[Bug 1082825] Review Request: mozilla-lightbeam - An add-on for visualizing HTTP requests between websites in real time

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1082825



--- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System  ---
mozilla-lightbeam-1.3.1-2.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1082825] Review Request: mozilla-lightbeam - An add-on for visualizing HTTP requests between websites in real time

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1082825



--- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System  ---
mozilla-lightbeam-1.3.1-2.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1082825] Review Request: mozilla-lightbeam - An add-on for visualizing HTTP requests between websites in real time

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1082825



--- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System  ---
mozilla-lightbeam-1.3.1-2.fc25 has been pushed to the Fedora 25 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1082825] Review Request: mozilla-lightbeam - An add-on for visualizing HTTP requests between websites in real time

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1082825

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Last Closed||2016-08-28 04:26:32



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1082825] Review Request: mozilla-lightbeam - An add-on for visualizing HTTP requests between websites in real time

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1082825



--- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System  ---
mozilla-lightbeam-1.3.1-2.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-b794502237

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1082825] Review Request: mozilla-lightbeam - An add-on for visualizing HTTP requests between websites in real time

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1082825



--- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System  ---
mozilla-lightbeam-1.3.1-2.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-e7022ca71b

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1082825] Review Request: mozilla-lightbeam - An add-on for visualizing HTTP requests between websites in real time

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1082825

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA



--- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System  ---
mozilla-lightbeam-1.3.1-2.fc25 has been pushed to the Fedora 25 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-974e78f169

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1082825] Review Request: mozilla-lightbeam - An add-on for visualizing HTTP requests between websites in real time

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1082825



--- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System  ---
mozilla-lightbeam-1.3.1-2.fc24 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 24.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-e7022ca71b

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1082825] Review Request: mozilla-lightbeam - An add-on for visualizing HTTP requests between websites in real time

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1082825



--- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System  ---
mozilla-lightbeam-1.3.1-2.fc25 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 25.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-974e78f169

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1082825] Review Request: mozilla-lightbeam - An add-on for visualizing HTTP requests between websites in real time

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1082825

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |MODIFIED



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1082825] Review Request: mozilla-lightbeam - An add-on for visualizing HTTP requests between websites in real time

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1082825



--- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System  ---
mozilla-lightbeam-1.3.1-2.fc23 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 23.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-b794502237

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1082825] Review Request: mozilla-lightbeam - An add-on for visualizing HTTP requests between websites in real time

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1082825

Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|NEW



--- Comment #13 from Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski  ---
Sorry for the noise. I put in the wrong bug number in my update.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1082825] Review Request: mozilla-lightbeam - An add-on for visualizing HTTP requests between websites in real time

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1082825



--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System  ---
lazygal-0.8.8-2.fc25 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 25.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-d507f45a1f

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1082825] Review Request: mozilla-lightbeam - An add-on for visualizing HTTP requests between websites in real time

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1082825

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1082825] Review Request: mozilla-lightbeam - An add-on for visualizing HTTP requests between websites in real time

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1082825



--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System  ---
lazygal-0.8.8-1.fc24 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 24.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-f3422e6d4c

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1082825] Review Request: mozilla-lightbeam - An add-on for visualizing HTTP requests between websites in real time

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1082825



--- Comment #10 from Jon Ciesla  ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/mozilla-lightbeam

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1082825] Review Request: mozilla-lightbeam - An add-on for visualizing HTTP requests between websites in real time

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1082825

Ben Rosser  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags|fedora-review?  |fedora-review+



--- Comment #9 from Ben Rosser  ---
Awesome, thanks.

Everything looks good-- package is APPROVED.

Package Review
==

Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed



= MUST items =

Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
 other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
 Guidelines.
[-]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
 license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
 license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
 Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
 found: "BSD (3 clause)", "MIT/X11 (BSD like)", "*No copyright* MIT/X11
 (BSD like)", "Unknown or generated", "*No copyright* MPL (v2.0)". 5
 files have unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in
 /home/bjr/Programming/fedora/reviews/1082825-mozilla-
 lightbeam/licensecheck.txt
[x]: If the package is under multiple licenses, the licensing breakdown
 must be documented in the spec.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
 Note: Directories without known owners:
 /usr/share/mozilla/extensions/{ec8030f7-c20a-464f-9b0e-13a3a9e97384},
 /usr/share/mozilla/extensions/{92650c4d-4b8e-4d2a-b7eb-24ecf4f6b63a}
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
 names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
 Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
 one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
 Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any
 that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
 beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
 work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
 provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
 %{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
 (~1MB) or number of files.
 Note: Documentation size is 0 bytes in 0 files.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local

= SHOULD items =

Generic:
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
 file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[x]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
 translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
 architectures.
[-]: %check is present and all tests pass.
[x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed
   

[Bug 1082825] Review Request: mozilla-lightbeam - An add-on for visualizing HTTP requests between websites in real time

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1082825



--- Comment #8 from Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski  ---
(In reply to Ben Rosser from comment #6)
> Issues
> ==
> 
> * Version 1.3.1 seems to be available:
> https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/lightbeam/; can you update
> the package, and I'll re-review?

Done.

