FAS Username: wef

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1808635] Review Request: golang-github-gohugoio-testmodbuilder - Some helper scripts used for Hugo testing

2020-02-28 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1808635

Elliott Sales de Andrade  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

Summary|Review Request: |Review Request:
   |b'golang-github-gohugoio-te |golang-github-gohugoio-test
   |stmodbuilder' - b'Some  |modbuilder - Some helper
   |helper scripts used for |scripts used for Hugo
   |Hugo testing'   |testing
   Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1808635] Review Request: b'golang-github-gohugoio-testmodbuilder' - b'Some helper scripts used for Hugo testing'

2020-02-28 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1808635



--- Comment #1 from Elliott Sales de Andrade  ---
This package built on koji: 
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=42009888

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1808635] New: Review Request: b'golang-github-gohugoio-testmodbuilder' - b'Some helper scripts used for Hugo testing'

2020-02-28 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1808635

Bug ID: 1808635
   Summary: Review Request:
b'golang-github-gohugoio-testmodbuilder' - b'Some
helper scripts used for Hugo testing'
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
 Component: Package Review
  Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org
  Reporter: quantum.anal...@gmail.com
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
  Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora



Spec URL:
https://qulogic.fedorapeople.org//golang-github-gohugoio-testmodbuilder.spec
SRPM URL:
https://qulogic.fedorapeople.org//golang-github-gohugoio-testmodbuilder-0-0.1.20200229gitb854d94.fc30.src.rpm

Description:
b'\nSome helper scripts used for Hugo testing.\n\n%gopkg'

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1694894] Review Request: aeskeyfind - Locate 128-bit and 256-bit AES keys in a captured memory image

2020-02-28 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1694894



--- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System  ---
aeskeyfind-1.0-7.el8 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 8 testing repository.
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-5f0edef101

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1797524] Review Request: sourcextractor++ - A program that extracts a catalog of sources from astronomical images

2020-02-28 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1797524



--- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System  ---
sourcextractor++-0.8-1.fc30 has been pushed to the Fedora 30 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-065df6d489

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1807409] Review Request: R-RhpcBLASctl - Control the Number of Threads on BLAS

2020-02-28 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1807409



--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System  ---
R-RhpcBLASctl-0.20.17-1.fc30 has been pushed to the Fedora 30 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-a3c0cf5828

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1797524] Review Request: sourcextractor++ - A program that extracts a catalog of sources from astronomical images

2020-02-28 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1797524



--- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System  ---
sourcextractor++-0.8-1.fc31 has been pushed to the Fedora 31 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-4d8b0250f9

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1694894] Review Request: aeskeyfind - Locate 128-bit and 256-bit AES keys in a captured memory image

2020-02-28 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1694894



--- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System  ---
aeskeyfind-1.0-7.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 testing repository.
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-dcfce7a05e

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1803320] Review Request: ghc-prettyprinter-ansi-terminal - ANSI terminal backend for the »prettyprinter« package

2020-02-28 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1803320



--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System  ---
ghc-prettyprinter-ansi-terminal-1.1.1.2-2.fc31 has been pushed to the Fedora 31
testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this
bug report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-1d5decc323

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1807409] Review Request: R-RhpcBLASctl - Control the Number of Threads on BLAS

2020-02-28 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1807409



--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System  ---
R-RhpcBLASctl-0.20.17-1.fc31 has been pushed to the Fedora 31 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-1d06f78ba4

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1797365] Review Request: perl-App-Packager - Abstract interface to a number of common packagers

2020-02-28 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1797365

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA



--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System  ---
perl-App-Packager-1.430.1-3.fc31 has been pushed to the Fedora 31 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-3c9e1f277c

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1797363] Review Request: perl-Text-Layout - Pango style text formatting

2020-02-28 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1797363



--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System  ---
perl-Text-Layout-0.018.1-3.fc31 has been pushed to the Fedora 31 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-1b09a7ad0f

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1803097] Review Request: mangohud - Vulkan overlay layer for monitoring FPS, temperatures, CPU/GPU load and more

2020-02-28 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1803097



--- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System  ---
mangohud-0.2.0-11.fc30 has been pushed to the Fedora 30 stable repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1795292] Review Request: python-pytest-astropy-header - pytest plugin to add diagnostic info

2020-02-28 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1795292

Sergio Pascual  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|POST|CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE
Last Closed||2020-02-29 01:38:42



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1694894] Review Request: aeskeyfind - Locate 128-bit and 256-bit AES keys in a captured memory image

2020-02-28 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1694894

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA



--- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System  ---
aeskeyfind-1.0-7.fc32 has been pushed to the Fedora 32 testing repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-71f1c089e3

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1797363] Review Request: perl-Text-Layout - Pango style text formatting

2020-02-28 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1797363

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA



--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System  ---
perl-Text-Layout-0.018.1-3.fc32 has been pushed to the Fedora 32 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-64b8c66486

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1807409] Review Request: R-RhpcBLASctl - Control the Number of Threads on BLAS

2020-02-28 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1807409

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA



--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System  ---
R-RhpcBLASctl-0.20.17-1.fc32 has been pushed to the Fedora 32 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-446e91a88b

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1808606] New: Review Request: python-itanium_demangler - Pure Python parser for mangled itanium symbols

2020-02-28 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1808606

Bug ID: 1808606
   Summary: Review Request: python-itanium_demangler - Pure Python
parser for mangled itanium symbols
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
  Hardware: All
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
 Component: Package Review
  Severity: medium
  Priority: medium
  Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org
  Reporter: m...@fabian-affolter.ch
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
  Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora



Spec URL:
https://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/python-itanium_demangler.spec
SRPM URL:
https://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/python-itanium_demangler-1.0-1.fc31.src.rpm

Project URL: https://github.com/whitequark/python-itanium_demangler

Description:
The Python Itanium Demangler is a pure Python parser for the Itanium C++ ABI 
symbol mangling language. This demangler generates an abstract syntax tree
from mangled symbols, which can be used for directly extracting type
information, as opposed to having to interpret the C++ source code.

Koji scratch build:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=42001302

rpmlint output:
$ rpmlint python-itanium_demangler-1.0-1.fc31.src.rpm
python-itanium_demangler.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) itanium ->
titanium, sanitarium
python-itanium_demangler.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US demangler
-> mangler, dangler
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings.

