[Bug 1822847] Review Request: vl-gothic-fonts - Japanese TrueType fonts
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1822847 Akira TAGOH changed: What|Removed |Added CC||fonts-bugs@lists.fedoraproj ||ect.org --- Comment #1 from Akira TAGOH --- This is rename of vlgothic-fonts. Re-review is needed for package renaming according to the new fonts packaging guidelines. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1822847] New: Review Request: vl-gothic-fonts - Japanese TrueType fonts
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1822847 Bug ID: 1822847 Summary: Review Request: vl-gothic-fonts - Japanese TrueType fonts Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: ta...@redhat.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://tagoh.fedorapeople.org/reviews/vl-gothic-fonts/vl-gothic-fonts.spec SRPM URL: https://tagoh.fedorapeople.org/reviews/vl-gothic-fonts/vl-gothic-fonts-20141206-17.fc33.src.rpm Description: VLGothic provides Japanese TrueType fonts from the Vine Linux project. Most of the glyphs are taken from the M+ and Sazanami Gothic fonts, but some have also been improved by the project. Fedora Account System Username: tagoh -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1821393] Review Request: pagure-cli - Pagure client
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1821393 Jens Petersen changed: What|Removed |Added CC||haskell-devel@lists.fedorap ||roject.org --- Comment #1 from Jens Petersen --- If you want to play with it there is a copr https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/petersen/pagure-cli/ (note the packaging is different though - for older releases). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1813292] Review Request: pkgtreediff - Package tree diff tool
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1813292 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-60f1285bce has been submitted as an update to Fedora 31. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-60f1285bce -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1813292] Review Request: pkgtreediff - Package tree diff tool
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1813292 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-ffe744638d has been submitted as an update to Fedora 32. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-ffe744638d -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1815810] Review Request: python-pg8000 - Pure Python PostgreSQL Driver
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1815810
--- Comment #16 from Neal Gompa ---
(In reply to Ernestas Kulik from comment #15)
> (In reply to Neal Gompa from comment #14)
> > More comments:
> >
> > > %pycached %{python3_sitelib}/%{pypi_name}/__init__.py
> > > %pycached %{python3_sitelib}/%{pypi_name}/core.py
> > > %pycached %{python3_sitelib}/%{pypi_name}/_version.py
> >
> > This is completely unnecessary for this module, please just use
> > "%{python3_sitelib}/%{pypi_name}/"
>
> Then for what modules would it be necessary? I much prefer spelling out
> every single file so that I know if something disappears either
> intentionally or not.
%pycached was created to make it easier to package Python modules that just
ship a file into %python3_sitelib and capture the cache file along with it.
While you can certainly use it with a module that installs properly into a
directory providing a namespace, there's no point and any separation would just
break the module anyway. You're not subpackaging within that folder tree, so
why pretend like you might?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1815726] Re-Review Request: mkdocs-material - A material design theme for MkDocs
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1815726
--- Comment #5 from Robin Lee ---
(In reply to Miro Hrončok from comment #4)
> This is very weird:
>
> %{python3_sitelib}/src/
>
>
>
>
> Why does a "mkdocs-material" package provide a Python module called "src"?