> *
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Kalev/
> MozillaExtensionsDraft#Sample_Spec_File seems to sugggest that XPIs should
> be unpacked? I'm assuming that's no longer the case because of extension
> signing?

That's correct.

> * This is very minor, but rpmlint is unhappy that your bundled font provides
> are not versioned. The versioning information can be acquired by unzipping
> the XPI and running ttname -a over the font files. It'd probably be nice to
> include that information, though I wouldn't consider it a blocker for review.

Done.

Spec URL:
http://rathann.fedorapeople.org/review/mozilla-lightbeam/mozilla-lightbeam.spec
SRPM URL:
http://rathann.fedorapeople.org/review/mozilla-lightbeam/mozilla-lightbeam-1.3.1-1.fc24.src.rpm

* Fri Aug 19 2016 Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski  - 1.3.1-1
- update to 1.3.1
- added versions to bundled font Provides

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1082825] Review Request: mozilla-lightbeam - An add-on for visualizing HTTP requests between websites in real time

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1082825



--- Comment #7 from Ben Rosser  ---
Any news here?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1082825] Review Request: mozilla-lightbeam - An add-on for visualizing HTTP requests between websites in real time

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1082825

Ben Rosser  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED



--- Comment #6 from Ben Rosser  ---
Issues
==

* Version 1.3.1 seems to be available:
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/lightbeam/; can you update the
package, and I'll re-review?

*
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Kalev/MozillaExtensionsDraft#Sample_Spec_File
seems to sugggest that XPIs should be unpacked? I'm assuming that's no longer
the case because of extension signing?

* This is very minor, but rpmlint is unhappy that your bundled font provides
are not versioned. The versioning information can be acquired by unzipping the
XPI and running ttname -a over the font files. It'd probably be nice to include
that information, though I wouldn't consider it a blocker for review.

Package Review
==

Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed



= MUST items =

Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
 other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
 Guidelines.
[-]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
 license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
 license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
 Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
 found: "BSD (3 clause)", "MIT/X11 (BSD like)", "*No copyright* MIT/X11
 (BSD like)", "Unknown or generated", "*No copyright* MPL (v2.0)". 5
 files have unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in
 /home/bjr/Programming/fedora/reviews/1082825-mozilla-
 lightbeam/licensecheck.txt
[x]: If the package is under multiple licenses, the licensing breakdown
 must be documented in the spec.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
 Note: Directories without known owners:
 /usr/share/mozilla/extensions/{ec8030f7-c20a-464f-9b0e-13a3a9e97384},
 /usr/share/mozilla/extensions/{92650c4d-4b8e-4d2a-b7eb-24ecf4f6b63a}
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
 names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
 Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
 one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
 Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any
 that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
 beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
 work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
 provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
 %{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
 (~1MB) or number of files.
 Note: Documentation size is 0 bytes in 0 files.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local

= SHOULD items =

Generic:
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
 file from upstream, 

[Bug 1082825] Review Request: mozilla-lightbeam - An add-on for visualizing HTTP requests between websites in real time

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1082825



--- Comment #5 from Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski  ---
Sure, I'll review cmap-resources. Thanks!

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1082825] Review Request: mozilla-lightbeam - An add-on for visualizing HTTP requests between websites in real time

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1082825

Ben Rosser  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||rosser@gmail.com
   Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|rosser@gmail.com
  Flags||fedora-review?



--- Comment #4 from Ben Rosser  ---
I'm happy to review this, any chance you could take
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1350260 in return?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1082825] Review Request: mozilla-lightbeam - An add-on for visualizing HTTP requests between websites in real time

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1082825



--- Comment #3 from Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski  ---
Spec URL:
http://rathann.fedorapeople.org/review/mozilla-lightbeam/mozilla-lightbeam.spec
SRPM URL:
http://rathann.fedorapeople.org/review/mozilla-lightbeam/mozilla-lightbeam-1.3.0-1.fc23.src.rpm

* Fri Mar 11 2016 Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski  - 1.3.0-1
- update to 1.3.0
- package signed xpi from addons.mozilla.org
- add missing license tags
- add Provides for bundled stuff

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1082825] Review Request: mozilla-lightbeam - An add-on for visualizing HTTP requests between websites in real time

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1082825



--- Comment #2 from Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski domi...@greysector.net ---
Spec URL:
http://rathann.fedorapeople.org/review/mozilla-lightbeam/mozilla-lightbeam.spec
SRPM URL:
http://rathann.fedorapeople.org/review/mozilla-lightbeam/mozilla-lightbeam-1.0.10.2-1.fc20.src.rpm

* Fri Oct 03 2014 Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski r...@greysector.net -
1.0.10.2-1
- updated to 1.0.10.2

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1082825] Review Request: mozilla-lightbeam - An add-on for visualizing HTTP requests between websites in real time

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1082825



--- Comment #1 from Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski domi...@greysector.net ---
Spec URL:
http://rathann.fedorapeople.org/review/mozilla-lightbeam/mozilla-lightbeam.spec
SRPM URL:
http://rathann.fedorapeople.org/review/mozilla-lightbeam/mozilla-lightbeam-1.0.10.1-1.fc20.src.rpm

* Mon Jun 02 2014 Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski r...@greysector.net -
1.0.10.1-1
- updated to 1.0.10.1

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review