$ rpmlint python3-itanium_demangler-1.0-1.fc31.noarch.rpm 
python3-itanium_demangler.noarch: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) itanium ->
titanium, sanitarium
python3-itanium_demangler.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US
demangler -> mangler, dangler
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings.

Fedora Account System Username: fab

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1807409] Review Request: R-RhpcBLASctl - Control the Number of Threads on BLAS

2020-02-28 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1807409



--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2020-a3c0cf5828 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 30.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-a3c0cf5828

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1807409] Review Request: R-RhpcBLASctl - Control the Number of Threads on BLAS

2020-02-28 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1807409

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED



--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2020-1d06f78ba4 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 31.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-1d06f78ba4

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1806017] Review Request: opae - a sdk for fpga hardware

2020-02-28 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1806017



--- Comment #4 from Tom Rix  ---
Spec URL : https://github.com/trixirt/opae-rpm/blob/opae-1.4.0-3/opae.spec
SRPM URL : https://releases.pagure.org/opae/opae-1.4.0-3.fc31.src.rpm

I believe address the outstanding issues.

The biggest change was consolidating the samples, tools and tools-extra
packages into the devel package.

The non-versioned *.so are intentional.  They have been moved to the devel
package

libsafestr.a was converted to a shared library.

rpmlint for undefined/weak symbols for
fpga* are in the libopae-c.so.1.4.0 library
*_s are in the libsafestr.so.1.4.0
These libraries are part of the base package.

At this time, there is no other documentation / manpages.

The license files are now distributed in the the opae datadir

ldconfig use removed

Use of systemd_* macros for fpga.service

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1808571] Review Request: python-cclib - Parsers for output files of computational chemistry packages

2020-02-28 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1808571

Antonio T. (sagitter)  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Depends On||1808573




Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1808573
[Bug 1808573] Review Request: python-periodictable - Extensible periodic table
of the elements
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1808573] Review Request: python-periodictable - Extensible periodic table of the elements

2020-02-28 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1808573

Antonio T. (sagitter)  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks||1808571
   Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value




Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1808571
[Bug 1808571] Review Request: python-cclib - Parsers for output files of
computational chemistry packages
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1808573] New: Review Request: python-periodictable - Extensible periodic table of the elements

2020-02-28 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1808573

Bug ID: 1808573
   Summary: Review Request: python-periodictable - Extensible
periodic table of the elements
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
  Hardware: All
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
 Component: Package Review
  Severity: medium
  Priority: medium
  Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org
  Reporter: anto.tra...@gmail.com
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
  Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora



Spec URL:
https://sagitter.fedorapeople.org/python-periodictable/python-periodictable.spec
SRPM URL:
https://sagitter.fedorapeople.org/python-periodictable/python-periodictable-1.5.2-1.fc31.src.rpm

This package is for Fedora, EPEL7 and EPEL8

Fedora Account System Username: sagitter

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1808571] New: Review Request: python-cclib - Parsers for output files of computational chemistry packages

2020-02-28 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1808571

Bug ID: 1808571
   Summary: Review Request: python-cclib - Parsers for output
files of computational chemistry packages
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
  Hardware: All
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
 Component: Package Review
  Severity: medium
  Priority: medium
  Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org
  Reporter: anto.tra...@gmail.com
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
  Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora



Spec URL: https://sagitter.fedorapeople.org/python-cclib/python-cclib.spec
SRPM URL:
https://sagitter.fedorapeople.org/python-cclib/python-cclib-1.6.2-1.fc31.src.rpm

This package is for Fedora, EPEL7 and EPEL8

Fedora Account System Username: sagitter

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1808552] Review Request: python-numpoly - Numpoly is a generic library for creating, manipulating and evaluating arrays of polynomials.

2020-02-28 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1808552

Luis Bazan  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1808552] Review Request: python-numpoly - Numpoly is a generic library for creating, manipulating and evaluating arrays of polynomials.

2020-02-28 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1808552

Luis Bazan  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|sanjay.an...@gmail.com



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1808552] Review Request: python-numpoly - Numpoly is a generic library for creating, manipulating and evaluating arrays of polynomials.

2020-02-28 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1808552

Luis Bazan  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks|1786882 |



--- Comment #1 from Luis Bazan  ---
koji build --scratch rawhide python-numpoly-0.1.11-1.fc31.src.rpm 
Uploading srpm: python-numpoly-0.1.11-1.fc31.src.rpm
[] 100% 00:00:00  49.06 KiB 152.31 KiB/sec
Created task: 41994431
Task info: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=41994431
Watching tasks (this may be safely interrupted)...
41994431 build (rawhide, python-numpoly-0.1.11-1.fc31.src.rpm): free
41994431 build (rawhide, python-numpoly-0.1.11-1.fc31.src.rpm): free -> open
(buildvm-armv7-21.arm.fedoraproject.org)
  41994432 rebuildSRPM (noarch): open (buildhw-04.phx2.fedoraproject.org)
  41994432 rebuildSRPM (noarch): open (buildhw-04.phx2.fedoraproject.org) ->
closed
  0 free  1 open  1 done  0 failed
  41994437 buildArch (python-numpoly-0.1.11-1.fc33.src.rpm, noarch): open
(buildvm-armv7-23.arm.fedoraproject.org)
  41994437 buildArch (python-numpoly-0.1.11-1.fc33.src.rpm, noarch): open
(buildvm-armv7-23.arm.fedoraproject.org) -> closed
  0 free  1 open  2 done  0 failed
41994431 build (rawhide, python-numpoly-0.1.11-1.fc31.src.rpm): open
(buildvm-armv7-21.arm.fedoraproject.org) -> closed
  0 free  0 open  3 done  0 failed

41994431 build (rawhide, python-numpoly-0.1.11-1.fc31.src.rpm) completed
successfully


Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1786882
[Bug 1786882] python-chaospy-3.2.4 is available
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1808552] Review Request: python-numpoly - Numpoly is a generic library for creating, manipulating and evaluating arrays of polynomials.

2020-02-28 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1808552

Luis Bazan  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks||1276941 (fedora-neuro)




Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1276941
[Bug 1276941] Fedora NeuroImaging and NeuroScience tracking bug
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1808552] Review Request: python-numpoly - Numpoly is a generic library for creating, manipulating and evaluating arrays of polynomials.