I checked this issue and reported upstream. I will exclude that directory when
commit.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1807753] Review Request: ydotool - Generic command-line automation tool
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1807753 --- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-63261d7bce has been submitted as an update to Fedora 32. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-63261d7bce -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1807753] Review Request: ydotool - Generic command-line automation tool
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1807753 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|MODIFIED --- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-3c7a0db716 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 31. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-3c7a0db716 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1810897] Review Request: hello - Prints a familiar, friendly greeting
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1810897 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-0348f28a44 has been pushed to the Fedora 30 testing repository. In short time you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing --advisory=FEDORA-2020-0348f28a44 \*` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-0348f28a44 See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1811775] Review Request: rubygem-semantic_puppet - Useful tools for working with Semantic Versions
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1811775 --- Comment #2 from Breno --- Spec URL: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/skywalkerz0r/rubygem-semantic_puppet/epel8/rubygem-semantic_puppet.spec SRPM URL: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/brandfbb/puppet6-stable-el8-fedora/epel-8-x86_64/01333826-rubygem-semantic_puppet/rubygem-semantic_puppet-1.0.2-1.el8.src.rpm Description: Tools used by Puppet to parse, validate, and compare Semantic Versions and Version Ranges and to query and resolve module dependencies. Fedora Account System Username: brandfbb Hi Robert-Andre', Thanks for reviewing this package and I am sorry for the long delay. With all this outbreak going on, I had a lot on my plate over here... well I bet it's kind of the same of us all. Here are^^ the updates, Thanks again. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1810897] Review Request: hello - Prints a familiar, friendly greeting
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1810897 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-48b58104ed has been pushed to the Fedora 31 testing repository. In short time you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing --advisory=FEDORA-2020-48b58104ed \*` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-48b58104ed See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1810897] Review Request: hello - Prints a familiar, friendly greeting
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1810897 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-f0bfd67c52 has been pushed to the Fedora 32 testing repository. In short time you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing --advisory=FEDORA-2020-f0bfd67c52 \*` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-f0bfd67c52 See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1809700] Review Request: hledger-ui - Curses-style user interface for the hledger accounting tool
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1809700 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-da08abc6db has been pushed to the Fedora 32 testing repository. In short time you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing --advisory=FEDORA-2020-da08abc6db \*` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-da08abc6db See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1821523] Review Request: musl - Fully featured lightweight standard C library for Linux
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1821523 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-a0981822f5 has been pushed to the Fedora 31 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1809994] Review Request: python-plugnplay - A generic plug-in system for Python
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1809994 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-bbd443e3b0 has been pushed to the Fedora 31 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1808276] Review request: libuInputPlus - C++ wrapper around libuinput
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1808276 --- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-9d0bd4996a has been pushed to the Fedora 31 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1808278] Review request: libevdevPlus - a c++ wrapper around libevdev
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1808278 --- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-69b95e4c8f has been pushed to the Fedora 31 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1816642] Review Request: golang-github-resty - Simple HTTP and REST client library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1816642 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-28b5301501 has been pushed to the Fedora 31 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1821523] Review Request: musl - Fully featured lightweight standard C library for Linux
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1821523 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-acd8cd347a has been pushed to the Fedora 30 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1819180] Review Request: ssh-chat - custom ssh server which serves a chat room instead of a shell
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1819180 --- Comment #7 from Ralf Senderek --- So the MOCK build problem is resolved. SRPM and SPEC files are updated. And a successful KOJI scratch build for F32 is here: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=43168846 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1815726] Re-Review Request: mkdocs-material - A material design theme for MkDocs
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1815726
Miro Hrončok changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mhron...@redhat.com
--- Comment #4 from Miro Hrončok ---
This is very weird:
%{python3_sitelib}/src/
Why does a "mkdocs-material" package provide a Python module called "src"?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1821330] Review Request: python-apypie - Python bindings for Apipie
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1821330 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-99d1b8f017 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 32. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-99d1b8f017 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1821330] Review Request: python-apypie - Python bindings for Apipie
