https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1174290
Susi Lehtola changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|505154 (FE-SCITECH) |
Referenced
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1174290
--- Comment #25 from Fedora Update System ---
scalasca-2.2.2-2.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 stable repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1174290
--- Comment #24 from Fedora Update System ---
scalasca-2.2.2-3.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 stable repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1174290
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1174290
--- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System ---
scalasca-2.2.2-3.fc23 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 23.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-15536
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1174290
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1174290
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1174290
--- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System ---
scalasca-2.2.2-2.el6 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 6.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-7965
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1174290
--- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System ---
scalasca-2.2.2-2.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 testing repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.\nIf you want
to test the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1174290
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1174290
--- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
scalasca-2.2.2-2.fc23 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 23.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/scalasca-2.2.2-2.fc23
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1174290
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1174290
Dave Love d.l...@liverpool.ac.uk changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1174290
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek zbys...@in.waw.pl changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|POST
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1174290
Vladimir Stackov amigo.el...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|amigo.el...@gmail.com |
Jon Ciesla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1174290
--- Comment #16 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1174290
--- Comment #14 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek zbys...@in.waw.pl ---
Re licensing of spec files: I think it is pretty rare for license files to
include any licensing information at all.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1174290
--- Comment #13 from Dave Love d.l...@liverpool.ac.uk ---
Thanks for the approval. I didn't see a notification about it for some reason.
I'll submit the package when I get back from holiday and have understood the
MPI
changes and checked the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1174290
--- Comment #11 from Dave Love d.l...@liverpool.ac.uk ---
This is the latest upstream. The buildrequires are now in epel6-testing.
Spec URL: https://loveshack.fedorapeople.org/review/scalasca.spec
SRPM URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1174290
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek zbys...@in.waw.pl changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1174290
--- Comment #10 from Dave Love d.l...@liverpool.ac.uk ---
(In reply to Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek from comment #9)
It fails to build in rawhide:
configure: error: provided interface version '7' of cube not sufficient for
Scalasca, provide
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1174290
--- Comment #8 from Dave Love d.l...@liverpool.ac.uk ---
Sorry I let this drop. I'm working on getting support for the latest version
into EPEL and making sure I can test that, since I don't run fedora.
Also I've failed to run fedora-review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1174290
--- Comment #9 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek zbys...@in.waw.pl ---
It fails to build in rawhide:
configure: error: provided interface version '7' of cube not sufficient for
Scalasca, provide '5' or compatible.
cube-config
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1174290
--- Comment #7 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek zbys...@in.waw.pl ---
Ping?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1174290
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek zbys...@in.waw.pl changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1174290
Bug 1174290 depends on bug 1174292, which changed state.
Bug 1174292 Summary: please update for EPEL6
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1174292
What|Removed |Added
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1174290
Dave Love d.l...@liverpool.ac.uk changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR) |505154 (FE-SCITECH)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1174290
--- Comment #4 from Dave Love d.l...@liverpool.ac.uk ---
(In reply to Vladimir Stackov from comment #3)
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#.25clean
Yes, but I'm doing what the packaging guidelines say by using a template
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1174290
--- Comment #2 from Dave Love d.l...@liverpool.ac.uk ---
The rm -rf is what the template installs. I wouldn't rule it out on EPEL5,
though I'm unlikely to want it on our EPEL5 cluster, and the dependencies
aren't currently available.
What is
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1174290
--- Comment #3 from Vladimir Stackov amigo.el...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to Dave Love from comment #2)
The rm -rf is what the template installs. I wouldn't rule it out on EPEL5,
though I'm unlikely to want it on our EPEL5 cluster, and the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1174290
Dave Love d.l...@liverpool.ac.uk changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||177841
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1174290
Bug 1174290 depends on bug 1013836, which changed state.
Bug 1013836 Summary: Review Request: scorep - Scalable Performance Measurement
Infrastructure for Parallel Codes
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1013836
What
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1174290
amigo.el...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amigo.el...@gmail.com
---
33 matches
Mail list logo