2020-02-28 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1808552

Luis Bazan  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks||1799926




Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1799926
[Bug 1799926] python-chaospy: FTBFS in Fedora rawhide/f32
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1808552] Review Request: python-numpoly - Numpoly is a generic library for creating, manipulating and evaluating arrays of polynomials.

2020-02-28 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1808552

Luis Bazan  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks||1786882




Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1786882
[Bug 1786882] python-chaospy-3.2.4 is available
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1808552] Review Request: python-numpoly - Numpoly is a generic library for creating, manipulating and evaluating arrays of polynomials.

2020-02-28 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1808552

Luis Bazan  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Alias||python-numpoly



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1808552] Review Request: python-numpoly - Numpoly is a generic library for creating, manipulating and evaluating arrays of polynomials.

2020-02-28 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1808552

Luis Bazan  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1808552] New: Review Request: python-numpoly - Numpoly is a generic library for creating, manipulating and evaluating arrays of polynomials.

2020-02-28 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1808552

Bug ID: 1808552
   Summary: Review Request: python-numpoly - Numpoly is a generic
library for creating, manipulating and evaluating
arrays of polynomials.
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
 Component: Package Review
  Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org
  Reporter: bazanlui...@gmail.com
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
  Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora



Hi team --

Description:
Numpoly is a generic library for creating, manipulating and evaluating arrays
of polynomials.

SPEC: https://lbazan.fedorapeople.org/python-numpoly.spec
SRPM: https://lbazan.fedorapeople.org/python-numpoly-0.1.11-1.fc31.src.rpm

Cheers,

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1808540] Review Request: rust-quickcheck_macros - Macro attribute for quickcheck

2020-02-28 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1808540

Igor Gnatenko  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|POST|CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE
Last Closed||2020-02-28 19:08:05



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1808540] Review Request: rust-quickcheck_macros - Macro attribute for quickcheck

2020-02-28 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1808540



--- Comment #3 from Igor Gnatenko  ---
(fedscm-admin):  The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rust-quickcheck_macros

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1808540] Review Request: rust-quickcheck_macros - Macro attribute for quickcheck

2020-02-28 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1808540



--- Comment #2 from Artem  ---
Why this in RHBZ title?

(rust-quickcheck_macros)

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1808540] Review Request: rust-quickcheck_macros - Macro attribute for quickcheck

2020-02-28 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1808540

Artem  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |POST
 CC||ego.corda...@gmail.com
   Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|ego.corda...@gmail.com
   Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value
  Flags||fedora-review+



--- Comment #1 from Artem  ---
Package was generated through rust2rpm, simplifying the review considerably.

- Conforms to packaging guidelines (rust2rpm generated spec)
- license correct and valid

Package approved.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1808540] New: Review Request: rust-quickcheck_macros - Macro attribute for quickcheck

2020-02-28 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1808540

Bug ID: 1808540
   Summary: Review Request: rust-quickcheck_macros - Macro
attribute for quickcheck
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
 Component: Package Review
  Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org
  Reporter: i.gnatenko.br...@gmail.com
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
  Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora



Spec URL:
https://ignatenkobrain.fedorapeople.org/for-review/rust-quickcheck_macros.spec
SRPM URL:
https://ignatenkobrain.fedorapeople.org/for-review/rust-quickcheck_macros-0.9.1-1.fc33.src.rpm
Description:
Macro attribute for quickcheck.
Fedora Account System Username: ignatenkobrain

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1694894] Review Request: aeskeyfind - Locate 128-bit and 256-bit AES keys in a captured memory image

2020-02-28 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1694894

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |MODIFIED



--- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2020-71f1c089e3 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 32.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-71f1c089e3

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1694894] Review Request: aeskeyfind - Locate 128-bit and 256-bit AES keys in a captured memory image

2020-02-28 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1694894



--- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2020-dcfce7a05e has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 7.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-dcfce7a05e

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1694894] Review Request: aeskeyfind - Locate 128-bit and 256-bit AES keys in a captured memory image

2020-02-28 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1694894



--- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2020-5f0edef101 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 8.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-5f0edef101

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1808509] New: Review Request: python-ailment - The angr intermediate language

2020-02-28 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1808509

Bug ID: 1808509
   Summary: Review Request: python-ailment - The angr intermediate
language
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
  Hardware: All
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
 Component: Package Review
  Severity: medium
  Priority: medium
  Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org
  Reporter: m...@fabian-affolter.ch
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
  Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora



Spec URL: https://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/python-ailment.spec
SRPM URL:
https://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/python-ailment-8.20.1.7-1.fc31.src.rpm

Project URL: https://github.com/angr/ailment

Description:
AIL is the angr intermediate language.

Koji scratch build:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=41990366

rpmlint output:
$ rpmlint python-ailment-8.20.1.7-1.fc31.src.rpm 
python-ailment.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) angr -> anger, angry, rang
python-ailment.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US angr -> anger,
angry, rang
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings.

$ rpmlint python3-ailment-8.20.1.7-1.fc31.noarch.rpm
python3-ailment.noarch: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) angr -> anger, angry,
rang
python3-ailment.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US angr -> anger,
angry, rang
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings.

Fedora Account System Username: fab

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1808506] New: Review Request: python-mulpyplexer - Module that multiplexes interactions with lists of Python objects

2020-02-28 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1808506

Bug ID: 1808506
   Summary: Review Request: python-mulpyplexer - Module that
multiplexes interactions with lists of Python objects
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
  Hardware: All
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
 Component: Package Review
  Severity: medium
  Priority: medium
  Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org
  Reporter: m...@fabian-affolter.ch
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
  Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora



Spec URL: https://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/python-mulpyplexer.spec
SRPM URL:
https://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/python-mulpyplexer-0.08-1.fc31.src.rpm

Project URL: https://github.com/zardus/mulpyplexer

Description:
Mulpyplexer is a piece of code that can multiplex interactions with lists of
python objects.

Koji scratch build:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=41990229

rpmlint output:
$ rpmlint python-mulpyplexer-0.08-1.fc31.src.rpm
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.

$ rpmlint python3-mulpyplexer-0.08-1.fc31.noarch.rpm 
python3-mulpyplexer.noarch: W: no-documentation
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings.