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1821330 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-f65cf84250 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 30. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-f65cf84250 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1821330] Review Request: python-apypie - Python bindings for Apipie
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1821330 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-4f03022d56 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 31. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-4f03022d56 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1821330] Review Request: python-apypie - Python bindings for Apipie
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1821330 --- Comment #12 from Ondrej Gajdusek --- Thank you both for the notification about the new release. I removed the license file hacks from the specfile for the new release. Build is GREEN. Spec URL: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/ogajduse/apypie/srpm-builds/01333616/python-apypie.spec SRPM URL: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/ogajduse/apypie/srpm-builds/01333616/python-apypie-0.2.2-1.fc31.src.rpm Copr build: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/ogajduse/apypie/srpm-builds/01333616/ Koji build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=43165226 Bodhi update: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-18c8b0f4c5 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1815726] Re-Review Request: mkdocs-material - A material design theme for MkDocs
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1815726 José Matos changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from José Matos --- The package is simple, this is a re-review and the license is correct and acceptable. The issue in %files has been fixed so the package is approved. With that said this package does not build in any Fedora release because the only release where it would work is Rawhide where python3dist(pymdown-extensions) >= 7 will be satisfied as soon as a new compose is available. Since you are also its packager you can coordinate with yourself if you want to release this for other releases. :-) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1818936] Review Request: perl-Mojolicious-Plugin-OpenAPI - OpenAPI / Swagger plugin for Mojolicious
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1818936 --- Comment #5 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Mojolicious-Plugin-OpenAPI -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1821523] Review Request: musl - Fully featured lightweight standard C library for Linux
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1821523 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2020-04-09 14:44:42 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-5a38657356 has been pushed to the Fedora 32 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1818936] Review Request: perl-Mojolicious-Plugin-OpenAPI - OpenAPI / Swagger plugin for Mojolicious
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1818936 --- Comment #4 from Emmanuel Seyman --- Feedback taken into account. Spec URL: http://people.parinux.org/~seyman/fedora/perl-Mojolicious-Plugin-OpenAPI/perl-Mojolicious-Plugin-OpenAPI.spec SRPM URL: http://people.parinux.org/~seyman/fedora/perl-Mojolicious-Plugin-OpenAPI/perl-Mojolicious-Plugin-OpenAPI-3.31-2.fc31.src.rpm I've also requested a repo (https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/24223). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1812675] Review Request: workspace - directory created on demand
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1812675 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2020-04-09 14:44:03 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-8feba29116 has been pushed to the Fedora 32 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1816367] Review Request: patator - A multi-purpose brute-forcer
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1816367 Bug 1816367 depends on bug 1816267, which changed state. Bug 1816267 Summary: Review Request: python-ajpy - AJP package crafting library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1816267 What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1808278] Review request: libevdevPlus - a c++ wrapper around libevdev
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1808278 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2020-04-09 14:43:30 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-78151e9bd8 has been pushed to the Fedora 32 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1807753] Review Request: ydotool - Generic command-line automation tool
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1807753 Bug 1807753 depends on bug 1808278, which changed state. Bug 1808278 Summary: Review request: libevdevPlus - a c++ wrapper around libevdev https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1808278 What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1815937] Review Request: httprobe - Probing tool for working HTTP and HTTPS servers
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1815937 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2020-04-09 14:42:49 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-127cacec20 has been pushed to the Fedora 32 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1807753] Review Request: ydotool - Generic command-line automation tool
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1807753 Bug 1807753 depends on bug 1808276, which changed state. Bug 1808276 Summary: Review request: libuInputPlus - C++ wrapper around libuinput https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1808276 What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1816642] Review Request: golang-github-resty - Simple HTTP and REST client library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1816642 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2020-04-09 14:42:43 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-68f7debb70 has been pushed to the Fedora 32 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1808276] Review request: libuInputPlus - C++ wrapper around libuinput
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1808276 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2020-04-09 14:42:41 --- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-70841b6261 has been pushed to the Fedora 32 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1816267] Review Request: python-ajpy - AJP package crafting library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1816267 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2020-04-09 14:43:03 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-a3c968a190 has been pushed to the Fedora 32 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1814795] Review Request: adb-enhanced - Swiss-army knife for Android testing and development
