[Bug 1357064] Review Request: lumina-desktop - A lightweight, portable desktop environment

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1357064 --- Comment #41 from Fedora Update System --- lumina-desktop-1.0.0-5.p2.Lbc08e90.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. --

[Bug 1357064] Review Request: lumina-desktop - A lightweight, portable desktop environment

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1357064 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA

[Bug 1357064] Review Request: lumina-desktop - A lightweight, portable desktop environment

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1357064 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|CLOSED |ON_QA

[Bug 1357064] Review Request: lumina-desktop - A lightweight, portable desktop environment

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1357064 --- Comment #38 from Fedora Update System --- lumina-desktop-1.0.0-5.p2.Lbc08e90.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. --

[Bug 1357064] Review Request: lumina-desktop - A lightweight, portable desktop environment

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1357064 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA

[Bug 1357064] Review Request: lumina-desktop - A lightweight, portable desktop environment

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1357064 Bug 1357064 depends on bug 1381197, which changed state. Bug 1381197 Summary: Please build a package for EPEL7 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1381197 What|Removed |Added

[Bug 1357064] Review Request: lumina-desktop - A lightweight, portable desktop environment

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1357064 --- Comment #36 from Fedora Update System --- lumina-desktop-1.0.0-5.p2.Lbc08e90.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See

[Bug 1357064] Review Request: lumina-desktop - A lightweight, portable desktop environment

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1357064 Raphael Groner changed: What|Removed |Added Depends On||1381197

[Bug 1357064] Review Request: lumina-desktop - A lightweight, portable desktop environment

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1357064 --- Comment #35 from Fedora Update System --- lumina-desktop-1.0.0-5.p2.Lbc08e90.fc25 has been pushed to the Fedora 25 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See

[Bug 1357064] Review Request: lumina-desktop - A lightweight, portable desktop environment

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1357064 --- Comment #34 from Fedora Update System --- lumina-desktop-1.0.0-5.p2.Lbc08e90.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See

[Bug 1357064] Review Request: lumina-desktop - A lightweight, portable desktop environment

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1357064 --- Comment #33 from Fedora Update System --- lumina-desktop-1.0.0-5.p2.Lbc08e90.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See

[Bug 1357064] Review Request: lumina-desktop - A lightweight, portable desktop environment

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1357064 --- Comment #32 from Fedora Update System --- lumina-desktop-1.0.0-3.p2.Lbc08e90.fc25 has been pushed to the Fedora 25 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See

[Bug 1357064] Review Request: lumina-desktop - A lightweight, portable desktop environment

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1357064 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA

[Bug 1357064] Review Request: lumina-desktop - A lightweight, portable desktop environment

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1357064 Raphael Groner changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|MODIFIED ---

[Bug 1357064] Review Request: lumina-desktop - A lightweight, portable desktop environment

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1357064 --- Comment #29 from Neal Gompa --- > As I plan to build packages for EPEL7, I keep the scriptlets. Then conditionalize it so that it doesn't run on F24 and newer. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the

[Bug 1357064] Review Request: lumina-desktop - A lightweight, portable desktop environment

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1357064 Raphael Groner changed: What|Removed |Added Alias|lumina-desktop | --- Comment

[Bug 1357064] Review Request: lumina-desktop - A lightweight, portable desktop environment

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1357064 --- Comment #27 from Jon Ciesla --- Package request has been approved: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/lumina-desktop -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You

[Bug 1357064] Review Request: lumina-desktop - A lightweight, portable desktop environment

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1357064 Raphael Groner changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|POST ---

[Bug 1357064] Review Request: lumina-desktop - A lightweight, portable desktop environment

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1357064 Sandro Mani changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+

[Bug 1357064] Review Request: lumina-desktop - A lightweight, portable desktop environment

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1357064 --- Comment #24 from Raphael Groner --- (In reply to Neal Gompa from comment #22) > Couple of issues I noticed: > > * update-desktop-database scriptlets need to be guarded out so they don't > run on F25+: >

[Bug 1357064] Review Request: lumina-desktop - A lightweight, portable desktop environment

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1357064 --- Comment #23 from Neal Gompa --- Also, You will need to configure libLumina for Fedora by introducing a Fedora.cpp file with the appropriate configuration and adjust the build scripts to use it in place of generic

[Bug 1357064] Review Request: lumina-desktop - A lightweight, portable desktop environment

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1357064 --- Comment #22 from Neal Gompa --- Couple of issues I noticed: * update-desktop-database scriptlets need to be guarded out so they don't run on F25+:

[Bug 1357064] Review Request: lumina-desktop - A lightweight, portable desktop environment