Fedora Account System Username: fab

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 810049] Review Request: netbeans-ide - Netbeans Integrated Development Environment (IDE)

2020-02-28 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=810049

Shalini  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||shalinikumari8...@gmail.com



--- Comment #89 from Shalini  ---
https://www.girls69.info/
http://callgirlsbooking.in/
http://femaleescortgurugram.com/
http://callgirlinnoida.com/
https://www.gurgaonfemaleescort.com/
http://newgurugram.in/
http://naughtygirl.co.in/
http://girls69.in/
http://girl-image.in/
https://www.newescort.in/
https://www.gurugramwali.com/
https://www.girlsrent.in/
http://www.rentacallgirl.com/
http://selectyourlady.com/
http://hotgirlsavita.com/
https://callgirlshub.com/
https://nightlifencr.in/
https://www.girlsrent.in/
http://beautygirl.co.in/
https://www.callgirlaerocity.com/
http://royalescortsingurgaon.com/
https://www.escortserviceingurugram.com/
http://russianescortgurugram.com/
https://www.escortserviceingurugram.com/maneser-escorts
http://femaleescortgurugram.com/call-girls-digha-escorts.html
https://callgirlshub.com/call-girls-in-neemrana-escorts.html
https://nightlifencr.com/noida-escorts.html
https://janvi-yadav.blogspot.com/2020/02/escorts-service-is-being-provided-by.html
https://janvi-yadav.blogspot.com/2019/12/do-we-feel-good-when-dating-someone.html
 
https://janvi-yadav.blogspot.com/2019/11/top-class-gurugram-escorts-service-by.html
https://janvi-yadav.blogspot.com/p/arrogance-in-10-years-we-can-say-that.html
https://janvi-yadav.blogspot.com/p/nobody-knows-what-heaven-is-like.html
https://janvi-yadav.blogspot.com/p/greed-is-bad-and-it-is-very-bad-disease.html
https://janvi-yadav.blogspot.com/p/if-you-want-to-have-safe-and-secure.html
https://janvi-yadav.blogspot.com/p/i-believe-that-time-of-life-is-never.html
https://janvi-yadav.blogspot.com/p/massage-service-always-benefits-our.html
https://janvi-yadav.blogspot.com/p/success-is-very-difficult-in-life-so.html
https://janvi-yadav.blogspot.com/p/you-need-love-and-our-gurugram-escorts.html
https://janvi-yadav.blogspot.com/p/i-have-never-betrayed-my-good-friend.html
https://janvi-yadav.blogspot.com/2020/02/vip-independent-escort-girls-in-gurugram.html
https://janvi-yadav.blogspot.com/2020/02/i-am-preeti-independent-girl-who-is.html
https://janvi-yadav.blogspot.com/p/blog-page.html
https://janvi-yadav.blogspot.com/2020/02/we-are-proud-that-we-provide-best.html 
https://callgirlsingurugramnisha.blogspot.com/2019/07/gurugram-call-girls-photos-collections.html
https://callgirlsingurugramnisha.blogspot.com/2019/07/independent-call-girls-gurugram-247.html
https://callgirlsingurugramnisha.blogspot.com/2019/07/we-are-top-class-consumer-of-gurugram.html
https://callgirlsingurugramnisha.blogspot.com/2019/12/best-high-profile-call-girl-gurugram.html
https://callgirlsingurugramnisha.blogspot.com/2020/01/apologizing-to-friends-is-not-easy-task.html
https://callgirlsingurugramnisha.blogspot.com/2020/01/our-independent-gurugram-call-girl.html
https://callgirlsingurugramnisha.blogspot.com/2020/01/friendship-is-most-beautiful.html

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1808467] New: Review Request: python-pysmt - Solver-agnostic library for SMT Formulae manipulation and solving

2020-02-28 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1808467

Bug ID: 1808467
   Summary: Review Request: python-pysmt - Solver-agnostic library
for SMT Formulae manipulation and solving
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
  Hardware: All
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
 Component: Package Review
  Severity: medium
  Priority: medium
  Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org
  Reporter: m...@fabian-affolter.ch
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
  Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora



Spec URL: https://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/python-pysmt.spec
SRPM URL:
https://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/python-pysmt-0.8.0-1.fc31.src.rpm

Project URL: http://www.pysmt.org

Description:
A library for SMT formulae manipulation and solving pySMT makes working
with Satisfiability Modulo Theory simple. Among others, you can:

* Define formulae in a solver independent way in a simple and inutitive way
* Write ad-hoc simplifiers and operators
* Dump your problems in the SMT-Lib format
* Solve them using one of the native solvers
* Wrapping any SMT-Lib complaint

Koji scratch build:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=41987982

rpmlint output:
$ rpmlint python-pysmt-0.8.0-1.fc31.src.rpm 
python-pysmt.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US formulae -> formula,
formulate, formulas
python-pysmt.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US inutitive ->
intuitive, nutritive, diminutive
python-pysmt.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US hoc -> ho, choc, hock
python-pysmt.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US simplifiers ->
simplifies, amplifiers, oversimplify
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 4 warnings.

$ rpmlint python3-pysmt-0.8.0-1.fc31.noarch.rpm
python3-pysmt.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US formulae ->
formula, formulate, formulas
python3-pysmt.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US inutitive ->
intuitive, nutritive, diminutive
python3-pysmt.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US hoc -> ho, choc,
hock
python3-pysmt.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US simplifiers ->
simplifies, amplifiers, oversimplify
python3-pysmt.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary pysmt
python3-pysmt.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary pysmt-install
python3-pysmt.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary pysmt-shell
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 7 warnings.

Fedora Account System Username: fab

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1808306] Review Request: ulauncher - Linux Application Launcher

2020-02-28 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1808306



--- Comment #3 from Artem  ---
https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/atim/playground/fedora-31-x86_64/01259511-ulauncher/ulauncher.spec

https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/atim/playground/fedora-31-x86_64/01259511-ulauncher/ulauncher-5.6.1-4.fc31.src.rpm

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1808306] Review Request: ulauncher - Linux Application Launcher

2020-02-28 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1808306



--- Comment #2 from Artem  ---
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/atim/playground/fedora-31-x86_64/01259508-ulauncher/ulauncher.spec

https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/atim/playground/fedora-31-x86_64/01259508-ulauncher/ulauncher-5.6.1-3.fc31.src.rpm

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1797368] Review Request: perl-String-Interpolate-Named - Interpolate named variables in text strings

2020-02-28 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1797368



--- Comment #4 from Gwyn Ciesla  ---
(fedscm-admin):  The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-String-Interpolate-Named

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1797367] Review Request: perl-File-LoadLines - Loads the contents of a text file into an array of lines

2020-02-28 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1797367



--- Comment #4 from Gwyn Ciesla  ---
(fedscm-admin):  The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-File-LoadLines

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1808411] New: Review Request: python-archinfo - Collection of classes that contain architecture-specific information

2020-02-28 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1808411

Bug ID: 1808411
   Summary: Review Request: python-archinfo - Collection of
classes that contain architecture-specific information
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
  Hardware: All
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
 Component: Package Review
  Severity: medium
  Priority: medium
  Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org
  Reporter: m...@fabian-affolter.ch
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
  Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora



Spec URL: https://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/python-archinfo.spec
SRPM URL:
https://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/python-archinfo-8.20.1.7-1.fc31.src.rpm

Project URL: https://github.com/angr/archinfo

Description:
archinfo is a collection of classes that contain architecture-specific
information. It is useful for cross-architecture tools.