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1814795 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2020-04-09 14:42:56 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-13bd8b61ed has been pushed to the Fedora 32 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1809994] Review Request: python-plugnplay - A generic plug-in system for Python
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1809994 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2020-04-09 14:42:51 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-535c02c61c has been pushed to the Fedora 32 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1815725] Re-Review Request: mkdocs-cinder - A clean responsive theme for the MkDocs
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1815725 José Matos changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #4 from José Matos --- The package is simple, this is a re-review and the license is correct and acceptable. The issue in %files has been fixed so the package is approved. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1821330] Review Request: python-apypie - Python bindings for Apipie
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1821330 --- Comment #11 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-apypie -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1815727] Re-Review Request: mkdocs-alabaster - Alabaster port for MkDocs
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1815727 José Matos changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from José Matos --- The package is simple, this is a re-review and the license is correct and acceptable. The issue in %files has been fixed so the package is approved. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1815728] Re-Review Request: mkdocs-bootstrap - Bootstrap theme for MKDocs
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1815728 José Matos changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from José Matos --- The package is simple, this is a re-review and the license is correct and acceptable. The issue in %files has been fixed so the package is approved. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1814682] Review Request: rshim - rshim driver for Mellanox BlueField SoC
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1814682 --- Comment #33 from l...@mellanox.com --- Thanks all for the comments! Below are the updated info (2.0.2) trying to solve the comments. I kept the "BuildRequires: systemd-units" in order to pass koji build. Spec URL: https://github.com/Mellanox/rshim-user-space/releases/download/rshim-2.0.2/rshim.spec SRPM URL: https://github.com/Mellanox/rshim-user-space/releases/download/rshim-2.0.2/rshim-2.0.2-1.fc31.src.rpm koji build URL: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=43163450 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1814682] Review Request: rshim - rshim driver for Mellanox BlueField SoC
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1814682
--- Comment #32 from l...@mellanox.com ---
(In reply to Michal Schmidt from comment #31)
> Thank you Honggang for the detailed review results.
> I disagree with the overall PASSED result, though the package is almost
> there.
>
>
> Liming,
>
> please fix this item flagged by fedora-review:
> > [!]: Uses parallel make %{?_smp_mflags} macro.
> The recommended fix is to use the "%make_build" macro.
>
> You still have this in the %install section:
> > %__spec_install_post
> Please remove it.
>
> About these BRs:
> > BuildRequires: systemd-units
> > BuildRequires: systemd-rpm-macros
> The first one seems unnecessary.
> systemd-rpm-macros should be sufficient.
Thanks Michal! I'll use %make_build and remove the %__spec_install_post in next
post.
As for the "systemd-units", it appears to be required by koji. I got some
failures like below once removed it. So I'll leave it for now (please correct
me if I am incorrect).
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=43163313
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1822561] Review Request: wget2 - the successor of GNU Wget, a file and recursive website downloader
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1822561 Anna Khaitovich changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Review Request: wget2 |Review Request: wget2 - the ||successor of GNU Wget, a ||file and recursive website ||downloader -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1822536] Review Request: A2 - This is Workload Automation Software
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1822536 Fabio Valentini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED CC||decatho...@gmail.com Resolution|--- |WONTFIX Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value Last Closed||2020-04-09 11:22:47 --- Comment #2 from Fabio Valentini --- This does not look like Free / Open Source software, so it won't be acceptable as a fedora package. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1820849] Review Request: golang-github-malfunkt-iprange - IPv4 address parser for the nmap format
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1820849
Olivier Lemasle changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #1 from Olivier Lemasle ---
Package approved.
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
= MUST items =
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[x]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package must not depend on deprecated() packages.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
= SHOULD items =
Generic:
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[x]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[-]: Sources are verified with gpgverify first in %prep if upstream
publishes signatures.
[-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[x]: %check is present and all tests pass.
[x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed
files.
[x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[x]: Buildroot is not present
[x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT)
[x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin.
[x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file
[x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag
[x]: SourceX is a working URL.
[x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
architectures.
[x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified.
= EXTRA items =
Generic:
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM.