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1357064 --- Comment #21 from Sandro Mani --- I'm out of home and office until the 4th of September with very unreliable internet connection, not sure if I manage to do a review until then. Sorry for the delay. -- You are

[Bug 1357064] Review Request: lumina-desktop - A lightweight, portable desktop environment

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1357064 --- Comment #20 from Raphael Groner --- SPEC: https://raphgro.fedorapeople.org/review/qt/lumina/lumina-desktop.spec SRPM: https://raphgro.fedorapeople.org/review/qt/lumina/lumina-desktop-1.0.0-2.p2.Lbc08e90.fc24.src.rpm

[Bug 1357064] Review Request: lumina-desktop - A lightweight, portable desktop environment

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1357064 Raphael Groner changed: What|Removed |Added Whiteboard|NotReady| --- Comment

[Bug 1357064] Review Request: lumina-desktop - A lightweight, portable desktop environment

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1357064 Raphael Groner changed: What|Removed |Added Whiteboard||NotReady ---

[Bug 1357064] Review Request: lumina-desktop - A lightweight, portable desktop environment

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1357064 --- Comment #17 from Raphael Groner --- https://lumina-desktop.org/version-1-0-0-released/ Can update on next weekend or so. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always

[Bug 1357064] Review Request: lumina-desktop - A lightweight, portable desktop environment

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1357064 --- Comment #12 from Sandro Mani --- Ah thanks for the clarification. The "Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release}" for the langpacks is needed though, right? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC

[Bug 1357064] Review Request: lumina-desktop - A lightweight, portable desktop environment

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1357064 --- Comment #11 from Kevin Kofler --- As for the difference between Recommends and Suggests, it is that Recommends is a "yes by default" optional dependency, Suggests is a "no by default" optional dependency. -- You

[Bug 1357064] Review Request: lumina-desktop - A lightweight, portable desktop environment

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1357064 --- Comment #10 from Kevin Kofler --- The Supplements is a boolean reverse dependency to ensure the langpack will be installed by default if the langpacks-* metapackage is. (It is, however, only allowed for Fedora

[Bug 1357064] Review Request: lumina-desktop - A lightweight, portable desktop environment

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1357064 --- Comment #9 from Sandro Mani --- I'm not sure these are correct: Enhances: %{name} = %{version}-%{release}\ Supplements: (%{name} = %{version}-%{release} and langpacks-%{1})\ Reading the bottom section of [1],

[Bug 1357064] Review Request: lumina-desktop - A lightweight, portable desktop environment

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1357064 --- Comment #8 from Raphael Groner --- SPEC: https://raphgro.fedorapeople.org/review/qt/lumina/lumina-desktop.spec SRPM:

[Bug 1357064] Review Request: lumina-desktop - A lightweight, portable desktop environment

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1357064 --- Comment #7 from Sandro Mani --- - /usr/bin/lte should be in the lumina-textedit package: lumina-desktop.x86_64: W: dangling-symlink /usr/bin/lte /usr/bin/lumina-textedit -- You are receiving this mail because: You

[Bug 1357064] Review Request: lumina-desktop - A lightweight, portable desktop environment

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1357064 --- Comment #6 from Sandro Mani --- - gcc-c++ already requires gcc (BuildRequires: gcc, gcc-c++) - You could use pkgconfig(...) style BuildRequires - The Group: tag is unnecessary - You should build the translations from

[Bug 1357064] Review Request: lumina-desktop - A lightweight, portable desktop environment

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1357064 Sandro Mani changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug 1357064] Review Request: lumina-desktop - A lightweight, portable desktop environment

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1357064 --- Comment #5 from Sandro Mani --- That's the most important I have ATM, alternatively I have some MinGW stuff, i.e. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1206218

[Bug 1357064] Review Request: lumina-desktop - A lightweight, portable desktop environment

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1357064 --- Comment #4 from Raphael Groner --- (In reply to Sandro Mani from comment #3) > @Raphael Groner > > Swap with https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1358328 ? Maybe. But I'm not familiar with perl. Can you

[Bug 1357064] Review Request: lumina-desktop - A lightweight, portable desktop environment

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1357064 Sandro Mani changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug 1357064] Review Request: lumina-desktop - A lightweight, portable desktop environment

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1357064 Neal Gompa changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ngomp...@gmail.com

[Bug 1357064] Review Request: lumina-desktop - A lightweight, portable desktop environment

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1357064 --- Comment #1 from Raphael Groner --- https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/raphgro/review/build/386324/ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about

[Bug 1357064] Review Request: lumina-desktop - A lightweight, portable desktop environment

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1357064 Raphael Groner changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||928937