Koji scratch build:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=41984685

rpmlint output:
$ rpmlint python-archinfo-8.20.1.7-1.fc31.src.rpm 
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.

$ rpmlint python3-archinfo-8.20.1.7-1.fc31.noarch.rpm 
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.

Fedora Account System Username: fab

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1808351] Review Request: dsp - An audio processing program with an interactive mode

2020-02-28 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1808351

František Nečas  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||fne...@redhat.com



--- Comment #1 from František Nečas  ---
This review is unofficial and doesn't change the review request status.

Package Review
==

Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed



= MUST items =

C/C++:
[x]: Package does not contain kernel modules.
[x]: Package contains no static executables.
[-]: Development (unversioned) .so files in -devel subpackage, if present.
 Note: Unversioned so-files in private %_libdir subdirectory (see
 attachment). Verify they are not in ld path.
[x]: If your application is a C or C++ application you must list a
 BuildRequires against gcc, gcc-c++ or clang.
[-]: Header files in -devel subpackage, if present.
[x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la)
[x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs.

Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
 other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
 Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
 Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
 found: "Unknown or generated", "ISC License", "GPL (v2 or later) (with
 incorrect FSF address)", "GNU Lesser General Public License (v2.1 or
 later)". 60 files have unknown license. Detailed output of
 licensecheck in
 /home/fnecas/devel/packaging/1808351-dsp/licensecheck.txt
[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: If the package is under multiple licenses, the licensing breakdown
 must be documented in the spec.
[x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
 names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
 Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
 (~1MB) or number of files.
 Note: Documentation size is 40960 bytes in 2 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
 one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
 Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
 The URL is valid, capitalization of Summary is correct in this context.
 All of frontend, front end and front-end seem to be used.
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
 license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
 license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
 beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package must not depend on deprecated() packages.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
 work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
 provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
 %{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local

= SHOULD items =

Generic:
[x]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
 file from upstream, 

[Bug 1806537] Review Request: gnome-flashback - GNOME Flashback session

2020-02-28 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1806537



--- Comment #2 from Artem  ---
Note: for fedora-review use

  fedora-review -b 1806537 -m fedora-31-x86_64

since this is for current GNOME 3.34 version.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1808405] Review Request: python-ana - Python module to provide easy distributed data storage

2020-02-28 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1808405

Fabian Affolter  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks||1808406




Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1808406
[Bug 1808406] Review Request: python-cooldict - Some useful dict-like
structures
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1808406] Review Request: python-cooldict - Some useful dict-like structures

2020-02-28 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1808406

Fabian Affolter  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Depends On||1808405
   Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value




Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1808405
[Bug 1808405] Review Request: python-ana - Python module to provide easy
distributed data storage
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1808406] New: Review Request: python-cooldict - Some useful dict-like structures

2020-02-28 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1808406

Bug ID: 1808406
   Summary: Review Request: python-cooldict - Some useful
dict-like structures
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
  Hardware: All
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
 Component: Package Review
  Severity: medium
  Priority: medium
  Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org
  Reporter: m...@fabian-affolter.ch
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
  Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora



Spec URL: https://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/python-cooldict.spec
SRPM URL:
https://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/python-cooldict-1.04-1.fc31.src.rpm

Project URL: https://github.com/zardus/cooldict

Description:
Helper for handling dictonery-like structures.

Koji scratch build:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=41984311

rpmlint output:
$ rpmlint python-cooldict-1.04-1.fc31.src.rpm 
python-cooldict.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US dictonery ->
benedictory
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings.

$ rpmlint python3-cooldict-1.04-1.fc31.noarch.rpm 
python3-cooldict.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US dictonery ->
benedictory
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings.

Fedora Account System Username: fab

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1808405] New: Review Request: python-ana - Python module to provide easy distributed data storage

2020-02-28 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1808405

Bug ID: 1808405
   Summary: Review Request: python-ana - Python module to provide
easy distributed data storage
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
  Hardware: All
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
 Component: Package Review
  Severity: medium
  Priority: medium
  Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org
  Reporter: m...@fabian-affolter.ch
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
  Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora



Spec URL: https://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/python-ana.spec
SRPM URL:
https://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/python-ana-0.06-1.fc31.src.rpm

Project URL: https://pypi.org/project/ana/

Description:
ANA is a project to provide easy distributed data storage. It provides every
object with a UUID and, when pickled, will first serialize the object's state
to a central location and then "pickle" the object into just its UUID.

Koji scratch build:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=41984194

rpmlint output:
$ rpmlint python-ana-0.06-1.fc31.src.rpm 
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.

$ rpmlint python3-ana-0.06-1.fc31.noarch.rpm
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.

Fedora Account System Username: fab

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1795053] Review Request: wfuzz - Web fuzzer

2020-02-28 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1795053



--- Comment #2 from Fabian Affolter  ---
(In reply to dan.cermak from comment #1)
> Overall this looks good, I have the following questions/comments:
> 
> - please don't put plain macros into comments, that's just asking for
> trouble with m4, prevent their expansion via %% or replace the # with %dnl
> (will only work in Rawhide & F32 though)

Doc building is no longer excluded.

> - upstream has a test suite, consider running it in %check?

They have but it's required to run a server as the calls are not mocked. I'm
not aware that the build system is able to run containers.

> - you have added 3 sed calls into %prep:
>   * please add an explanation why you have added these and what they do
>   * You unrestrict the pycurl dependency: given that you don't run any
> tests, this seems a bit dangerous, especially given this oddly specific
> version requirement (and that we have a newer version in Rawhide). If you
> believe that the dependency specification is wrong, then please submit a
> patch upstream and patch the sources in the spec.