Rpmlint
---
Checking: golang-github-malfunkt-iprange-devel-0.9.0-1.fc33.noarch.rpm
[Bug 1822561] New: Review Request: wget2
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1822561 Bug ID: 1822561 Summary: Review Request: wget2 Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: Package Review Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: akhai...@redhat.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/akhaitov/wget2/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/01332110-wget2/wget2.spec SRPM: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/akhaitov/wget2/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/01332110-wget2/wget2-1.99.2-1.fc33.src.rpm Description: GNU Wget2 is the successor of GNU Wget, a file and recursive website downloader. Designed and written from scratch it wraps around libwget, that provides the basic functions needed by a web client. Wget2 works multi-threaded and uses many features to allow fast operation. In many cases Wget2 downloads much faster than Wget1.x due to HTTP2, HTTP compression, parallel connections and use of If-Modified-Since HTTP header. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1821330] Review Request: python-apypie - Python bindings for Apipie
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1821330 --- Comment #10 from Evgeni Golov --- 0.2.2 has been release with the license file in the tarball :) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1821330] Review Request: python-apypie - Python bindings for Apipie
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1821330 Ewoud Kohl van Wijngaarden changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ekohl...@redhat.com --- Comment #9 from Ewoud Kohl van Wijngaarden --- Note that 0.2.2 has just been released which includes the LICENSE file. Probably a cleaner fix. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1815810] Review Request: python-pg8000 - Pure Python PostgreSQL Driver
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1815810
--- Comment #15 from Ernestas Kulik ---
(In reply to Neal Gompa from comment #14)
> More comments:
>
> > %pycached %{python3_sitelib}/%{pypi_name}/__init__.py
> > %pycached %{python3_sitelib}/%{pypi_name}/core.py
> > %pycached %{python3_sitelib}/%{pypi_name}/_version.py
>
> This is completely unnecessary for this module, please just use
> "%{python3_sitelib}/%{pypi_name}/"
Then for what modules would it be necessary? I much prefer spelling out every
single file so that I know if something disappears either intentionally or not.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1822536] Review Request: A2 - This is Workload Automation Software
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1822536 --- Comment #1 from atgenautomat...@gmail.com --- https://github.com/atgenautomation/a2 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1822536] New: Review Request: A2 - This is Workload Automation Software
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1822536 Bug ID: 1822536 Summary: Review Request: A2 - This is Workload Automation Software Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: atgenautomat...@gmail.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora SRPM URL: http://www.atgensoft.com/html/downloads/A2-0.3.0-1.el7.x86_64.rpm Description: This is Software for Workload Automation using SSH/WinRM named as A2 produced by Atgen Software Solutions. Refer GitHub Repo https://github.com/atgenautomation/a2 Fedora Account System Username: atgenautomation -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1820849] Review Request: golang-github-malfunkt-iprange - IPv4 address parser for the nmap format
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1820849 Olivier Lemasle changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||o.lema...@gmail.com Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|o.lema...@gmail.com Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value Flags||fedora-review? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1821826] Review Request: golang-github-russross-blackfriday - Markdown processor
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1821826 --- Comment #1 from Olivier Lemasle --- This is already packages in Fedora: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/golang-github-russross-blackfriday -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1821826] Review Request: golang-github-russross-blackfriday - Markdown processor
