https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1422683
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1422683
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1422683
--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System ---
dahdi-tools-2.11.1-6.fc27 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 27.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-a7778ba64a
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1422683
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1422683
Tom Hughes changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1422683
--- Comment #10 from Jared Smith ---
I've gone ahead and added a Requires for systemd-udev, just to be explicit.
I've added a BuildRequires on perl-generators as well.
As for the systemd unit file -- yes, it's
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1422683
--- Comment #9 from Tom Hughes ---
Do we need a systemd-udev require? or do we just assume that is present?
Per https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Perl I believe we need BRs on
perl-generators and possibly on perl?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1422683
--- Comment #8 from Tom Hughes ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
Issues:
===
- If (and only if) the source package
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1422683
Tom Hughes changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|t...@compton.nu
--
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1422683
Tom Hughes changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1422683
Tom Hughes changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1422683
--- Comment #7 from Jared Smith ---
My most sincere apologies for the latency on this issue... I've been wholly
consumed with work (12+ hours per day) and some pressing personal/family issues
that have consumed the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1422683
--- Comment #6 from Tom Hughes ---
Please calm down.
No, you can't increase the priority - well you can but it won't do any good
because we're all volunteers so there's no manager sitting down prioritising
bugs and telling
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1422683
--- Comment #5 from Slava ---
Is possible increase priority on this ticket ?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1422683
--- Comment #4 from Slava ---
I checked https://jsmith.fedorapeople.org/Packaging/dahdi-tools/ rpm and
systemd service file and is it not easy
move init script to /usr/bin/dahdictl and in systemd
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1422683
Slava changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||volga...@networklab.ca
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1422683
--- Comment #2 from Tom Hughes ---
What do we need to do to get this sorted? ideally we need to get this back in
for F26 so we can update asterisk...
It looks like there are three issues in the review output:
* Build
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1422683
--- Comment #1 from Leif Madsen ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
Issues:
===
- All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1422683
Leif Madsen changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||lmad...@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1422683
Jared Smith changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1384718
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1422683
Jared Smith changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1377117
21 matches
Mail list logo