Strict release pinning breaks the installations. There is an issue with
7.43.0.3. Fedora 31 ships 7.43.0.2 and Fedora 32 7.43.0.5. With both versions
of pycurl I'm not able to reproduce the reported issues. Thus I removed the
pinning. 

> - The documentation is not built, why? If there is an upstream issue, please
> link to it.

This issue seems to be resolved now.

Update files:
Spec URL: https://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/wfuzz.spec
SRPM URL:
https://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/wfuzz-2.4.5-2.fc31.src.rpm

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1808276] Review request: libuInputPlus - a c++ wrapper around libuinput

2020-02-28 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1808276

Artem  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
 CC||ego.corda...@gmail.com
   Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|ego.corda...@gmail.com
   Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value
  Flags||fedora-review?



--- Comment #1 from Artem  ---
1. Drop date from:

   Version:  0.1.3.20200211
   ->
   Version:  0.1.3

Also the latest version should been packaged which is 0.1.4.

2. Drop 'wef' from:

   Release:  1%{?dist}.wef
   ->
   Release:  1%{?dist}

3. Source URL incorrect and not downloadable:

   Source0: 
https://github.com/YukiWorkshop/libuInputPlus/archive/%{name}-%{version}.tar.gz
   ->
   Source0:  %{url}/-/archive/v%{version}/%{name}-%{version}.tar.gz

4. Use new line for every BR. It's easier for patch/diff and for better
readability. Also please sort it in alphabetical order.

   BuildRequires: cmake make gcc-c++
   ->
   BuildRequires: cmake
   BuildRequires: gcc-c++
   BuildRequires: make

5. Add dot into the end of description:

   Library required for ydotool
   ->
   Library required for ydotool.

6. Instead of build dir better use:

   mkdir build
   ->
   mkdir -p %{_target_platform}

7. Instead of cd us pushd/popd:

   cd build
   ->
   pushd %{_target_platform}

8. Use cmake macros and do not hardcode paths:

   cmake -DCMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX=/usr ..
   ->
   %cmake -DCMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX=%{_prefix} ..

9. Use macros for make:
   %make_build
   https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#_parallel_make

10. Add %install section before %make_install

11. You need to own dir, do not glob here:
%{_includedir}/*
->
%{_includedir}/uInputPlus/

12. Seems like there is test persist in this project. Run tests in %check
section
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#_test_suites

13. Development (unversioned) .so files in -devel subpackage, if present.
Note: Unversioned so-files directly in %_libdir.
See: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-
guidelines/#_devel_packages

14.

---


Package Review
==

Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed


Issues:
===
- Development (unversioned) .so files in -devel subpackage, if present.
  Note: Unversioned so-files directly in %_libdir.
  See: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-
  guidelines/#_devel_packages
- Static libraries in -static or -devel subpackage, providing -devel if
  present.
  Note: Package has .a files: libevdevPlus. Illegal package name:
  libevdevPlus. Does not provide -static: libevdevPlus.
  See: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-
  guidelines/#packaging-static-libraries


= MUST items =

C/C++:
[x]: Package does not contain kernel modules.
[x]: Package contains no static executables.
[x]: If your application is a C or C++ application you must list a
 BuildRequires against gcc, gcc-c++ or clang.
[x]: ldconfig not called in %post and %postun for Fedora 28 and later.
[x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la)
[x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs.

Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
 other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
 Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
 Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
 found: "Unknown or generated", "Expat License". 4 files have unknown
 license. Detailed output of licensecheck in /mnt/data-
 linux/tmp/review/1808278-libevdevPlus/licensecheck.txt
[!]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[!]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[!]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
 names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[?]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[x]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
 Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[!]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. 

[Bug 1808351] New: Review Request: dsp - An audio processing program with an interactive mode

2020-02-28 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1808351

Bug ID: 1808351
   Summary: Review Request: dsp - An audio processing program with
an interactive mode
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
  Hardware: All
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
 Component: Package Review
  Severity: medium
  Priority: medium
  Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org
  Reporter: nfo...@redhat.com
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
  Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora



Spec URL:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/nforro/dsp/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/01258301-dsp/dsp.spec
SRPM URL:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/nforro/dsp/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/01258301-dsp/dsp-1.6-1.fc33.src.rpm
Description: dsp is an audio processing program with an interactive mode
Fedora Account System Username: nforro

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1797368] Review Request: perl-String-Interpolate-Named - Interpolate named variables in text strings

2020-02-28 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1797368

Petr Pisar  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags|fedora-review?  |fedora-review+



--- Comment #3 from Petr Pisar  ---
Source and Url addresses are usable. Ok.
Source archive (SHA-256:
727299fa69258b604770e059ec4da906bfde71861fdd1e3e89e30677371c5a80) is original.
Ok.
Summary verified from README. Ok.
Description verified from README. Ok.
License verified from lib/String/Interpolate/Named.pm and README. Ok.
No XS code, noarch BuildArch is Ok.

FIX: Build-require 'perl(Exporter)' (lib/String/Interpolate/Named.pm:10).

All tests pass. Ok.

$ rpmlint perl-String-Interpolate-Named.spec
../SRPMS/perl-String-Interpolate-Named-1.00-3.fc33.src.rpm
../RPMS/noarch/perl-String-Interpolate-Named-1.00-3.fc33.noarch.rpm 
sh: /usr/bin/python2: No such file or directory
2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
rpmlint is Ok.

$ rpm -q -lv -p
../RPMS/noarch/perl-String-Interpolate-Named-1.00-3.fc33.noarch.rpm 
drwxr-xr-x2 root root0 Feb 28 10:50
/usr/share/doc/perl-String-Interpolate-Named
-rw-r--r--1 root root  780 Oct 31 13:33
/usr/share/doc/perl-String-Interpolate-Named/Changes
-rw-r--r--1 root root 1154 Oct 31 13:53
/usr/share/doc/perl-String-Interpolate-Named/README
-rw-r--r--1 root root 3573 Feb 28 10:50
/usr/share/man/man3/String::Interpolate::Named.3pm.gz
drwxr-xr-x2 root root0 Feb 28 10:50
/usr/share/perl5/vendor_perl/String
drwxr-xr-x2 root root0 Feb 28 10:50
/usr/share/perl5/vendor_perl/String/Interpolate
-rw-r--r--1 root root 8687 Oct 31 13:56
/usr/share/perl5/vendor_perl/String/Interpolate/Named.pm
File layout and the permissions are Ok.