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1821826 Olivier Lemasle changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||o.lema...@gmail.com Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|o.lema...@gmail.com Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value Flags||fedora-review? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1818936] Review Request: perl-Mojolicious-Plugin-OpenAPI - OpenAPI / Swagger plugin for Mojolicious
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1818936 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Petr Pisar --- This is a rebase, restarting the review. Url and Source0 addresses are usable. Ok. Source0 archive (SHA-256: 7689ad5922614094d699c2c3441cb05c7d58cd691779e4f8e79ea456f0f46782) is original. Ok. Summary verified from lib/Mojolicious/Plugin/OpenAPI.pm. Ok. Description verified from lib/Mojolicious/Plugin/OpenAPI.pm. Ok. License verified from Makefile.PL, lib/Mojolicious/Plugin/OpenAPI.pm, README.md. Ok. Other files have other good licenses and are not distributed in any binary package. Ok. No XS code, noarch BuildArch is Ok. FIX: Do not build-require 'perl(YAML::XS)' it's nowhere directly used. TODO: You can remove one of the 'perl(Mojolicious)' BuildRequires. One is enough. TODO: Build-require 'perl(Data::Validate::IP)' for an optional test (t/v2-formats.t:69:). All tests pass. Ok. $ rpmlint perl-Mojolicious-Plugin-OpenAPI.spec ../SRPMS/perl-Mojolicious-Plugin-OpenAPI-3.31-1.fc33.src.rpm ../RPMS/noarch/perl-Mojolicious-Plugin-OpenAPI-3.31-1.fc33.noarch.rpm sh: /usr/bin/python2: No such file or directory 2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. rpmlint is Ok. $ rpm -q -lv -p ../RPMS/noarch/perl-Mojolicious-Plugin-OpenAPI-3.31-1.fc33.noarch.rpm drwxr-xr-x2 root root0 Apr 9 10:41 /usr/share/doc/perl-Mojolicious-Plugin-OpenAPI -rw-r--r--1 root root12342 Mar 31 13:42 /usr/share/doc/perl-Mojolicious-Plugin-OpenAPI/Changes -rw-r--r--1 root root10945 Mar 31 13:42 /usr/share/doc/perl-Mojolicious-Plugin-OpenAPI/README.md -rw-r--r--1 root root 3104 Apr 9 10:40 /usr/share/man/man3/JSON::Validator::OpenAPI::Mojolicious.3pm.gz -rw-r--r--1 root root 4848 Apr 9 10:40 /usr/share/man/man3/Mojolicious::Plugin::OpenAPI.3pm.gz -rw-r--r--1 root root 4053 Apr 9 10:40 /usr/share/man/man3/Mojolicious::Plugin::OpenAPI::Cors.3pm.gz -rw-r--r--1 root root 4334 Apr 9 10:40 /usr/share/man/man3/Mojolicious::Plugin::OpenAPI::Guides::OpenAPIv2.3pm.gz -rw-r--r--1 root root 4908 Apr 9 10:40 /usr/share/man/man3/Mojolicious::Plugin::OpenAPI::Guides::OpenAPIv3.3pm.gz -rw-r--r--1 root root 1915 Apr 9 10:40 /usr/share/man/man3/Mojolicious::Plugin::OpenAPI::Guides::Swagger2.3pm.gz -rw-r--r--1 root root 2712 Apr 9 10:40 /usr/share/man/man3/Mojolicious::Plugin::OpenAPI::Security.3pm.gz -rw-r--r--1 root root 2936 Apr 9 10:40 /usr/share/man/man3/Mojolicious::Plugin::OpenAPI::SpecRenderer.3pm.gz drwxr-xr-x2 root root0 Apr 9 10:40 /usr/share/perl5/vendor_perl/JSON drwxr-xr-x2 root root0 Apr 9 10:40 /usr/share/perl5/vendor_perl/JSON/Validator drwxr-xr-x2 root root0 Apr 9 10:40 /usr/share/perl5/vendor_perl/JSON/Validator/OpenAPI -rw-r--r--1 root root20604 Mar 24 02:23 /usr/share/perl5/vendor_perl/JSON/Validator/OpenAPI/Mojolicious.pm drwxr-xr-x2 root root0 Apr 9 10:40 /usr/share/perl5/vendor_perl/Mojolicious drwxr-xr-x2 root root0 Apr 9 10:40 /usr/share/perl5/vendor_perl/Mojolicious/Plugin drwxr-xr-x2 root root0 Apr 9 10:40 /usr/share/perl5/vendor_perl/Mojolicious/Plugin/OpenAPI -rw-r--r--1 root root20868 Mar 31 13:42 /usr/share/perl5/vendor_perl/Mojolicious/Plugin/OpenAPI.pm -rw-r--r--1 root root14203 Mar 6 01:01 /usr/share/perl5/vendor_perl/Mojolicious/Plugin/OpenAPI/Cors.pm drwxr-xr-x2 root root0 Apr 9 10:40 /usr/share/perl5/vendor_perl/Mojolicious/Plugin/OpenAPI/Guides -rw-r--r--1 root root 8423 Mar 3 07:53 /usr/share/perl5/vendor_perl/Mojolicious/Plugin/OpenAPI/Guides/OpenAPIv2.pod -rw-r--r--1 root root10470 Mar 3 07:53 /usr/share/perl5/vendor_perl/Mojolicious/Plugin/OpenAPI/Guides/OpenAPIv3.pod -rw-r--r--1 root root 1782 Mar 3 07:53 /usr/share/perl5/vendor_perl/Mojolicious/Plugin/OpenAPI/Guides/Swagger2.pod -rw-r--r--1 root root 6974 Mar 6 01:01 /usr/share/perl5/vendor_perl/Mojolicious/Plugin/OpenAPI/Security.pm -rw-r--r--1 root root34334 Mar 31 13:38 /usr/share/perl5/vendor_perl/Mojolicious/Plugin/OpenAPI/SpecRenderer.pm File layout and permissions are Ok. $ rpm -q --requires -p ../RPMS/noarch/perl-Mojolicious-Plugin-OpenAPI-3.31-1.fc33.noarch.rpm | sort
[Bug 1821450] Review Request: golang-github-casbin-2 - An authorization library for ACL, RBAC and ABAC
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1821450 --- Comment #1 from Fabian Affolter --- Spec URL: https://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/golang-github-casbin-2.spec SRPM URL: https://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/golang-github-casbin-2-2.2.2-1.fc31.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1821450] Review Request: golang-github-casbin-2 - An authorization library for ACL, RBAC and ABAC
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1821450 Fabian Affolter changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Review Request: |Review Request: |golang-github-casbin - An |golang-github-casbin-2 - An |authorization library for |authorization library for |ACL, RBAC and ABAC |ACL, RBAC and ABAC Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1822509] New: Review Request: lavalauncher - a simple launcher for Wayland
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1822509 Bug ID: 1822509 Summary: Review Request: lavalauncher - a simple launcher for Wayland Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: bob.hep...@gmail.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/wef/lavalauncher/fedora-31-x86_64/01332066-lavalauncher/lavalauncher.spec SRPM URL: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/wef/lavalauncher/fedora-31-x86_64/01332066-lavalauncher/lavalauncher-1.6-4.fc31.src.rpm Description: LavaLauncher is a simple launcher for Wayland. It serves a single purpose: Letting the user execute shell commands by clicking on icons on a dynamically sized bar, placed at one of the screen edges or in the center. Unlike most popular launchers, LavaLauncher does not care about .desktop files or icon themes. To create a button, you simply provide the path to an image and a shell command. This makes LavaLauncher considerably more flexible: You could have buttons not just for launching applications, but also for ejecting your optical drive, rotating your screen, sending your cat an email, playing a funny sound, muting all audio, toggling your lamps, etc. You can turn practically anything you could do in your shell into a button. The configuration is done entirely via command flags. See the manpage for details and an example. LavaLauncher has been successfully tested with sway and wayfire. Fedora Account System Username: wef -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1821330] Review Request: python-apypie - Python bindings for Apipie
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1821330 Fabian Affolter changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #8 from Fabian Affolter --- Use "Source1: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Apipie/apypie/master/LICENSE; Please fix this before importing the package. Package APPROVED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1822469] New: Review Request: golang-github-ory-dockertest - Support for ephermal docker images for your Go tests
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1822469 Bug ID: 1822469 Summary: Review Request: golang-github-ory-dockertest - Support for ephermal docker images for your Go tests Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: m...@fabian-affolter.ch QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/golang-github-ory-dockertest.spec SRPM URL: https://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/golang-github-ory-dockertest-3.5.5-1.fc31.src.rpm Project URL: https://github.com/ory/dockertest Description: Use Docker to run your Go language integration tests against third party services. Koji scratch build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=43135812 rpmlint output: $ rpmlint golang-github-ory-dockertest-3.5.5-1.fc31.src.rpm golang-github-ory-dockertest.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) ephermal -> ephemeral, thermal golang-github-ory-dockertest.src: W: no-%build-section 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. $ rpmlint golang-github-ory-dockertest-devel-3.5.5-1.fc31.noarch.rpm golang-github-ory-dockertest-devel.noarch: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) ephermal -> ephemeral, thermal golang-github-ory-dockertest-devel.noarch: W: hidden-file-or-dir /usr/share/gocode/src/github.com/ory/dockertest/.goipath 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. Fedora Account System Username: fab -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