$ rpm -q --requires -p
../RPMS/noarch/perl-String-Interpolate-Named-1.00-3.fc33.noarch.rpm | sort -f |
uniq -c
  1 perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.30.1)
  1 perl(:VERSION) >= 5.10.1
  1 perl(Carp)
  1 perl(Exporter)
  1 perl(parent)
  1 perl(strict)
  1 perl(utf8)
  1 perl(warnings)
  1 rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1
  1 rpmlib(FileDigests) <= 4.6.0-1
  1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1
  1 rpmlib(PayloadIsZstd) <= 5.4.18-1
Binary requires are Ok.

$ rpm -q --provides -p
../RPMS/noarch/perl-String-Interpolate-Named-1.00-3.fc33.noarch.rpm | sort -f |
uniq -c
  1 perl(String::Interpolate::Named) = 1.00
  1 perl-String-Interpolate-Named = 1.00-3.fc33
Binary provides are Ok.

$ resolvedeps rawhide
../RPMS/noarch/perl-String-Interpolate-Named-1.00-3.fc33.noarch.rpm 
Binary dependencies are resolvable. Ok.

The package builds in F33
(https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=41981404). Ok.

Otherwise the package is in line with Fedora and Perl packaging guide lines.

Please correct the 'FIX' item before building this package.
Resolution: Package APPROVED.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1797368] Review Request: perl-String-Interpolate-Named - Interpolate named variables in text strings

2020-02-28 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1797368

Petr Pisar  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
 CC||ppi...@redhat.com
   Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|ppi...@redhat.com
  Flags||fedora-review?



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1801533] Review Request: memstrack - a memory allocation analyzer

2020-02-28 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1801533



--- Comment #5 from Kairui Song  ---
(In reply to Attila Lakatos from comment #4)
> 1. It is not a MUST thing but you should consider to add a man page for
> memstrack binary file. If you do not have one, work with upstream to add one
> where it makes sense. However, it's only up to you.

Thanks, I'll consider it in the furture, and there is a README should have a
brief introduction to the tool and the TUI is already inteactive and provide
basic usage info.

> 
> > install -p -m 644 misc/99memstrack/module-setup.sh 
> > %{buildroot}/%{dracutmoduledir}/module-setup.sh
> 2. memstrack.spec:49: Are you sure that you want to set the file permissions
> to 644? In that case it creates a non-executable script.

That's right, that's a dracut module which don't need execution permission.

> 
> 3. No owner of /usr/lib/dracut/module.d
> Your package should own all of the files that are installed as part of the
> %install process.

Good catch, will fix it. That's a malformed dracut module path, this package
don't own it, so I should just install files under it and dont touch the dir
itself, and add dependency on dracut to ensure it exists.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1808306] Review Request: ulauncher - Linux Application Launcher

2020-02-28 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1808306

Artem  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value



--- Comment #1 from Artem  ---
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/atim/playground/fedora-31-x86_64/01259191-ulauncher/ulauncher.spec

https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/atim/playground/fedora-31-x86_64/01259191-ulauncher/ulauncher-5.6.1-2.fc31.src.rpm

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1808315] Review Request: elementary-notifications - GTK Notifications Server

2020-02-28 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1808315

Fabio Valentini  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks||1512217
   ||(PantheonDesktopPackageRevi
   ||ews)
   Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value




Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1512217
[Bug 1512217] Tracking: Pantheon Desktop related package review tracker
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1512217] Tracking: Pantheon Desktop related package review tracker

2020-02-28 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1512217

Fabio Valentini  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Depends On||1808315




Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1808315
[Bug 1808315] Review Request: elementary-notifications - GTK Notifications
Server
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1808315] New: Review Request: elementary-notifications - GTK Notifications Server

2020-02-28 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1808315

Bug ID: 1808315
   Summary: Review Request: elementary-notifications - GTK
Notifications Server
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
  Hardware: All
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
 Component: Package Review
  Severity: medium
  Priority: medium
  Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org
  Reporter: decatho...@gmail.com
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
  Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora



Spec URL:
https://decathorpe.fedorapeople.org/packages/elementary-notifications.spec
SRPM URL:
https://decathorpe.fedorapeople.org/packages/elementary-notifications-0-0.1.20200224.git676c175.fc31.src.rpm

Description:
elementary Notifications is a GTK notification server for Pantheon.

Fedora Account System Username: decathorpe

koji scratch build for rawhide:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=41980679

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1808306] New: Review Request: ulauncher - Linux Application Launcher

2020-02-28 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1808306

Bug ID: 1808306
   Summary: Review Request: ulauncher - Linux Application Launcher
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
  Hardware: All
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
 Component: Package Review
  Severity: medium
  Priority: medium
  Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org
  Reporter: ego.corda...@gmail.com
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
  Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora



Spec URL:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/atim/playground/fedora-31-x86_64/01259083-ulauncher/ulauncher.spec
SRPM URL:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/atim/playground/fedora-31-x86_64/01259083-ulauncher/ulauncher-5.6.1-1.fc31.src.rpm

Description:
Ulauncher is a fast application launcher for Linux. It's is written in Python,
using GTK+.


Fedora Account System Username: atim

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1798798] Review Request: ocaml-ppx-deriving - Type-driven code generation for OCaml

2020-02-28 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1798798



--- Comment #5 from Ankur Sinha (FranciscoD)  ---
No worries, please let me know when it's ready for another look :)

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1808288] Review Request: golang-github-projectdiscovery-gologger - A simple layer for leveled logging in go

2020-02-28 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1808288

Fabian Affolter  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks||1808299




Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1808299
[Bug 1808299] Review Request: shuffledns - Wrapper around massdns
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1797367] Review Request: perl-File-LoadLines - Loads the contents of a text file into an array of lines

2020-02-28 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1797367

Petr Pisar  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

Summary|Review Request: |Review Request:
   |perl-File-LoadLines - Read  |perl-File-LoadLines - Loads
   |text files into lines array |the contents of a text file
   ||into an array of lines



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1808259] Review Request: massdns - High-performance DNS stub resolver for bulk lookups and reconnaissance

2020-02-28 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1808259

Fabian Affolter  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks||1808299




Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1808299
[Bug 1808299] Review Request: shuffledns - Wrapper around massdns
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1808299] Review Request: shuffledns - Wrapper around massdns

2020-02-28 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1808299

Fabian Affolter  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks||563471 (FE-SECLAB)
 Depends On||1808288, 1808259 (massdns)
   Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value




Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=563471
[Bug 563471] Tracker: Review Requests for Fedora Security Lab related packages
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1808259
[Bug 1808259] Review Request: massdns - High-performance DNS stub resolver for
bulk lookups and reconnaissance
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1808288
[Bug 1808288] Review Request: golang-github-projectdiscovery-gologger - A
simple layer for leveled logging in go
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1797367] Review Request: perl-File-LoadLines - Read text files into lines array

2020-02-28 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1797367

Petr Pisar  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags|fedora-review?  |fedora-review+



--- Comment #3 from Petr Pisar  ---
Source0 and Url addresses are usable. Ok.
Source0 archive (SHA-256:
ab0c1c31cf7b694dd3c9a0707098f7483763d46b60799a7f496ea0588be46b7b) is original.
Ok.
Summary is Ok.
Description verified from README. Ok.

FIX: Add a fullstop character at the end of the description text.

License verified from README, and lib/File/LoadLines.pm. Ok.
No XS code, noarch BuildArch is Ok.

FIX: Build-require 'perl(Exporter)' (lib/File/LoadLines.pm:7).
FIX: Build-require 'perl(utf8)' (t/10-basic.t:8).

All tests pass. Ok.

$ rpmlint perl-File-LoadLines.spec
../SRPMS/perl-File-LoadLines-0.02-3.fc33.src.rpm
../RPMS/noarch/perl-File-LoadLines-0.02-3.fc33.noarch.rpm 
sh: /usr/bin/python2: No such file or directory
2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
rpmlint is Ok.

$ rpm -q -lv -p ../RPMS/noarch/perl-File-LoadLines-0.02-3.fc33.noarch.rpm 
drwxr-xr-x2 root root0 Feb 28 09:11
/usr/share/doc/perl-File-LoadLines
-rw-r--r--1 root root  152 Oct 29  2018
/usr/share/doc/perl-File-LoadLines/Changes
-rw-r--r--1 root root  807 Oct 26  2018
/usr/share/doc/perl-File-LoadLines/README
-rw-r--r--1 root root 2298 Feb 28 09:11
/usr/share/man/man3/File::LoadLines.3pm.gz
drwxr-xr-x2 root root0 Feb 28 09:11
/usr/share/perl5/vendor_perl/File
-rw-r--r--1 root root 5240 Oct 29  2018
/usr/share/perl5/vendor_perl/File/LoadLines.pm
A file layout and the permissions are Ok.

$ rpm -q --requires -p
../RPMS/noarch/perl-File-LoadLines-0.02-3.fc33.noarch.rpm | sort -f | uniq -c
  1 perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.30.1)
  1 perl(:VERSION) >= 5.10.1
  1 perl(base)
  1 perl(Encode)
  1 perl(Exporter)
  1 perl(strict)
  1 perl(warnings)
  1 rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1
  1 rpmlib(FileDigests) <= 4.6.0-1
  1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1
  1 rpmlib(PayloadIsZstd) <= 5.4.18-1
Binary requires are Ok.

$ rpm -q --provides -p
../RPMS/noarch/perl-File-LoadLines-0.02-3.fc33.noarch.rpm | sort -f | uniq -c
  1 perl(File::LoadLines) = 0.02
  1 perl-File-LoadLines = 0.02-3.fc33
Binary provides are Ok.

$ resolvedeps rawhide ../RPMS/noarch/perl-File-LoadLines-0.02-3.fc33.noarch.rpm 
Binary dependencies are resolvable. Ok.

The package builds in Fedora 33
(https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=41979480). Ok.

Otherwise the package is in line with Fedora and Perl packaging guidelines.
Please correct the 'FIX' items before building this package.
Resolution: Package APPROVED.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1808299] New: Review Request: shuffledns - Wrapper around massdns

2020-02-28 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1808299

Bug ID: 1808299
   Summary: Review Request: shuffledns - Wrapper around massdns
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
  Hardware: All
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
 Component: Package Review
  Severity: medium
  Priority: medium
  Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org
  Reporter: m...@fabian-affolter.ch
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
  Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora



Spec URL: https://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/shuffledns.spec
SRPM URL:
https://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/shuffledns-1.0.0-1.fc31.src.rpm

Project URL: https://github.com/projectdiscovery/shuffledns

Description:
ShuffleDNS is a wrapper around massdns written in go that allows you to
enumerate valid subdomains using active bruteforce as well as resolve
subdomains with wildcard handling and easy input-output support.

Koji scratch build:
fails, missing deps

rpmlint output:
$ rpmlint shuffledns-1.0.0-1.fc31.src.rpm 
shuffledns.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) massdns -> madness
shuffledns.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US massdns -> madness
shuffledns.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US subdomains -> sub
domains, sub-domains, domains
shuffledns.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US bruteforce -> brute
force, brute-force, forceful
shuffledns.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US wildcard -> wild card,
wild-card, wildcat
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 5 warnings.

$ rpmlint
golang-github-projectdiscovery-shuffledns-devel-1.0.0-1.fc31.noarch.rpm
golang-github-projectdiscovery-shuffledns-devel.noarch: W: spelling-error
%description -l en_US subdomains -> sub domains, sub-domains, domains
golang-github-projectdiscovery-shuffledns-devel.noarch: W: spelling-error
%description -l en_US bruteforce -> brute force, brute-force, forceful
golang-github-projectdiscovery-shuffledns-devel.noarch: W: spelling-error
%description -l en_US wildcard -> wild card, wild-card, wildcat
golang-github-projectdiscovery-shuffledns-devel.noarch: W: hidden-file-or-dir
/usr/share/gocode/src/github.com/projectdiscovery/shuffledns/.goipath
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 4 warnings.

Fedora Account System Username: fab

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1804636] Review Request: ghc-rio - A standard library for Haskell

2020-02-28 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1804636



--- Comment #7 from Jens Petersen  ---
https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/22588 (f32)

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1797367] Review Request: perl-File-LoadLines - Read text files into lines array

2020-02-28 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1797367

Petr Pisar  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
 CC||ppi...@redhat.com
   Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|ppi...@redhat.com
  Flags||fedora-review?



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org